CANX ensures proper folding of N-linked glycoproteins by:
Binding Monoglucosylated Oligosaccharides: Retains unfolded glycoproteins in the ER until correct folding is achieved .
Collaborating with ERp57: Facilitates disulfide bond formation in MHC class I molecules during antigen presentation .
Calcium Homeostasis: Maintains ER calcium levels critical for chaperone activity .
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD):
Cystic Fibrosis: Misfolded CFTR glycoprotein evades CANX-mediated quality control, leading to degradation and disease progression .
Cancer: CANX dysregulation is implicated in breast, prostate, liver, and lung cancers. Anti-CANX antibodies are explored for diagnostic and therapeutic targeting in lung cancer .
Data from The Human Protein Atlas highlights widespread CANX expression:
CANX (Calnexin) is a single-pass type I membrane protein belonging to the calreticulin family. It consists of a large (50 kDa) N-terminal calcium-binding lumenal domain, a single transmembrane helix, and a short (90 residues) acidic cytoplasmic tail. In humans, calnexin is encoded by the gene CANX . The protein appears variably as a 90kDa, 80kDa, or 75kDa band on western blotting depending on the antibody source used for detection . CANX Human Recombinant produced in E.Coli is typically a single, non-glycosylated polypeptide chain containing 462 amino acids (residues 21-481) with a molecular mass of approximately 52.5kDa .
CANX functions as a calcium-binding chaperone protein that plays a crucial role in assisting protein folding and quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). It specifically binds to and retains unfolded or unassembled N-linked glycoproteins in the ER, preventing their premature export along the secretory pathway . CANX binds only to N-glycoproteins that have GlcNAc2Man9Glc1 oligosaccharides, which result from the trimming of two glucose residues by glucosidases I and II . This selective binding mechanism enables CANX to identify and interact with glycoproteins requiring further folding assistance.
CANX participates in a sophisticated quality control cycle for glycoproteins. When a glycoprotein is not properly folded, an enzyme called UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (UGGT) adds a glucose residue back onto the oligosaccharide, regenerating the glycoprotein's ability to bind to calnexin . This cycle continues until the protein either folds correctly or is targeted for degradation. In cases of persistently misfolded proteins, EDEM/Htm1p eventually marks the underperforming glycoprotein for degradation by removing one of the nine mannose residues, and the mannose lectin Yos-9 (OS-9 in humans) recognizes these exposed mannose residues to sort misfolded glycoproteins for degradation .
Isolation of native CANX from human tissue samples typically employs differential centrifugation to isolate ER fractions, followed by detergent solubilization and affinity chromatography. For optimal results, use a lysis buffer containing 20mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors. Calcium-dependent affinity chromatography works effectively for CANX purification due to its calcium-binding properties. For immunoprecipitation, antibodies targeting the lumenal domain typically yield better results than those targeting the cytoplasmic tail. Multiple purification steps are usually required to achieve >90% purity, with ion exchange chromatography as a valuable secondary step. Always verify purification by western blotting with anti-CANX antibodies and assess functionality through glycoprotein binding assays .
When working with recombinant CANX proteins, researchers should consider several methodological approaches. First, select the appropriate expression system based on research needs—E. coli systems provide high yield but lack post-translational modifications, while mammalian cell expression systems provide more native-like protein but with lower yields . For stability, store CANX at 4°C if using within 2-4 weeks or at -20°C for longer-term storage . Adding carrier proteins (0.1% HSA or BSA) significantly improves long-term stability . Formulation is critical—recombinant CANX is typically stable in buffers containing 20mM Tris-HCl with either 10% glycerol (for E. coli-expressed protein) or 2mM CaCl₂ (for mammalian-expressed protein) . Avoid multiple freeze-thaw cycles, as this significantly reduces activity. For binding experiments, ensure the presence of calcium in buffers (typically 2mM) as CANX is a calcium-dependent lectin .
When designing experiments to study CANX interactions with client proteins, several methodological considerations are essential. First, ensure glycosylation status control in your experimental system—CANX binds specifically to monoglucosylated N-glycans (GlcNAc2Man9Glc1), so the glycosylation state of client proteins must be carefully managed or monitored . Include calcium in all buffers (typically 1-2mM CaCl₂) as CANX-client interactions are calcium-dependent . For co-immunoprecipitation studies, use gentle detergents (0.5-1% CHAPS or digitonin) that preserve membrane protein interactions better than stronger detergents like SDS or Triton X-100. Consider the transient nature of CANX-client interactions—chemical crosslinking (using DSP or formaldehyde) before immunoprecipitation can capture these temporary associations. For functional studies, design experiments that distinguish between chaperone effects and lectin-binding effects, possibly using CANX mutants defective in one function but not the other. Additionally, include controls for ER retention effects versus direct folding assistance, as these are distinct CANX functions that can be difficult to separate experimentally .
Studying the CANX-ERp57 complex requires specialized approaches due to its dynamic nature. Co-immunoprecipitation using mild detergents (0.5% CHAPS) is effective but must be performed at physiological calcium concentrations (2mM) to maintain complex integrity. Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) allows visualization of the interaction in live cells—split fluorescent protein tags fused to CANX and ERp57 produce fluorescence when the proteins interact. For mapping interaction domains, generate truncated constructs of both proteins, focusing on the P-domain of CANX known to mediate ERp57 binding. Proximity ligation assays provide high sensitivity for detecting endogenous protein interactions in fixed cells. For functional assessment, measure oxidoreductase activity using di-eosin-glutathione disulfide (Di-E-GSSG) fluorescent substrate in the presence and absence of CANX. Mutagenesis of the ERp57 binding site on CANX (particularly the proline-rich P-domain) allows for separation of ERp57-dependent and independent functions. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to create CANX variants unable to bind ERp57 but maintaining glycoprotein binding can distinguish their collaborative versus independent functions in cellular models .
For investigating CANX's role in MHC class I assembly, pulse-chase experiments with radioactive amino acids provide temporal resolution of the assembly process—pulse cells briefly with [³⁵S]methionine/cysteine and chase with cold medium, then immunoprecipitate at various timepoints to track MHC I progression through the assembly pathway. Sequential immunoprecipitation can isolate specific complexes: first precipitate with anti-MHC I antibodies, then re-precipitate with anti-CANX antibodies to identify MHC I molecules bound to CANX. Brefeldin A treatment blocks ER-to-Golgi transport, allowing accumulation and better visualization of assembly intermediates. For distinguishing CANX's role from calreticulin's, use cells from knockout models or siRNA knockdown, recognizing that CANX preferentially binds free MHC I α-chains while calreticulin binds partially assembled MHC I complexes. Flow cytometry with conformation-specific antibodies can assess the impact of CANX manipulation on cell surface MHC I expression and folding quality. Blue native PAGE preserves protein complexes during electrophoresis, allowing visualization of assembly intermediates at different stages. In vitro reconstitution systems using purified components can test direct effects of CANX on MHC I folding rates and efficiency .
Analyzing CANX dynamics in the ER quality control cycle requires cutting-edge methodologies. FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) with fluorescently tagged CANX reveals its mobility and binding kinetics within the ER membrane. Single-molecule tracking using super-resolution microscopy (PALM/STORM) captures the nanoscale movements of individual CANX molecules during client engagement. To monitor the glucosylation/deglucosylation cycle, use mass spectrometry with glycan-specific enrichment methods to track glycan processing intermediates. Proximity labeling techniques (BioID or APEX) identify the complete interactome of CANX at different stages of the quality control cycle. For studying CANX's role in ER-associated degradation (ERAD), combine proteasome inhibitors with glycosylation inhibitors and pulse-chase analysis to measure degradation kinetics of CANX clients. Mathematical modeling of the entire calnexin cycle requires quantitative data on binding affinities, enzyme kinetics, and protein transport rates, providing a systems biology approach to understanding this complex process. Multi-color live cell imaging with orthogonal tags on CANX, glucosidases, UGGT, and client proteins allows simultaneous visualization of all key components. Activity-based protein profiling with glycan-specific probes can capture transient CANX-substrate interactions in their native cellular environment .
The variability in CANX molecular weight observed in different experimental systems (appearing as 90kDa, 80kDa, 75kDa, or even 52.5kDa bands) can be methodologically challenging . To address this, researchers should implement several strategies. First, use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to confirm identity—commercial antibodies targeting the N-terminal domain versus the C-terminal domain can produce different apparent molecular weights. Always include positive controls of known identity when performing western blots. For recombinant proteins, the expression system significantly impacts apparent molecular weight—E. coli-expressed CANX (52.5kDa) lacks glycosylation and has a truncated sequence (usually residues 21-481) compared to full-length native CANX . Post-translational modifications affect migration patterns, so consider pretreatment with PNGase F to remove N-glycans for more consistent results. SDS-PAGE conditions including acrylamide percentage, buffer systems, and running conditions impact apparent molecular weight—standardize these parameters across experiments for comparable results. Mass spectrometry provides definitive molecular weight determination and should be used to verify ambiguous samples. For publication, always clearly state the source of CANX (recombinant vs. native), expression system, and detection method to avoid confusion when reporting molecular weights .
When facing contradictory data in CANX functional studies, systematic methodological approaches can help resolve discrepancies. First, consider cell-type specific effects—CANX function varies between cell types, with particularly notable differences between professional secretory cells and other cell types. Carefully control experimental conditions including calcium concentrations (CANX is calcium-dependent) and stress states of cells (ER stress alters CANX function). Distinguish between direct and indirect effects by using purified component in vitro systems versus cellular systems. For contradictory findings on CANX-client interactions, validate using complementary techniques—if co-IP and FRET give different results, add a third method like proximity ligation assay. Consider temporal dynamics—seemingly contradictory data may represent different time points in a dynamic process, so comprehensive time course experiments are essential. For knockout/knockdown studies with contradictory results, verify the completeness of CANX depletion and rule out compensatory mechanisms (especially upregulation of calreticulin). Substrate-specific effects are common—CANX may function differently with various glycoprotein clients, so contradictions might arise from studying different substrate proteins. Develop quantitative assays to measure specific CANX functions (e.g., folding rate enhancement, aggregation prevention) rather than relying solely on binding studies .
Differentiating between CANX's chaperone and lectin functions requires careful experimental design and data interpretation. Utilize point mutations in CANX that specifically disrupt either function—mutations in the carbohydrate-binding domain affect lectin function while leaving the polypeptide-binding chaperone domain intact. The E426Q mutation specifically disrupts lectin function while preserving chaperone activity. Design glycosylation mutants of client proteins by removing N-glycosylation sites—if CANX still affects their folding despite inability to bind via glycans, this demonstrates glycan-independent chaperone activity. Use glucosidase inhibitors (e.g., castanospermine) to prevent formation of monoglucosylated glycans required for lectin binding—any remaining CANX effects under these conditions represent lectin-independent functions. Employ competition assays with free monoglucosylated glycans to specifically inhibit lectin interactions while allowing chaperone interactions to continue. For mechanistic studies, measure folding rates using intrinsic fluorescence or limited proteolysis in controlled in vitro systems with defined glycosylation states. Conduct parallel experiments in CANX knockout cells with rescue by either wild-type CANX or lectin-deficient mutants. Combine biochemical assays with structural studies (hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry or crosslinking mass spectrometry) to map interaction surfaces between CANX and clients, distinguishing glycan-binding regions from polypeptide-binding regions .
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) offers revolutionary potential for studying CANX structure-function relationships. For sample preparation, use amphipols or nanodiscs rather than detergents to maintain the native membrane environment of CANX. Focus on capturing CANX in complex with client glycoproteins at different folding stages—the transient nature of these complexes can be stabilized using mild chemical crosslinking or by engineering disulfide-trapped intermediates. For data collection, implement the latest advances in Volta phase plates and energy filters to enhance contrast of these challenging membrane protein specimens. Process cryo-EM data using 3D variability analysis to capture conformational heterogeneity that likely represents different functional states of CANX during client processing. For highest resolution structural information, combine single-particle cryo-EM with subtomogram averaging from cellular cryo-electron tomography. Validate structural findings using integrated approaches: complement cryo-EM structures with hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry and crosslinking mass spectrometry to identify dynamic regions and interaction interfaces. Map found structural features to functional significance using CANX variants with targeted mutations based on cryo-EM-identified domains. For studying CANX within its native ER context, use correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) with cryo-electron tomography to visualize CANX localization and organization within the intact ER membrane .
Recent studies suggest CANX dwindles with aging and might contribute to cytoprotection in various human age-related diseases . To investigate this promising research direction, several methodological approaches are particularly valuable. For human studies, analyze CANX expression patterns across age-stratified tissue biobanks using both transcriptomic and proteomic approaches, normalizing against other ER proteins to identify specific age-related changes. Develop conditional knockout mouse models with age-inducible CANX deletion to distinguish between developmental effects and age-specific roles. Single-cell RNA-seq combined with imaging mass cytometry can identify cell populations most affected by age-related CANX changes. For functional studies, use protein structure prediction algorithms to identify potential aging-related post-translational modifications on CANX, then validate these using phosphoproteomics and other PTM-specific approaches. Implement CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) to restore CANX levels in aged cells and assess functional recovery of ER proteostasis. High-content screening assays measuring protein folding efficiency, ER stress, and protein quality control in aged versus young cells with CANX manipulation can identify small molecules that might compensate for age-related CANX deficiencies. For translational potential, correlate CANX function with clinical markers of age-related diseases in patient-derived cells, focusing on neurodegenerative disorders where protein misfolding plays a key role .
Investigating CANX's interactions with the broader ER quality control machinery requires sophisticated methodologies that capture the complexity of these multi-component systems. Proximity-dependent biotin labeling (BioID or TurboID) with CANX as the bait protein maps the complete spatiotemporal interactome of CANX in living cells. Perform large-scale CRISPR screens using ER stress reporters to systematically identify genes that functionally interact with CANX in quality control. Real-time fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with multi-color labeling quantifies the dynamics and stoichiometry of CANX interactions with other quality control components (glucosidases, UGGT, ERp57) in live cells. Reconstitute minimal functional units of the ER quality control machinery using purified components in artificial membrane systems (liposomes or supported lipid bilayers) to define sufficiency and necessity of specific interactions. Implement multiplexed quantitative proteomics to monitor global changes in protein maturation upon selective perturbation of individual components of the quality control machinery. Use high-resolution expansion microscopy combined with super-resolution imaging to visualize nanoscale organization of quality control complexes within the ER membrane. Biophysical techniques including microscale thermophoresis and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry provide quantitative binding parameters for CANX interactions across different calcium concentrations and redox environments. Mathematical modeling incorporating these biophysical parameters can predict emergent properties of the interconnected quality control network under various cellular conditions .
Calnexin is a type I integral membrane protein with a large luminal domain, a single transmembrane helix, and a short cytoplasmic tail. It is involved in the folding and assembly of newly synthesized glycoproteins in the ER. Calnexin interacts with nascent glycoproteins through its lectin site, which binds to specific oligosaccharide intermediates on the folding glycoprotein .
Calnexin functions as a molecular chaperone, ensuring that glycoproteins achieve their correct conformation before they proceed to the Golgi apparatus. It retains misfolded or partially folded proteins in the ER, preventing them from being transported to the Golgi. This retention is crucial for maintaining cellular homeostasis and preventing the accumulation of misfolded proteins, which can lead to diseases .
Calnexin works in conjunction with another ER chaperone, calreticulin, to assist in protein folding. Both proteins are part of the calnexin/calreticulin cycle, which is essential for the proper folding of glycoproteins. Calnexin also interacts with other ER-resident proteins, such as ERp57, to facilitate the formation of disulfide bonds in glycoproteins .
Recombinant human calnexin is produced using various expression systems, such as HEK293 cells. The recombinant protein is often tagged with a fusion partner, such as the Fc region of human IgG1, to facilitate purification and detection. Recombinant calnexin retains its functional properties and is used in various research applications, including studies on protein folding, quality control, and ER stress responses .
Calnexin is widely used in research to study the mechanisms of protein folding and quality control in the ER. It is also used to investigate the role of ER stress in various diseases, such as neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, and cancer. Recombinant calnexin is a valuable tool for these studies, providing insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes .