The CEP70 antibody (e.g., Abcam ab237801) is raised against a recombinant fragment of human CEP70 corresponding to amino acids 50–300 . This region includes coiled-coil domains critical for CEP70’s interaction with γ-tubulin, a key centrosomal protein . The antibody is validated for:
Western blot (WB): Detects a 70 kDa band in human placental lysate and pancreatic cancer cell lines .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Stains CEP70 in paraffin-embedded pancreatic cancer tissues .
Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF): Visualizes CEP70 at centrosomes in interphase cells and spindle poles during mitosis .
CEP70 antibodies have been instrumental in demonstrating the protein’s role in:
Microtubule organization: Depletion of CEP70 via siRNA disrupts radial microtubule arrays and spindle formation, highlighting its critical role in centrosome-mediated cytoskeletal regulation .
Centrosomal localization: CEP70 interacts directly with γ-tubulin via its coiled-coil domains, ensuring proper centrosome assembly .
Immunofluorescence and Western blot analyses using CEP70 antibodies revealed its localization in sperm acrosomes and flagella . Biallelic mutations in CEP70 correlate with severe male infertility due to:
Acrosome defects: Absent or malformed acrosomes impair sperm penetration .
Flagellar abnormalities: Disrupted microtubule organization leads to motility issues .
CEP70 overexpression is linked to pancreatic cancer progression. Antibody-based studies show:
CEP70 (Centrosomal protein of 70 kDa) is a component of the centrosome that plays critical roles in microtubule organization. Specifically, CEP70:
Participates in organizing both preexisting and nascent microtubules during interphase
Is required for the organization and orientation of the mitotic spindle during mitosis
Interacts within a complex network of proteins including CEP135 and γ-tubulin
Facilitates the stabilization of microtubules and supports spindle microtubule nucleation
CEP70 localizes to the centrosome throughout the cell cycle, as demonstrated by immunofluorescence studies showing colocalization with centrosomal markers like γ-tubulin in both interphase and mitotic cells .
CEP70 is a 597 amino acid protein with a calculated molecular weight of approximately 70 kDa. The protein contains multiple coiled-coil domains that are critical for its function and localization:
The peptide fragments containing the coiled-coil domains are essential for CEP70's interaction with γ-tubulin
These domains are also crucial for proper localization of CEP70 to the centrosome
Truncation studies have shown that amino acid sequences 1-597 (full-length), 1-326, and 75-326 of CEP70 interact with γ-tubulin, while sequences 75-179, 254-326, 1-179, and 327-597 do not interact
This structural organization suggests that the coiled-coil domains create interaction surfaces that mediate both protein-protein interactions and centrosomal targeting.
When selecting a CEP70 antibody, consider the following research-focused criteria:
Application compatibility: Determine if the antibody has been validated for your intended application (WB, IHC, ICC/IF, IP)
Species reactivity: Confirm reactivity with your experimental model organism (human, mouse, etc.)
Epitope location: Some antibodies target specific regions (e.g., N-terminal) which may affect detection based on protein conformation or interactions
Validation data: Review available immunoblotting, IHC, and IF data to assess specificity
Immunogen information: Check whether the antibody was raised against a recombinant fragment or synthetic peptide, which may influence epitope recognition
For instance, antibody ab237801 is suitable for WB, IHC-P, and ICC/IF applications and reacts with human and mouse samples, with the immunogen corresponding to a recombinant fragment within human CEP70 aa 50-300 .
A rigorous validation approach for CEP70 antibodies should include:
Positive and negative controls:
Use cell lines known to express CEP70 (e.g., HeLa, MCF7, PC-3) as positive controls
Include non-expressing or knockdown samples as negative controls
Multiple detection methods:
Western blot: Confirm single band of expected size (~70 kDa, though some isoforms exist at 67, 65, and 25 kDa)
Immunofluorescence: Verify centrosomal localization with colocalization studies using established centrosomal markers like γ-tubulin or pericentrin
siRNA knockdown:
Overexpression studies:
Following these validation steps will ensure antibody specificity before proceeding with critical experiments.
Based on established protocols from the literature, optimal conditions for CEP70 immunofluorescence include:
Fixation method:
Blocking conditions:
Antibody dilutions:
Counterstaining:
DAPI for nuclear visualization
Co-staining with γ-tubulin or pericentrin to confirm centrosomal localization
Microscopy technique:
For accurate intensity measurements of CEP70 at the centrosome, utilize the two-square measurement method: center two computer-generated squares on each centrosome, with the inner square containing the CEP70 signal plus background, and the region between the squares representing background only. Subtract the background to obtain the true CEP70 signal intensity .
For successful Western blot detection of CEP70, consider these technical modifications:
Sample preparation:
Use whole cell lysates from tissues or cultured cells (human placenta, heart, kidney, PC-3, MCF7)
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Gel percentage:
Transfer conditions:
Standard transfer protocols for proteins in this size range
Antibody concentrations:
Expected band sizes:
Positive controls:
These modifications will enhance detection sensitivity and specificity when working with CEP70.
To effectively study centrosome dynamics using CEP70 antibodies:
Cell synchronization techniques:
Use nocodazole treatment for mitotic arrest
Thymidine block for S-phase synchronization
Serum starvation for G0/G1 enrichment
Time-course experiments:
Fix cells at different cell cycle phases
Use CEP70 antibodies (1:100 dilution) with co-staining for cell cycle markers
Track CEP70 intensity and localization changes through the cell cycle
Live-cell imaging:
Combine with fluorescently-tagged CEP70 constructs
Use stable cell lines expressing GFP-CEP70 at near-endogenous levels
Quantitative analysis:
Functional perturbation:
Use siRNA knockdown of CEP70 to observe effects on centrosome structure and function
Compare phenotypes with those observed in γ-tubulin or pericentrin depletion experiments
This integrated approach will provide insights into how CEP70 contributes to dynamic centrosome functions throughout the cell cycle.
When facing contradictory results regarding CEP70 expression in cancer:
Validation across multiple detection methods:
Compare results from immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and qRT-PCR
Use at least two different validated antibodies targeting different epitopes of CEP70
Include proper controls for each technique
Comprehensive tissue sampling:
Standardized scoring systems:
Implement quantitative intensity measurement for immunohistochemistry
Use histological scoring systems (H-score or Allred)
Blind analysis by multiple pathologists
Cell line validation:
Genetic verification:
A study on pancreatic cancer demonstrated that while CEP70 mRNA expression was elevated, gene copy number remained unchanged, pointing to potential epigenetic mechanisms of overexpression .
To investigate CEP70's role in cancer progression:
Expression correlation studies:
Use immunohistochemistry with CEP70 antibodies (1:100 dilution) on tissue microarrays
Compare expression between normal and cancerous tissues
Correlate with clinical parameters and survival data
| Parameter | Correlation with CEP70 Expression |
|---|---|
| Histological grade | Significant correlation observed |
| pTNM stage | Significant correlation observed |
| Lymph node metastasis | Significant correlation observed |
| CA19-9 levels | Correlation observed |
For instance, in pancreatic cancer, only 7.4% of normal pancreatic tissues showed high CEP70 expression, while 77.6% of cancer tissues demonstrated high expression .
Functional studies in cancer cell models:
Knockdown CEP70 using specific siRNAs in cancer cell lines
Assess effects on proliferation using sulforhodamine B staining
Evaluate impact on cell cycle progression through BrdU incorporation
Analyze migration and invasion capabilities
Mechanistic investigations:
Analyze centrosome amplification and spindle abnormalities using CEP70 antibodies
Examine effects on chromosomal stability
Investigate downstream signaling pathways affected by CEP70 modulation
Therapeutic potential assessment:
Evaluate CEP70 as a potential biomarker for specific cancer types
Test the efficacy of targeting CEP70 in combination with standard therapies
These approaches can provide comprehensive insights into CEP70's role in cancer biology and its potential as a therapeutic target .
Common technical issues with CEP70 antibodies and their solutions include:
Low or no signal in Western blot:
Increase antibody concentration (try 1:500 instead of 1:1000)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Use enhanced chemiluminescence detection systems
Verify protein loading and transfer efficiency
Consider different extraction buffers to improve solubilization of centrosomal proteins
Be aware that CEP70 expression varies between cell types; 293T cells may show low abundance
High background in immunofluorescence:
Increase blocking time and concentration (try 5% BSA)
Optimize antibody dilution (start with 1:100 and adjust)
Include additional washing steps
Use highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies
Consider alternative fixation methods if methanol fixation gives poor results
Multiple bands in Western blot:
Non-specific centrosomal staining:
Co-stain with established centrosomal markers (γ-tubulin, pericentrin)
Verify specificity through siRNA knockdown
Use super-resolution microscopy for better localization precision
These troubleshooting approaches will help resolve common technical challenges when working with CEP70 antibodies.
When encountering unusual CEP70 localization patterns:
Verification strategies:
Confirm with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Use fluorescently-tagged CEP70 constructs to validate localization
Apply super-resolution microscopy techniques for precise localization
Conduct fractionation studies to biochemically confirm localization
Context-dependent interpretation:
Consider cell cycle stage (CEP70 normally localizes to centrosomes throughout the cell cycle)
Assess if the cell is undergoing normal or abnormal mitosis
Evaluate potential post-translational modifications affecting localization
Determine if observed localization changes under experimental conditions
Co-localization studies:
Perform detailed co-localization with multiple centrosomal markers
Include markers for various subcellular compartments to identify non-centrosomal localization
Calculate co-localization coefficients for quantitative assessment
Functional validation:
Use domain deletion constructs to identify regions responsible for unusual localization
Examine if protein-protein interactions are altered in the unusual localization context
Test if the unusual localization correlates with functional changes in microtubule organization
These approaches provide a framework for validating and interpreting unexpected CEP70 localization patterns in a scientifically rigorous manner .
For studying centrosome amplification in cancer:
Quantitative immunofluorescence approach:
Use CEP70 antibodies (1:100 dilution) with γ-tubulin co-staining
Count centrosome number per cell (>2 centrosomes indicates amplification)
Calculate percentage of cells with amplified centrosomes
Compare normal versus cancer cell lines or tissues
High-content imaging and analysis:
Develop automated image acquisition and analysis workflows
Quantify not only centrosome number but also size, intensity, and clustering
Correlate with cell cycle markers and chromosomal aberrations
3D imaging techniques:
Apply confocal z-stack imaging to visualize the full centrosome structure
Use 3D reconstruction to accurately assess centrosome clustering in cancer cells
Functional consequences assessment:
Combine with live-cell imaging to track mitotic progression and errors
Monitor chromosome segregation defects using DAPI staining
Correlate centrosome amplification with aneuploidy and genomic instability
Therapeutic screening platform:
Utilize CEP70 antibodies to evaluate centrosome-targeting drugs
Assess centrosome clustering inhibitors effectiveness
Screen for compounds that selectively target cells with centrosome amplification
This methodology can provide valuable insights into the role of centrosome amplification in cancer development and progression .
Recent methodological advances include:
Super-resolution microscopy techniques:
STED (Stimulated Emission Depletion) microscopy for nanoscale resolution of centrosome structure
SIM (Structured Illumination Microscopy) for improved visualization of microtubule-centrosome interactions
Single-molecule localization microscopy for precise mapping of CEP70 within the centrosome
Live-cell imaging approaches:
Combine with photoactivatable or photoswitchable fluorescent protein-tagged CEP70
Track dynamic changes in CEP70 localization during microtubule reorganization
Measure recruitment kinetics of CEP70 during centrosome maturation
Proximity labeling techniques:
BioID or APEX2 fusion with CEP70 to identify proximal interacting proteins
Compare interactomes between normal and pathological conditions
Map the spatial organization of the centrosomal protein network
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM):
Combine immunofluorescence using CEP70 antibodies with electron microscopy
Precisely localize CEP70 within ultrastructural context of the centrosome
Map relationships between CEP70, centrioles, and pericentriolar material
These advanced methodologies enable researchers to gain unprecedented insights into the spatial and temporal dynamics of CEP70 in microtubule organization .
To investigate CEP70 expression and cancer prognosis:
This comprehensive approach was utilized in pancreatic cancer research, where CEP70 expression showed significant correlation with histological grade, pTNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and CA19-9 levels .
When investigating CEP70 as a therapeutic target:
Target validation strategy:
Confirm overexpression in disease tissues compared to normal using antibody-based detection
Validate effects of genetic knockdown (siRNA, CRISPR) on cancer cell phenotypes
Conduct rescue experiments to confirm specificity of observed effects
Assess effects in multiple cell lines to ensure generalizability
Mechanism of action studies:
Identify downstream pathways affected by CEP70 modulation
Characterize effects on centrosome function, microtubule organization, and mitotic progression
Evaluate impacts on chromosomal stability and genomic integrity
Use CEP70 antibodies to monitor centrosome changes after intervention
Therapeutic approach selection:
Consider small molecule inhibitors targeting protein-protein interactions
Evaluate antisense oligonucleotides or siRNA-based therapeutics
Assess antibody-drug conjugates targeting CEP70-expressing cells
Develop combination approaches with standard chemotherapeutics
Toxicity and specificity assessment:
Test effects on normal cells with lower CEP70 expression
Evaluate potential off-target effects
Conduct detailed analysis of centrosome and mitotic spindle integrity
Translational considerations:
Develop companion diagnostics using validated CEP70 antibodies
Identify patient populations most likely to benefit from CEP70-targeting
Design appropriate clinical endpoints based on mechanism of action
These methodological considerations provide a framework for investigating CEP70 as a potential therapeutic target in cancer, as suggested by findings in pancreatic cancer research .