CD226, also known as DNAM-1 (DNAX accessory molecule-1), is a transmembrane glycoprotein with a molecular weight of approximately 38.6 kDa (canonical form consists of 336 amino acid residues). It is primarily localized in the cell membrane and undergoes post-translational modifications, particularly glycosylation, which can increase its apparent molecular weight to approximately 67 kDa when detected in Western blots . CD226 has two extracellular domains, both of which are necessary for optimal functional interaction with its ligands, although one domain can bind with lower affinity in solid binding assays .
CD226 is predominantly expressed on:
Peripheral blood T-lymphocytes
Natural killer (NK) cells
B cells
Platelets
Functionally, CD226 plays crucial roles in:
Intercellular adhesion
Lymphocyte signaling
Cytotoxicity and lymphokine secretion by CTLs and NK cells
Regulating the proinflammatory (Th1/Th17) and anti-inflammatory (Th2) balance in immune responses
When searching the literature, researchers should be aware of these alternative designations for CD226:
CD226 antibodies are employed in multiple research techniques, with the most common applications being:
Flow cytometry - for characterizing CD226 expression on various immune cell populations
Western blotting - for detecting CD226 protein in cell or tissue lysates
Immunohistochemistry - for examining CD226 expression in tissue sections
ELISA - for detecting soluble CD226 in biological fluids
Functional studies - including blocking CD226 signaling in immunological assays
When using CD226 antibodies for flow cytometry:
Fresh samples are preferable as CD226 expression may be affected by extended storage
CD226 antibodies can detect both exogenous transfected CD226 on cell surfaces and natural CD226 on immune cells like platelets and lymphocytes
Multi-parameter panels should include markers for specific immune cell subsets (e.g., CD3, CD4, CD19) to properly identify CD226-expressing populations
Consider fixation protocols carefully as some may affect CD226 epitope accessibility
Based on published methodologies, a sandwich ELISA system for soluble CD226 can be established by:
Coating ELISA plates with purified anti-CD226 mAbs (e.g., mA1.3 in mouse studies)
Using a second anti-CD226 mAb (e.g., mA1.1) labeled with horseradish peroxidase or biotin as the detection antibody
Optimizing antibody concentrations to achieve detection sensitivities of 0.25-3.0 ng/mL
This approach has been successfully used to measure soluble CD226 levels in plasma from mouse models of disease, revealing that soluble CD226 levels decreased in LPS-induced sepsis compared to normal controls .
CD226 antibodies have become valuable tools in studying autoimmune diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Key applications include:
Quantifying CD226+ B cell populations, which are significantly elevated in SLE patients compared to healthy controls
Correlating CD226+ B cell percentages with disease activity metrics:
SLEDAI-2K scores (ρ = 0.39, P = 0.006)
Anti-dsDNA antibody titers (ρ = 0.45, P = 0.001)
Complement levels (negatively correlated with C3: ρ = -0.35, P = 0.015 and C4: ρ = -0.38, P = 0.008)
Monitoring CD226+ B cells as potential biomarkers for disease prognosis, as lower baseline percentages of CD226+ B cells correlate with better outcomes (Lupus Low Disease Activity State) after 12 months of treatment
In transplantation research, CD226 antibodies are used both as analytical tools and potential therapeutic agents:
As analytical tools:
Monitoring CD226 expression on lymphocyte populations during transplant rejection
Analyzing the balance between effector and regulatory T cells
As experimental therapeutic agents:
Anti-CD226 monoclonal antibodies promote expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in mixed lymphocyte cultures
Treatment with CD226 mAbs inhibits the cytotoxicity of effector cells
In allogeneic skin transplant mouse models, administration of CD226 mAbs reduces inflammation and prolongs allograft survival by increasing Treg frequency
CD226 antibodies have revealed differential expression patterns across T cell subsets:
Th1 cells:
CD226 strongly promotes Th1 differentiation
Enhances IFN-γ production in naive T cells
CD226 knockdown results in decreased T-bet and IFN-γ expression
Th2 cells:
CD226 and its ligand CD155 are downregulated on Th2-polarized naive T cells
IL-13 production does not correlate with CD226 expression
Th17 cells:
CD226 and CD155 are highly expressed under Th17-polarizing conditions
Most IL-17-producing cells express high levels of CD226
These findings establish CD226 as an important regulator of the proinflammatory (Th1/Th17) versus anti-inflammatory (Th2) balance in immune responses .
When validating CD226 antibodies, researchers should include:
Positive controls:
Cell lines with confirmed high CD226 expression (e.g., activated T cells, NK cells)
Recombinant CD226 protein for Western blots and ELISA
Negative controls:
CD226 knockout (CD226 KO) cells or tissues
Isotype control antibodies matched to the CD226 antibody class and species
Primary antibody omission controls
Validation approaches:
To address potential cross-reactivity:
Verification strategies:
Test antibodies on CD226 knockout samples
Compare results across multiple antibody clones targeting different CD226 epitopes
Perform peptide competition assays with specific CD226 peptides
Species considerations:
Verify specificity when working across species, as CD226 gene orthologs have been reported in mouse, rat, bovine, zebrafish, chimpanzee, and chicken
Be aware that anti-human CD226 antibodies may not recognize mouse CD226 and vice versa
Experimental design:
When faced with contradictory data regarding CD226 expression:
Technical considerations:
Evaluate antibody clone differences (some epitopes may be masked in certain contexts)
Review cell preparation techniques (enzymatic dissociation may cleave surface CD226)
Consider fixation and permeabilization effects on epitope accessibility
Biological variables:
Account for activation-dependent changes in CD226 expression
Consider splice variants or post-translational modifications that may affect antibody binding
Evaluate the impact of the microenvironment on CD226 expression
Complementary approaches:
The CD226-TIGIT axis represents an important immune checkpoint pathway:
Interaction dynamics:
CD226 and TIGIT both bind to CD112 and CD155 ligands
TIGIT inhibits the interaction between CD155 and CD226
CD226 delivers activating signals while TIGIT provides inhibitory signals
Research applications:
Blocking antibodies against CD226 can be used to study how disrupting CD226-CD155 interactions affects T cell and NK cell functions
Dual staining with anti-CD226 and anti-TIGIT antibodies helps analyze the balance between activating and inhibitory signals
CD226 antibodies can be used alongside TIGIT-Ig fusion proteins to study their therapeutic potential in autoimmune disease models
CD226 antibodies show promise for developing clinical biomarkers:
In SLE:
CD226+ B cells correlate with disease activity metrics (SLEDAI-2K scores, anti-dsDNA antibody titers)
Baseline percentages of CD226+ B cells predict disease outcomes at 12 months
CD226+ B cells may serve as markers for renal involvement and predict complete renal remission
In transplantation:
Monitoring CD226 expression patterns may help predict rejection risk
CD226 expression on specific lymphocyte subsets might serve as a biomarker for immunosuppression efficacy
Methodological considerations:
Enhancing specificity for CD226 detection requires:
Sample preparation optimization:
Fresh isolation of cells to preserve CD226 epitopes
Careful selection of enzymatic dissociation methods to avoid cleaving surface CD226
Optimized fixation protocols that maintain epitope integrity
Advanced detection approaches:
Dual staining with antibodies targeting different CD226 epitopes
Combining surface and intracellular staining to detect total CD226 pools
Using proximity ligation assays to verify CD226-ligand interactions in situ
Data analysis refinement:
For functional blocking of CD226:
Antibody-based approaches:
Select anti-CD226 mAbs demonstrated to block CD226-CD155 interactions
Determine optimal antibody concentrations through titration experiments
Consider using F(ab')2 fragments to avoid Fc-mediated effects
Alternative blocking strategies:
Recombinant soluble CD155 to compete with cell-bound CD155 for CD226 binding
Both extracellular domains of CD226 are required for optimal functional interaction with CD155, so truncated recombinant proteins containing both domains may be effective competitors
siRNA or CRISPR-based knockdown/knockout of CD226 for long-term functional studies
Validation of blocking efficacy: