CBP60F Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
CBP60F antibody; At4g31000 antibody; F6I18.90Calmodulin-binding protein 60 F antibody
Target Names
CBP60F
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a transcription activator protein. The protein functions by binding to specific DNA sequences, likely the 5'-GAAATTTTGG-3' motif, to stimulate the expression of downstream target genes.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT4G31000

STRING: 3702.AT4G31000.1

UniGene: At.27210

Protein Families
Plant ACBP60 protein family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is CBP60F and what is its relationship to CBP60g?

CBP60F belongs to the CBP60 (Calmodulin-Binding Protein 60) family, which plays critical roles in plant immune responses. Based on research on CBP60g, these proteins are likely involved in salicylic acid (SA) production and defense signaling pathways. CBP60g works partially redundantly with SARD1 in plant immunity, with CBP60g playing a more prominent role early in defense responses and SARD1 becoming more important later . While CBP60F is less characterized, its structural similarity suggests potential functional overlap with other family members in defense response regulation.

What are the recommended methods for producing CBP60F antibodies?

For producing high-quality CBP60F antibodies, researchers should consider a multi-stage approach. Begin by expressing recombinant CBP60F protein using bacterial or mammalian expression systems, followed by protein purification via affinity chromatography. For antibody production, both monoclonal and polyclonal approaches have merits. Monoclonal antibodies offer higher specificity but require hybridoma technology, while polyclonal antibodies can be produced more readily but may have cross-reactivity with other CBP60 family members. Affinity purification using immobilized CBP60F protein is essential for removing non-specific antibodies .

How should CBP60F antibodies be validated for research use?

Comprehensive validation requires multiple complementary approaches. Begin with Western blotting to confirm specificity using both recombinant CBP60F and plant extracts with known CBP60F expression levels. Include wild-type and knockout/knockdown controls. Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to verify target capture. Cross-reactivity assessment with other CBP60 family members (especially CBP60g) is crucial due to sequence homology . Finally, conduct immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence to confirm subcellular localization patterns that align with predicted CBP60F distribution.

How can researchers effectively use CBP60F antibodies in flow cytometry applications?

For flow cytometry applications with CBP60F antibodies, researchers should implement a barcoding strategy to maximize experimental efficiency. The antibody can be conjugated to different fluorochromes (e.g., AF488, APC, PE, BV421) to create a combination of markers that allows for multiplexed analysis . This approach requires:

  • Optimization of antibody concentration (typically 1:200 dilution)

  • Blocking with normal rat and mouse serum (1-2%) and anti-CD16/32 (10 μg/ml)

  • Incubation at 4°C for 30 minutes followed by four washes

  • Creation of fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls

This barcoding strategy enables simultaneous analysis of multiple samples, reducing inter-assay variability and reagent consumption .

What considerations should be made when designing experiments to study CBP60F's role in defense responses?

Based on insights from CBP60g studies, experiments should account for temporal dynamics of CBP60F's potential activity. CBP60g shows stronger effects early in defense responses while related proteins like SARD1 predominate later . Therefore:

  • Design time-course experiments capturing both early (0-6h) and late (24-72h) defense responses

  • Include appropriate genetic controls (knockouts/knockdowns)

  • Monitor multiple defense outputs including:

    • Salicylic acid accumulation

    • Pathogenesis-related gene expression

    • Immune-related calcium signaling events

    • Resistance to pathogens

Given the potential functional redundancy seen in CBP60g/SARD1, examine combinatorial effects with other immune regulators through double mutant analysis .

What are the recommended fixation and permeabilization protocols for CBP60F antibody immunostaining?

For optimal immunostaining results with CBP60F antibodies, a standardized fixation and permeabilization protocol should be employed:

  • Fix samples with Fix Buffer I (paraformaldehyde-based) at 37°C for 10-15 minutes

  • Centrifuge and resuspend cells in FACS buffer

  • Permeabilize using a mild detergent solution compatible with intracellular epitopes

  • Block non-specific binding with 1-2% normal serum and 10 μg/ml anti-CD16/32

  • Apply CBP60F antibody diluted 1:200 in blocking buffer

  • Incubate at 4°C for 30 minutes followed by four washes

This protocol preserves cellular morphology while allowing antibody access to intracellular CBP60F protein .

How can bispecific antibody technology be applied to study CBP60F interactions with other proteins?

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) can be engineered to simultaneously bind CBP60F and potential interaction partners to study protein-protein interactions in plant immunity. Using techniques from therapeutic antibody design, researchers can create several formats:

  • IgG-like bsAbs with one binding site for CBP60F and another for a suspected interaction partner

  • Tandem scFv formats linking anti-CBP60F and anti-partner binding domains

  • Knobs-into-holes heterodimeric Fc designs for asymmetric bsAbs

These approaches allow for co-immunoprecipitation of protein complexes, visualization of interactions via proximity-based assays, and functional studies of CBP60F molecular partnerships .

What are the challenges in distinguishing CBP60F from other CBP60 family members in experimental systems?

Distinguishing CBP60F from other family members presents significant challenges due to potential sequence homology. Researchers should employ a multi-faceted approach:

  • Develop epitope-mapped antibodies targeting unique regions of CBP60F

  • Conduct extensive cross-reactivity testing against recombinant CBP60 family proteins

  • Validate using genetic approaches (knockout/knockdown lines)

  • Employ mass spectrometry to confirm antibody targets from immunoprecipitated samples

  • Consider using isoform-specific mRNA expression data to correlate with protein detection

Pre-absorption tests with recombinant CBP60g can help identify and eliminate antibodies with cross-reactivity issues .

How can researchers investigate CBP60F's potential role in calcium signaling during immune responses?

Given the calmodulin-binding function suggested by the CBP60 family name, investigating CBP60F's role in calcium signaling requires specialized approaches:

  • Implement live-cell calcium imaging using fluorescent indicators (e.g., Fluo4-AM at 1μM with 25nM Powerload)

  • Design co-immunoprecipitation experiments to detect calmodulin-CBP60F interactions

  • Develop calcium chelation assays to assess how calcium levels affect CBP60F function

  • Compare immune responses in wildtype vs. CBP60F-modified plants under conditions that alter calcium signaling

  • Create calcium-binding mutants of CBP60F to identify critical residues for function

This comprehensive approach can help uncover CBP60F's potential role in calcium-dependent immune signaling pathways .

What are the common causes of non-specific binding with CBP60F antibodies and how can they be minimized?

Non-specific binding can significantly impact CBP60F antibody performance. Common causes and solutions include:

  • Cross-reactivity with other CBP60 family proteins: Employ epitope mapping and pre-absorption with recombinant family members

  • Fc receptor binding: Block with 10 μg/ml anti-CD16/32 and 1-2% normal serum

  • Inadequate blocking: Extend blocking times and use combinations of blocking agents

  • Suboptimal antibody concentration: Perform titration experiments to determine optimal concentration

  • Sample preparation issues: Ensure complete cell lysis and removal of cellular debris

Implementing these strategies can substantially improve signal-to-noise ratios in CBP60F antibody applications.

How should researchers address contradictory results between different detection methods for CBP60F?

When faced with contradictory results across different detection methods:

  • Systematically compare antibody performance across applications (Western blot, immunoprecipitation, flow cytometry)

  • Validate findings with independent antibody clones targeting different CBP60F epitopes

  • Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data

  • Consider post-translational modifications that might affect epitope accessibility

  • Employ genetic controls (knockouts/knockdowns) to establish baseline signals

  • Evaluate reagent quality, including antibody degradation or aggregation

This structured approach helps identify whether discrepancies stem from technical issues or reflect genuine biological complexity in CBP60F expression or modification.

What methodological approaches can improve the detection sensitivity of low-abundance CBP60F in plant tissues?

For low-abundance CBP60F detection, employ these sensitivity-enhancing strategies:

  • Signal amplification using tyramide signal amplification (TSA) or alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) techniques

  • Sample enrichment through subcellular fractionation focusing on CBP60F's expected localization

  • Proximity ligation assays (PLA) to detect CBP60F interactions with known partners

  • Mass spectrometry with targeted selected reaction monitoring (SRM) for specific CBP60F peptides

  • Implement a barcoding-based multiplexed flow cytometry approach to increase signal-to-noise ratio

These techniques can dramatically improve detection limits for low-abundance CBP60F protein in complex plant tissue samples.

How might single-cell analysis techniques be adapted for studying CBP60F expression patterns?

Single-cell analysis of CBP60F expression would provide unprecedented resolution of its role in plant immunity. Approaches include:

  • Adaptation of antibody-based barcoding methods for single-cell flow cytometry

  • Development of CBP60F reporter constructs for live imaging

  • Single-cell RNA-seq paired with protein analysis to correlate transcription and translation

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) with metal-labeled CBP60F antibodies

  • Spatial transcriptomics combined with immunohistochemistry to map expression patterns

These techniques would reveal cell-type-specific expression patterns and potential heterogeneity in CBP60F function across plant tissues.

What are the implications of recent antibody engineering advances for studying CBP60F protein interactions?

Recent advances in antibody engineering offer new opportunities for CBP60F research:

  • Creation of CBP60F nanobodies for super-resolution microscopy

  • Development of split-protein complementation systems using engineered antibody fragments

  • Application of effector-modulating mutations or glycoengineering to enhance specific antibody functions

  • Design of tetravalent bispecific antibodies to simultaneously target multiple epitopes on CBP60F complexes

  • Implementation of antibody-based proximity labeling to identify the CBP60F interactome

These approaches can reveal previously undetectable protein interactions and provide new insights into CBP60F function.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.