CHCHD5 (coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 5) is a mitochondrial protein with a calculated molecular weight of approximately 12 kDa (110 amino acids) . The significance of CHCHD5 lies in its emerging role in cancer research, where it has been identified as overexpressed in human malignancies, particularly breast and colon cancers . In some research contexts, CHCHD5 is also referred to as CHTM1 (a novel metabolic marker), highlighting its potential importance in cancer metabolism . The gene encoding CHCHD5 maps to human chromosome 2, which contains over 1,400 genes and constitutes about 8% of the human genome .
Based on current literature and commercial offerings, CHCHD5 antibodies are available in several formats:
The selection of an appropriate antibody should be based on the specific experimental requirements and the validation data available for each antibody in the intended application.
CHCHD5 contains a characteristic CHCH (coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix) domain, which is a structural motif found in several mitochondrial proteins . This domain is formed by specific arrangements of cysteine residues (often in CX9C motifs) that can form disulfide bonds, contributing to protein stability and function in the mitochondrial intermembrane space . When developing or selecting antibodies, researchers should consider whether the epitope is within this domain, as it may affect antibody specificity and performance in different experimental conditions, particularly under reducing versus non-reducing conditions.
For optimal Western blot results with CHCHD5 antibodies, follow these methodological guidelines:
Sample preparation: Prepare protein lysates from cells (A431, HeLa, HepG2, MCF-7 have shown positive detection)
Protein loading: 20-40 μg of total protein per lane is typically sufficient
Separation: Use 12-15% SDS-PAGE gels to efficiently resolve the low molecular weight (12 kDa) CHCHD5 protein
Transfer: Semi-dry or wet transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes
Blocking: 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody: Dilute CHCHD5 antibody at 1:500-1:3000 (antibody-dependent)
Incubation: Overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking
Washing: 3-5 times with TBST, 5-10 minutes each
Secondary antibody: Anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated at 1:5000-1:10000
Detection: Use ECL or similar chemiluminescent detection systems
When validating new antibodies or experimental conditions, it is highly recommended to include positive controls (known CHCHD5-expressing cells) and negative controls (CHCHD5 knockout cells) to confirm specificity.
For successful immunofluorescence studies targeting CHCHD5:
Cell preparation:
Fixation and permeabilization protocol:
Blocking:
Antibody incubation:
Dilute primary CHCHD5 antibody in IF buffer (PBS, 5% BSA, 0.01% Triton X-100) at 1:50-1:500
Incubate overnight at 4°C
Wash 3 times for 10 minutes each with IF buffer
Incubate with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody (typically at 1.0 μg/mL) for 1 hour at room temperature
Co-stain with DAPI for nuclear visualization
Validation strategies:
Immunohistochemical detection of CHCHD5 requires careful attention to the following factors:
Tissue preparation:
Use freshly fixed tissues or properly stored paraffin blocks
FFPE (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded) sections typically 4-6 μm thick
Antigen retrieval methods:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0)
Optimize time and temperature for specific antibodies
Antibody dilution and incubation:
Controls for validation:
Signal development and counterstaining:
DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) detection system is commonly used
Hematoxylin counterstaining to visualize tissue architecture
Research has demonstrated that CHCHD5 shows increased expression in breast and colon cancer tissues compared to matched normal tissues, with approximately 81-83% of tumors exhibiting elevated levels .
A comprehensive validation strategy for CHCHD5 antibodies should include:
Genetic validation:
Molecular weight verification:
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Peptide competition:
Pre-incubate antibody with the immunizing peptide/protein to block specific binding
This should eliminate specific signals while non-specific signals will remain
Application-specific validation:
For immunoprecipitation: Verify enrichment by Western blot
For immunofluorescence: Confirm co-localization with established mitochondrial markers
When investigating CHCHD5 in disease contexts, particularly cancer, implement these essential controls:
Paired sample controls:
Loading/normalization controls:
Technical replication:
Perform at least three independent experiments
For patient samples, include adequate sample sizes (n>30) for statistical power
Methodological controls:
For IHC: Use isotype controls and peptide competition assays to confirm staining specificity
For IF: Include secondary-only controls to assess background fluorescence
Expression validation through orthogonal methods:
To accurately determine CHCHD5 subcellular localization:
Subcellular fractionation:
Perform careful mitochondrial isolation using established protocols
Further fractionate mitochondria to separate outer membrane, inner membrane, and matrix compartments
Analyze CHCHD5 distribution by Western blot alongside marker proteins for each compartment
High-resolution microscopy:
Confocal microscopy with co-staining for mitochondrial markers
Super-resolution microscopy (STED, STORM) for precise localization within mitochondrial subcompartments
Electron microscopy:
Immunogold labeling for ultrastructural localization
This can determine if CHCHD5 associates with specific mitochondrial structures (e.g., cristae)
Proximity labeling approaches:
BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins to identify proteins in close proximity to CHCHD5
This can provide insights into functional protein complexes
Given that CHCHD family proteins typically localize to the mitochondrial intermembrane space , particular attention should be paid to this compartment when designing localization experiments.
| Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | Insufficient protein loading; Degraded protein; Ineffective antibody | Increase protein amount (40-60 μg); Add protease inhibitors; Validate antibody with positive control |
| Multiple bands | Non-specific binding; Protein degradation; Post-translational modifications | Increase antibody dilution (1:2000-1:3000); Use fresh samples; Confirm with another validated antibody |
| High background | Insufficient blocking; Excessive antibody; Inadequate washing | Extend blocking time (2 hours); Dilute antibody further; Increase washing duration and frequency |
| Weak signal | Low CHCHD5 expression; Inefficient transfer; Suboptimal detection | Enrich mitochondrial fraction; Optimize transfer for low MW proteins; Use high-sensitivity detection systems |
| Unexpected MW | Post-translational modifications; Incorrect target | Use denaturing and reducing conditions; Confirm with knockout controls |
For the specific case of CHCHD5, its small size (12 kDa) requires particular attention to:
Using higher percentage gels (15-20%)
Optimizing transfer conditions for small proteins (lower voltage, longer time)
Avoiding loss during membrane washing (use 0.2 μm rather than 0.45 μm pore size membranes)
When faced with contradictory results from different CHCHD5 antibodies:
Epitope comparison:
Determine the epitope regions recognized by each antibody
Antibodies targeting different regions may give different results if:
Post-translational modifications mask certain epitopes
Protein interactions shield specific regions
Conformational changes affect epitope accessibility
Validation status assessment:
Prioritize results from antibodies validated using knockout controls
Consider the extent of validation for each specific application
Cross-validation approach:
Use orthogonal methods (qPCR, mass spectrometry) to resolve discrepancies
Employ multiple antibodies in the same experiment to identify consistent patterns
Experimental conditions review:
Different fixation methods in IF/IHC may affect epitope availability
Denaturing vs. native conditions in Western blot and IP may explain differences
Reporting recommendations:
Clearly document all antibodies used (catalog number, lot, dilution)
Acknowledge limitations and discrepancies in publications
Consider reporting results from multiple antibodies where appropriate
Several factors may influence the successful detection of CHCHD5 across different biological samples:
Expression level variations:
Sample preparation impact:
Fixation methods and duration affect epitope preservation
For FFPE tissues, older blocks may require adjusted antigen retrieval protocols
Fresh frozen samples may provide better epitope preservation
Mitochondrial content differences:
Cells with higher mitochondrial content (e.g., cardiomyocytes, hepatocytes) may show stronger signals
Consider normalizing to mitochondrial markers when comparing across cell types
Disease state influences:
Changes in mitochondrial morphology or content in disease states may affect detection
Post-translational modifications may be altered in pathological conditions
Technical considerations:
Different cell types may require adjusted permeabilization conditions
Tissue-specific autofluorescence or endogenous peroxidase activity may necessitate additional blocking steps for IF or IHC
CHCHD5 antibodies can be valuable tools for investigating mitochondrial abnormalities in various diseases:
Quantitative assessment of altered expression:
Western blot and image analysis to quantify CHCHD5 levels in disease vs. control samples
IHC to visualize expression changes in specific tissue regions or cell types
Co-localization studies:
Dual immunofluorescence with markers of mitochondrial stress or damage
Changes in CHCHD5 localization pattern may indicate mitochondrial dysfunction
Proximity labeling applications:
CHCHD5 antibodies for immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Identifying altered CHCHD5 protein interactions in disease states
Dynamic regulation analysis:
Antibodies to track CHCHD5 levels during disease progression or treatment response
Phospho-specific antibodies (if available) to detect post-translational modifications
Therapeutic target assessment:
Using antibodies to monitor CHCHD5 modulation in response to experimental therapeutics
High-content screening with CHCHD5 immunostaining as a readout for compound effects
Given the observed overexpression of CHCHD5 in cancer tissues, particularly breast and colon cancers , these approaches are especially relevant for cancer research.
To investigate CHCHD5 protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:
Proximity-based approaches:
BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins to identify proteins in the vicinity of CHCHD5
FRET or BRET assays for monitoring direct protein interactions in living cells
In situ visualization:
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) to visualize and quantify protein interactions at endogenous levels
Dual-color super-resolution microscopy to analyze co-localization at nanoscale resolution
Biochemical characterization:
Size-exclusion chromatography to identify CHCHD5-containing protein complexes
Blue native PAGE to preserve native protein complexes for analysis
Computational prediction validation:
Use antibodies to experimentally confirm predicted interactions from bioinformatic analyses
Focus on other CHCH domain-containing proteins (CHCHD1-10) as potential interactors
For high-throughput applications and biomarker development:
Tissue microarray (TMA) analysis:
Optimize CHCHD5 IHC protocols for TMA applications
Use automated imaging and quantification systems for consistent scoring
Apply validated scoring criteria (e.g., H-score, Allred score) for standardization
Multiplex immunofluorescence approaches:
Combine CHCHD5 antibodies with other cancer or mitochondrial markers in multiplex panels
Use spectral unmixing or sequential staining approaches to overcome antibody compatibility issues
Apply machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition in complex datasets
Liquid biopsy development:
Explore CHCHD5 detection in circulating tumor cells or extracellular vesicles
Develop sensitive detection methods (e.g., proximity-based assays) for low-abundance targets
High-content screening applications:
Standardize CHCHD5 immunofluorescence for automated high-content systems
Develop multi-parametric readouts combining CHCHD5 with indicators of cell health, mitochondrial function, or cancer phenotypes
Clinical validation strategies:
Design rigorous biomarker validation studies with appropriate statistical power
Consider clinical factors (tumor stage, grade, treatment history) in biomarker performance evaluation
Validate across multiple independent cohorts before clinical implementation
Research has demonstrated that CHCHD5 is overexpressed in 81.11% of colon cancer samples by Western blot and 81.81% by IHC, with similar findings in breast cancer (83.60% by IHC) , suggesting potential utility as a biomarker.
Understanding CHCHD5 in the context of the broader CHCHD protein family:
Structural comparisons:
CHCHD5, like other family members, contains the characteristic CHCH domain
Comparative structural analysis using antibodies against different family members can identify unique vs. conserved features
Functional overlap assessment:
Co-expression and co-localization patterns:
Use antibodies against multiple CHCHD proteins to determine their relative expression across tissues
Investigate potential formation of heterocomplexes between family members
Evolutionary conservation analysis:
Apply antibodies cross-reactive with orthologous proteins to study evolutionary conservation
Connect structural conservation to functional importance across species
Differential regulation study:
Examine how expression of different CHCHD family members responds to cellular stresses
Identify unique vs. shared regulatory mechanisms
Recent and emerging technologies enhancing antibody research:
Recombinant antibody technologies:
Development of synthetic antibodies with improved specificity and reduced batch-to-batch variation
Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) for applications requiring small probe size or intracellular expression
Advanced validation approaches:
Multimodal imaging innovations:
Combining antibody-based detection with other imaging modalities (e.g., metabolic imaging)
Correlative light and electron microscopy to connect molecular localization with ultrastructure
Automation and standardization:
Automated protocols for consistent antibody performance across laboratories
Machine learning algorithms for objective interpretation of immunostaining results
Single-cell applications:
Adapting antibodies for single-cell proteomics techniques
Spatial proteomics to map CHCHD5 distribution at subcellular resolution in tissue contexts
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) represent an important research frontier:
Identification strategies:
Immunoprecipitation with CHCHD5 antibodies followed by PTM-specific mass spectrometry
Development of modification-specific antibodies (phospho-, acetyl-, ubiquitin-specific)
Functional consequences:
Investigate how PTMs affect CHCHD5 localization, stability, or interactions
Determine if disease states show altered PTM patterns
Regulatory mechanisms:
Study how cellular signaling pathways regulate CHCHD5 PTMs
Examine PTM changes in response to mitochondrial stress or metabolic alterations
Technical considerations:
Optimize sample preparation to preserve labile PTMs
Validate that existing antibodies detect modified forms of CHCHD5
Therapeutic implications:
Explore targeting enzymes that modify CHCHD5 as potential disease interventions
Develop screens to identify compounds that modulate specific CHCHD5 PTMs
Understanding CHCHD5 PTMs may be particularly relevant in cancer contexts, where altered post-translational modification is a common feature of dysregulated cellular signaling.
Despite progress in CHCHD5 research, several important gaps remain:
Comprehensive validation across applications:
Many commercially available antibodies lack validation in multiple applications
Limited knockout-validation data compared to other protein targets
Epitope mapping information:
Incomplete information about specific epitopes recognized by different antibodies
This limits understanding of differential performance in various applications
Cross-reactivity profiles:
Insufficient data on potential cross-reactivity with other CHCHD family members
This complicates interpretation of results, especially in systems with multiple expressed CHCHD proteins
Species reactivity limitations:
Post-translational modification detection:
Few modification-specific antibodies available
Unknown effects of modifications on epitope recognition by existing antibodies
Addressing these gaps will require collaborative efforts between commercial antibody providers and academic researchers to generate and share validation data.
Researchers can enhance the quality and availability of CHCHD5 research tools through:
Rigorous validation and sharing:
Perform comprehensive validation using knockout controls and multiple applications
Publish detailed validation data including positive and negative results
Consider using standardized validation formats such as those proposed by the International Working Group for Antibody Validation
Repository contributions:
Submit detailed protocols to repositories like protocols.io
Share raw validation data and images through appropriate databases
Collaborative characterization:
Participate in multi-laboratory antibody testing initiatives
Compare performance of multiple antibodies against the same target
Technology development:
Develop improved antibodies for underserved applications
Create new tools for studying CHCHD5 biology (e.g., nanobodies, aptamers)
Education and standardization:
Promote best practices in antibody validation and use
Adopt standardized reporting formats for antibody experiments