The CCDC28A Antibody is a polyclonal rabbit immunoglobulin (IgG) designed to target the coiled-coil domain-containing protein 28A (CCDC28A). It is primarily used in research to study the protein’s role in male fertility, oncology, and cellular processes. This antibody is validated for western blotting (WB), immunofluorescence (IF/ICC), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with reactivity confirmed in human, mouse, and rat samples .
CCDC28A is a 30 kDa protein encoded by the CCDC28A gene. Its expression is highest in the male testis, where it regulates sperm morphology and motility . In oncology, CCDC28A is implicated in leukemogenesis through its fusion with the nucleoporin 98 (NUP98) gene in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), forming the NUP98-CCDC28A fusion protein .
The CCDC28A Antibody is instrumental in studying:
Male Fertility: Detects CCDC28A in spermatozoa to analyze defects caused by gene knockout, including bent sperm heads and acrosomal malformations .
Oncology: Investigates the NUP98-CCDC28A fusion protein’s role in leukemogenesis, where it promotes myeloid progenitor self-renewal .
Proteomics: Used in co-immunoprecipitation assays to identify CCDC28A’s interaction partners, such as SPACA1 and GSK3A .
In Ccdc28a knockout mice, the antibody confirmed reduced CCDC28A levels in epididymal sperm, correlating with:
The antibody has been used to study the NUP98-CCDC28A fusion protein, which:
CCDC28A is a coiled-coil domain-containing protein 28A that plays a critical role in male reproductive biology. It is specifically expressed in male germ cells and is essential for proper sperm tail morphogenesis and function. Research has demonstrated that CCDC28A deficiency results in diminished sperm motility and structural aberrations in sperm tails, particularly affecting the head-tail coupling apparatus (HTCA) . Understanding this protein is crucial for researchers investigating male infertility, as CCDC28A knockout models show disruptions at the capitulum-basal plate junction of the HTCA, leading to bending of the sperm head within the neck region and thickening of the tail midpiece .
While CCDC28A and CCDC28B share approximately 50% amino acid identity and both contain coiled-coil domains, they exhibit distinctive expression patterns and functional roles. CCDC28A is primarily expressed in germ cells, whereas CCDC28B is expressed in supporting somatic cells within the testes . Additionally, CCDC28B has been implicated in ciliogenesis and co-localizes with Bardet-Biedl syndrome proteins at peri-centriolar structures, with mutations contributing epistatic alleles to Bardet-Biedl syndrome, an oligogenic disease associated with basal bodies and cilia disorders . When designing antibodies and experiments, researchers must account for these structural similarities to avoid cross-reactivity while targeting the unique functional domains of each protein.
Human CCDC28A encodes two potential protein isoforms with distinct structural characteristics:
Long (L) isoform: 274 amino acids with an extended N-terminus containing a globular domain (~1/3 strong hydrophobic amino acids)
Short (S) isoform: 184 amino acids, well-conserved across species
The most conserved region includes an approximately 100 amino acid-long predicted coiled-coil (CC) motif . This region shows 93% amino acid identity with the murine protein (NP_659069). When developing antibodies, researchers should consider whether to target:
Common epitopes (present in both isoforms, typically in the CC domain)
Isoform-specific epitopes (particularly the N-terminal 90 amino acids unique to the L-isoform)
Species-conserved epitopes (for cross-species research applications)
CCDC28A shows differential expression across various cell types, with particular enrichment patterns relevant to research:
This expression profile should inform research design, including selection of appropriate positive and negative control tissues when validating CCDC28A antibodies .
When selecting CCDC28A antibodies, researchers should consider:
Target specificity: Determine whether you need to detect both isoforms or discriminate between them
Cross-reactivity: Assess potential cross-reactivity with CCDC28B due to 50% sequence homology
Application compatibility: Verify antibody suitability for your specific applications (Western blot, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, etc.)
Epitope location: For studying protein interactions, avoid antibodies targeting functional domains that might interfere with binding partners
Species reactivity: Select antibodies with appropriate cross-reactivity if conducting comparative studies
For maximum specificity in distinguishing CCDC28A from CCDC28B, target antibodies to the less conserved regions outside the coiled-coil domain, particularly when investigating reproductive biology contexts where both proteins are present but in different cell types .
Rigorous validation of CCDC28A antibodies should include:
Western blot analysis using:
Positive controls (tissues with known expression: testes, hematopoietic stem cells)
Negative controls (tissues with minimal expression)
Recombinant CCDC28A (both isoforms if possible)
CCDC28A knockout samples (when available)
Peptide competition assays to confirm binding specificity
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to verify target identity
Immunohistochemistry validation comparing expression patterns with in situ hybridization data
Cross-reactivity testing against CCDC28B to ensure specificity
Researchers should be particularly cautious about potential cross-reactivity given the structural similarity between CCDC28A and CCDC28B, and the existence of multiple isoforms .
To investigate CCDC28A's role in sperm head-tail coupling:
Immunofluorescence microscopy:
Use CCDC28A antibodies to visualize protein localization at the HTCA
Co-stain with markers for the capitulum and basal plate
Compare normal and abnormal sperm morphology
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with immunogold labeling:
Apply CCDC28A antibodies conjugated to gold particles
Analyze the precise subcellular localization within the HTCA
Identify structural abnormalities at the capitulum-basal plate junction
Comparative analysis workflow:
Collect sperm samples from control and CCDC28A-deficient models
Quantify morphological defects using standardized criteria
Correlate CCDC28A expression levels with severity of HTCA disruption
Assess the relationship between structural abnormalities and motility parameters
This multifaceted approach enables researchers to establish the mechanistic link between CCDC28A deficiency and the observed bending of the head within the neck region, often accompanied by thickening of the tail midpiece .
For optimal CCDC28A detection in testicular tissue:
Fixation options:
For paraffin sections: 4% paraformaldehyde (12-24 hours) preserves both morphology and antigenicity
For frozen sections: 2% paraformaldehyde (2 hours) followed by sucrose cryoprotection
Antigen retrieval:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
For coiled-coil domains, consider additional treatment with 0.5% Triton X-100
Blocking protocol:
5% normal serum (from species of secondary antibody)
1% BSA in PBS
Include 0.3% glycine to reduce background
Antibody incubation:
Detection system:
Fluorescent: Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies for multicolor analysis
Chromogenic: HRP/DAB for archival samples and quantitative analysis
These protocols should allow clear visualization of CCDC28A in male germ cells while maintaining the ability to distinguish from CCDC28B expression in somatic cells .
CCDC28A antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating leukemia mechanisms:
Detection of NUP98-CCDC28A fusion protein:
Western blot analysis to identify the chimeric protein in patient samples
Immunoprecipitation to isolate and characterize fusion protein complexes
Antibodies targeting different domains can distinguish between normal CCDC28A and fusion protein
Expression profiling across leukemia subtypes:
Immunohistochemistry to evaluate CCDC28A expression in different FAB classifications
Flow cytometry to quantify expression levels in specific cell populations
Correlate expression with clinical outcomes and molecular subtypes
Mechanistic studies:
ChIP assays to identify genomic binding sites of NUP98-CCDC28A
Co-immunoprecipitation to isolate interacting partners
Analysis of downstream pathways affected by fusion protein expression
Research has revealed that CCDC28A is selectively enriched in the FAB-M6 class of acute myeloid leukemia and in T-ALL samples associated with MLL internal duplications, suggesting specific pathological roles in these contexts .
When employing CCDC28A antibodies for flow cytometry in hematopoietic research:
Cell preparation considerations:
Fixation: 2% paraformaldehyde followed by permeabilization with 0.1% saponin
For detecting nuclear or perinuclear antigens, use methanol permeabilization
Antibody panel design:
Controls and validation:
Include fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls
Use CCDC28A-overexpressing and knockout samples as positive and negative controls
Block with recombinant CCDC28A protein to confirm specificity
Sorting strategies for downstream applications:
Sort cells based on CCDC28A expression levels
Perform functional assays to correlate expression with stem cell properties
Analyze sorted populations by qPCR to confirm CCDC28A transcript levels
This methodology leverages the enriched expression of CCDC28A in hematopoietic stem cells, common lymphoid progenitors, and naive T and NK cells to advance our understanding of its role in normal hematopoiesis and leukemic transformation .
To effectively differentiate between CCDC28A isoforms:
Isoform-specific antibody approach:
Generate antibodies targeting the N-terminal 90 amino acids unique to the L-isoform
Use common region antibodies to detect total CCDC28A expression
Apply both antibodies in parallel experiments to determine relative isoform abundance
Western blot optimization:
Use high-resolution SDS-PAGE (12-15%) to separate the 274aa (L) and 184aa (S) isoforms
Include recombinant proteins of both isoforms as size references
Employ gradient gels for improved separation of closely migrating bands
Mass spectrometry analysis:
Immunoprecipitate CCDC28A from tissue samples
Perform tryptic digestion and analyze peptide fragments
Identify isoform-specific peptides from the N-terminal region
RNA-based approaches as complementary methods:
Design primers spanning the translation start sites of both isoforms
Perform qRT-PCR with isoform-specific primers
Use RNA-seq data to quantify relative isoform expression levels
This multi-faceted approach helps researchers accurately characterize the expression patterns of CCDC28A isoforms across different tissues and experimental conditions, which is particularly relevant given their potential distinct functions .
To investigate CCDC28A protein interactions in the HTCA:
Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:
Use CCDC28A antibodies to pull down protein complexes from testicular lysates
Analyze by mass spectrometry to identify novel interacting partners
Confirm interactions with reciprocal co-IP using antibodies against identified partners
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Apply CCDC28A antibodies together with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Visualize and quantify interactions in situ within specific subcellular compartments
Compare interaction patterns between normal and pathological samples
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Use CCDC28A domains (particularly the coiled-coil region) as bait
Screen testis-specific cDNA libraries to identify potential binding partners
Validate candidates using biochemical and cellular approaches
FRET/FLIM analysis:
Express fluorescently-tagged CCDC28A with potential partners
Measure energy transfer to confirm direct protein-protein interactions
Map interaction domains through deletion constructs
Understanding these interactions will provide mechanistic insights into how CCDC28A deficiency leads to the observed structural aberrations in sperm tails and the resulting male infertility .
To mitigate CCDC28A/CCDC28B cross-reactivity issues:
Epitope selection strategy:
Target the least conserved regions between the two proteins
Avoid antibodies directed against the highly conserved coiled-coil domains
Consider using peptide antibodies against unique sequences
Pre-absorption protocol:
Incubate antibodies with recombinant CCDC28B protein prior to use
Titrate the amount of blocking protein to maintain CCDC28A sensitivity
Perform parallel experiments with non-absorbed antibody to assess specificity gain
Validation using genetic models:
Test antibodies on CCDC28A and CCDC28B knockout tissues
Create expression systems with tagged versions of each protein
Compare reactivity patterns with mRNA expression data
Differential expression analysis:
Exploit the distinct cellular expression patterns (CCDC28A in germ cells, CCDC28B in somatic cells)
Use co-localization with cell-type specific markers
Employ dual immunofluorescence with validated antibodies for each protein
This methodical approach helps ensure experimental observations are attributed to the correct protein, particularly in tissues where both paralogs are expressed .
For robust interpretation of CCDC28A antibody data in leukemia studies:
Essential positive controls:
FAB-M6 leukemia samples (known to have enriched CCDC28A expression)
T-ALL samples with MLL internal duplications
Tissues with confirmed high CCDC28A expression (testis, hematopoietic stem cells)
Negative controls:
CCDC28A-knockdown cell lines
Non-hematopoietic tissues with minimal CCDC28A expression
Isotype control antibodies to assess non-specific binding
Technical validation controls:
Peptide competition assays to confirm specificity
Multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Correlation with mRNA expression data
Context-specific controls:
For NUP98-CCDC28A fusion studies, include controls for NUP98 expression
When assessing fusion protein function, include NUP98 fusion proteins with other partners
Compare with other fusion proteins that do not involve the Hoxa-Meis1 pathway
Functional readouts:
Correlate antibody staining with proliferative capacity
Assess relationship between CCDC28A detection and self-renewal potential of myeloid progenitors
Compare results with known leukemogenic pathways
These controls help researchers interpret CCDC28A antibody results within the complex context of leukemia heterogeneity and ensure findings are specific and reproducible .