cdr2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Biological Role of CDR2

CDR2 is a 52 kDa intracellular protein encoded by the CDR2 gene (NCBI Gene ID: 1039). Key features include:

  • Structural Domains: An N-terminal leucine zipper for dimerization and a C-terminal functional domain of unknown specificity .

  • Expression: Primarily in cerebellar Purkinje neurons, testis, and tumors (e.g., ovarian, breast, renal cancers) .

  • Function: Binds c-myc to regulate transcription and cell cycle progression . CDR2 degradation is mediated by the APC/C complex during mitosis, influencing spindle formation .

CDR2 Antibody in Paraneoplastic Syndromes

CDR2 antibodies (anti-Yo) are hallmark biomarkers of PCD, a rare autoimmune disorder triggered by tumors expressing CDR2:

  • Clinical Association:

    • 87% of PCD patients with gynecologic/breast cancers harbor CDR2 antibodies .

    • Neurological symptoms include cerebellar ataxia, dysarthria, and visual disturbances .

  • Diagnostic Utility:

    AssaySensitivity (Serum)Specificity (Serum)Sensitivity (CSF)Specificity (CSF)
    CDR2 Line Blot100%99.5%92%99.6%
    CDR2L Line Blot100%99.7%100%99.6%
    Dual CDR2/CDR2L testing improves specificity to 99.9% in serum and CSF .

CDR2 Antibody Mechanisms and Tumor Immunity

  • Antigen Source: CDR2 is ectopically expressed in 60% of ovarian and 25% of breast cancers .

  • Immune Response:

    • CDR2-specific CD8+ T cells and high-titer antibodies correlate with tumor containment .

    • Antibody binding disrupts CDR2’s interaction with c-myc, potentially inhibiting tumor proliferation .

  • Paradoxical Findings:

    • CDR2 is expressed in normal ovarian tissue and non-PCD cancers, yet antibody production is rare, implicating immune dysregulation in PCD .

Key Studies:

  1. CDR2L Co-Positivity:

    • 85.7% of PCD patients have concurrent CDR2/CDR2L antibodies, while isolated CDR2 positivity occurs in non-PCD cancers .

    • CDR2L localizes to cell membranes, unlike cytoplasmic CDR2, suggesting distinct antigenic epitopes .

  2. Therapeutic Insights:

    • Targeting CDR2-c-myc interaction may reduce tumor growth .

    • APC/C-mediated CDR2 degradation highlights cell cycle vulnerabilities .

Limitations:

  • False positives occur in 0.5% of non-PCD sera, necessitating confirmatory tissue-based assays .

  • CDR2 mRNA is ubiquitous, yet protein expression is restricted, complicating biomarker validation .

Future Directions

  • Diagnostic Refinement: Integrate CDR2L-specific assays to reduce false positives .

  • Mechanistic Studies: Elucidate CDR2’s role in hypoxic response and mitotic regulation .

  • Therapeutic Strategies: Explore CDR2-directed immunotherapies or small-molecule inhibitors .

CDR2 antibodies serve as critical diagnostic tools for PCD and offer insights into tumor-immune interactions. Advances in dual antigen testing and mechanistic studies promise to enhance clinical management and therapeutic innovation.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
cdr2 antibody; SPAC57A10.02Mitosis inducer protein kinase cdr2 antibody; EC 2.7.11.1 antibody
Target Names
cdr2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Cdr2 antibody acts as a mitotic inducer. During the G2 phase of the cell cycle, it negatively regulates Wee1, a known mitotic inhibitor. Cdr2 also plays a role in cytokinesis, where it is essential for proper septum formation.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. SIN-dependent phosphorylation of Cdr2 promotes its interaction with the 14-3-3 protein Rad24, which sequesters Cdr2 in the cytoplasm during cell division. PMID: 28162898
  2. Distinct levels of Pom1 gradients delineate a medial Cdr2 domain, essential for cell division placement, and control its activity, ultimately driving mitotic commitment. [Pom1; Cdr2] PMID: 24316795
  3. The association of Cdr2 effectors with different domains might spatially constrain Cdr1 and Wee1, promoting Wee1 inhibition upon Cdr2 kinase activation. PMID: 26071525
  4. Cdr2 was the only cell cycle target of Pom1 kinase activity identified in cells. PMID: 25720772
  5. The dual regulation exerted by Pom1 on Cdr2 prevents Cdr2 assembly into stable nodes in the cell tip region where Pom1 concentration is high. PMID: 24982431
  6. Pom1 phosphorylates the C-terminal domain of Cdr2, and this modification reduces Cdr2-T166 phosphorylation by Ssp1. PMID: 24508166
  7. Cdr2p functions at two distinct positions within the cell at specific cell cycle stages to influence the timing of mitotic entry and cytokinesis, respectively. PMID: 15454577

Show More

Hide All

Database Links
Protein Families
Protein kinase superfamily, CAMK Ser/Thr protein kinase family, NIM1 subfamily

Q&A

What is CDR2 and where is it normally expressed?

CDR2 (Cerebellar degeneration-related protein 2) is an onconeural protein that, under physiological conditions, has restricted expression primarily in cerebellar Purkinje neurons, brain stem neurons, and testes . It functions as a regulator of gene transcription and plays important roles in neuronal calcium homeostasis . CDR2 is a 62 kDa protein with a coiled-coil structure that associates with membrane-bound and free ribosomes in the cytoplasm of these cells . Unlike what was previously thought, recent research has shown that CDR2 is also highly expressed in the midbrain, which has implications for its role in dopaminergic neurons and Parkinson's disease pathology .

What is the relationship between CDR2 and CDR2L?

CDR2L (CDR2-like) is a paralogue of CDR2 that shares significant structural and functional similarities. While CDR2 is primarily involved in gene transcription regulation, CDR2L appears to be implicated in protein synthesis mechanisms . Both proteins serve as targets for anti-Yo antibodies in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, though they have distinct cellular functions . Research indicates that they may have complementary roles in maintaining neuronal homeostasis, with both being recognized by the immune system in autoimmune conditions affecting the cerebellum .

What are anti-Yo antibodies and how do they relate to CDR2?

Anti-Yo antibodies, also known as anti-PCA1 (Purkinje cell antigen 1) antibodies, are autoantibodies that specifically target CDR2 and CDR2L proteins . These antibodies are predominantly of the IgG1 subtype and are found in approximately 50% of paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration cases . Anti-Yo antibodies recognize intracellular antigens within Purkinje cells and are associated with the degeneration of these neurons in PCD . They are important biomarkers for diagnosing PCD and are typically associated with underlying gynecological malignancies where CDR2/CDR2L are ectopically expressed .

What is the role of CDR2 in Parkinson's disease?

CDR2 appears to have a neuroprotective function in dopaminergic neurons relevant to Parkinson's disease (PD). Research has shown that CDR2 levels are significantly reduced after stereotaxic injection of 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) into the striatum in experimental PD models . Additionally, post-mortem examination of PD patients' brains revealed decreased CDR2 levels . Experimental studies demonstrated that overexpression of CDR2 rescued cells from MPP+-induced cytotoxicity, while knockdown of CDR2 accelerated toxicity, suggesting a potentially protective role for this onconeural protein during dopaminergic neurodegeneration . The mechanism appears to involve protection against calpain- and ubiquitin proteasome system-mediated degradation, which are key pathways in PD pathology .

How do CDR2 antibodies affect Purkinje cell function in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration?

CDR2 antibodies impact Purkinje cells through several mechanisms affecting calcium homeostasis. When these antibodies are internalized by Purkinje cells, they lead to reduced immunoreactivity of calcium-binding proteins like calbindin D28K (CB) and L7/Pcp-2, as well as reduced dendritic arborizations . The internalization of CDR2 antibodies causes a dysregulation of cellular calcium homeostasis by altering the expression levels of voltage-gated calcium channel Cav2.1, protein kinase C gamma, and calcium-dependent protease calpain-2 . This disruption contributes to morphological changes and potentially fatal alterations in cell signaling pathways that ultimately lead to neurodegeneration . Additionally, CDR2 and calbindin D28K co-immunoprecipitate, suggesting direct interaction that may be disrupted when antibodies bind to CDR2 .

What is the pathological mechanism of anti-Yo paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration?

The pathology of anti-Yo PCD involves both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Initially, there is lymphocytic infiltration followed by rapid loss of Purkinje cells, often without significant ongoing inflammation in later stages . While in vitro studies suggest anti-Yo antibodies can directly induce Purkinje cell death by binding to the intracellular 62 kDa Yo antigen (CDR2) and disrupting cellular signaling and protein homeostasis , in vivo models indicate that anti-Yo PCD is primarily T-cell mediated . The breakdown of immune tolerance appears to be linked to genetic alterations in tumor cell antigens, leading to the formation of neoantigens that elicit autoreactive T cells . Current evidence suggests that while antibodies serve as important biomarkers, T lymphocytes may be the main effectors of cerebellar injury in PCD . This complex interplay between antibody-mediated and T-cell-mediated mechanisms remains an active area of research .

What models are used to study CDR2 antibody-mediated pathology?

Researchers employ several experimental models to study CDR2 antibody-mediated pathology. One prominent model is cerebellar organotypic slice culture (cOTSC), an ex vivo system using rat cerebellar tissue that allows for the study of antibody internalization and its effects on neuronal function . In this model, cerebellar slices are co-incubated with either human patient serum containing anti-Yo antibodies or rabbit CDR2 and CDR2L antibodies to observe antibody-induced pathology . For Parkinson's disease studies, models include stereotaxic injection of MPP+ into the striatum of experimental animals, primary cultures of mesencephalic neurons, and MN9D cell lines . These complementary approaches enable researchers to investigate both in vivo relevance and cellular mechanisms of CDR2 antibody-mediated pathology under controlled conditions .

What techniques are used to detect and quantify CDR2 and its antibodies?

Detection and quantification of CDR2 and anti-CDR2 antibodies employ various techniques:

  • Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence: Used to visualize CDR2 expression in tissue sections and assess changes in protein localization and levels .

  • High-resolution multiphoton imaging: Enables real-time visualization of antibody internalization and its effects on cellular morphology and protein expression in live tissue slices .

  • Co-immunoprecipitation: Used to identify protein-protein interactions, such as the interaction between CDR2 and calbindin D28K .

  • Western blotting: Quantifies CDR2 protein levels and detects changes in expression following experimental manipulations .

  • In situ hybridization: Used to detect mRNA expression patterns, particularly important for distinguishing between different tissue expression profiles .

  • ELISA and immunoblotting: Common techniques for detecting anti-CDR2 antibodies in patient serum samples .

These methodologies provide complementary approaches to studying both the normal function of CDR2 and the pathological effects of anti-CDR2 antibodies .

How can researchers differentiate between CDR2 and CDR2L in experimental settings?

Differentiating between CDR2 and CDR2L requires specific approaches due to their structural similarities. Researchers can use:

  • Specific antibodies: Employ affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies specifically targeting either CDR2 (such as Sigma #HPA023870) or CDR2L (Sigma #HPA022015) . These antibodies recognize distinct epitopes on each protein.

  • Molecular weight discrimination: CDR2 is a 62 kDa protein while CDR2L has a different molecular weight, allowing differentiation by Western blot analysis .

  • PCR with specific primers: Design primers that specifically amplify either CDR2 or CDR2L genes based on their sequence differences.

  • Functional assays: Since CDR2 is primarily involved in gene transcription regulation while CDR2L is implicated in protein synthesis, functional assays targeting these distinct roles can help differentiate between them .

  • Subcellular localization studies: While both proteins are cytoplasmic, subtle differences in their association with cellular components may be used for differentiation .

These techniques allow researchers to specifically study the individual roles of these paralogues in normal physiology and disease states .

What is the relationship between CDR2 antibody internalization and calcium homeostasis?

The internalization of CDR2 antibodies by Purkinje cells triggers a cascade of events that significantly disrupts calcium homeostasis. Research has revealed that after internalization, these antibodies cause increased expression of voltage-gated calcium channel Cav2.1, protein kinase C gamma, and the calcium-dependent protease calpain-2 . This leads to dysregulated calcium signaling within the cell. Importantly, CDR2 antibodies reduce the immunoreactivity of calbindin D28K (CB), a calcium-binding protein critical for buffering intracellular calcium in Purkinje cells . The direct co-immunoprecipitation of CDR2 with CB suggests a functional interaction between these proteins that gets disrupted when antibodies bind to CDR2 .

When researchers modify intracellular calcium transients or inhibit calcium-dependent proteases like calpain, they can reduce antibody-driven immunoreactivity loss of CB and L7/Pcp-2, suggesting that calcium dysregulation is a central mechanism in CDR2 antibody-mediated neurotoxicity . This complex relationship between antibody internalization and calcium homeostasis represents a potential therapeutic target, as drugs that modulate these calcium-dependent events may protect against Purkinje cell degeneration in PCD .

How does CDR2 contribute to neuroprotection in dopaminergic neurons?

CDR2's neuroprotective role in dopaminergic neurons operates through multiple mechanisms:

  • Protection against proteolytic degradation: CDR2 appears to inhibit or regulate calpain- and ubiquitin proteasome system-mediated protein degradation, which are major pathways of cellular damage in neurodegenerative conditions .

  • Calcium homeostasis regulation: Similar to its role in Purkinje cells, CDR2 likely helps maintain calcium homeostasis in dopaminergic neurons, protecting against excitotoxicity .

  • Cell survival pathway modulation: Overexpression of CDR2 rescues cells from MPP+-induced cytotoxicity in experimental models, suggesting it modulates cell survival pathways .

  • Interaction with calcium-binding proteins: The interaction between CDR2 and calcium-binding proteins may enhance cellular resilience to stress conditions .

In experimental models of Parkinson's disease, the protective effect of CDR2 is demonstrated by the fact that CDR2 overexpression rescues dopaminergic cells from MPP+-induced toxicity, while CDR2 knockdown accelerates this toxicity . These findings suggest that strategies to maintain or increase CDR2 levels might have therapeutic potential in neurodegenerative diseases affecting dopaminergic neurons .

What are the structural differences between CDR loops in antibodies and T-cell receptors?

Complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) in antibodies and T-cell receptors (TCRs) share architectural similarities but exhibit important structural differences:

  • Length distributions: TCR and antibody CDRs have different length distributions. For example, over 90% of CDRβ2 loops are six residues long, while only 0.2% of CDRH2 have six residues (with most being seven to ten residues long) .

  • Structural space occupation: TCR CDRs and antibody CDRs tend to occupy distinct areas of structural space. When clustered based on structural similarity, most clusters contain either TCR CDRs or antibody CDRs, but rarely both .

  • Sequence patterns: Even in cases where TCR and antibody CDRs form similar structural conformations, the underlying sequence patterns that create these structures differ significantly .

  • Nanobody relation: Interestingly, CDRs from nanobodies (single-domain antibodies) typically cluster with conventional antibody CDRs rather than with TCR CDRs, suggesting a closer structural relationship to antibodies despite their single-domain nature .

These structural distinctions likely reflect the different functional roles of antibodies (which bind diverse soluble and cell-surface antigens) versus TCRs (which recognize peptide-MHC complexes) . Understanding these differences is crucial for designing therapeutic antibodies and developing computational methods for predicting CDR structures .

What are the current limitations in studying CDR2 antibody-mediated neurodegeneration?

Research on CDR2 antibody-mediated neurodegeneration faces several significant challenges:

  • Model limitations: Current experimental models, while valuable, cannot fully recapitulate the complexity of the human immune system and the blood-brain barrier dynamics in PCD .

  • Antibody internalization mechanisms: The precise mechanisms by which anti-Yo antibodies penetrate neuronal membranes and enter cells remain incompletely understood, limiting targeted intervention strategies .

  • T-cell versus antibody contributions: Differentiating between the pathological contributions of antibodies and T-cells in PCD remains difficult, with evidence suggesting both play roles but with different importance in different contexts .

  • Limited patient samples: The relative rarity of PCD means limited availability of patient samples for research, particularly at early disease stages .

  • Therapeutic targeting challenges: Developing treatments is complicated by the intracellular location of CDR2/CDR2L antigens and the irreversible nature of neuronal damage once it occurs .

Addressing these limitations will require development of improved animal models, advanced imaging techniques for tracking antibody internalization and effects, and better methods for studying the interplay between humoral and cell-mediated immunity in neurological autoimmune conditions .

How might understanding CDR2's role in calcium homeostasis lead to new therapeutic approaches?

The relationship between CDR2 and calcium homeostasis offers promising therapeutic directions:

  • Calcium channel modulators: Since CDR2 antibody internalization affects voltage-gated calcium channel Cav2.1 expression, drugs targeting these channels might prevent calcium dysregulation and subsequent neurodegeneration .

  • Calpain inhibitors: Research shows that inhibition of calcium-dependent protease calpain-2 attenuates CDR2 antibody-induced immunoreactivity loss and morphological changes, suggesting calpain inhibitors as potential neuroprotective agents .

  • Calcium-binding protein supplementation or stabilization: Strategies to maintain or restore calbindin D28K function could help preserve calcium buffering capacity in affected neurons .

  • Combined approaches: Table 1 from research indicates that modifying intracellular Ca²⁺ transients and inhibiting Ca²⁺-dependent proteases can reduce antibody-driven immunoreactivity loss, suggesting multi-target approaches may be most effective .

  • CDR2 stabilization or upregulation: Since overexpression of CDR2 rescued cells from MPP⁺-induced cytotoxicity, approaches that increase or stabilize CDR2 expression might protect neurons in both PCD and Parkinson's disease .

These potential therapeutic strategies emphasize the importance of calcium homeostasis research in neurodegeneration and could lead to novel treatments for currently intractable conditions like PCD .

What is the significance of studying CDR structure in developing therapeutic antibodies?

Understanding CDR structure has profound implications for therapeutic antibody development:

  • Rational antibody design: Knowledge of how TCR and antibody CDRs differ structurally enables more precise engineering of therapeutic antibodies with specific binding properties .

  • Computational prediction tools: Structural analysis of CDRs facilitates the development of prediction algorithms that can accelerate antibody design by predicting how sequence changes will affect CDR structure and antigen binding .

  • Design of targeted immunotherapies: Understanding the structural basis of CDR-antigen interactions could lead to better-targeted immunotherapies for treating conditions like PCD, potentially by blocking pathogenic antibody binding or designing decoy antigens .

  • Nanobody development: The finding that nanobody CDRs structurally resemble conventional antibody CDRs rather than TCR CDRs has implications for developing nanobody-based therapeutics, which can access targets that conventional antibodies cannot reach .

  • Addressing antigenic variation: Insights into CDR structural diversity may help develop antibodies that can accommodate antigenic variation, which is important for targeting rapidly mutating antigens .

These applications demonstrate that fundamental structural studies of CDRs have direct translational relevance for developing next-generation antibody therapeutics for neurological and other disorders .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.