cgt-3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
cgt-3 antibody; F59G1.1Ceramide glucosyltransferase 3 antibody; EC 2.4.1.80 antibody
Target Names
cgt-3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Cgt-3 antibody targets the enzyme responsible for the initial glycosylation step in glycosphingolipid biosynthesis. This enzyme catalyzes the transfer of glucose from ceramide to produce glucosylceramides (GlcCer). GlcCer play a crucial role in determining the physical properties and physiological functions of membranes, and may also regulate signal transduction pathways. In nematodes, Cgt-3 appears to be the primary active form involved in this process. Notably, only branched-chain sphingoid bases, such as 15-methylhexadecasphing-4-enine, are utilized for the synthesis of complex sphingolipids in Caenorhabditis elegans. In collaboration with the cgt-1 enzyme, Cgt-3 participates in the trafficking of proteins like mig-14 to the cell membrane within intestinal cells.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Animals lacking CGT are unable to synthesize glycosphingolipids, resulting in growth arrest at the first larval stage. These animals exhibit defects in specific cells within their digestive tract. PMID: 19240113
Database Links

KEGG: cel:CELE_F59G1.1

STRING: 6239.F59G1.1b.2

UniGene: Cel.17849

Protein Families
Glycosyltransferase 2 family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in pharyngeal intestinal valve, intestinal rectal valve and hypodermis.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

How do I validate the specificity of CGT-3 antibodies in human tissue samples?

  • Methodological approach:

    • Use CRISPR-Cas9 knockout models (e.g., Grm3−/− or Grm2−/−/3*−/− mice) to confirm absence of off-target binding .

    • Perform parallel testing with transfected HEK293T/17 cells expressing human UGT8 (CGT-3’s gene product) .

    • Validate via Western blotting for monomeric (~100 kDa) and dimeric (~200 kDa) forms, ensuring pH and post-mortem interval controls .

What experimental controls are critical for CGT-3 antibody-based assays?

  • Key controls:

    • Negative controls: Tissue from UGT8 knockout models or siRNA-mediated knockdown systems .

    • Technical controls: Include isotype-matched antibodies and blocking peptides to confirm signal specificity.

    • Biological controls: Compare expression across tissues (e.g., cerebellum vs. cerebral cortex) to confirm expected localization .

How does tissue fixation impact CGT-3 antibody performance in immunohistochemistry?

  • Optimization strategy:

    • Test antigen retrieval methods (e.g., citrate buffer vs. proteinase K) to reverse formalin-induced epitope masking.

    • Validate with fresh-frozen vs. paraffin-embedded sections, as lipid-rich membranes (CGT-3’s localization) are sensitive to fixation .

Advanced Research Questions

How can conflicting data on CGT-3’s role in neurological disorders be resolved?

  • Analytical framework:

    • Stratify cohorts by UGT8 polymorphisms (e.g., rs10234440) to assess genotype-phenotype correlations .

    • Use multi-omics integration (transcriptomics + proteomics) to distinguish compensatory pathways from direct effects .

    • Apply spatial transcriptomics to map CGT-3 expression gradients in the cerebellum and cortex .

What methodologies enable epitope mapping for CGT-3 antibodies?

  • Stepwise protocol:

    • Generate truncation mutants of UGT8 to identify antibody-binding regions .

    • Perform competitive ELISA with synthetic peptides spanning extracellular domains .

    • Validate using cryo-EM to resolve antibody-antigen interfaces at near-atomic resolution .

How do post-translational modifications affect CGT-3 antibody binding?

  • Investigative workflow:

    • Treat cell lysates with glycosidases (e.g., PNGase F) or phosphatases to assess glycan/phosphorylation dependencies .

    • Use mass spectrometry to map modification sites (e.g., N-linked glycosylation at Asn-152) .

    • Compare binding kinetics via surface plasmon resonance (SPR) before/after enzymatic treatment .

Table 1. CGT-3 Antibody Validation Metrics

ParameterRecommended MethodAcceptable ThresholdCitation
SpecificityKnockout model validation≥10-fold signal drop
AffinitySPR or ELISA (KD)≤1 nM
Batch consistencyCoefficient of variation (CV) in WB≤15%

Table 2. Common Pitfalls in CGT-3 Research

IssueSolutionCitation
Non-specific bandsUse tandem epitope tags (e.g., FLAG-HA)
Low signal in IHCOptimize lipid-preserving fixation protocols
Cross-reactivityValidate across species (human, mouse, rat)

Methodological Recommendations

  • For functional studies, pair CGT-3 antibodies with UDP-glucose uptake assays to directly link expression to enzymatic activity .

  • In translational cohorts, correlate plasma CGT-3 levels with CSF biomarkers (e.g., neurofilament light chain) to assess blood-brain barrier penetration .

  • Leverage single-cell B cell cloning (as in ) to engineer CGT-3 antibodies with isotype-switched variants for mechanistic studies.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.