CCH Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 Weeks (Made-to-Order)
Synonyms
CCH antibody; At3g56240 antibody; F18O21.200Copper transport protein CCH antibody; Copper chaperone CCH antibody
Target Names
CCH
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a protein involved in copper homeostasis. It can complement the functional deficiencies observed in yeast *ATX1* and *SOD1* mutants.
Gene References Into Functions

The target protein's function is further elucidated by the following:

  1. ATX1, a copper chaperone, is negatively regulated by the lipid messenger phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate. (PMID: 16585509)
  2. Higher plants exhibit two types of ATX1-like copper chaperones: the ATX1-type, primarily involved in copper delivery to P-type ATPases; and the CCH-type, possessing additional plant-specific functions mediated by a carboxy-terminal domain. (PMID: 17223078)
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G56240

STRING: 3702.AT3G56240.1

UniGene: At.24871

Protein Families
ATX1 family
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in phloem (at protein level).

Q&A

What is CCH and how does it function in antibody generation?

CCH (Concholepas concholepas hemocyanin) is an oxygen-carrying glycoprotein derived from the "Loco" or Chilean abalone, a gastropod mollusk found along the Pacific coasts of Chile and Peru. It functions as a carrier protein for antibody generation due to several key properties:

  • High molecular weight and complex structure

  • Rich glycosylation pattern featuring mannose-rich structures

  • Xenogeneic nature (foreign to mammalian systems)

  • Extended permanence time inside antigen-presenting cells
    As a carrier, CCH can be conjugated to small antigens (haptens) that would otherwise not elicit a strong immune response. When administered, natural antibodies in mammalian sera recognize CCH, activating the classical pathway of the complement system. This enhances antigen presentation and leads to robust antibody production against both CCH and the conjugated hapten .
    Research applications include:

  • Carrier for antibody generation

  • Experimental antigen

  • Carrier for vaccines (anti-prion, immunocontraceptive)

  • Adjuvant in cancer immunotherapy

How do natural antibodies against CCH compare with those against other hemocyanins?

Natural antibodies recognizing CCH, KLH (Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin), and FLH (Fissurella latimarginata hemocyanin) have been detected in unimmunized, healthy human donors. This represents the first documented evidence of natural antibodies against molluskan hemocyanins other than KLH .
These cross-reactive antibodies are explained by:

  • Shared preserved xenogeneic peptide sequences

  • Presence of similar carbohydrate structures, including mannose-rich motifs
    Notably, positive anti-KLH control sera (from melanoma patients immunized with tumor antigen-pulsed dendritic cells and KLH as an adjuvant) also react with CCH, confirming structural similarities that result in antibody cross-reactivity .
    Different donors show varying levels of reactivity, suggesting individual variations in natural antibody repertoires. This has implications for personalized immunotherapeutic approaches using hemocyanins as carriers or adjuvants .

What experimental protocols are used to detect natural antibodies against CCH?

Standard protocols for detecting natural antibodies against CCH include:
Sample Collection and Ethical Considerations:

  • Human serum samples from healthy, unimmunized donors

  • Compliance with ethical guidelines (Declaration of Helsinki)

  • Institutional review board approval
    Antibody Detection Methodology:

  • ELISA using native and deglycosylated hemocyanins

  • Positive controls: sera from patients immunized with KLH

  • Antibody isotype determination (IgG, IgM)
    Data Analysis:

  • Statistical processing using GraphPad Prism

  • Two-tailed Student's t-test for antibody detection

  • Minimum of three experimental replicates for reproducibility
    For researchers implementing these protocols, it's essential to include appropriate controls to distinguish specific binding from background and to validate results across multiple donors to account for individual variations.

How does CCH activate the classical pathway of the human complement system?

CCH activates the classical complement pathway through a specific mechanism involving natural antibodies:

  • Natural IgG and IgM antibodies in human serum bind to CCH

  • C1, a pattern recognition receptor, recognizes these antibody-antigen complexes

  • C1 binding initiates the classical pathway by activating serine-proteases C1r and C1s

  • C1s cleaves complement components C2 and C4

  • This generates C3 convertases leading to terminal pathway activation
    This process produces:

  • Proinflammatory mediators

  • Opsonizing factors enhancing phagocytosis

  • Immunostimulatory molecules bridging innate and adaptive immunity
    Experimental Validation:
    To distinguish classical pathway activation from lectin or alternative pathway activation, researchers implement specific controls including:

  • EGTA/Mg²⁺ buffers to selectively inhibit the classical pathway

  • C1q-depleted sera to confirm classical pathway dependency

  • Detection of pathway-specific activation products using enzyme immunoassays

How does deglycosylation affect the immunological properties of CCH?

Deglycosylation of CCH produces counterintuitive effects that distinguish it from other hemocyanins:

HemocyaninEffect of Deglycosylation on Antitumor ActivityEffect on ImmunogenicityEffect on Natural Antibody Binding
CCHNo significant effectIncreasedVariable between donors
FLHDecreasedNot specifiedMarkedly increased (oxidized)
KLHNot specifiedNot specifiedDecreased (in donor D3)
These findings challenge the conventional understanding of glycosylation in immunogenicity. For CCH specifically, the protein backbone appears to be the predominant carrier of immunogenic epitopes, while glycans may actually mask some epitopes .
The mechanistic explanation involves:
  • Removal of sterically hindering carbohydrates exposing protein epitopes

  • Generation of neo-epitopes during the deglycosylation process

  • Altered protein folding enhancing accessibility of immunogenic regions
    Researchers should note that experimental deglycosylation protocols must be carefully standardized, as different methods (enzymatic vs. chemical) may produce varying results .

What molecular mechanisms explain CCH's immunomodulatory properties?

Multiple interconnected mechanisms contribute to CCH's immunomodulatory properties:
Primary Mechanisms:

  • Natural Antibody Recognition and Complement Activation

    • Pre-existing antibodies bind CCH

    • Classical complement pathway activation

    • Generation of immunostimulatory complement fragments

  • Structural Characteristics

    • High molecular weight (~8 MDa)

    • Complex quaternary structure

    • Xenogeneic epitopes foreign to mammalian immune systems

  • Antigen Processing and Presentation

    • Prolonged residence time in antigen-presenting cells

    • Enhanced processing through mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis

    • Generation of diverse peptide epitopes for T-cell recognition
      Secondary Mechanisms:

  • Cross-reactivity with tumor antigens

  • Stimulation of pattern recognition receptors

  • Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokine production
    Interestingly, isolated CCH subunits can have similar or even enhanced effects compared to the whole molecule, suggesting that the quasi-D5 symmetry is not the primary determinant of immunogenicity .

What analytical techniques are most effective for characterizing CCH antibody interactions?

Modern analytical platforms for characterizing CCH antibody interactions include:
Biophysical Characterization:

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) for real-time binding kinetics

  • Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI) for label-free interaction analysis

  • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters

  • Microscale Thermophoresis (MST) for solution-phase binding analysis
    Structural Analysis:

  • Circular Dichroism (CD) for secondary structure assessment

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS) for epitope mapping

  • Negative-stain Electron Microscopy for visualizing antibody-CCH complexes
    Functional Assessment:

  • Complement activation assays (C1q binding, C4b deposition)

  • Cell-based functional assays

  • In vivo immunogenicity studies
    Specialized Techniques for Glycan Analysis:

  • Lectin microarrays for glycan profiling

  • Mass spectrometry for glycan characterization

  • Glycosidase treatment assays for functional importance of specific glycans
    When planning analytical studies, researchers should implement a multi-method approach to obtain comprehensive characterization data, as each technique provides complementary information about different aspects of the CCH-antibody interaction.

How do CCH-induced antibodies compare with computationally designed antibodies?

The increasing sophistication of computational approaches allows for interesting comparisons between traditionally induced and in silico designed antibodies:

CharacteristicCCH-Induced AntibodiesComputationally Designed Antibodies
Production MethodAnimal immunization or in vitro display technologiesDeep learning algorithms trained on human antibody datasets
Development TimelineWeeks to monthsDays (for in silico generation)
HumannessLimited (if animal-derived)Can be optimized (>90% humanness achievable)
DevelopabilityVariableCan be specifically designed for high expression, stability, and low aggregation
Biophysical PropertiesNatural variationOptimized for "medicine-likeness"
Manufacturing ConsistencyBatch-to-batch variation possibleHigher theoretical consistency from defined sequences
Recent validation studies have demonstrated that computationally generated antibodies:
  • Express well in mammalian cells

  • Can be purified in sufficient quantities

  • Exhibit favorable biophysical attributes comparable to marketed antibodies

  • Show high monomer content and thermal stability

  • Display low hydrophobicity and self-association
    While CCH-induced antibodies benefit from natural selection processes in the immune system, computationally designed antibodies offer advantages in speed, customization, and potentially expanding the druggable antigen space to include targets refractory to conventional approaches .

What factors should be considered when designing CCH-based conjugate vaccines?

When designing CCH-based conjugate vaccines, researchers should consider:
Conjugation Chemistry:

  • Maintain native epitopes of both CCH and the target antigen

  • Select appropriate linkers to preserve tertiary structure

  • Optimize conjugation ratio for maximal immunogenicity
    Formulation Parameters:

  • Adjuvant selection (considering that CCH itself has adjuvant properties)

  • Stability under storage conditions

  • Dosing regimen optimization
    Immunological Considerations:

  • Pre-existing anti-CCH antibodies in the target population

  • Potential for epitope spreading

  • Balance between humoral and cellular immune responses
    Clinical Translation Factors:

  • Scalable manufacturing process

  • Reproducible conjugation chemistry

  • Regulatory considerations for a novel carrier protein
    CCH has already shown promise as a carrier for anti-prion vaccines, immunocontraceptive vaccines, and as an adjuvant in dendritic cell vaccines against prostate cancer, demonstrating its versatility in various therapeutic contexts .

What experimental controls are essential when evaluating CCH antibody responses?

Robust experimental design for CCH antibody studies requires specific controls:
For Natural Antibody Detection:

  • Serum from unimmunized donors (negative control)

  • Serum from KLH-immunized subjects (positive control)

  • Irrelevant protein controls to assess specificity

  • Deglycosylated hemocyanin controls to evaluate glycan contribution
    For Complement Activation Studies:

  • Heat-inactivated serum (56°C, 30 min) to eliminate complement activity

  • C1q-depleted serum to confirm classical pathway dependence

  • EGTA/Mg²⁺ buffers to distinguish classical from alternative pathway

  • Positive activation controls (aggregated IgG)
    For Functional Assays:

  • Isotype-matched control antibodies

  • Fc receptor blocking reagents to eliminate non-specific binding

  • Multiple time points to capture kinetic differences

  • Multiple donor samples to account for genetic variability
    Implementing these controls ensures that observed effects are specifically attributable to CCH antibody interactions and not to experimental artifacts or alternative mechanisms.

How can researchers standardize CCH preparations for consistent antibody studies?

Standardization of CCH preparations is critical for reproducible antibody studies:
Purification Protocol:

  • Collection of Concholepas concholepas specimens from defined geographical locations

  • Hemolymph extraction under controlled conditions

  • Multiple chromatography steps (usually size exclusion followed by ion exchange)

  • Endotoxin removal (crucial for immunological studies)

  • Sterile filtration and controlled storage
    Quality Control Parameters:

  • Protein concentration determination (Bradford/BCA)

  • Endotoxin levels (<0.05 EU/mg protein)

  • SDS-PAGE profile

  • Spectrophotometric analysis (A280/A350 ratio)

  • Glycan profile characterization
    Batch Validation:

  • Comparative immunogenicity testing against reference standard

  • Complement activation potential

  • Natural antibody binding profile
    Storage Conditions:

  • Temperature (-80°C for long-term; 4°C for working solutions)

  • Buffer composition (typically PBS pH 7.2-7.4)

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles Implementing these standardization measures enables meaningful comparison of results between different studies and laboratories, enhancing the reliability of CCH antibody research.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.