CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody that specifically recognizes human Cyclin C protein around the phosphorylation site of serine 275. The immunogen used to produce this antibody is a synthesized non-phosphopeptide derived from human Cyclin C with the sequence N-G-S(p)-Q-N . This antibody detects endogenous levels of total Cyclin C protein regardless of phosphorylation status at Ser275 .
Cyclin C serves as a component of the Mediator complex, which functions as a coactivator involved in regulated gene transcription of nearly all RNA polymerase II-dependent genes. Specifically, it binds to and activates cyclin-dependent kinase CDK8, which phosphorylates the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II, potentially inhibiting the formation of a transcription initiation complex .
Based on validation studies, CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody has been confirmed for the following applications:
| Application | Validated | Recommended Dilution |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | Yes | 1:500-1:3000 |
| ELISA | Yes | According to protocol |
The antibody has demonstrated successful detection of endogenous levels of Cyclin C in various experimental contexts, particularly in human and mouse samples . Researchers should note that while these applications are validated, optimization for specific experimental conditions may be necessary.
To maintain optimal antibody performance, CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody should be stored at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt . Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as these can compromise antibody activity through protein denaturation and aggregation. The antibody is supplied in rabbit IgG in phosphate buffered saline (without Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺), pH 7.4, 150mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide, and 50% glycerol , which helps maintain stability during freezing.
For routine use, aliquoting the antibody into single-use volumes before freezing is recommended to minimize freeze-thaw cycles. When removing from freezer storage, thaw on ice and centrifuge briefly before use to collect all liquid at the bottom of the tube.
When using CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody in a new experimental system, validation is critical to ensure specificity. Implement the following multi-step validation strategy:
Positive and negative controls: Include known Cyclin C-expressing and non-expressing samples in parallel experiments.
Knockdown/knockout validation: Compare antibody staining in wild-type versus CCNC knockdown (siRNA) or knockout samples. This approach provides the most definitive evidence of specificity.
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess immunizing peptide (N-G-S(p)-Q-N) before application to samples. Signal disappearance confirms specificity for the target epitope.
Molecular weight verification: In Western blot applications, confirm that the detected band corresponds to the expected molecular weight of Cyclin C (~33 kDa) .
Cross-validation with alternative antibodies: Compare results with other validated anti-Cyclin C antibodies targeting different epitopes.
This comprehensive validation approach is particularly important given documented cases of cross-reactivity with antibodies against other nuclear proteins, as seen with an antibody against NCAPH2 that showed cross-reactivity with SWI/SNF complex components .
A robust Western blot experiment using CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody should include these essential controls:
Positive control: Cell lysate known to express Cyclin C (e.g., LOVO cells have been documented to express detectable levels of Cyclin C) .
Loading control: Probing for housekeeping proteins (e.g., GAPDH, β-actin) to ensure equal loading across samples.
Negative control: Either:
Primary antibody omission control
Sample with Cyclin C knocked down/knocked out
Non-specific rabbit IgG at the same concentration as the primary antibody
Molecular weight marker: To confirm the detected band appears at the expected size of ~33 kDa for Cyclin C .
Antibody titration: Testing different dilutions (within the recommended 1:500-1:3000 range) to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio for your specific samples .
Including these controls allows for rigorous interpretation of results and troubleshooting of potential experimental issues.
Antibody cross-reactivity is a significant concern in research applications. For CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody, employ these strategies to assess and mitigate potential cross-reactivity:
IP-Mass Spectrometry analysis: Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify all proteins pulled down by the antibody, similar to the approach used in study . This provides an unbiased assessment of all potential cross-reactive targets.
Parallel knockout validations: Test antibody reactivity in wild-type versus CCNC knockout samples. Persistent signal in knockout samples indicates cross-reactivity.
Epitope alignment analysis: Perform in silico analysis to identify proteins with sequence similarity to the immunizing peptide (N-G-S(p)-Q-N).
Pre-adsorption controls: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide before use to block specific binding.
Multi-antibody validation: Compare results with other anti-Cyclin C antibodies targeting different epitopes.
This is particularly important in light of findings from study , which demonstrated that a commercial antibody against NCAPH2 cross-reacted with SWI/SNF complex components in an NCAPH2-independent manner, potentially confounding interpretation of results.
Incorporating CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody into multiplexed immunoassays requires careful consideration of potential cross-reactivity between detection antibodies. Based on approaches described in , researchers can implement these strategies:
Physical separation using aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS): This method confines detection antibody solutions to regions with complementary capture antibodies, preventing cross-reactions between different detection antibodies .
Spectral unmixing: When using fluorescently labeled antibodies, select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap and apply computational unmixing algorithms.
Sequential antibody application: Apply and detect antibodies sequentially with washing and blocking steps between applications.
Cross-reactivity pre-screening: Before multiplexing, test all antibodies in the panel for cross-reactivity against all capture antibodies.
Species-specific secondary antibodies: When possible, use primary antibodies from different host species to enable discrimination through species-specific secondary antibodies.
When implementing these approaches, validation should include comparison of multiplexed results with single-antibody controls to confirm signal specificity and quantitative accuracy .
Studying Cyclin C within the Mediator complex using CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody requires special considerations due to the complex's size and protein-protein interactions:
Epitope accessibility: The antibody targets residues around Ser275, which may have differential accessibility when Cyclin C is incorporated into the Mediator complex. Gentle fixation and optimization of protein extraction methods are crucial.
Co-immunoprecipitation optimization: When using this antibody for Co-IP of Mediator complex components:
Use gentle lysis conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Consider crosslinking approaches to stabilize transient interactions
Include appropriate detergent concentrations to maintain complex integrity while enabling antibody access
Comparative analysis with CDK8 module components: Include parallel analysis of other CDK8 module components (CDK8, MED12, MED13) to verify detection of the intact module.
Chromatin association studies: When studying chromatin-associated Mediator complex, optimize extraction conditions to distinguish between soluble and chromatin-bound fractions.
Functional validation: Complement immunodetection with functional assays of Mediator activity to correlate detection with biological function.
This antibody can provide insights into Cyclin C's role in the Mediator complex as a coactivator involved in regulated gene transcription of RNA polymerase II-dependent genes .
The CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody was raised against a non-phosphopeptide derived from human Cyclin C around the phosphorylation site of serine 275 . This has important implications for detection and experimental design:
Total vs. phospho-specific detection: This antibody detects total Cyclin C regardless of Ser275 phosphorylation status. For phosphorylation-specific detection, researchers should consider using phospho-specific antibodies like Anti-Cyclin C (phospho Ser275) Antibody .
Epitope masking considerations: Post-translational modifications including phosphorylation can potentially affect antibody binding through:
Conformational changes in the protein structure
Direct steric hindrance at the binding site
Altered protein-protein interactions that may mask the epitope
Comparative analysis approach: For comprehensive analysis of Ser275 phosphorylation role:
Use both CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody and phospho-specific antibodies in parallel
Compare relative signal intensities under different conditions
Include phosphatase treatment controls to verify phosphorylation-dependent effects
Functional significance: When studying Cyclin C phosphorylation, consider that phosphorylation at Ser275 may regulate:
CDK8 activation
Mediator complex assembly or activity
RNA polymerase II transcription initiation
This understanding enables more precise experimental design and interpretation when studying Cyclin C regulation through post-translational modifications.
When using CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody in Western blotting, researchers may encounter several technical challenges. Here are common issues and their solutions:
| Issue | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | - Insufficient protein loading - Primary antibody concentration too low - Protein degradation - Improper transfer | - Increase protein loading (20-50 μg suggested) - Use higher antibody concentration (1:500 rather than 1:3000) - Add protease inhibitors to lysate - Verify transfer with reversible stain |
| High background | - Antibody concentration too high - Insufficient blocking - Contaminated buffers | - Dilute antibody (try 1:3000) - Increase blocking time/concentration - Prepare fresh buffers - Increase washing steps |
| Multiple bands | - Cross-reactivity - Protein degradation - Post-translational modifications | - Include peptide competition control - Use fresh samples with protease inhibitors - Include phosphatase treatment control |
| Weak signal | - Low expression level - Inefficient extraction - Antibody deterioration | - Increase exposure time - Use enhanced lysis buffer - Use fresh antibody aliquot |
For optimal results with CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody, use LOVO cell lysates as a positive control as documented in prior validation , and maintain consistent experimental conditions once optimized.
Although CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody is not explicitly validated for immunofluorescence in the provided data, researchers may still attempt this application with proper controls. To distinguish between specific binding and artifacts:
Include comprehensive controls:
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide
Secondary-only control: Omit primary antibody
Isotype control: Use non-specific rabbit IgG
Knockdown/knockout control: Compare signal in CCNC-depleted samples
Co-localization analysis:
Perform co-staining with antibodies against known Cyclin C interactors (e.g., CDK8)
Expected nuclear localization pattern for Cyclin C
Visualization with confocal microscopy to assess subcellular localization
Signal validation techniques:
Compare staining pattern with multiple antibodies against different Cyclin C epitopes
Correlate staining intensity with known expression levels in different cell types
Consider photobleaching controls to distinguish true signal from autofluorescence
Nuclear marker co-staining:
Include DAPI or other nuclear counterstain
Confirm expected nuclear localization of Cyclin C
Examine signal distribution relative to subnuclear structures
These approaches help establish confidence in the specificity of immunofluorescence signals, particularly important given potential cross-reactivity concerns noted with some nuclear protein antibodies .
Epitope masking can occur due to protein-protein interactions, conformational changes, or post-translational modifications affecting the region around Ser275 in Cyclin C. To overcome these challenges:
Optimized sample preparation:
Test multiple lysis buffers with varying detergent concentrations
Compare different fixation methods if applicable (e.g., PFA vs. methanol)
Evaluate the effect of denaturing vs. non-denaturing conditions
Epitope retrieval techniques:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using citrate or EDTA buffers
Enzymatic epitope retrieval using proteinase K or trypsin
Evaluation of pH conditions (pH 6.0 vs. pH 9.0) for optimal retrieval
Protein modification approaches:
Phosphatase treatment to remove phosphorylation that might mask epitopes
Deglycosylation enzymes if glycosylation affects accessibility
Protein crosslinking reversal if applicable
Alternative detection strategies:
Indirect detection methods with signal amplification
Use of alternative antibodies targeting different Cyclin C epitopes in parallel
Consideration of proximity ligation assays for detection of protein complexes
Implementing these strategies can significantly improve detection of Cyclin C in complex samples where the epitope may be partially occluded due to biological context.
Cyclin C plays critical roles in transcriptional regulation through the Mediator complex, with potential implications in cancer biology. CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody can be applied in cancer research through these approaches:
Expression profiling across cancer types:
Quantitative Western blot analysis of Cyclin C levels across cancer cell lines
Correlation of expression with cancer subtype, stage, and patient outcomes
Comparative analysis with other CDK8 module components
Functional studies in cancer models:
Analysis of Cyclin C expression before and after treatment with CDK inhibitors
Correlation of expression with therapeutic response
Evaluation as a potential biomarker for treatment selection
Integration with multiplexed approaches:
Therapeutic antibody development:
This antibody can contribute to understanding Cyclin C's role in cancer progression and potentially inform therapeutic strategies targeting the CDK8-Cyclin C complex .
Integrating CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody with single-cell technologies offers opportunities to explore Cyclin C expression and function at unprecedented resolution:
Antibody conjugation for single-cell proteomics:
Direct conjugation with fluorophores, metals, or barcodes for CyTOF, CODEX, or other single-cell proteomics platforms
Optimization of conjugation chemistry to maintain epitope binding
Validation of conjugated antibodies against unconjugated controls
Integration with spatial proteomics:
Incorporation into multiplexed immunofluorescence panels
Cyclic immunofluorescence (CyCIF) to build high-parameter tissue maps
Correlation of Cyclin C expression with spatial tissue organization
Deep repertoire mining approaches:
Microdevice-based applications:
These approaches enable examination of cellular heterogeneity in Cyclin C expression and function, potentially revealing subpopulations with distinct roles in normal physiology and disease .
Advanced computational approaches can significantly extend the utility of data generated using CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody:
Structural prediction and epitope analysis:
In silico analysis of antibody-antigen interactions
Prediction of conformational changes that might affect epitope accessibility
Molecular dynamics simulations to understand binding kinetics
Image analysis automation:
Machine learning algorithms for quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence data
Automated detection of subcellular localization patterns
Integration of multiple markers for complex phenotype identification
Multi-omics data integration:
Correlation of protein expression data with transcriptomics and epigenomics
Network analysis to identify Cyclin C-associated pathways
Causal inference models to distinguish drivers from passengers in expression networks
Synthetic antibody-antigen binding simulations:
These computational approaches can enhance experimental design, data interpretation, and hypothesis generation when working with CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody, particularly in complex systems where multiple variables affect protein expression and function .
When investigating Cyclin C function, researchers must consider the complementary information provided by total protein detection versus phosphorylation-specific detection:
For comprehensive analysis, using both antibody types in parallel provides complementary data - total protein levels from CCNC (Ab-275) Antibody and specific phosphorylation status from phospho-specific antibodies . This approach enables calculation of the phosphorylated fraction of total Cyclin C, offering insights into both expression and post-translational regulation.
When selecting among different commercial antibodies targeting Cyclin C, researchers should evaluate these key parameters:
Epitope differences and their implications:
Validation depth comparison:
Review available validation data (Western blot images, knockout controls)
Check for peer-reviewed publications using specific antibodies
Evaluate species cross-reactivity relevant to your model system
Application-specific performance:
Some antibodies may perform better in specific applications (WB vs. IF vs. IP)
Compare recommended dilutions and reported signal-to-noise ratios
Consider whether native or denatured protein detection is required
Specific experimental requirements:
Host species considerations:
Compatibility with other antibodies in multiplexed applications
Available secondary antibody options
Potential background in tissues from the same species
This comparative analysis enables selection of the optimal Cyclin C antibody for specific experimental questions and systems .