Anti-CPK-EF is a polyclonal antibody developed against the EF-hand domain of calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs). These kinases are critical for calcium signal transduction in plants, influencing stress responses, growth, and development .
Key specifications for Anti-CPK-EF (AS11 1807) are summarized below:
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Immunogen | KLH-conjugated synthetic peptide from CPK EF domain (e.g., Arabidopsis At4g35310/At5g04870) |
| Reactivity | A. thaliana, H. vulgare, Populus sp., T. aestivum |
| Applications | Western blot (1:1000 dilution) |
| Molecular Weight | 60–65 kDa (expected/apparent) |
| Storage | Lyophilized at -20°C; reconstituted in sterile water |
While direct studies on "CPK22" are absent, Anti-CPK-EF has been utilized to investigate:
Post-translational modifications of CPKs during pathogen defense.
Specificity: Validated against plant CPKs but not tested in animal systems .
Limitations: No cross-reactivity data for non-plant species or isoforms beyond the EF domain.
The lack of "CPK22" in scientific literature suggests potential nomenclature discrepancies. Anti-CPK-EF (AS11 1807) represents the closest validated reagent for plant CPK studies . Future research should clarify whether "CPK22" refers to a novel isoform or alternate designation.
KEGG: ath:AT4G04710
STRING: 3702.AT4G04710.1
CPK22 belongs to the calcium-dependent protein kinase family that functions as Ca²⁺ sensor protein kinases critical to transcriptional reprogramming in plant innate immune signaling. Similar to other CDPKs such as CPK4, CPK5, CPK6, and CPK11, these proteins are involved in sensing calcium signatures during immune responses and translating them into appropriate cellular responses .
Antibodies against CPK22 enable researchers to:
Detect expression levels in different plant tissues
Monitor activation patterns during immune responses
Study protein-protein interactions
Investigate post-translational modifications
Analyze localization patterns during stress responses
Based on applications of antibodies against similar CDPKs, CPK22 antibodies serve multiple experimental purposes:
| Application | Purpose | Typical Protocol Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting | Protein expression quantification | 1:1000-1:5000 dilution; 10-12% SDS-PAGE |
| Immunoprecipitation | Protein complex isolation | 2-5 μg antibody per sample; gentle lysis buffers |
| Immunofluorescence | Subcellular localization | 1:200-1:500 dilution; requires fixation optimization |
| ELISA | Quantitative detection | 1-10 μg/ml coating concentration |
| ChIP | DNA-protein interaction | 5-10 μg antibody per sample; requires crosslinking |
Rigorous validation is essential due to potential cross-reactivity with other CDPKs. Recommended approaches include:
Western blot analysis using:
Recombinant CPK22 protein (positive control)
Extracts from cpk22 mutant plants (negative control)
Closely related CPKs to assess cross-reactivity
Peptide competition assay to confirm epitope specificity
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to verify target identity
Testing across multiple plant tissues and conditions to confirm expected expression patterns
Differentiation between CPK family members presents significant technical challenges:
High sequence homology within conserved kinase and calcium-binding domains
Functional redundancy, as demonstrated in studies with cpk5,6 double, cpk5,6,11 triple, and cpk4,5,6,11 quadruple mutants
Overlapping expression patterns and co-activation during stress responses
To address these challenges:
Target variable regions rather than conserved domains when generating antibodies
Use knockout/knockdown mutants for validation
Employ multiple detection methods to confirm results
Consider complementary nucleic acid-based approaches when protein detection is ambiguous
Effective protein extraction and preservation protocols are critical for reliable detection:
Extraction buffer optimization:
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)
150 mM NaCl
1 mM EDTA
1 mM EGTA (calcium chelator to stabilize conformation)
1% Triton X-100 or 0.5% NP-40
Protease inhibitor cocktail
Phosphatase inhibitors (if studying phosphorylation status)
5 mM DTT (reducing agent)
Tissue-specific considerations:
High-phenolic tissues: Add PVP or PVPP
High-lipid tissues: Increase detergent concentration
High-starch tissues: Include amylase during extraction
Research on related CDPKs indicates that protein stability can be significantly affected by extraction conditions, especially calcium concentration, which influences protein conformation .
Based on success with similar plant kinases, several expression systems offer advantages:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Optimization Strategies |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective | May form inclusion bodies | Use solubility tags (MBP, SUMO); lower induction temperature |
| Insect cells | Proper folding, PTMs | Higher cost, longer production time | Optimize MOI; harvest timing |
| Plant-based | Native environment, proper PTMs | Variable yields | Codon optimization; use strong promoters |
| Cell-free | Rapid production | Limited scale | Optimize reaction components |
When generating antibodies, targeting unique regions of CPK22 rather than highly conserved domains significantly improves specificity and reduces cross-reactivity with other CPKs.
Environmental stressors significantly alter CDPK expression and activity patterns:
Pathogen exposure responses:
Abiotic stress considerations:
Different stress conditions trigger distinct calcium signatures that activate specific CDPKs
Post-translational modifications during stress may affect antibody epitope accessibility
Extraction protocols may need adjustment based on stress conditions
Research demonstrates that CPK5 and CPK11 activate specific target genes related to defense responses, including enzymes that modulate defense-related metabolites, cell wall components, and redox signaling molecules .
Understanding pathway interactions improves experimental design and data interpretation:
CDPK and MAPK pathway interaction:
Transcriptional targets:
Experimental approaches for studying CPK22 in plant immunity:
Time-course experiments:
Monitor activation kinetics following pathogen exposure
Compare with genetic mutants to establish function
Combine with transcriptomic analysis to identify downstream targets
Co-immunoprecipitation studies:
Identify interacting proteins during immune activation
Use cross-linking approaches to capture transient interactions
Analyze by mass spectrometry to identify novel components
Quantitative phosphorylation analysis:
Use phospho-specific antibodies to monitor activation
Combine with phosphoproteomic approaches to identify substrates
Compare phosphorylation patterns across different stress conditions
Research shows single cpk mutants typically don't display altered pathogen responses due to functional redundancy, while higher-order mutants (double, triple, and quadruple) progressively lose flg22-induced oxidative burst and gene activation capabilities, resulting in compromised pathogen defense .
Recent methodological advances include:
Single-domain antibody development:
Camelid single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) offer advantages including small size (15-17 kDa), high stability, and high affinity
These novel antibody formats provide better tissue penetration and epitope access
Successfully applied to other research antibodies with binding affinities around 9×10⁻⁹ M
Multiplexed detection systems:
Simultaneous monitoring of multiple CDPKs
Antibody arrays for comprehensive CDPK family analysis
Single-cell techniques for cell-type specific responses
Advanced imaging applications:
Super-resolution microscopy combined with specific antibodies
Live-cell imaging approaches for real-time activation monitoring
Multi-color imaging to analyze pathway components simultaneously
While CPK22 is primarily studied in plant biology, research methodologies can inform broader applications:
Parallel research in human diseases:
Comparative signaling studies:
Ca²⁺-dependent signaling occurs in both plants and animals
Antibody-based techniques for studying kinase activation have applications across fields
Methodological advances in one field often benefit related research areas
The techniques developed for studying plant CDPKs can provide valuable insights for researchers working on related kinases in other organisms, particularly regarding antibody specificity, activation dynamics, and interaction networks.
| Issue | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low signal intensity | Insufficient protein, degradation, low antibody affinity | Increase protein loading, optimize extraction buffer, try different antibody concentrations |
| High background | Non-specific binding, inadequate blocking | Increase blocking time/concentration, optimize antibody dilution, include competing proteins |
| Multiple bands | Cross-reactivity, degradation products, isoforms | Use more specific antibody, include protease inhibitors, perform peptide competition |
| Inconsistent results | Antibody degradation, variable expression | Aliquot antibody, standardize protocols, include positive controls |
| Poor reproducibility | Protocol variation, sample preparation differences | Standardize methods, document conditions, use internal controls |
For maximum reproducibility:
Standardize sample preparation:
Use consistent tissue collection methods
Standardize growth conditions and treatments
Process samples identically between experiments
Implement quality control measures:
Include positive and negative controls in each experiment
Use internal loading controls for quantification
Track antibody performance with control samples
Document experimental conditions:
Maintain detailed records of all protocol parameters
Note antibody lot numbers and dilutions
Record any deviations from standard protocols
Validate findings with complementary approaches:
Confirm key results with alternative detection methods
Use genetic approaches (mutants, overexpression) to verify antibody findings
Consider transcript analysis to support protein-level observations
Implementing these strategies significantly improves data reliability and facilitates meaningful comparison across experiments and between laboratories.