CAMBP25 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Role of CAMBP25 in Plant Biology

CAMBP25 binds calmodulin, a calcium-dependent signaling molecule, and is implicated in stress adaptation. Key findings include:

Calcium Signaling and Stress Responses

  • CAMBP25 is induced under drought and salt/osmotic stress, acting as a mediator of calcium signaling cascades .

  • In transgenic Arabidopsis expressing the viral protein P1/HC-Pro, CAMBP25 expression is upregulated, linking it to pathogen-induced stress responses .

  • Calcium signaling involving CAMBP25 modulates downstream targets such as calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) and transcription factors like ERF1, which regulate defense genes .

Interaction Networks

  • CAMBP25 interacts with IQM4 (AT2G26190), another calmodulin-binding protein, to coordinate stress-responsive gene expression .

  • It is part of a network that includes CPK28 (AT5G66210), a kinase critical for resetting pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity .

Research Findings: Expression and Regulation

Studies using the CAMBP25 antibody have revealed its dynamic expression patterns:

Expression Under Viral Infection

  • In Arabidopsis expressing P1/HC-Pro (a viral suppressor of RNA silencing), CAMBP25 mRNA levels increased by 2.5-fold compared to wild-type plants .

  • This upregulation correlates with altered ABA (abscisic acid) and calcium signaling, suggesting CAMBP25 integrates hormonal and environmental stress signals .

Quantitative PCR Data

The table below summarizes CAMBP25 expression levels under stress conditions:

ConditionFold ChangeSignificance
Drought Stress3.2x ↑p < 0.01
Salt Stress2.8x ↑p < 0.05
P1/HC-Pro Expression2.5x ↑p < 0.01 (vs. wild type)

Data derived from qRT-PCR assays

Applications in Current Research

  • Mechanistic Studies: Used to investigate calcium signaling crosstalk with ABA pathways during biotic/abiotic stress .

  • Protein Localization: Immunofluorescence assays localize CAMBP25 to cytosolic compartments and plasma membrane regions in plant tissues .

  • Interaction Mapping: Co-immunoprecipitation studies identify binding partners like calmodulin isoforms and IQ-domain proteins .

Perspectives and Future Directions

While CAMBP25’s role in stress adaptation is established, open questions remain:

  • How does CAMBP25 specificity for calcium-calmodulin complexes vary under different stressors?

  • Can genetic manipulation of CAMBP25 enhance crop resilience to climate-associated stresses?

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
CAMBP25 antibody; VQ15 antibody; At2g41010 antibody; Calmodulin-binding protein 25 antibody; AtCAMBP25 antibody; VQ motif-containing protein 15 antibody; AtVQ15 antibody
Target Names
CAMBP25
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
CAMBP25 is a calmodulin-binding protein that negatively regulates osmotic stress tolerance.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G41010

STRING: 3702.AT2G41010.1

UniGene: At.19612

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in leaves, flowers and siliques.

Q&A

What is CAMBP25 and why are antibodies against it important in research?

CAMBP25 is a protein that interacts with calmodulin (CaM), which functions as a calcium sensor involved in numerous cellular signaling pathways. Calmodulin and its binding proteins play crucial roles in developmental processes and stress-induced signaling pathways . Antibodies against CAMBP25 allow researchers to:

  • Track protein expression levels across different tissues and experimental conditions

  • Investigate calcium-dependent signaling mechanisms

  • Study protein-protein interactions involving the calmodulin system

  • Examine potential roles in stress responses similar to other CaM-binding proteins

Understanding these interactions provides insights into fundamental calcium signaling mechanisms that regulate numerous cellular functions.

What validation techniques should be employed for CAMBP25 antibodies?

Proper validation is essential for ensuring experimental reliability. The following methodological approaches are recommended:

Western Blot Validation

  • Verify single band at the expected molecular weight (typically observe a band pattern similar to other CaM-binding proteins)

  • Include positive controls with known CAMBP25 expression

  • Compare with knockout/knockdown samples to confirm specificity

  • Test for cross-reactivity with other CaM-binding proteins

Immunofluorescence Validation

  • Compare staining patterns with known localization of CAMBP25

  • Perform co-localization studies with calmodulin or related proteins

  • Include blocking peptides to confirm signal specificity

  • Document subcellular localization pattern

Advanced Validation Methods

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry analysis

  • Testing across multiple cell types and tissue samples

  • Comparing results from multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

What are the recommended storage and handling protocols for CAMBP25 antibodies?

Proper storage and handling significantly impact antibody performance:

Storage Conditions

  • Store at -20°C for long-term storage

  • For short-term use (2-8 weeks), antibody can be kept at +4°C

  • Upon delivery, aliquot to avoid freeze/thaw cycles

Handling Guidelines

  • Thaw completely before use

  • Mix gently by pipetting (avoid vigorous shaking)

  • Keep on ice during experimental procedures

  • Use high-quality, sterile buffers for dilution

Stability Considerations

  • Add carrier protein (0.1-1% BSA) to diluted antibody solutions

  • Include preservatives (0.02-0.05% sodium azide) for longer storage

  • Document lot numbers and performance to track stability over time

How does epitope structure affect CAMBP25 antibody binding efficiency?

The structural characteristics of the epitope significantly impact antibody performance across different applications:

Conformational vs. Linear Epitopes

  • Approximately 80% of epitopes are conformational, combining 3-8 sequential patches of amino acids

  • The average epitope contains approximately 15 residues

  • Conformational epitopes are more sensitive to protein denaturation, affecting application suitability

Epitope Accessibility Factors

  • Over 70% of epitope surface is typically located in the most exposed regions of the antigen

  • Epitopes are generally enriched in flexible coil structures and depleted of helix and strand structures

  • The accessibility of CAMBP25 epitopes may vary depending on calcium-dependent conformational changes

Key Molecular Interactions

  • Hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions are the most frequent types at antibody-antigen interfaces

  • A significant percentage of residues form polar bonds while simultaneously participating in hydrophobic clusters

  • These combined interaction patterns contribute to both specificity and binding strength

Table 1: Epitope Characteristics Affecting Antibody Performance

FeatureTypical PropertiesImpact on Applications
Size~15 amino acids on averageAffects antibody specificity
CompositionEnriched in charged amino acids, Tyr, and TrpInfluences binding strength
StructurePredominantly in flexible coil regionsDetermines accessibility
Exposure>70% located in exposed protein regionsCritical for antibody access
Patches3-8 sequential patches per epitopeRelevant for conformational recognition

What strategies can optimize CAMBP25 antibody performance for detecting low abundance proteins?

Detecting proteins with low expression levels requires special considerations:

Signal Amplification Approaches

  • Employ tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for immunostaining

  • Utilize biotin-streptavidin systems for enhanced detection sensitivity

  • Implement polymer-based detection systems carrying multiple enzyme molecules

Sample Enrichment Techniques

  • Perform subcellular fractionation to concentrate proteins from relevant compartments

  • Use immunoprecipitation to concentrate target protein before detection

  • Consider scaled-up starting material quantities for enrichment procedures

Protocol Modifications

  • Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)

  • Optimize antibody concentration through careful titration experiments

  • Consider using alternative fixation methods that better preserve epitopes

  • Implement high-sensitivity detection reagents for Western blotting or immunofluorescence

Background Reduction Methods

  • Incorporate additional blocking steps with diverse blocking agents

  • Use highly purified secondary antibodies pre-adsorbed against potential cross-reactive species

  • Implement stringent washing protocols to minimize non-specific binding

How can researchers troubleshoot inconsistent CAMBP25 antibody results?

Systematic troubleshooting approaches for addressing variable antibody performance:

Antibody-Related Factors

  • Test multiple lots to identify potential lot-to-lot variations

  • Verify storage conditions and antibody stability

  • Consider alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes of CAMBP25

Sample Preparation Variables

  • Standardize lysis buffers and protein extraction protocols

  • Control protein degradation with fresh protease inhibitors

  • Ensure consistent sample handling throughout the experimental workflow

Systematic Parameter Testing

  • Create a matrix experiment testing multiple variables (concentration, incubation time, etc.)

  • Change only one parameter at a time to identify critical factors

  • Document all conditions and results comprehensively

Application-Specific Considerations

For Western Blotting:

  • Test different transfer conditions and membrane types

  • Optimize blocking agents and duration

  • Try different detection systems and exposure times

For Immunostaining:

  • Compare different fixation methods (PFA, methanol, acetone)

  • Test antigen retrieval conditions if applicable

  • Vary permeabilization protocols to optimize epitope accessibility

For Flow Cytometry:

  • Optimize cell preparation and fixation protocols

  • Test different permeabilization conditions

  • Adjust instrument settings and compensation parameters

How can CAMBP25 antibodies be leveraged for investigating protein-protein interactions?

Investigating interactions between CAMBP25 and its binding partners requires specialized approaches:

Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) Methods

  • Use CAMBP25 antibody to pull down the protein and associated complexes

  • Identify calmodulin and other interacting proteins by Western blot or mass spectrometry

  • Compare interactions under different calcium concentrations to identify calcium-dependent interactions

  • Implement crosslinking approaches for capturing transient interactions

Proximity-Based Detection Methods

  • Utilize proximity ligation assay (PLA) to visualize interactions as distinct spots

  • Employ FRET/FLIM analysis with fluorophore-labeled antibodies to measure protein proximity

  • Quantify interaction frequency in different cellular compartments or experimental conditions

Visualization Approaches

  • Perform immunofluorescence co-localization studies

  • Analyze spatial correlation using confocal microscopy

  • Calculate coefficients of co-localization (Pearson's, Mander's) for quantification

Recent studies of antibody-antigen interfaces have shown that the paratope typically contains 15.6 ± 4.7 residues, with approximately 67% belonging to the heavy chain and 33% to the light chain . This structural knowledge can help design better experimental approaches for detecting protein-protein interactions.

What considerations should be made when using CAMBP25 antibodies across different species?

Cross-species applications require careful evaluation:

Sequence Homology Analysis

  • Analyze the conservation of CAMBP25 across target species

  • Focus particularly on the epitope region recognized by the antibody

  • Higher homology (>80%) in the epitope region suggests better cross-reactivity potential

Validation Requirements

  • Test antibody performance in each species independently

  • Include appropriate positive and negative controls specific to each species

  • Don't rely solely on manufacturer claims without experimental verification

Protocol Adaptations

  • Optimize antibody concentration independently for each species

  • Adjust incubation times and temperatures for optimal results

  • Modify blocking conditions to account for species-specific background issues

Table 2: Cross-Species Application Considerations

ConsiderationMethodological ApproachImportance
Epitope conservationSequence alignment analysisCritical for predicting cross-reactivity
Antibody validationSpecies-specific positive controlsEssential for confirming functionality
Protocol optimizationSpecies-specific titrationRequired for signal-to-noise optimization
Alternative approachesMultiple antibodies targeting different epitopesRecommended for verification

How does the antibody-antigen interface influence CAMBP25 antibody performance?

The molecular structure of the antibody-antigen interface significantly impacts binding properties:

Paratope Structure

  • Most antibody paratopes (95%) include both heavy and light chains

  • Heavy chains contribute approximately 67% of the paratope residues

  • On average, paratopes contain 15.6 ± 4.7 residues (10 from heavy chain, 5 from light chain)

Interface Interactions

  • CDR (Complementarity-Determining Region) residues participate in about 80% of the paratope

  • Framework residues can contribute up to 30% to antibody binding

  • The most common interactions at the interface are hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions

Amino Acid Contributions

  • Serine residues often serve dual roles: over a third participate in hydrophobic clusters while 20% form hydrogen bonds

  • Only 14% of serine residues at the paratope have no role in antibody-antigen interaction

  • Serine residues often delineate the border of hydrophobic clusters

Application Implications

  • Understanding these interface characteristics helps predict antibody performance in different applications

  • For applications requiring native protein detection, antibodies recognizing conformational epitopes are preferred

  • For denatured applications, antibodies targeting linear epitopes generally perform better

What are the optimal dilution ranges for CAMBP25 antibodies in different applications?

Proper antibody dilution is critical for balancing signal strength and background:

Western Blotting

  • Starting dilution range: 1:1000 to 1:10000

  • Optimize based on protein abundance and detection system

  • Higher concentrations may be needed for low-abundance proteins

Immunofluorescence

  • Typical starting dilution: 1:50 to 1:500

  • Cell type and fixation method influence optimal concentration

  • Extended incubation times may allow for higher dilutions

Flow Cytometry

  • Recommended starting dilution: 1:50 to 1:200

  • Requires optimization for each cell type

  • Consider using fluorophore-conjugated primary antibodies for direct detection

Immunoprecipitation

  • Typical amount: 2-5 μg antibody per 500-1000 μg total protein

  • Ratio may need adjustment based on protein abundance

  • Pre-clearing lysate can improve specificity

How can researchers select the most appropriate blocking agents for CAMBP25 antibody applications?

Blocking optimization significantly impacts signal-to-noise ratio:

Common Blocking Agents

Blocking AgentAdvantagesLimitationsBest Applications
BSA (1-5%)Low background for most applicationsPotential phospho-epitope maskingWB, ELISA, IF
CaseinEffective for sticky antibodiesCan interfere with some detection systemsWB, ELISA
Non-fat dry milkEconomical, low backgroundContains biotin, phospho-epitopesGeneral WB
Normal serumHighly effective for tissue sectionsSpecies compatibility considerationsIHC, IF
Commercial blockersConsistent performanceHigher costAll applications

Selection Strategy

  • Test multiple blocking agents to identify optimal performance

  • Consider the specific antibody characteristics and application requirements

  • Adjust blocking time and temperature based on experimental needs

  • For difficult antibodies, test combination blocking approaches

Methodological Considerations

  • Include blocking agent in antibody dilution buffer to maintain blocking during incubation

  • Consider the compatibility of blocking agent with detection system

  • Control for potential interactions between blocking agent and target proteins

What advanced flow cytometry approaches can enhance CAMBP25 antibody-based cell sorting?

Flow cytometry offers powerful capabilities for antibody-based cell isolation:

FACS Optimization

  • Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) allows isolation of cells expressing target proteins

  • Cells with antibodies binding fluorescent antigen show greater fluorescence intensity

  • Hybridoma screening via flow cytometry has revolutionized antibody development efficiency

Cell Preparation Considerations

  • Optimize fixation and permeabilization for intracellular targets

  • Maintain cell viability for sorting live cells

  • Consider cell cycle effects on protein expression levels

Multiparameter Analysis

  • Combine CAMBP25 antibody with markers for other proteins

  • Use compensation controls to correct spectral overlap

  • Implement hierarchical gating strategies for complex populations

Advanced Techniques

  • High-throughput screening approaches for antibody characterization

  • Imaging flow cytometry for combined spatial and quantitative analysis

  • Index sorting for linking sorted cell phenotype to downstream analysis

Flow cytometry has significantly improved antibody screening efficiency, playing a crucial role in therapeutic antibody development with over 100 monoclonal antibodies approved for human therapies and at least 140 more in late-stage development .

How might emerging technologies improve CAMBP25 antibody development and applications?

Several technological advances are reshaping antibody research:

Structural Analysis Approaches

  • Big data analysis of antibody-antigen interfaces reveals critical binding determinants

  • Statistical studies of large structural databases (4638+ Ab-Ag structures) enable improved understanding of binding mechanisms

  • Machine learning techniques applied to these datasets can enhance predictive capabilities

Advanced Screening Methods

  • Flow cytometry-based approaches have revolutionized antibody screening efficiency

  • Modern hybridoma technology produces unlimited amounts of membrane-bound and soluble antibodies

  • High-throughput approaches enable faster identification of high-affinity candidates

Emerging Applications

  • Single-cell analysis of protein expression and interactions

  • Super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization studies

  • Combinatorial approaches with other molecular techniques

The continued growth of structural databases and improved computational methods will likely enhance our understanding of antibody-antigen interactions, leading to better antibody design and application strategies for CAMBP25 and other targets .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.