CDF3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

CDF3 Antibody Overview

CDF3 is a Dof-type zinc finger domain-containing protein identified in Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress). It shares identity with H-protein promoter binding factor-2a (GI:3386546) and interacts with circadian clock-associated proteins LKP2 and FKF1. Despite these interactions, overexpression of CDF3 does not alter flowering time under short- or long-day conditions, suggesting regulatory roles beyond photoperiodic control .

Protein Structure

  • Domain: Contains a Dof-type zinc finger motif critical for DNA binding and protein interactions.

  • Homology: Structurally related to other plant Dof proteins involved in growth and stress responses .

Functional Insights

  • Interactions: Binds LKP2 (a kelch-repeat F-box protein) and FKF1 (a flavin-binding protein), which are key regulators of circadian rhythms and flowering time.

  • Role in Arabidopsis: Unlike its homologs (e.g., CDF1/CDF2), CDF3 does not directly influence flowering pathways, hinting at niche regulatory functions .

Research Limitations and Future Directions

Current understanding of CDF3 is limited to Arabidopsis models, with no clinical or mammalian studies reported. Key gaps include:

  • Mechanistic Pathways: How CDF3 modulates transcriptional networks despite lacking flowering-time effects.

  • Ecological Roles: Potential roles in stress adaptation or developmental regulation beyond circadian systems.

Comparative Context: CDF3 vs. CD3 Antibodies

While CDF3 is plant-specific, CD3 antibodies (discussed in other sources[1–7]) target the T-cell co-receptor CD3 in humans, highlighting the importance of precise terminology in antibody research.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
CDF3 antibody; DOF3.3 antibody; HPPBF-2A antibody; At3g47500 antibody; F1P2.50Cyclic dof factor 3 antibody; Dof zinc finger protein DOF3.3 antibody; AtDOF3.3 antibody; H-protein promoter-binding factor 2a antibody
Target Names
CDF3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
CDF3 is a transcription factor that exhibits specific binding to a 5'-AA[AG]G-3' consensus core sequence. It plays a crucial role in regulating the photoperiodic flowering response and acts as a transcriptional repressor of 'CONSTANS' expression.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. CDF3 has a multifaceted role, influencing both flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance. This multifaceted function is partly attributed to its control over the CBF/DREB2A-CRT/DRE and ZAT10/12 modules. PMID: 28044345
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G47500

STRING: 3702.AT3G47500.1

UniGene: At.519

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in the vasculature of cotyledons and hypocotyls, leaves and roots.

Q&A

What is CDF3 and why is it significant for plant research?

CDF3 is a Dof-type zinc finger domain-containing protein that is identical to H-protein promoter binding factor-2a (GI:3386546) found in Arabidopsis thaliana . Its significance lies in its interactions with LKP2 and FKF1 proteins, which are involved in circadian rhythm and flowering time regulation pathways . Despite these interactions, research has shown that overexpression of CDF3 does not change flowering time under either short or long day conditions, making it an interesting subject for investigating regulatory mechanisms in plants .

How does the molecular structure of CDF3 influence antibody design and specificity?

The CDF3 protein contains a Dof-type zinc finger domain which serves as a key antigenic determinant for antibody development . When designing CDF3 antibodies, researchers must consider the protein's structural features to ensure that the epitopes selected are accessible and not obscured by protein folding. Similarly to other antibody development strategies, epitope selection should target regions that are unique to CDF3 to prevent cross-reactivity with other Dof-type proteins. This approach mirrors strategies used in developing specific antibodies for other target proteins, where careful epitope mapping is essential for ensuring specificity .

What are the critical differences between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for CDF3 research?

For CDF3 research, the choice between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies depends on experimental goals:

Antibody TypeAdvantages for CDF3 ResearchLimitationsBest Applications
PolyclonalRecognizes multiple epitopes on CDF3, providing stronger signalMay have higher batch-to-batch variabilityPreliminary studies, Western blotting
MonoclonalConsistent specificity, reduced backgroundRecognizes only a single epitope, potentially limiting detectionCo-immunoprecipitation studies of CDF3 with interaction partners LKP2 and FKF1

This distinction parallels the considerations in antibody selection for other research targets, where specificity requirements must be balanced with detection sensitivity .

What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for maintaining CDF3 antibody efficacy?

CDF3 antibodies, like the one offered by PhytoAB, are typically supplied in lyophilized form and require careful handling to maintain efficacy . For optimal storage:

  • Use a manual defrost freezer to avoid temperature fluctuations

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can denature the antibody

  • Upon receipt of shipped antibody (typically at 4°C), immediately transfer to recommended storage temperature

  • When reconstituting lyophilized antibody, use sterile techniques and appropriate buffer solutions

These storage principles align with best practices for preserving antibody functionality across different antibody types .

How can I validate the specificity of a CDF3 antibody before experimental use?

Validation of CDF3 antibody specificity can be approached through several complementary methods:

  • Western blot analysis using:

    • Wild-type Arabidopsis extracts (positive control)

    • CDF3 knockout/knockdown plant tissues (negative control)

    • Recombinant CDF3 protein (positive control)

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm binding to the intended target

  • Pre-absorption tests with purified CDF3 antigen to demonstrate specificity

Similar validation approaches have been successfully employed for antibodies targeting other proteins, providing a framework for CDF3 antibody validation .

How can CDF3 antibodies be optimized for studying protein-protein interactions with LKP2 and FKF1?

To effectively study CDF3's interactions with LKP2 and FKF1, researchers should consider:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) optimization:

    • Use gentle lysis buffers to preserve protein complexes

    • Consider crosslinking agents to stabilize transient interactions

    • Optimize antibody-to-lysate ratios to prevent oversaturation

  • Proximity ligation assays:

    • Combine CDF3 antibodies with LKP2/FKF1 antibodies for in situ visualization of interactions

    • Include appropriate controls such as single antibody controls

  • Bimolecular complementation assays as complementary approaches

These methodologies parallel approaches used successfully in characterizing other protein-protein interactions in plant systems and could be adapted for CDF3 interaction studies .

What strategies can be employed to investigate why CDF3 overexpression doesn't affect flowering time despite its interaction with flowering regulators?

This apparent contradiction presents an interesting research question that can be approached using CDF3 antibodies in several ways:

  • Investigate post-translational modifications that may regulate CDF3 activity:

    • Use phospho-specific antibodies if phosphorylation sites are known

    • Employ CDF3 antibodies for immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify modifications

  • Examine subcellular localization changes under different conditions:

    • Use immunofluorescence microscopy with CDF3 antibodies to track localization

    • Compare wild-type vs. overexpression lines under different day-length conditions

  • Study temporal dynamics of interactions:

    • Time-course experiments using CDF3 antibodies for Co-IP at different time points

    • Correlate with expression patterns of downstream genes

Similar methodological approaches have been applied to resolve contradictory findings in other plant protein studies .

What are common issues in Western blotting with CDF3 antibodies and how can they be resolved?

When using CDF3 antibodies for Western blotting, researchers might encounter several challenges:

IssuePossible CausesSolutions
Weak signalInsufficient protein, degraded antibodyIncrease protein loading, optimize antibody concentration, verify antibody storage conditions
Multiple bandsCross-reactivity, degradation productsInclude blocking peptides, optimize washing steps, use fresher samples
High backgroundNon-specific binding, insufficient blockingIncrease blocking time, try different blocking agents, optimize antibody dilution
No signalEpitope masking, denaturation issuesTry different extraction buffers, adjust reducing conditions

These troubleshooting approaches apply to many antibody-based experiments and can be adapted specifically for CDF3 detection .

How should researchers interpret contradictory results between different detection methods using CDF3 antibodies?

When faced with contradictory results:

  • Consider epitope accessibility differences between methods:

    • Western blotting uses denatured proteins

    • Immunoprecipitation and immunohistochemistry use native conformations

  • Validate with orthogonal approaches:

    • Complement antibody-based methods with genetic approaches (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9)

    • Use tagged CDF3 constructs as alternative detection methods

  • Examine experimental conditions that might affect CDF3 protein:

    • Time of day (for circadian-regulated proteins)

    • Developmental stage

    • Environmental conditions

This systematic approach to resolving contradictions is similar to strategies used in other complex antibody-based research scenarios .

How can high-throughput antibody repertoire analysis techniques be applied to improve CDF3 antibody development?

Recent advances in antibody repertoire analysis provide opportunities for enhanced CDF3 antibody development:

  • Next-generation sequencing of antibody variable regions can identify candidates with optimal binding properties to CDF3 epitopes

  • Phage display libraries can be screened against multiple CDF3 epitopes simultaneously to develop panels of antibodies with complementary binding properties

  • Computational analysis of CDR-H3 loops can predict binding affinity and specificity for CDF3 targets

These advanced techniques represent the cutting edge of antibody development and can significantly improve the quality and specificity of research-grade CDF3 antibodies.

What considerations are important when designing bispecific antibodies incorporating CDF3 recognition?

For researchers interested in developing bispecific antibodies that include CDF3 targeting:

  • Format selection is critical:

    • The Fabsc format may offer advantages over bssc format in terms of:

      • Reduced aggregation tendency

      • Better preservation of binding affinity

      • Higher production yields in expression systems

  • Epitope selection must consider:

    • Accessibility of the CDF3 epitope in native conditions

    • Potential steric hindrance between the binding domains

    • Distance constraints between epitopes for effective dual binding

  • Validation strategies should include:

    • Binding assays to confirm retention of affinity for both targets

    • Functional assays to verify biological activity

These considerations parallel those important for developing other bispecific antibodies in research applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.