CFAP61 (Cilia- and Flagella-Associated Protein 61) is a conserved component of the calmodulin- and radial spoke-associated complex (CSC) in cilia and flagella. It plays a critical role in stabilizing radial spoke (RS) components and ensuring proper axoneme assembly during spermatogenesis . Mutations in CFAP61 are linked to multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella (MMAF), a major cause of male infertility . Antibodies against CFAP61 enable researchers to investigate its localization, interactions, and functional deficits in disease models.
Antigen Selection: Two mouse CFAP61 peptides were used to generate polyclonal antibodies, validated via Western blot and immunofluorescence (IF) .
Specificity: Antibodies confirmed the absence of CFAP61 in Cfap61 knockout (KO) mice, demonstrating no cross-reactivity with other proteins .
Localization: CFAP61 is distributed along the flagella in elongating spermatids and interacts with radial spoke components (e.g., RSPH9, ARMC4) and CSC proteins like MAATS1 (CFAP91) .
Structural Defects: Cfap61 KO mice exhibit disorganized axonemes, including missing central pairs (CP), radial spokes (RS), and inner dynein arms (IDA) . IF staining revealed absent CFAP61 and CFAP251 signals in patient spermatozoa .
CSC and RS Interactions: Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) confirmed CFAP61 binds MAATS1 (CSC) and RS stalk proteins (ARMC4, RSPH3A) .
IFT Protein Retention: CFAP61 interacts with intraflagellar transport (IFT) proteins (e.g., IFT81, WDR35). In Cfap61 KO mice, IFT proteins accumulate abnormally in elongating spermatids .
Diagnostic Utility: CFAP61 antibodies aid in identifying MMAF cases caused by CFAP61 mutations. Reduced CFAP61 staining in sperm flagella correlates with infertility .
Therapeutic Insights: Cfap61 KO mice recapitulate human infertility, providing models for testing assisted reproductive technologies (e.g., ICSI) .
CFAP61 (Cilia and Flagella Associated Protein 61) is a protein that plays critical roles in cell motility and ciliary function. It specifically regulates ciliary beating and morphogenesis, making it essential for proper mucociliary clearance in respiratory tissues and flagellar function in reproductive cells. The protein was previously designated as an uncharacterized protein C20orf26 homolog before its functional characterization .
Research with knockout models has demonstrated that CFAP61 is particularly important for sperm flagella development and function, with deficiencies leading to multiple morphological abnormalities of sperm flagella (MMAF) . The protein's involvement in ciliary architecture maintenance suggests it contributes to both structural integrity and functional dynamics of motile cilia.
Several types of CFAP61 antibodies are available for research applications, with polyclonal rabbit antibodies being particularly common. These include:
Polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbits (e.g., CAB18194) with specific reactivity for human CFAP61
Antibodies validated for various applications including Western blot (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Antibodies with different species reactivity profiles (human-specific, mouse-specific, or cross-reactive with multiple species)
The selection of an appropriate antibody depends on the specific research application, desired species reactivity, and validation requirements for the study design.
While the search results don't provide detailed structural information about CFAP61's domains, we know it functions in ciliary and flagellar contexts. Proteins in this family typically contain structural motifs that facilitate interactions with microtubules, other axonemal proteins, or regulatory molecules involved in ciliary beating.
Functional studies suggest CFAP61 likely contains domains involved in:
Microtubule binding or stabilization, particularly affecting the central pair microtubules of the axoneme
Protein-protein interaction regions that facilitate assembly of the ciliary/flagellar apparatus
Potential regulatory domains that coordinate ciliary beating patterns
Further structural characterization through techniques like X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy would be valuable for elucidating the precise domain architecture of CFAP61.
For optimal immunofluorescence results with CFAP61 antibodies, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:
Sample Preparation:
Antibody Concentration and Incubation:
Typical dilutions range from 1:100 to 1:500 for primary CFAP61 antibodies
Overnight incubation at 4°C often yields superior signal-to-noise ratios
Include appropriate blocking steps with BSA or normal serum to minimize non-specific binding
Counterstaining Strategies:
The immunofluorescence pattern of CFAP61 typically shows localization along the axoneme of cilia and flagella, with reduced or absent staining observed in samples from individuals with pathogenic CFAP61 variants .
For optimal Western blot detection of CFAP61 protein:
Sample Preparation:
For ciliated tissue or cells: Direct lysis in RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors
For sperm samples: Special extraction buffers may be required to solubilize axonemal proteins
Electrophoresis Parameters:
Use 8-10% SDS-PAGE gels due to the relatively large size of CFAP61
Longer running times may improve resolution
Transfer and Detection:
Semi-dry or wet transfer systems with PVDF membranes are suitable
Primary antibody dilutions typically range from 1:500 to 1:2000
Incubation overnight at 4°C often improves specific binding
HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies with ECL detection provide good sensitivity
Controls and Validation:
Include positive controls from tissues known to express CFAP61 (testis, respiratory epithelium)
Negative controls should include samples from CFAP61-knockout models or tissues known to lack expression
Expect a band corresponding to the predicted molecular weight of CFAP61
These conditions may need optimization based on the specific CFAP61 antibody being used and the particular sample type under investigation .
Verifying antibody specificity is crucial for reliable CFAP61 research. Recommended validation approaches include:
Genetic Controls:
Multiple Antibody Verification:
Utilize antibodies targeting different epitopes of CFAP61 to confirm consistent localization patterns
Compare results from different antibody types (monoclonal vs. polyclonal)
Peptide Competition Assays:
Pre-incubate the antibody with excess purified CFAP61 protein or peptide
Specific antibodies will show reduced or eliminated signal after competition
Correlation with mRNA Expression:
Verify that antibody signal correlates with CFAP61 mRNA expression patterns across tissues
Immunoprecipitation Followed by Mass Spectrometry:
Confirm that the immunoprecipitated protein is indeed CFAP61 through peptide mass fingerprinting
These validation steps ensure that experimental observations genuinely reflect CFAP61 biology rather than antibody cross-reactivity or non-specific binding .
Pathogenic variants in CFAP61 have been directly linked to male infertility through the following mechanisms:
Sperm Flagellar Structural Abnormalities:
Functional Impact on Sperm:
Affected individuals present with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT), characterized by:
Low sperm count (oligozoospermia)
Poor motility (asthenozoospermia)
Abnormal morphology (teratozoospermia)
Genetic Evidence:
The direct causative relationship between CFAP61 dysfunction and male infertility has been further supported by animal models, as Cfap61-deficient mice also display the OAT phenotype .
While not yet established as standard clinical diagnostics, CFAP61 antibodies hold potential for diagnostic applications in ciliopathies through several approaches:
Immunohistochemical Assessment:
CFAP61 antibodies can detect altered expression or localization in ciliated tissues from patients with suspected ciliopathies
Reduced or absent CFAP61 staining in otherwise intact cilia could indicate pathogenic variants
Sperm Analysis in Male Infertility:
Research Applications Informing Future Diagnostics:
Characterizing the relationship between specific CFAP61 variants and protein expression/localization patterns
Developing antibody panels that target multiple ciliary proteins including CFAP61
Before clinical implementation, extensive validation of antibody performance across diverse patient samples would be required. Integration with genetic testing would likely provide the most comprehensive diagnostic approach for CFAP61-related ciliopathies .
The relationship between CFAP61 dysfunction and respiratory disease stems from its critical role in ciliary function:
Future research using CFAP61 antibodies to examine respiratory epithelial samples from patients with unexplained respiratory conditions could help elucidate the full spectrum of CFAP61-related respiratory pathologies .
Advanced approaches to study CFAP61 protein interactions within the ciliary axoneme include:
Proximity Labeling Techniques:
BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins with CFAP61 to identify proximal interacting partners in living cells
TurboID offers faster labeling kinetics for capturing transient interactions
Co-immunoprecipitation with CFAP61 Antibodies:
Gentle lysis conditions to preserve native protein complexes
Mass spectrometry identification of co-precipitated proteins
Reciprocal co-IP validation of key interactions
Super-resolution Microscopy:
STORM or PALM imaging using CFAP61 antibodies combined with other axonemal protein markers
Provides spatial resolution to map CFAP61 positioning relative to other axonemal components
Cryo-electron Tomography:
Structural analysis of wild-type versus CFAP61-deficient axonemes
Can reveal the precise location of CFAP61 within the 3D axonemal architecture
Functional Interaction Studies:
Mutagenesis of potential interaction domains followed by phenotypic assessment
FRET-based approaches to study direct interactions with candidate partners
These approaches can collectively build a comprehensive interactome map for CFAP61, revealing its functional integration within the complex ciliary machinery .
Integrating CFAP61 antibody studies with genetic analysis creates a powerful approach for ciliopathy research:
Genotype-Phenotype Correlation Studies:
Use CFAP61 antibodies to assess protein expression/localization in samples with different CFAP61 variants
Create a catalog linking specific variants to particular patterns of protein dysfunction
Example: Specific variants (c.1654C>T, c.2911G>A, c.144-2A>G, c.1666G>A) have been linked to male infertility with demonstrable changes in CFAP61 localization
Functional Validation of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS):
Apply CFAP61 antibodies to assess the impact of novel variants on protein expression and localization
Combine with in vitro functional assays to determine pathogenicity
CRISPR-engineered Cell/Animal Models:
Generate models with specific CFAP61 variants identified in patients
Use antibodies to compare protein dynamics between wild-type and mutant models
Assess rescue with wild-type CFAP61 expression
Multi-omic Integration:
Correlate CFAP61 antibody staining patterns with transcriptomic and proteomic changes
Identify compensatory mechanisms in response to CFAP61 dysfunction
Family-based Studies:
Analyze CFAP61 expression/localization in samples from affected and unaffected family members
Correlate with inheritance patterns of specific variants
This integrated approach provides more comprehensive insights than either genetic or antibody-based methods alone .
When investigating species-specific differences in CFAP61 function using antibodies, researchers should consider:
Antibody Cross-reactivity Assessment:
Sequence Homology Analysis:
Functional Conservation Evaluation:
Tissue-specific Expression Patterns:
Investigate whether CFAP61 expression patterns in ciliated tissues are consistent across species
Document any species-specific differences in subcellular localization
Control Selection:
Include appropriate positive and negative controls for each species
Consider using CFAP61-knockout tissues from the relevant species as definitive negative controls
These considerations ensure that observed differences reflect genuine biological variation rather than technical limitations of the antibodies used .