The CA11 antibody refers to a monoclonal antibody targeting carbonic anhydrase-related protein 11 (CA11), a protein implicated in glioma biology and tumor regulation. CA11 is secreted by neurons and exerts inhibitory effects on glioma cell growth by modulating cellular signaling pathways. This article synthesizes research findings on CA11’s role in gliomas, its therapeutic potential, and antibody-based applications.
CA11 and its homolog CA10 are secreted by depolarized neurons and act as neurexin ligands, influencing glioma growth through the Akt signaling pathway. Key findings include:
Inhibitory Effects: Conditioned medium (CM) from depolarized neurons containing CA11 reduces glioma cell proliferation, promotes apoptosis, and inhibits tumor migration .
Survival Correlation: Low CA11 expression in glioma tissues is associated with shorter patient survival across datasets like REMBRANDT and TCGA LGG .
Mechanism: CA11 knockdown in glioma cells enhances tumor aggressiveness, including increased clone formation and reduced apoptosis .
The CA11 antibody is used to measure protein expression levels in glioma samples via techniques like:
Western blot: Detects CA11 protein reduction in glioma cells treated with CM from depolarized neurons .
Immunohistochemistry: Identifies low CA11 expression in high-grade glioma tissues .
CA11 has been proposed as a therapeutic target for gliomas. Strategies include:
Antibody-mediated modulation: Enhancing CA11 activity to inhibit tumor growth.
Gene therapy: Overexpression of CA11 in glioma cells to mimic its tumor-suppressive effects .
| Treatment | Effect on Glioma Cells |
|---|---|
| CM from depolarized neurons | Reduces CA11 expression, inhibits proliferation |
| CA11 knockdown | Promotes cell growth, migration, and tumor size |
CA11 (Carbonic Anhydrase XI), also known as CARP2 or CARP XI, belongs to the alpha-carbonic anhydrase family. Unlike other carbonic anhydrases, CA11 does not have catalytic activity but plays significant roles in central nervous system function. CA11 is observed in multiple tissues including the cerebellum, cerebrum, liver, stomach, small intestine, colon, kidney, and testis, with particularly prominent expression in the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum .
CA11 contains a hydrophobic N-terminal region that serves as a signal sequence and includes asparagine glycosylation sites. Research indicates that CA11 functions as a secreted synaptic protein that can act as a neurexin ligand. Recent studies have shown that CA11 secreted by depolarized neurons can inhibit glioma cell growth, suggesting its potential role in regulating neuronal activity-dependent processes .
| Tissue | CA11 Expression Level |
|---|---|
| Cerebellum | High (prominent in Purkinje cells) |
| Cerebrum | Moderate to High |
| Liver | Moderate |
| Stomach | Moderate |
| Small intestine | Moderate |
| Colon | Moderate |
| Kidney | Moderate |
| Testis | Moderate |
CA11 antibodies have been validated for multiple applications, with specific recommended dilutions and protocols for each application. The choice of application depends on your research question and the specific cellular or molecular aspects of CA11 you wish to investigate.
| Application | Validated Antibody Types | Typical Dilution Ranges | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | Polyclonal, Monoclonal | 1:500-1:2000 | Detects bands at 36-48 kDa depending on glycosylation |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Polyclonal | 1:20-1:200 | May require antigen retrieval with TE buffer pH 9.0 |
| Immunofluorescence (IF/ICC) | Recombinant | 1:125-1:500 | Validated in U2OS cells |
| Flow Cytometry (FC) | Recombinant | 0.25 μg per 10^6 cells | Validated in A431 cells |
| ELISA | Polyclonal, Recombinant | 1:5000-1:20000 | High sensitivity for secreted CA11 |
When selecting an application, consider that Western blotting is ideal for quantifying total protein levels, IHC for tissue localization patterns, IF for subcellular localization, FC for quantifying CA11 in specific cell populations, and ELISA for detecting secreted CA11 in conditioned media or biological fluids .
Proper storage and handling of CA11 antibodies is critical for maintaining their specificity and sensitivity in experimental applications. Research demonstrates that antibody performance can significantly degrade with improper handling.
Recommended Storage Conditions:
Store at -20°C for long-term storage (stable for one year after shipment)
For frequent use, store small aliquots at 4°C for up to one month
Avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles as they can denature antibodies and reduce activity
Most CA11 antibodies are supplied in PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol pH 7.3
Some preparations (20μL sizes) may contain 0.1% BSA for additional stability
Handling Best Practices:
Briefly centrifuge vials before opening to collect all material at the bottom
When aliquoting, use sterile microcentrifuge tubes and maintain sterile technique
Aliquot volumes appropriate for single experiments to avoid freeze/thaw cycles
Allow antibodies to reach room temperature before opening to avoid condensation
Do not vortex antibodies; mix by gentle inversion or flicking
When prepared and stored properly, most CA11 antibodies maintain their reactivity for at least 12 months from the date of receipt .
Antibody validation is critical for ensuring experimental reproducibility and reliable results. For CA11 antibodies, several validation strategies are recommended based on current research standards:
Recommended Validation Methods:
Genetic Controls: The optimal validation method employs wild-type cells alongside CRISPR knockout cells. This rigorous approach allows for definitive confirmation of antibody specificity .
Expression Controls: Test antibodies on CA11-transfected vs. non-transfected cell lines (e.g., 293T cells) . Expected bands should appear at approximately 36-43 kDa in transfected cells but not in non-transfected controls.
Peptide Competition Assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide before application to sample. Signal elimination confirms specificity.
Multi-application Validation: Verify consistent results across different applications (WB, IHC, IF) to confirm target recognition regardless of protein conformation.
Cross-reactivity Testing: Test against related carbonic anhydrase family members to ensure specificity within this protein family.
Validation Data Analysis:
For WB: Evaluate band pattern, molecular weight (36-48 kDa depending on glycosylation), and signal-to-noise ratio
For IHC/IF: Compare staining pattern with known expression profile in tissues (high in cerebellum, particularly Purkinje cells)
For FC: Validate with known CA11-expressing cells (positive) and non-expressing cells (negative)
A comprehensive validation strategy increases confidence in antibody specificity and experimental results .
Western blot optimization for CA11 detection requires attention to several key parameters to ensure specific and sensitive detection of this 36 kDa protein. CA11 can appear at different molecular weights (36-48 kDa) due to post-translational modifications, particularly glycosylation.
Sample Preparation:
Use fresh tissue/cells when possible
For brain tissue samples, rapid extraction and processing are essential to prevent protein degradation
Recommended lysis buffer: RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors
Add deglycosylation enzymes (PNGase F) to a portion of your sample to confirm glycosylation-related band shifts
Electrophoresis and Transfer Parameters:
Use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal resolution of CA11 (36 kDa)
Run at 100-120V to prevent overheating
Transfer to PVDF membranes (preferred over nitrocellulose for glycoproteins) at 100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight at 4°C
Antibody Incubation:
Block with 5% non-fat milk or 3% BSA in TBST
Optimal antibody dilutions: 1:500-1:2000 for most CA11 antibodies
Incubate primary antibody overnight at 4°C for best results
Secondary antibody: Anti-rabbit or anti-mouse HRP (depending on primary antibody host) at 1:2500-1:5000
Detection Optimization:
Use ECL substrate appropriate for expected expression level
For low expression, enhanced chemiluminescent substrates are recommended
Expected bands: 36 kDa (main band), with possible additional bands at 40-48 kDa (glycosylated forms)
If multiple bands are observed, validation experiments with deglycosylation enzymes can help confirm which bands represent CA11 isoforms versus non-specific binding .
Proper controls are essential for interpreting CA11 antibody experimental results accurately. Based on rigorous research practices, the following controls should be included:
Positive Controls:
Negative Controls:
Primary antibody omission control (tissue/cells treated with blocking solution and secondary antibody only)
Isotype control (matching the primary antibody's host species and isotype)
Ideally, CA11 knockout/knockdown cells or tissues (CRISPR-edited cells)
Validation Controls:
Peptide competition/blocking control (pre-incubation of antibody with immunizing peptide)
Cross-reactivity controls (testing on tissues known to lack CA11 expression)
For IHC, include antigen retrieval controls with and without TE buffer pH 9.0 treatment
Loading Controls:
For Western blots: β-actin, GAPDH, or other housekeeping proteins
For IF/IHC: Nuclear stain (DAPI/Hoechst) and cell type-specific markers
Including these controls in your experimental design allows for confident interpretation of results and helps troubleshoot potential issues with antibody specificity or experimental conditions .
Successful immunohistochemical detection of CA11 requires optimization of several key parameters. Based on published methodologies, the following best practices are recommended:
Tissue Preparation:
Fixation: 4% paraformaldehyde for 24-48 hours is optimal for brain tissue
Processing: Standard paraffin embedding with careful attention to temperature to avoid antigen degradation
Sectioning: 5-7 μm thickness is ideal for CA11 detection
Antigen Retrieval (Critical Step):
Primary method: TE buffer pH 9.0 (recommended for most CA11 antibodies)
Alternative method: Citrate buffer pH 6.0
Heat-induced epitope retrieval: 95-98°C for 15-20 minutes followed by gradual cooling
Blocking and Antibody Incubation:
Block with 5-10% normal serum from secondary antibody host species
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for membrane permeabilization
CA11 antibody dilution: 1:20-1:200 (optimize for each specific antibody)
Incubation time: Overnight at 4°C yields best results
Detection Systems:
DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) for brightfield microscopy
Fluorescent secondary antibodies for co-localization studies
Validated Tissues for Positive Control:
Human brain tissue (especially cerebellum for Purkinje cells)
Human lung tissue
Human ovary tissue
Human placenta tissue
Human spleen tissue
For dual labeling experiments, CA11 can be co-stained with neuronal markers to study its distribution in specific neuronal populations. Careful titration of antibody concentration is essential for optimal signal-to-noise ratio .
Recent research has revealed that CA11 plays a significant role in neuronal-glioma interactions, specifically as a negative regulator of neuronal activity-dependent glioma growth. The following methodological approaches can be used to study this phenomenon:
Co-culture Experimental Design:
Establish primary neuronal cultures from rat/mouse cortex
Treat neurons with high KCl (50mM) to induce depolarization and CA11 secretion
Collect conditioned medium (CM) and concentrate using ultrafiltration
Apply CM to glioma cell lines (U251, U87) with or without CA11 immunodepletion
Measure proliferation using MTT assay or BrdU incorporation
Key Experimental Groups:
Control medium (from non-depolarized neurons)
CM (from depolarized neurons containing secreted CA11)
CM with CA11 immunodepleted
CM with control IgG immunodepleted
Recombinant CA11 treatment
Analytical Methods:
Western blot to confirm CA11 secretion and immunodepletion
qRT-PCR to measure CA11 mRNA expression in glioma cells after CM treatment
Luciferase assays with CA11 promoter constructs to assess transcriptional regulation
Pathway analysis using Akt inhibitors to elucidate signaling mechanisms
Research Findings:
Research has shown that CM from depolarized neurons contains increased levels of CA11, which inhibits glioma cell proliferation. When CA11 is depleted from CM, glioma proliferation increases significantly. Additionally, CM treatment reduces CA11 expression in glioma cells through the Akt signaling pathway .
| Treatment | Effect on Glioma Proliferation | Effect on CA11 Expression |
|---|---|---|
| Control medium | Baseline | No change |
| CM from depolarized neurons | Increased (but moderated by CA11) | Decreased (time-dependent) |
| CM with CA11 depleted | Significantly increased | Decreased |
| Recombinant CA11 treatment | Decreased | N/A |
These findings suggest that CA11 functions as a tumor suppressor in gliomas, and its expression is negatively associated with glioma grade and patient survival .
Flow cytometry offers a powerful approach for quantifying CA11 expression in different cell populations and studying its regulation under various conditions. For optimal results with CA11 antibodies in flow cytometry, consider the following methodological guidelines:
Sample Preparation Protocol:
Isolate cells of interest (primary cells or cell lines)
For intracellular staining (most common for CA11):
Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature
Permeabilize with 0.1% saponin or 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS
Block with 2% BSA in PBS for 30 minutes
For surface CA11 detection (if studying externalized protein):
Use non-fixed cells
Block with 2% BSA in PBS for 30 minutes
Antibody Staining:
Use anti-CA11 antibody at recommended concentration (typically 0.25 μg per 10^6 cells in 100 μl suspension)
Incubate for 30-60 minutes at room temperature or 4°C
Wash 3× with PBS containing 0.5% BSA
Apply fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody appropriate for your instrument configuration
For multicolor applications, include panels with lineage markers
Controls:
Unstained cells
FMO (Fluorescence Minus One) controls
Isotype control antibody
Analysis Considerations:
Gate on viable cells using appropriate viability dye
Set compensation using single-stained controls
When studying neuroinflammatory conditions, consider pairing CA11 with markers of cell activation
For clinical samples, markers to distinguish cell subpopulations (e.g., CD14/CD16 for monocyte subsets) are essential
Flow cytometry data has revealed that CA11 expression varies across monocyte subpopulations, with CD14+CD16+ nonclassical monocytes showing the highest surface expression levels .
Accurate quantification of CA11 expression is essential for understanding its biological role in normal and pathological conditions. Multiple methods can be employed, each with specific advantages for different research questions:
Western Blot Quantification:
Use recombinant CA11 protein to create a standard curve (5-100 ng range)
Load equal amounts of total protein (confirmed by BCA/Bradford assay)
Include housekeeping controls (β-actin, GAPDH)
Use densitometry software (ImageJ, Image Lab) to quantify band intensity
Normalize CA11 signal to loading control
For glycosylated forms, consider the sum of all specific bands (36-48 kDa)
ELISA-Based Quantification:
Commercial CA11 ELISA kits typically have detection ranges of 0.1-10 ng/ml
For secreted CA11 in conditioned media or cerebrospinal fluid
Allows high-throughput analysis of multiple samples
Flow Cytometry Quantification:
Measure mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) as indicator of protein abundance
Use calibration beads with known antibody binding capacity
Convert MFI to molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF)
Immunohistochemical Quantification:
Semi-quantitative scoring (0-3+) based on staining intensity
Digital image analysis using software like QuPath or ImageJ
H-score calculation (percentage of positive cells × intensity)
Comparison of Quantification Methods:
| Method | Sensitivity | Throughput | Application | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Moderate | Low | Total protein | Semi-quantitative |
| ELISA | High | High | Secreted protein | Cannot distinguish isoforms |
| Flow Cytometry | Moderate-High | Medium | Per-cell expression | Requires single-cell suspensions |
| IHC | Low-Moderate | Low | Tissue localization | Subjective scoring |
When reporting CA11 expression data, clearly specify the quantification method, normalization approach, and statistical analysis to ensure reproducibility .
CA11 has emerged as a significant player in glioma biology, with research indicating it functions as a tumor suppressor. CA11 antibodies are valuable tools for investigating this role through various methodological approaches:
CA11 Expression in Gliomas:
CA11 expression is reduced in clinical glioma samples compared to normal brain tissue
Expression levels correlate negatively with histological grade
Low CA11 expression is associated with shorter survival in multiple independent datasets:
Functional Studies Using CA11 Antibodies:
Immunoprecipitation of Secreted CA11:
Use anti-CA11 antibodies to deplete CA11 from neuronal conditioned medium
Apply to glioma cells to assess proliferation effects
Results show CA11 depletion enhances glioma cell proliferation
CA11 Knockdown Studies:
Validate knockdown efficiency using CA11 antibodies in Western blot
Effects of CA11 knockdown in glioma models:
Promoted cell growth and clone formation
Enhanced migration
Inhibited apoptosis
Increased tumor size in xenografted nude mice
Signaling Pathway Analysis:
Use CA11 antibodies to monitor protein levels after pathway inhibition
Research shows neuronal CM inhibits CA11 expression in glioma cells via Akt signaling
Survival Analysis Based on CA11 Expression:
| Dataset | Sample Size | Low CA11 Expression Impact on Survival | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| REMBRANDT | 577 | Reduced survival | <0.001 |
| TCGA LGG | 510 | Reduced survival | <0.001 |
| GSE4271 | 77 | Reduced survival | <0.05 |
| GSE42669 | 58 | Reduced survival | <0.05 |
These findings suggest CA11 as a potential therapeutic target and prognostic marker for gliomas. CA11 antibodies are essential tools for validating expression patterns in patient samples and functional studies in experimental models .
CA11 is evolutionarily conserved across mammals, making comparative studies valuable for understanding its fundamental biological functions. When using CA11 antibodies for cross-species research, consider the following methodological approaches:
Sequence Homology Analysis:
Human and mouse CA11 share approximately 95% amino acid sequence identity
Human and rat CA11 share approximately 94% amino acid sequence identity
Specific regions may have higher conservation, affecting antibody cross-reactivity
Cross-Species Validation Approaches:
Western Blot Comparison:
Run samples from multiple species side-by-side
Compare band patterns and molecular weights
Human CA11: ~36 kDa primary band
Mouse/Rat CA11: ~36-38 kDa (slight variations in glycosylation)
IHC/IF Optimization by Species:
Antigen retrieval conditions may differ between species
Antibody dilutions often require species-specific optimization
Fixation protocols may need adjustment (particularly for rodent tissues)
Control Samples by Species:
Human: Cerebellum (Purkinje cells), kidney
Mouse: Cerebellum, kidney, testis
Rat: Cerebellum, kidney, testis
Application Examples:
Comparative neuroanatomical studies of CA11 distribution across species
Evaluation of CA11 in animal models of glioma and neurological diseases
Evolutionary studies of carbonic anhydrase family member functions
CA11 undergoes several post-translational modifications (PTMs), particularly glycosylation, which can significantly impact protein detection and function. Understanding and addressing these challenges is critical for accurate CA11 research:
Key CA11 Post-Translational Modifications:
N-glycosylation: CA11 contains asparagine glycosylation sites that contribute to its secretion and stability
Signal peptide cleavage: The hydrophobic N-terminal region serves as a signal sequence that is cleaved during secretion
Potential phosphorylation sites that may regulate function
Challenges in PTM Detection:
Variable molecular weight: Glycosylation can shift CA11's apparent molecular weight from 36 kDa (unmodified) to 40-48 kDa in Western blots
Epitope masking: Glycans may obscure antibody binding sites, affecting detection efficiency
Tissue-specific glycosylation patterns: The extent and type of glycosylation may vary between tissues
Species differences: Glycosylation patterns can differ between human, mouse, and rat CA11
Methodological Solutions:
Enzymatic deglycosylation:
Treat protein samples with PNGase F to remove N-linked glycans
Compare migration patterns before and after treatment
Run treated and untreated samples side-by-side in Western blots
PTM-specific antibodies:
Use antibodies that specifically recognize glycosylated or non-glycosylated forms
Develop antibodies against specific PTM sites
Mass spectrometry approaches:
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
Glycopeptide enrichment strategies
Site-specific PTM mapping
Expression systems for comparison:
Bacterial expression (no glycosylation)
Mammalian expression systems (physiological glycosylation)
Comparison of recombinant and native proteins
These methodological approaches can help distinguish between different CA11 forms and understand how PTMs affect its function in neuronal-glial interactions and potential roles in pathology .
CA11 functions as a secreted protein that mediates intercellular communication, particularly in neuronal-glial interactions. The following methodological approaches utilize CA11 antibodies to investigate its secretion and extracellular functions:
Detecting Secreted CA11:
Conditioned Media Analysis:
Culture neurons or other CA11-expressing cells
Induce depolarization with high KCl (50mM) medium
Collect and concentrate conditioned media using ultrafiltration
Analyze by Western blot using CA11 antibodies
Research shows depolarized neurons secrete significantly higher levels of CA11 compared to non-depolarized neurons
ELISA Quantification:
Functional Analysis of Secreted CA11:
Immunodepletion Studies:
Recombinant CA11 Application:
Produce HA-tagged recombinant CA11 in expression systems
Purify and apply to target cells
Detect binding using anti-HA or anti-CA11 antibodies
Analyze downstream effects on cellular function
Receptor Identification:
Visualization of CA11 Secretion and Binding:
Live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged CA11
Immunofluorescence to detect bound CA11 on target cells
Co-localization studies with potential receptors
These approaches have revealed that CA11 secreted by neurons acts as a negative regulator of glioma growth, providing insights into its potential therapeutic applications in brain tumors .
CA11 antibodies are being employed in cutting-edge neuroscience research to elucidate its roles in brain function and disease. Here are the most advanced applications currently being pursued:
Single-Cell Multi-Omics Analysis:
Integration of CA11 protein detection with transcriptomics at single-cell level
CITE-seq (Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing) approaches
Correlation of CA11 expression with cell-type-specific markers
Identification of CA11-expressing cell populations in complex tissues
In Vivo Imaging and Functional Studies:
Development of fluorescently labeled CA11 antibodies for in vivo imaging
PET imaging with radiolabeled antibodies to track CA11 expression in animal models
Correlation of CA11 dynamics with neuronal activity and disease progression
Therapeutic Development and Target Validation:
Use of CA11 antibodies to modulate CA11 function in disease models
Validation of CA11 as a potential therapeutic target for gliomas
Low CA11 expression correlates with poor survival in glioma patients across multiple datasets
CA11 knockdown promotes glioma progression in xenograft models
Neuronal Activity-Dependent Regulation:
Study of how neuronal activity regulates CA11 expression and secretion
Investigation of CA11's role in modulating synaptic function
Exploration of CA11 as a neurexin ligand affecting synaptic organization
Brain Tumor Microenvironment Research:
Analysis of CA11 in neuron-glioma crosstalk
In situ detection of CA11 in tumor microenvironments
CA11 as part of a gene signature associated with radiotherapy response and prognosis in gliomas
Contrasting functions with other neuron-derived factors like neuroligin-3 that promote glioma growth
These advanced applications are expanding our understanding of CA11's multifaceted roles in the nervous system and its potential as a therapeutic target for brain tumors and possibly other neurological disorders.
When working with CA11 antibodies, researchers may encounter various technical challenges. Here are methodological approaches to troubleshoot common issues:
| Issue | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | Low CA11 expression | Use higher protein concentration (50-100 μg); Enrich sample by immunoprecipitation |
| Inefficient transfer | Verify transfer with Ponceau S staining; Optimize transfer conditions for glycoproteins | |
| Antibody concentration too low | Increase antibody concentration (1:250-1:500) | |
| Multiple bands | Glycosylation isoforms | Compare with deglycosylated sample (PNGase F treatment) |
| Non-specific binding | Increase blocking (5% milk/BSA); Use more stringent washing | |
| Protein degradation | Add protease inhibitors; Minimize sample processing time | |
| High background | Insufficient blocking | Increase blocking time (overnight at 4°C) |
| Secondary antibody concentration too high | Dilute secondary antibody (1:5000-1:10000) | |
| Membrane overexposure | Reduce exposure time; Dilute primary antibody |
| Issue | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low signal | CA11 concentration below detection limit | Concentrate samples; Use more sensitive detection system |
| Antibody degradation | Use fresh aliquot; Verify antibody activity | |
| High background | Insufficient blocking | Extend blocking time; Use different blocking agent |
| Cross-reactivity | Pre-absorb antibody with related proteins | |
| Poor reproducibility | Variable sample handling | Standardize sample collection and processing |
| Inconsistent temperature | Maintain consistent temperature during incubations |