CCNI antibodies are polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies designed to bind specifically to Cyclin I, encoded by the CCNI gene (UniProt ID: Q14094). Cyclin I is expressed in adult heart, brain, skeletal muscle, testis, and thyroid, with lower levels in placenta, lung, kidney, and pancreas .
CCNI antibodies are primarily validated for Western blotting, though cross-reactivity predictions extend to other species . For example:
Affinity Biosciences DF10025: Targets human and mouse CCNI, with high-confidence predictions for pig, bovine, and horse .
Sigma-Aldrich GW22274: Validated for human, mouse, and rat samples .
Batch Validation: Antibody performance can vary between lots, necessitating rigorous validation using genetic knockout controls (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9) .
Orthogonal Controls: Methods like RNA expression correlation or immunoprecipitation are recommended to confirm specificity .
CCNI exhibits tissue-specific expression:
| Tissue | Expression Level (Adults) | Expression Level (Fetal) |
|---|---|---|
| Heart/Brain | High | High (fetal brain) |
| Skeletal Muscle | High | - |
| Testis/Thyroid | High | - |
| Lung/Kidney | Low | Low (fetal lung/liver/kidney) |
CCNI’s role in cell cycle regulation and its abundance in metabolically active tissues suggest potential implications in neurodegenerative diseases or cardiac pathologies .
Antibody Specificity: Only ~36–50% of commercial antibodies perform reliably in immunofluorescence or immunoprecipitation .
Recommendations:
Characterization initiatives like YCharOS aim to improve antibody reliability by openly comparing commercial reagents . For CCNI, expanding validation to include immunohistochemistry (IHC) or flow cytometry could enhance its utility in disease research.
CCNI (Cyclin I) is a member of the cyclin protein family with distinct structural and functional characteristics. In humans, the canonical CCNI protein consists of 377 amino acid residues with a molecular mass of approximately 42.6 kDa . Its primary subcellular localization is in the nucleus, with up to two different isoforms reported .
Unlike better-characterized cyclins that directly regulate cell cycle progression, CCNI has specialized functions that include involvement in spermatogenesis . It shows high expression in adult heart, brain, and skeletal muscle tissues, suggesting tissue-specific functions beyond basic cell cycle control .
CCNI is known by several synonyms in scientific literature, including CYC1, CYI, cyclin ITI, and CCNI1 . Evolutionary conservation is evident across numerous species, with CCNI gene orthologs identified in mouse, rat, bovine, frog, zebrafish, chimpanzee, chicken, camel, and woodpecker models .
This protein's unique expression patterns and potential functions make it an important target for research into specialized cellular processes, particularly in tissues where it shows high expression.
CCNI antibodies support multiple research applications, each with specific methodological considerations:
Western blotting represents the most widely used application for CCNI antibodies, allowing detection of the 41-43 kDa protein in cell and tissue lysates . For optimal results:
Use 10% SDS-PAGE gels for proper separation of CCNI (predicted band size: 41-43 kDa)
Apply primary antibody at recommended dilutions (typically 1:1000)
Include positive controls such as 293T whole cell lysates, which consistently show CCNI expression
For tissue localization studies:
Select appropriate fixation and antigen retrieval methods
Include positive control tissues (heart, brain, skeletal muscle)
Consider tissue-specific expression patterns when interpreting results
For subcellular localization studies:
Include appropriate nuclear counterstains to confirm CCNI's nuclear localization
Consider confocal microscopy for precise localization analysis
For quantitative detection of CCNI:
Standardize with recombinant CCNI protein when available
Optimize blocking conditions to minimize background
Each application requires specific validation steps and controls to ensure reliable results when working with CCNI antibodies.
Thorough validation is essential for ensuring reliable results with CCNI antibodies. A comprehensive validation strategy should include:
Positive and negative controls:
Western blot validation:
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test reactivity against related proteins
Evaluate potential cross-species reactivity when working with non-human models
| Validation Parameter | Methodology | Expected Results |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Serial dilution analysis | Consistent detection at expected concentrations |
| Reproducibility | Inter-assay comparison | Consistent results across experiments |
| Application suitability | Multi-application testing | Performance in intended applications |
| Lot-to-lot consistency | Comparative testing | Minimal variation between lots |
Overexpression studies: Confirm increased signal with CCNI overexpression
Knockdown studies: Verify signal reduction following CCNI-targeted siRNA treatment
Cross-technique concordance: Compare results across different detection methods
Documenting validation results thoroughly ensures experimental reliability and facilitates troubleshooting when unexpected results occur.
The choice of epitope significantly impacts CCNI antibody performance in different applications and experimental contexts:
CCNI antibodies target different regions of the protein:
N-terminal region antibodies (e.g., Aviva Systems Biology's ARP64388_P050)
C-terminal region antibodies (e.g., those targeting sequences like "VYRPLKHTLVTCDKGVFRLHPSSVPGPDFSKDNSKPEVPVRGTAAFYHHLPAASGCKQTSTKRKVEEMEVDDFYDGIKRLYNEDNV")
These different epitope targets affect:
Accessibility in native versus denatured conditions
Potential cross-reactivity with related proteins
Sensitivity to post-translational modifications
When selecting antibodies, consider CCNI's functional domains:
Cyclin box region (critical for potential CDK interactions)
Regions involved in protein-protein interactions
Sites of known post-translational modifications
For research involving multiple species:
Epitopes in highly conserved regions provide broader cross-reactivity
Compare the immunogen sequence to the target species sequence
Species-specific reactivity varies (e.g., some antibodies are validated for human, mouse, rabbit, rat, bovine, dog, guinea pig, and hamster samples)
For structural studies: Choose antibodies targeting accessible epitopes
For functional studies: Select antibodies that don't interfere with important functional domains
For detecting specific isoforms: Choose antibodies targeting isoform-specific regions
For detecting post-translational modifications: Avoid antibodies targeting modification sites
Understanding these epitope considerations helps researchers select the most appropriate CCNI antibody for their specific experimental requirements.
The choice between monoclonal and polyclonal CCNI antibodies significantly impacts experimental results based on their distinct characteristics:
Polyclonal antibodies, such as the rabbit polyclonal anti-CCNI antibodies offered by Atlas Antibodies , provide:
Recognition of multiple epitopes on CCNI protein
Generally higher sensitivity due to multiple binding sites
Greater tolerance to minor protein denaturation or modifications
Potential batch-to-batch variability
Possible higher background in some applications
Monoclonal antibodies offer:
Recognition of a single specific epitope
Consistent reproducibility between batches
Often higher specificity for particular applications
Potentially lower sensitivity for low-abundance targets
More vulnerability to epitope masking or modification
| Application | Preferred Antibody Type | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Either suitable | Both work well under denaturing conditions |
| IHC - FFPE | Monoclonal advantage | Better specificity in fixed tissues |
| IHC - Frozen | Polyclonal advantage | Higher sensitivity for detecting low abundance |
| Immunoprecipitation | Polyclonal advantage | Multiple epitope binding enhances capture |
| Flow Cytometry | Monoclonal advantage | Consistent epitope recognition improves quantification |
For critical experiments, consider using both antibody types in complementary approaches:
Use polyclonal antibodies for initial detection and localization
Confirm findings with monoclonal antibodies targeting specific epitopes
Validate results across multiple methodologies
This strategic approach leverages the strengths of each antibody type while compensating for their respective limitations.
Successful Western blot detection of CCNI requires optimization of several critical parameters:
Extraction buffer: RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors effectively extracts nuclear proteins like CCNI
Protein concentration: 20-30 μg total protein per lane is typically sufficient
Sample handling: Minimize freeze-thaw cycles to prevent degradation
Denaturation: Heat samples at 95°C for 5 minutes in reducing sample buffer
Gel percentage: 10% SDS-PAGE gels provide optimal resolution around CCNI's molecular weight (41-43 kDa)
Running conditions: 100-120V constant voltage for uniform migration
Include appropriate molecular weight markers spanning 25-75 kDa range
Transfer method: Wet transfer at 100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight at 4°C
Membrane selection: PVDF membranes generally provide better results than nitrocellulose for CCNI
Transfer validation: Use reversible staining (Ponceau S) to confirm successful transfer
Blocking: 5% non-fat milk in TBST (1 hour at room temperature)
Primary antibody dilution: Typically 1:1000 in 5% BSA/TBST for most CCNI antibodies
Primary antibody incubation: Overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking
Washing: 3-5 washes with TBST, 5-10 minutes each
Secondary antibody: Anti-rabbit HRP conjugate at appropriate dilution (typically 1:5000-1:10000)
Detection method: Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) with appropriate exposure times
Expected band pattern: Primary band at approximately 41-43 kDa
Quantification: Normalize CCNI signals to appropriate loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH)
| Issue | Possible Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | Insufficient protein, antibody dilution too high | Increase protein loading, adjust antibody concentration |
| Multiple bands | Cross-reactivity, protein degradation | Optimize antibody specificity, add protease inhibitors |
| High background | Insufficient blocking, antibody concentration too high | Extend blocking time, dilute antibody further |
| Weak signal | Low CCNI expression, insufficient incubation | Use tissues with high CCNI expression, extend incubation time |
Following these optimized protocols helps ensure consistent and reliable detection of CCNI by Western blotting.
CCNI is well-conserved across species, affecting antibody cross-reactivity in comparative studies:
Commercial CCNI antibodies show varying species reactivity profiles:
Human-specific antibodies: Optimized for human samples only
Multi-species antibodies: Some react with human, mouse, rabbit, rat, bovine, dog, guinea pig, and hamster samples
Specialized antibodies: Some are developed for specific research models like camel or woodpecker
CCNI sequence conservation affects antibody performance:
Mammalian species show high sequence homology (typically >90% with human CCNI)
Non-mammalian vertebrates show more divergence
Conservation is highest in functional domains like the cyclin box
When working with new species:
Perform comparative Western blots with known positive controls
Include relevant negative controls
Test multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Optimize protocols for each species (antibody concentration, incubation time)
Understanding these cross-species considerations is essential for comparative studies and when translating findings between model systems and human applications.
Investigating CCNI's subcellular localization, primarily in the nucleus , requires specialized methodological approaches:
For precise subcellular localization:
Cell preparation:
Fixation: 4% paraformaldehyde (10 minutes at room temperature)
Permeabilization: 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 (5-10 minutes)
Blocking: 1-5% BSA in PBS (30-60 minutes)
Antibody application:
Imaging parameters:
Confocal microscopy for precise colocalization
Z-stack acquisition for 3D localization analysis
Multi-channel acquisition for colocalization studies
For quantitative assessment of CCNI distribution:
Subcellular fractionation protocol:
Separate nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions
Confirm fraction purity with markers (Lamin B for nuclear, GAPDH for cytoplasmic)
Analyze fractions by Western blotting with CCNI antibodies
Quantitative analysis:
Densitometric quantification of CCNI in each fraction
Normalization to fraction-specific loading controls
Calculation of nuclear/cytoplasmic distribution ratios
For understanding CCNI relationship with nuclear structures:
Dual immunofluorescence with markers for:
Nuclear speckles (SC35)
Nucleoli (Fibrillarin)
Chromatin states (Histone modifications)
Nuclear matrix (Lamin proteins)
Colocalization analysis:
Calculate Pearson's or Mander's coefficients
Perform line scan analysis across nuclear structures
Implement 3D rendering for spatial relationship analysis
These methodological approaches provide complementary information about CCNI localization, offering insights into its potential nuclear functions.
CCNI is known to be involved in spermatogenesis , and antibody-based approaches enable detailed investigation of this function:
Track CCNI expression throughout spermatogenesis:
Immunohistochemistry approach:
Western blot analysis:
Compare CCNI levels across developmental timepoints
Fractionate testicular cells to analyze specific populations
Correlate with known spermatogenesis markers
Identify which spermatogenic cells express CCNI:
Dual immunofluorescence with cell-specific markers:
Spermatogonia: PLZF, OCT4
Spermatocytes: SYCP3, γH2AX
Spermatids: PRM1, TNP1
High-resolution imaging:
Confocal microscopy for precise colocalization
Super-resolution techniques for detailed subcellular distribution
Assess CCNI's functional significance in spermatogenesis:
In vitro approaches:
CCNI knockdown in spermatogenic cell cultures
Assessment of meiotic progression
Evaluation of chromatin dynamics and DNA damage repair
Protein interaction networks:
Co-immunoprecipitation with CCNI antibodies in testicular lysates
Identification of testis-specific binding partners
Validation of interactions with proximity ligation assays
Understand evolutionary conservation of CCNI function:
Cross-species comparison:
Analyze CCNI expression and function across rodent and human samples
Correlate with known fertility phenotypes
Integrate with genomic data from infertility studies
These methodological approaches provide comprehensive insights into CCNI's specific role in the complex process of spermatogenesis.
Understanding CCNI's functional networks requires comprehensive investigation of its protein-protein interactions:
Standard Co-IP protocol:
Lyse cells in non-denaturing buffer to preserve protein complexes
Immunoprecipitate CCNI using 2-5 μg antibody per mg protein lysate
Analyze co-precipitated proteins by Western blot or mass spectrometry
Validate with reciprocal IP using antibodies against identified partners
Crosslinking-assisted Co-IP:
Implement mild crosslinking (0.5-1% formaldehyde, 10 minutes)
Stabilize transient interactions before lysis
Perform IP with CCNI antibodies and analyze complexes
Reverse crosslinks before final analysis
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):
Incubate fixed cells with CCNI antibody and partner protein antibody
Apply species-specific PLA probes with oligonucleotides
Perform rolling circle amplification where probes are in proximity (<40 nm)
Visualize discrete interaction sites as fluorescent spots
Advanced microscopy approaches:
FRET analysis with labeled antibody fragments
Live-cell imaging with proximity sensors
Super-resolution microscopy for detailed interaction mapping
Identify critical binding regions:
Use antibodies targeting specific CCNI domains
Compare immunoprecipitation profiles with various antibodies
Map interaction interfaces through epitope competition experiments
Understand dynamic interaction networks:
Map CCNI interactome changes following:
Cell cycle progression
Differentiation signals
Stress conditions
Quantify interaction dynamics through sequential co-IPs
These methods provide complementary information about CCNI's protein interaction network, offering insights into its functional role in cellular processes.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) often regulate protein function, and antibody-based approaches enable their investigation in CCNI:
Phospho-detection strategies:
Immunoprecipitate CCNI and probe with phospho-specific antibodies
Perform lambda phosphatase treatment as control
Use Phos-tag™ gels to detect mobility shifts in phosphorylated CCNI
Site-specific phosphorylation:
Develop antibodies against predicted phosphorylation sites
Validate with phosphomimetic and phospho-null mutants
Map phosphorylation dynamics across cellular conditions
Modified CCNI detection:
Immunoprecipitate CCNI under denaturing conditions
Probe with ubiquitin-specific antibodies
Detect characteristic ladder pattern of ubiquitinated proteins
Stability assessment:
Treat cells with proteasome inhibitors
Monitor CCNI levels by Western blotting
Correlate ubiquitination status with protein stability
Acetylation assessment:
Immunoprecipitate CCNI and probe with acetyl-lysine antibodies
Treat cells with HDAC inhibitors to enhance acetylation signals
Map acetylation sites through mass spectrometry after immunopurification
SUMOylation analysis:
Immunoprecipitate CCNI under denaturing conditions
Probe with SUMO-specific antibodies
Identify SUMO-modified forms through mobility shift detection
Link modifications to functional outcomes:
Correlate PTM status with CCNI localization
Assess protein-protein interaction dependencies on PTMs
Evaluate protein stability and turnover relative to modification status
| PTM Type | Critical Reagents | Special Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Phosphorylation | Phosphatase inhibitors, Phos-tag™ gels | Labile modifications, preserve during lysis |
| Ubiquitination | Proteasome inhibitors, denaturing lysis | Often substoichiometric, enrichment needed |
| Acetylation | HDAC inhibitors, acetyl-lysine antibodies | Can be tissue-specific, context-dependent |
| SUMOylation | SUMO-specific antibodies, SUMO protease inhibitors | Often difficult to detect, specialized protocols needed |
These approaches provide comprehensive analysis of CCNI post-translational modifications and their functional significance.
While the search results don't specifically mention CCNI's role in the immune system, researchers can adapt antibody-based approaches to investigate potential immune functions:
Tissue expression profiling:
Immune cell-type profiling:
Perform flow cytometry with CCNI antibodies on immune cell populations
Analyze expression in T cells, B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells
Sort cells based on CCNI expression for functional characterization
Activation-dependent expression:
Stimulate immune cells with antigens, cytokines, or pathogens
Monitor CCNI expression changes by Western blot
Correlate with activation markers and functional outcomes
Knockdown/knockout approaches:
Deplete CCNI in immune cells using siRNA or CRISPR
Assess effects on proliferation, cytokine production, differentiation
Perform immune function assays (e.g., T cell proliferation, antibody production)
Co-immunoprecipitation studies:
Identify CCNI interactions with immune signaling components
Map dynamic changes in protein complexes during immune activation
Validate functional significance through targeted disruption
Phosphorylation analysis:
Examine CCNI phosphorylation status during immune signaling
Identify responsible kinases in immune pathways
Correlate modifications with functional outcomes
This methodological framework provides a comprehensive approach to investigating CCNI's potential roles in immune system function, which remains an open area for research investigation.