CAT4 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (made-to-order)
Synonyms
CAT4 antibody; At3g03720 antibody; F20H23.25Cationic amino acid transporter 4 antibody; vacuolar antibody
Target Names
CAT4
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a permease involved in the transport of cationic amino acids.
Gene References Into Functions

Functional Characterization: Studies have demonstrated the subcellular localization of several members of the cationic amino acid transporter family. Specifically:

  • AtCAT2 and AtCAT4, two members of a small subfamily, exhibit primarily tonoplast localization when tagged with GFP. In contrast, the closely related AtCAT3 is predominantly found in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. (PMID: 24709150)
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G03720

STRING: 3702.AT3G03720.1

UniGene: At.27319

Protein Families
Amino acid-polyamine-organocation (APC) superfamily, Cationic amino acid transporter (CAT) (TC 2.A.3.3) family
Subcellular Location
Vacuole membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in roots, stems, flowers, and leaves.

Q&A

What is CAT4 and why is it significant in biological research?

CAT4 (Cationic Amino acid Transporter 4), also known as SLC7A4, is a member of the solute carrier family 7 and functions as a transporter protein within the amino acid-polyamine-organocation (APC) superfamily . The human CAT4 gene is identified with Gene ID 6545 and SwissProt ID O43246 . This protein has significant research interest because:

  • It plays a potential role in cationic amino acid transport mechanisms

  • It has a calculated molecular weight of approximately 68,268 Da

  • Its expression patterns and function are still being characterized across different tissues

  • Understanding its regulation may provide insights into amino acid metabolism disorders
    Research on CAT4 contributes to our understanding of cellular transport mechanisms and may have implications for metabolic and neurological conditions where amino acid transport is disrupted.

What are the key differences between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for CAT4 detection?

CharacteristicPolyclonal CAT4 AntibodiesMonoclonal CAT4 Antibodies
SourceDerived from multiple B-cell lineagesProduced from single B-cell clone
Epitope recognitionRecognize multiple epitopes on CAT4Target a single epitope on CAT4
Production methodImmunization of host animals (e.g., rabbits) Hybridoma or phage display technology
Application versatilityGenerally more robust across different applicationsMay be more specific but limited to particular applications
Lot-to-lot variabilityHigher variability between production batchesGreater consistency between batches
Cross-reactivityPotentially higher cross-reactivityTypically higher specificity, lower cross-reactivity
Example productsRabbit pAb against C-terminal region Phage display-derived monoclonals
For experimental design considerations, polyclonal antibodies offer advantages when signal amplification is needed or when protein conformation might vary under different conditions. Monoclonal antibodies are preferable when absolute specificity is required, particularly in quantitative analyses or when distinguishing between closely related protein family members.

What applications are CAT4 antibodies validated for in current research?

Current commercial CAT4 antibodies have been validated primarily for the following applications:

  • Western Blotting (WB): Validated at dilution ranges of 1:500-1:2000 , allowing for detection of denatured CAT4 protein in cell or tissue lysates

  • ELISA: Validated at dilution of approximately 1:10000 , enabling quantitative measurement of CAT4 in solution

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Some CAT4 antibodies may be suitable for tissue section analysis, though specific validation may vary by manufacturer
    Researchers should note that validation for other applications such as immunoprecipitation, chromatin immunoprecipitation, or flow cytometry may require additional testing or optimization. When designing experiments with novel applications, preliminary validation is strongly recommended using positive controls with known CAT4 expression levels.

How should researchers optimize Western blot protocols specifically for CAT4 detection?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for CAT4 detection requires attention to several key factors:
Sample Preparation:

  • Use phosphate buffer (0.42% Potassium phosphate, 0.87% Sodium chloride, pH 7.3) for consistent results

  • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of the target protein

  • Consider membrane-enriched fractions when studying this transmembrane protein
    Electrophoresis and Transfer:

  • Use 8-10% polyacrylamide gels to properly resolve the ~68 kDa CAT4 protein

  • Ensure complete transfer of high molecular weight proteins by using longer transfer times or adding SDS to transfer buffer
    Antibody Incubation:

  • Start with manufacturer-recommended dilutions (1:500-1:2000 for WB)

  • Optimize blocking conditions to reduce background (5% non-fat milk or BSA)

  • Consider extended incubation times (overnight at 4°C) for primary antibody
    Signal Detection:

  • For low abundance CAT4, consider using enhanced chemiluminescence substrates

  • When quantifying, ensure signal is within linear detection range
    Controls:

  • Always include positive controls (e.g., tissues/cells with known CAT4 expression)

  • Consider knockdown/knockout samples as negative controls to confirm specificity
    Researchers should perform pilot experiments to determine optimal conditions for their specific sample types and antibody lots.

What are the most effective strategies for validating CAT4 antibody specificity?

Comprehensive validation of CAT4 antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Genetic Approaches:

    • siRNA/shRNA knockdown of CAT4/SLC7A4 expression

    • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout cell lines

    • Overexpression systems with tagged CAT4 protein

  • Biochemical Validation:

    • Peptide competition assays using the immunizing peptide (e.g., C-terminal region)

    • Detection of recombinant CAT4 protein at predicted molecular weight

    • Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated proteins

  • Cross-Species Reactivity Testing:

    • Test antibody against CAT4 orthologs if claiming multi-species reactivity

    • Sequence alignment analysis to predict potential cross-reactivity

  • Multiple Antibody Concordance:

    • Compare results from different antibodies targeting distinct CAT4 epitopes

    • Correlation between antibody signal and mRNA expression data

  • Application-Specific Controls:

    • For IHC: include absorption controls and isotype controls

    • For WB: evaluate migration pattern and molecular weight markers
      Documentation of these validation steps significantly strengthens research findings and should be reported in publications to enhance reproducibility.

How can single-cell RNA-sequencing data be integrated with CAT4 antibody studies?

Integrating single-cell RNA-seq data with CAT4 antibody studies creates powerful research opportunities:
Methodological Approach:

  • Expression Correlation Analysis:

    • Compare CAT4 protein expression (by antibody) with SLC7A4 mRNA expression

    • Identify cell populations with discordant protein/mRNA levels to study post-transcriptional regulation

  • Cell Type Identification:

    • Use scRNA-seq to identify specific cell types expressing SLC7A4

    • Target these cell types for immunostaining with CAT4 antibodies

  • Panel Design for Multi-Parameter Analysis:

    • Design antibody panels that include CAT4 alongside markers of cell populations identified in scRNA-seq

    • Use Cytomarker or similar tools to optimize marker combinations

  • Spatial Context Analysis:

    • Correlate spatial distribution of CAT4 protein (from imaging) with transcriptomic cell types

    • Apply multiplexed immunofluorescence guided by scRNA-seq clustering results

  • Validation Strategy:

    • Validate antibody specificity in cell populations with known mRNA expression levels

    • Use FACS-sorted populations based on scRNA-seq profiles for antibody testing
      This integration enables more precise targeting of specific cell populations and provides a systems-level understanding of CAT4 expression patterns and regulation.

How can phage display technology be used to develop novel high-affinity CAT4 antibodies?

Phage display offers a powerful approach for developing novel CAT4 antibodies with specific binding properties:
Methodological Workflow:

  • Library Construction:

    • Extract mRNA from B-cells and convert to cDNA via reverse transcription

    • PCR amplify variable regions of heavy and light chains

    • Insert variable regions into phage display vectors

  • Biopanning Against CAT4:

    • Immobilize purified CAT4 protein or specific epitopes (e.g., C-terminal domain)

    • Incubate with phage library displaying antibody fragments

    • Wash away non-binding phages

    • Elute bound phages and amplify in bacteria

    • Repeat for 3-5 rounds with increasing stringency

  • Screening and Validation:

    • Evaluate individual clones by ELISA against CAT4

    • Sequence positive clones to identify unique antibodies

    • Express and purify antibody fragments for functional testing

  • Antibody Engineering:

    • Convert promising fragments to full IgG format if needed

    • Optimize affinity through targeted mutations

    • Engineer for specific applications (e.g., detection vs. blocking)
      This approach enables the development of custom CAT4 antibodies with precisely defined binding characteristics without requiring animal immunization , potentially yielding antibodies in under 7 weeks compared to traditional methods.

What are the potential pitfalls in using CAT4 antibodies for quantitative analysis, and how can they be addressed?

Quantitative analysis using CAT4 antibodies faces several challenges that require specific methodological approaches:
Common Pitfalls and Solutions:

  • Antibody Affinity Variation:

    • Pitfall: Lot-to-lot variation affects quantitative comparisons

    • Solution: Use the same antibody lot throughout a study; include calibration standards

  • Non-Specific Binding:

    • Pitfall: Background signal confounds quantitative measurements

    • Solution: Validate specificity using knockout controls; optimize blocking conditions

  • Linear Range Limitations:

    • Pitfall: Signal saturation at higher CAT4 concentrations

    • Solution: Establish standard curves; perform dilution series to ensure measurements within linear range

  • Post-Translational Modifications:

    • Pitfall: Modifications may mask epitopes or alter antibody affinity

    • Solution: Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes; characterize PTM landscape

  • Sample Processing Variability:

    • Pitfall: Inconsistent protein extraction efficiency

    • Solution: Standardize sample preparation; normalize to total protein or housekeeping proteins

  • Cross-Reactivity with Related Transporters:

    • Pitfall: CAT family members share sequence homology

    • Solution: Perform specificity testing against related proteins; use peptide competition assays
      For absolute quantification, researchers should consider developing a quantitative ELISA with recombinant CAT4 standards or employing mass spectrometry-based approaches as complementary techniques.

How can CAT4 antibodies be incorporated into designed protein assemblies for enhanced detection or therapeutic applications?

Recent advances in protein design enable the incorporation of CAT4 antibodies into engineered assemblies:
Methodological Approaches:

  • Nanocage Assembly:

    • CAT4 antibodies can be incorporated into designed protein assemblies along symmetry axes

    • Computational fusion or docking of protein building blocks with cyclic symmetry

    • Design of antibody-binding, nanocage-forming proteins that arrange IgG dimers in defined architectures

  • Implementation Strategy:

    • Rigid fusion of three building block types: antibody Fc-binding proteins, monomeric helical linkers, and cyclic oligomers

    • Strategic positioning of CAT4-targeting domains within larger assemblies

    • Validation through structural methods (cryo-EM, SAXS)

  • Application-Specific Designs:

    • For Detection: Multi-valent assemblies increasing avidity and sensitivity

    • For Therapeutics: Controlled clustering of CAT4 antibodies to modulate transporter function

    • For Imaging: Incorporation of multiple detection modalities (fluorophores, MRI contrast agents)

  • Functional Testing Protocols:

    • Characterize assembly formation through size exclusion chromatography

    • Confirm CAT4 binding activity is maintained in assembled structure

    • Evaluate functional effects on amino acid transport
      These engineered assemblies offer potential advantages in sensitivity, specificity, and novel functionalities beyond conventional antibody applications .

What factors affect CAT4 antibody stability, and how should researchers optimize storage conditions?

Proper storage and handling of CAT4 antibodies is critical for maintaining activity and reproducibility:
Stability Factors and Optimization:

FactorImpact on StabilityRecommended Practices
TemperatureFreezing/thawing cycles can cause denaturationStore at -20°C; avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles
Buffer CompositionAffects protein folding and aggregationUse recommended buffer (e.g., 0.42% Potassium phosphate, 0.87% Sodium chloride, pH 7.3)
PreservativesPrevent microbial contaminationInclude 0.01% sodium azide for long-term storage
Protein ConcentrationDilute solutions more prone to adsorption lossesMaintain at recommended concentration (e.g., 1mg/mL)
Glycerol ContentPrevents freezing damage30% glycerol recommended for frozen storage
Light ExposureMay damage conjugated antibodiesStore in amber vials if fluorophore-conjugated
pH StabilityExtreme pH can denature antibodiesMaintain pH 7.2-7.4 for optimal stability
Working Solution Preparation:
  • Prepare fresh working dilutions on day of use

  • Dilute in buffer containing carrier protein (BSA or gelatin)

  • Keep working solutions on ice during experimental procedures
    Long-term Stability Assessment:

  • Document lot number and date of first use

  • Periodically validate activity against positive controls

  • Consider aliquoting to minimize freeze/thaw cycles
    Following these practices will maximize antibody shelf-life and experimental reproducibility.

How should researchers interpret discrepancies between CAT4 antibody results and mRNA expression data?

Discrepancies between protein detection by CAT4 antibodies and mRNA expression are common and can provide valuable biological insights:
Potential Causes and Interpretation Framework:

  • Post-Transcriptional Regulation:

    • miRNA-mediated suppression of translation

    • Alternative splicing creating isoforms not recognized by the antibody

    • Methodological approach: Examine specific mRNA isoforms; investigate miRNA databases

  • Protein Stability Differences:

    • Variations in protein half-life between tissues/conditions

    • Methodological approach: Pulse-chase experiments; proteasome inhibition studies

  • Technical Limitations:

    • Antibody sensitivity thresholds different from mRNA detection limits

    • Methodological approach: Use more sensitive detection methods; concentrate samples

  • Epitope Accessibility Issues:

    • Post-translational modifications masking epitopes

    • Protein-protein interactions blocking antibody binding sites

    • Methodological approach: Test multiple antibodies against different epitopes

  • Temporal Differences:

    • Time lag between transcription and translation

    • Methodological approach: Time-course experiments capturing both mRNA and protein
      When encountering discrepancies, researchers should:

  • Document both protein and mRNA detection methods thoroughly

  • Consider biological explanations before concluding technical failure

  • Validate findings with orthogonal methods (e.g., mass spectrometry)

  • Explore potential regulatory mechanisms that might explain the differences
    These discrepancies often reveal important regulatory mechanisms rather than experimental failures.

What are the best practices for benchmarking different CAT4 antibodies against each other?

Systematic benchmarking of CAT4 antibodies ensures optimal reagent selection for specific applications:
Comprehensive Benchmarking Methodology:

  • Sample Preparation Standardization:

    • Use identical positive control samples across all antibody evaluations

    • Include recombinant CAT4 protein, cell lines with known expression, and tissue samples

    • Process all samples simultaneously with standardized protocols

  • Parallel Application Testing:

    • Test all antibodies simultaneously under identical conditions

    • Standardize key parameters (dilutions, incubation times, detection methods)

    • Include application-specific controls (blocking peptides, isotype controls)

  • Quantitative Performance Metrics:

    • Signal-to-noise ratio calculation

    • Sensitivity assessment (limit of detection)

    • Specificity determination (using knockout/knockdown controls)

    • Reproducibility measurement (intra- and inter-assay CV%)

  • Epitope Mapping Consideration:

    • Document epitope locations for each antibody

    • Assess performance differences based on epitope accessibility

    • Consider complementary antibodies targeting different regions

  • Clustering Analysis Approach:

    • Apply antibody clustering methods based on performance characteristics

    • Analyze binding patterns across diverse samples

    • Create antibody performance dendrograms
      This systematic approach enables objective selection of optimal CAT4 antibodies for specific research questions and sample types.

What is the potential of CAT4 antibodies as biomarkers for neurological disorders?

Emerging research suggests potential applications for CAT4 antibodies in neurological disorder research:
Research Directions and Methodological Considerations:

  • Antibody Biomarker Discovery Approach:

    • Screen serum samples from neurological disorder patients against synthetic molecule libraries

    • Identify molecules retaining more IgG antibodies from case vs. control samples

    • Test identified molecules as capture agents for diagnostically useful antibodies

  • Application to Alzheimer's Disease Research:

    • Similar methodology to that used for identifying candidate IgG biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease

    • Development of peptoid-based capture systems for disease-specific antibodies

    • Correlation analysis between CAT4-related transport abnormalities and disease progression

  • Experimental Design Considerations:

    • Case-control studies with age-matched healthy controls

    • Include disease specificity controls (e.g., other neurological conditions)

    • Longitudinal sampling to track changes over disease progression

  • Validation Requirements:

    • Multiple cohort validation

    • Correlation with clinical metrics and established biomarkers

    • Sensitivity and specificity calculation against gold standard diagnostics
      While preliminary, this research direction may offer new insights into neurological disorders where amino acid transport mechanisms are implicated in pathophysiology.

How can multiplexed detection systems be developed for CAT4 and related transporters?

Development of multiplexed detection systems enables comprehensive analysis of CAT4 alongside related transporters:
Methodological Framework:

  • Antibody Panel Design Strategy:

    • Use single-cell RNA-seq data to identify co-expressed transporters

    • Apply tools like Cytomarker for rational panel design

    • Select antibodies with compatible species origins and isotypes

  • Multiplexing Technologies:

    • Mass Cytometry (CyTOF):

      • Metal-conjugated antibodies enable 30+ parameter analysis

      • No spectral overlap issues compared to fluorescence-based methods

      • Validated in immune cell profiling with >220 surface markers

    • Multiplexed Immunofluorescence:

      • Tyramide signal amplification for sequential staining

      • Spectral unmixing to resolve overlapping fluorophores

      • Analysis with platforms like ImcPQ for cell segmentation and quantification

  • Validation Protocol:

    • Single-stain controls for each antibody

    • Blocking experiments to confirm specificity

    • Comparison with transcriptomic data for concordance

  • Data Analysis Pipeline:

    • Dimensionality reduction techniques (UMAP, t-SNE)

    • Clustering algorithms (Leiden, PhenoGraph)

    • Integration with other omics datasets
      This approach enables comprehensive characterization of amino acid transport systems rather than isolated analysis of CAT4 alone.

What are the future directions for CAT4 antibody engineering and novel applications?

Future directions in CAT4 antibody research will likely advance along several promising avenues:
Emerging Technologies and Applications:

  • Advanced Antibody Engineering:

    • Development of bispecific antibodies targeting CAT4 and related transporters

    • Creation of conditionally active antibodies responsive to specific microenvironments

    • Engineering antibodies with enhanced tissue penetration properties

  • Therapeutic Development Potential:

    • CAT4-targeting antibodies to modulate amino acid transport in metabolic disorders

    • Development of antibody-drug conjugates for targeted delivery to CAT4-expressing cells

    • Designed protein assemblies incorporating CAT4 antibodies for multivalent targeting

  • Novel Detection Methods:

    • Nanobody-based sensors for real-time monitoring of CAT4 expression

    • CRISPR-based reporters coupled with anti-CAT4 detection systems

    • Development of CAT4 proximity labeling techniques for interactome analysis

  • Integration with Emerging Technologies:

    • Combination with spatial transcriptomics for location-specific expression analysis

    • Integration with organ-on-chip models for functional transport studies

    • Application in 3D organoid systems to study CAT4 in tissue-specific contexts The field is moving toward more integrated approaches that combine molecular, cellular, and systems-level analysis to understand CAT4 function in normal physiology and disease states.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.