CDKF-4 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
CDKF-4 antibody; Os02g0700600 antibody; LOC_Os02g47220 antibody; OJ1111_E07.13-1 antibody; OsJ_08052 antibody; P0459B01.42-1Cyclin-dependent kinase F-4 antibody; CDKF;4 antibody; EC 2.7.11.22 antibody; EC 2.7.11.23 antibody; Serine/threonine-protein kinase MHK-like protein 2 antibody
Target Names
CDKF-4
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is CDKF-4 and what role does it play in plant cell cycle regulation?

CDKF-4 (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase F-4) is a protein kinase involved in cell cycle regulation in plants, particularly in rice (Oryza sativa subsp. japonica). It belongs to the broader family of cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs) that play key roles in regulating the eukaryotic cell cycle.

CDKs function as master integrators that couple mitogenic/oncogenic signaling with the cell division cycle . In plants, CDKs are critical for coordinating cell division and differentiation processes during development. While much research has focused on CDK genes like cdc2Os1, cdc2Os2, cdc2Os3, and R2 in rice , CDKF-4 represents a distinct member of this family with specialized functions.

Unlike some CDKs that show uniform expression throughout dividing regions (such as cdc2Os1, cdc2Os2, and R2), certain CDKs like cdc2Os3 show phase-specific expression patterns . Understanding CDKF-4's specific expression pattern and activation mechanisms provides insights into specialized aspects of the plant cell cycle regulation.

What are the key characteristics and specifications of CDKF-4 Antibody?

CDKF-4 Antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA761614XA01OFG) is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits against recombinant Oryza sativa subsp. japonica (Rice) CDKF-4 protein . Its key characteristics include:

ParameterSpecification
TypePolyclonal Antibody
Host SpeciesRabbit
Target SpeciesOryza sativa subsp. japonica (Rice)
ImmunogenRecombinant Oryza sativa subsp. japonica CDKF-4 protein
ApplicationsELISA, Western Blot (WB)
FormLiquid
ConjugationNon-conjugated
Storage Buffer0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Purification MethodAntigen Affinity Purified
Uniprot NumberQ6Z8C8
Storage Conditions-20°C or -80°C; avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

This antibody has been designed specifically for detecting CDKF-4 protein in rice samples and has been validated for ELISA and Western Blot applications .

How should researchers properly validate CDKF-4 Antibody for experimental use?

Proper validation of CDKF-4 Antibody is critical for ensuring experimental reproducibility. Following the lessons from the "antibody characterization crisis" , researchers should implement these validation steps:

Primary Validation Steps:

  • Positive and Negative Controls: Include wild-type rice samples (positive control) and CDKF-4 knockout or knockdown samples (negative control) when available.

  • Specificity Testing: Test the antibody against recombinant CDKF-4 protein and related CDK proteins to confirm specificity.

  • Application-Specific Validation:

    • For Western Blot: Confirm single band at expected molecular weight (~35-40 kDa, depending on modifications)

    • For ELISA: Establish standard curves using purified CDKF-4 protein

    • For Immunohistochemistry: Compare staining patterns with known expression patterns

Advanced Validation:
4. Peptide Competition Assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm signal specificity.

  • Orthogonal Method Verification: Compare results with other detection methods like mass spectrometry or RNA expression data.

As noted in recent scientific literature, "~50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet even basic standards for characterization" , making proper validation an essential step rather than an optional one.

What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for CDKF-4 Antibody?

To maintain CDKF-4 Antibody integrity and performance over time, follow these evidence-based storage and handling guidelines:

Storage Conditions:

  • Upon receipt, store at -20°C or -80°C

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can degrade antibody performance

  • For short-term use (within one month), storage at 2-8°C under sterile conditions after reconstitution is acceptable (based on general antibody handling principles similar to other antibodies)

Handling Recommendations:

  • Aliquot the antibody upon first thaw to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • When removing from freezer, thaw on ice

  • Centrifuge briefly before opening the vial to collect solution at the bottom

  • Handle using sterile technique when preparing working dilutions

  • Working dilutions should be prepared fresh before use

Stability Information:
Following reconstitution practices from similar antibodies, expect:

  • 12 months stability at -20°C to -70°C as supplied

  • 1 month at 2-8°C under sterile conditions after reconstitution

  • 6 months at -20°C to -70°C under sterile conditions after reconstitution

How can researchers optimize Western Blot protocols for CDKF-4 Antibody?

Optimizing Western Blot protocols for CDKF-4 Antibody requires careful consideration of several parameters:

Sample Preparation:

  • Extract proteins using a plant-specific extraction buffer containing:

    • 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)

    • 150 mM NaCl

    • 1% Triton X-100

    • 0.5% sodium deoxycholate

    • Protease inhibitor cocktail

    • Phosphatase inhibitors (if studying phosphorylation states)

  • Homogenize rice tissue samples thoroughly and clarify by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C

Western Blot Protocol Optimization:

  • Protein Loading: 20-50 μg total protein per lane

  • Gel Percentage: 10-12% polyacrylamide gel

  • Transfer Conditions:

    • Semi-dry transfer: 15V for 60 minutes, or

    • Wet transfer: 100V for 60 minutes at 4°C

  • Blocking: 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature

  • Primary Antibody:

    • Dilution: 1:500 to 1:2000 (optimize for each lot)

    • Incubation: Overnight at 4°C

  • Secondary Antibody:

    • Anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibody (1:5000)

    • Incubation: 1 hour at room temperature

  • Detection: Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL)

Troubleshooting Tips:

  • If high background occurs, increase blocking time or try 3% BSA instead of milk

  • If signal is weak, increase antibody concentration or extend incubation time

  • If multiple bands appear, increase wash steps and optimize antibody dilution

This protocol is based on established methods for plant CDK detection similar to those used in studies of rice CDK expression .

What approaches are recommended for investigating CDKF-4 expression patterns across different plant tissues?

Investigating CDKF-4 expression patterns requires a multi-faceted approach:

In Situ Hybridization for Transcript Detection:

  • Prepare tissue sections from root apices, shoot meristems, and other tissues of interest

  • Design RNA probes specific to CDKF-4 mRNA

  • Hybridize probes to fixed tissue sections

  • Visualize using colorimetric or fluorescent detection methods

This approach has been successfully used for investigating expression patterns of rice CDK genes, revealing that some CDKs (like cdc2Os1 and cdc2Os2) are expressed uniformly in dividing regions while others (like cdc2Os3) show patchy distributions corresponding to specific cell cycle phases .

Immunohistochemistry for Protein Localization:

  • Fix plant tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde

  • Embed in paraffin and prepare thin sections (5-10 μm)

  • Perform antigen retrieval if necessary

  • Block with appropriate blocking solution

  • Incubate with CDKF-4 Antibody (1:100 to 1:500 dilution)

  • Apply secondary antibody (fluorescent or HRP-conjugated)

  • Counterstain nuclei with DAPI

  • Visualize using confocal microscopy

Quantitative Analysis Recommendations:

  • Use double-labeling with cell cycle markers to correlate CDKF-4 expression with cell cycle phases

  • Implement image analysis software to quantify expression levels across different tissues

  • Consider fluorescence intensity measurements for semi-quantitative comparisons

How can CDKF-4 Antibody be used to study phosphorylation states and activation mechanisms?

Studying CDKF-4 phosphorylation states requires specialized techniques similar to those developed for human CDK4:

2D Gel Electrophoresis Approach:

  • Separate protein extracts first by isoelectric focusing, then by SDS-PAGE

  • Transfer to membrane and probe with CDKF-4 Antibody

  • Identify phosphorylated versus non-phosphorylated forms based on isoelectric point shifts

While this technique has been described as "tedious" , it remains one of the most effective methods for studying phosphorylation states.

Phospho-specific Detection Methods:
Drawing from human CDK4 research, where antibodies specific to T172-phosphorylated CDK4 have been developed , researchers might:

  • Use commercial phospho-Ser/Thr antibodies in combination with CDKF-4 immunoprecipitation

  • Develop custom phospho-specific antibodies for CDKF-4

  • Use mass spectrometry to map phosphorylation sites after immunoprecipitation

In Vitro Kinase Assays:

  • Immunoprecipitate CDKF-4 from plant extracts using CDKF-4 Antibody

  • Incubate with recombinant substrates and [γ-32P]ATP

  • Analyze phosphorylation by autoradiography or phosphor imaging

Tip: When studying phosphorylation states, always include phosphatase inhibitors (sodium fluoride, sodium orthovanadate, β-glycerophosphate) in extraction buffers to preserve in vivo phosphorylation status.

What are the current methodological challenges in CDKF-4 research and how might they be addressed?

Current Challenges and Solutions in CDKF-4 Research:

  • Antibody Specificity Issues

    • Challenge: Ensuring specific detection of CDKF-4 without cross-reactivity to related CDKs

    • Solution: Implement rigorous validation using knockout controls and peptide competition assays as recommended in antibody characterization initiatives

  • Detection of Low-Abundance Phosphorylated Forms

    • Challenge: Phosphorylated CDKF-4 may exist in small quantities

    • Solution: Employ enrichment techniques such as phosphopeptide enrichment prior to analysis or develop highly sensitive ELISA methods similar to those created for phospho-CDK4

  • Temporal Resolution of Cell Cycle-Dependent Activities

    • Challenge: Capturing dynamic changes in CDKF-4 activity during cell cycle progression

    • Solution: Implement cell synchronization protocols combined with time-course sampling, similar to approaches used for other plant CDKs

  • Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns

    • Challenge: Distinguishing expression patterns in different plant tissues

    • Solution: Combine in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry for multi-level analysis, as demonstrated in rice CDK research

  • Antibody Reproducibility Between Lots

    • Challenge: Maintaining consistent antibody performance across different production batches

    • Solution: Consider transitioning to recombinant antibody technologies that offer improved reproducibility, following the model of initiatives like NeuroMab

How does CDKF-4 compare functionally to other plant CDKs and what research methods best highlight these differences?

Comparative Analysis of Plant CDKs:

Based on studies of rice CDKs, we can draw methodological approaches for comparing CDKF-4 with other plant CDKs:

Expression Pattern Analysis:
Rice CDK studies have shown distinct expression patterns - some CDKs (cdc2Os1, cdc2Os2, R2) are expressed uniformly throughout dividing tissues, while others (cdc2Os3) show cell cycle phase-specific expression . Similar methodologies can reveal CDKF-4's unique expression profile:

  • Perform in situ hybridization on serial tissue sections

  • Counter-stain with cell cycle markers (e.g., histone H4 for S-phase)

  • Document expression patterns across different developmental stages

Functional Classification Methods:
Rice CDKs have been classified based on conserved motifs (PSTAIRE vs. non-PSTAIRE) . To determine CDKF-4's classification:

  • Conduct sequence analysis focusing on key regulatory motifs

  • Perform phylogenetic analysis to position CDKF-4 within the CDK family tree

  • Correlate expression patterns with structural classification

Biochemical Activity Comparison:
To compare CDKF-4's enzymatic properties with other CDKs:

  • Conduct parallel immunoprecipitation kinase assays

  • Compare substrate preferences using recombinant substrates

  • Analyze inhibitor sensitivity profiles

Genetic Functional Analysis:
To differentiate CDKF-4's biological role:

  • Generate knockout/knockdown lines for comparative phenotypic analysis

  • Perform complementation studies to test functional overlap

  • Conduct transcriptome analysis of mutant lines

The research approach should integrate these methods to build a comprehensive understanding of CDKF-4's unique properties compared to other plant CDKs.

What control experiments are essential when using CDKF-4 Antibody in research studies?

Proper controls are crucial for antibody-based experiments, as highlighted by the antibody reproducibility crisis in scientific research . For CDKF-4 Antibody, implement these essential controls:

Western Blot Controls:

  • Positive Control: Extract from tissues known to express CDKF-4

  • Negative Control: Extract from:

    • CDKF-4 knockout/knockdown plants

    • Tissues where CDKF-4 is not expressed

  • Loading Control: Probe for housekeeping proteins (e.g., actin, tubulin)

  • Antibody Controls:

    • Primary antibody omission

    • Secondary antibody only

    • Pre-immune serum (for polyclonal antibodies)

    • Blocking peptide competition

Immunoprecipitation Controls:

  • Input Sample: Run a portion of pre-IP lysate

  • IgG Control: Perform parallel IP with non-specific IgG

  • Bead-Only Control: Process sample without antibody

  • Known Interactor: Confirm co-IP of expected interaction partners

Immunohistochemistry Controls:

  • Positive and Negative Tissue Controls

  • Antibody Controls (as listed for Western blot)

  • Autofluorescence Control: Unstained section to assess background

  • Counterstain Control: Nuclear stain to facilitate localization

ELISA Controls:

  • Standard Curve: Using recombinant CDKF-4 protein

  • Blank Wells: Buffer only

  • Cross-Reactivity Controls: Related CDK proteins

Implementing these controls is non-negotiable for generating reliable and reproducible data with CDKF-4 Antibody.

How can researchers effectively use CDKF-4 Antibody in combination with other techniques to study protein-protein interactions?

Investigating CDKF-4 protein interactions requires integrating antibody-based methods with complementary techniques:

Immunoprecipitation-Based Methods:

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Lyse plant tissues in non-denaturing buffer

    • Immunoprecipitate CDKF-4 using the antibody

    • Analyze co-precipitated proteins by Western blot or mass spectrometry

    Similar approaches with human CDK4 have revealed interactions with cyclins, CDK inhibitors (p21, p27), and regulatory proteins .

  • Proximity-Dependent Biotin Labeling (BioID):

    • Generate fusion construct of CDKF-4 with BirA* biotin ligase

    • Express in plant cells and provide biotin

    • Purify biotinylated proteins using streptavidin

    • Identify interactors by mass spectrometry

In Situ Interaction Analysis:

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):

    • Use CDKF-4 Antibody alongside antibodies for potential interactors

    • Apply PLA protocol to visualize interactions as fluorescent spots

    • Quantify interactions in different cell types/conditions

  • Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):

    • Label CDKF-4 Antibody with donor fluorophore

    • Label antibody against potential interactor with acceptor fluorophore

    • Measure energy transfer in fixed cells

Validation and Characterization of Interactions:

  • Yeast Two-Hybrid: Confirm direct interactions

  • GST Pull-Down: Validate interactions using recombinant proteins

  • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): Visualize interactions in planta

For studying CDKF-4 interactions with cell cycle regulators, researchers might apply methods similar to those used to study interactions between phosphorylated human CDK4 and regulatory proteins like p21 and p27 .

What considerations should researchers take into account when designing experiments to study CDKF-4 in stress response pathways?

When investigating CDKF-4's role in plant stress responses, researchers should consider:

Experimental Design Principles:

  • Stress Treatment Standardization:

    • Define precise stress parameters (intensity, duration, application method)

    • Include recovery periods to capture dynamic responses

    • Apply multiple stress types (drought, salt, temperature, pathogen) to identify specific vs. general responses

  • Temporal Resolution:

    • Design time-course experiments (minutes to days)

    • Sample at biologically relevant timepoints based on stress physiology

    • Consider circadian effects on stress responses

  • Tissue-Specific Analysis:

    • Sample different tissues separately (roots, shoots, leaves, meristems)

    • Consider developmental stage influences

    • Examine specific cell types using laser-capture microdissection

Methodological Framework:

  • Expression Analysis:

    • Quantify CDKF-4 transcript levels by qRT-PCR

    • Measure protein levels by Western blot with CDKF-4 Antibody

    • Visualize expression patterns by immunohistochemistry

  • Post-Translational Modifications:

    • Assess phosphorylation status under stress conditions

    • Examine protein stability/degradation rates

    • Monitor subcellular localization changes

  • Functional Analysis:

    • Use CDKF-4 mutants/transgenics to test stress phenotypes

    • Measure kinase activity under stress conditions

    • Identify stress-specific protein interactions

Data Integration Strategies:

  • Multi-Omics Integration:

    • Correlate CDKF-4 data with transcriptome profiles

    • Consider proteome and phosphoproteome analyses

    • Integrate with metabolomic data related to stress responses

  • Comparative Analysis:

    • Compare CDKF-4 responses to those of other CDKs

    • Examine CDKF-4 behavior across different plant species

    • Relate findings to known stress response pathways

This comprehensive approach will help establish CDKF-4's specific roles in stress response mechanisms and their relationship to cell cycle regulation.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.