Host/Isotype: Rabbit polyclonal IgG, ensuring broad epitope recognition and high specificity for CHCHD7 .
Immunogen: Recombinant CHCHD7 fusion protein (Ag13735), validated for reactivity with human, mouse, and rat tissues .
Molecular Weight: The antibody detects proteins of approximately 10 kDa, consistent with CHCHD7’s small size .
The CHCHD7 gene (NCBI Gene ID: 79145) encodes a mitochondrial protein involved in copper homeostasis, cytochrome C oxidase (CcO) biosynthesis, and growth regulation . Its dysfunction has been linked to developmental traits in animals and mitochondrial stress pathways .
| Application | Dilution | Sample Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500–1:2000 | Mouse pancreas, human placenta |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:20–1:200 | Human pancreas (with antigen retrieval) |
| ELISA | N/A | Human, mouse, rat |
Genetic Analysis in Goats: A 17-bp indel polymorphism in the CHCHD7 gene (NC_030821.1:g58695432-58695448del) was associated with growth traits in cashmere goats. The antibody could validate such genetic variants in tissue samples .
Mitochondrial Stress: CHCHD7’s role in copper delivery and mitochondrial function aligns with its potential involvement in oxidative stress pathways, as observed in neurodegenerative diseases like Huntington’s (via CHCHD2 homologs) .
A study comparing traditional PCR with the Mathematical Expectation (ME) method for CHCHD7 variant detection in goats reported:
| Breed | Predicted RT (ME) | Actual RT | Efficiency Gain |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBWC | 207 | 667 | 36.78% |
| IMWC | 146 | 538 | 27.59% |
| (RT = Reaction Time; ME = Mathematical Expectation) . |
The CHCHD7 antibody (19911-1-AP) was validated in:
CHCHD7 (Coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 7) is a member of a multifamily of proteins containing a conserved (coiled coil 1)-(helix 1)-(coiled coil 2)-(helix 2) domain. The protein is ubiquitously expressed in human tissues, as demonstrated by Northern blot analysis . While its precise biological function remains largely unknown, CHCHD7 has gained research significance due to its involvement in chromosomal aberrations found in salivary gland pleiomorphic adenomas, the most common benign epithelial tumors of the salivary gland . CHCHD7 and PLAG1 are located head-to-head approximately 500 bp apart in chromosome 8q12, and CHCHD7-PLAG1 gene fusions have been identified in these tumors . The protein is also associated with mitochondrial function, specifically the intermembrane space , suggesting potential roles in cellular energetics.
Currently, several types of CHCHD7 antibodies are available for research, primarily polyclonal antibodies produced in rabbits. These include:
Most commercially available antibodies are affinity-purified and supplied in buffered solutions containing glycerol and preservatives like sodium azide . These antibodies are typically raised against synthetic peptides corresponding to regions of the human CHCHD7 protein, often near the C-terminus .
CHCHD7 antibodies have been validated for several standard research applications with specific recommended dilutions:
When performing these applications, researchers should note that positive WB detection has been reported in mouse pancreas tissue and human placenta tissue . For IHC, human pancreas tissue has shown positive results, with vendors suggesting antigen retrieval using TE buffer pH 9.0 or alternatively citrate buffer pH 6.0 .
Antigen retrieval optimization for CHCHD7 detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues requires careful consideration of buffer systems and retrieval conditions. According to available data, the primary recommended method is:
When optimizing retrieval conditions, consider implementing a systematic approach:
Perform a temperature gradient experiment (95-125°C) with both buffer systems
Test variable retrieval durations (10-30 minutes)
Include positive control tissues (human pancreatic tissue is recommended based on validation data)
After retrieval, ensure adequate cooling before proceeding with blocking steps
For challenging samples, consider dual antigen retrieval approaches where enzymatic treatment (proteinase K, 5-10 μg/mL for 5-10 minutes) follows the heat-induced method. When evaluating results, assess not only staining intensity but also the expected subcellular localization pattern in mitochondria .
Optimizing Western blot detection of CHCHD7 requires consideration of tissue-specific parameters and protein characteristics:
Extraction Protocol:
For mitochondrial proteins like CHCHD7, use a mitochondrial isolation buffer containing:
250 mM sucrose
10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)
0.1 mM EGTA
Protease inhibitor cocktail
Sample Preparation Parameters:
Expected molecular weight: 10-12 kDa observed (calculated 12 kDa)
Recommended loading amount: 10-30 μg of total protein
Reducing conditions required
Heat samples at 70°C rather than 95°C to prevent aggregation of mitochondrial proteins
Electrophoresis and Transfer:
Use higher percentage gels (15-20%) for optimal resolution of low molecular weight CHCHD7
Transfer to PVDF membranes (0.2 μm pore size) at lower voltage (30V) overnight at 4°C
Add 10% methanol to transfer buffer to enhance transfer of small proteins
Detection Parameters:
Incubation: Overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody: HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG at 1:5000-1:10000
Extended blocking (2 hours) with 5% non-fat milk to reduce background
Tissue-Specific Considerations:
Mouse pancreas and human placenta tissues have shown reliable detection of CHCHD7 , so consider using these as positive controls when establishing protocols for new tissue types.
When designing co-localization experiments to study CHCHD7's mitochondrial localization, several technical considerations should be addressed:
Antibody Selection:
Choose CHCHD7 antibodies validated for immunofluorescence applications with documented subcellular localization patterns
Optimal working concentration for IF applications: 0.25-2 μg/mL
Ensure the host species differs from your mitochondrial marker antibodies to avoid cross-reactivity
Mitochondrial Markers for Co-localization:
| Marker | Compartment | Compatibility |
|---|---|---|
| TOM20 | Outer membrane | Recommended first choice |
| COX IV | Inner membrane | Good alternative |
| COXII | Matrix | Alternative option |
| MitoTracker dyes | Membrane potential-dependent | Compatible with fixation protocols |
Fixation Optimization:
Paraformaldehyde (4%) for 10-15 minutes preserves mitochondrial morphology
Avoid methanol fixation which can disrupt mitochondrial structure
For membrane proteins like CHCHD7, gentle permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 minutes is recommended
Image Acquisition Parameters:
Deconvolution microscopy or confocal microscopy with Airyscan is recommended for resolving mitochondrial substructures
Sequential scanning to avoid bleed-through
Z-stack imaging (0.2-0.3 μm steps) for complete mitochondrial network visualization
Consider super-resolution techniques (STED, STORM) for studying precise submitochondrial localization
Controls and Quantification:
Include non-mitochondrial markers (e.g., ER, Golgi) as negative controls
Perform quantitative co-localization analysis using Pearson's or Mander's coefficients
Validate findings with biochemical fractionation followed by Western blotting
CHCHD7's reported mitochondrial intermembrane space localization suggests that experimental design should particularly focus on markers for this specific compartment.
Inconsistent staining patterns in CHCHD7 immunohistochemistry can stem from several technical and biological factors:
Technical Factors:
Fixation Variability: Different tissues may have undergone variable fixation durations. Overfixed tissues may require extended antigen retrieval (25-30 minutes) with high-pH TE buffer .
Antibody Concentration Optimization: Different tissues may require adjusted antibody concentrations:
Detection System Sensitivity: Consider amplification systems (TSA/CARD) for tissues with low expression levels.
Biological Factors:
Expression Level Variation: CHCHD7 is ubiquitously expressed but at varying levels across tissues .
Isoform Expression: Different tissues may express variant isoforms with altered epitope availability.
Post-Translational Modifications: Tissue-specific PTMs may affect antibody recognition.
Systematic Troubleshooting Approach:
Perform titration experiments (1:10 to 1:200) on multi-tissue arrays
Compare multiple antigen retrieval methods side-by-side
Test multiple antibody clones/vendors targeting different epitopes
Consider dual IF staining with mitochondrial markers to confirm specificity
To address these issues, implement standardized tissue processing protocols across samples and consider using automated IHC platforms to minimize technical variability.
Non-specific bands when detecting CHCHD7 (expected size: 10-12 kDa) can be problematic but can be addressed through systematic optimization:
Common Causes and Solutions:
Cross-reactivity with Related Proteins:
Sample Preparation Issues:
Incomplete denaturation can cause higher MW aggregates
Solution: Optimize sample preparation by including 8M urea in lysis buffer for complete denaturation of mitochondrial membrane proteins
Degradation Products:
Lower MW bands may represent degradation products
Solution: Include additional protease inhibitors (especially serine and cysteine protease inhibitors) and prepare samples fresh
Optimization Protocol:
| Parameter | Recommended Adjustment |
|---|---|
| Blocking | Extended blocking (2 hrs) with 5% milk-TBST |
| Antibody dilution | Increase dilution gradually (1:1000 → 1:2000) |
| Washing | Extended washing (5 x 10 minutes with 0.1% Tween-20) |
| Primary antibody incubation | 4°C overnight with gentle rocking |
| Secondary antibody | Use highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies |
Validation Approaches:
Use CHCHD7 recombinant protein (ab183240) as a positive control
Confirm specificity through siRNA/shRNA knockdown experiments
Compare staining patterns with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Consider pre-adsorption of the antibody with the immunizing peptide
For systems showing persistent background, consider using a monoclonal antibody or implementing more stringent blocking with 5% BSA + 5% normal serum matching the host species of the secondary antibody.
Comprehensive validation of CHCHD7 antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach incorporating several control experiments:
Positive Controls:
Recombinant Protein Analysis:
Verified Tissue Controls:
Negative Controls:
Peptide Competition/Neutralization:
Genetic Knockdown/Knockout Validation:
siRNA or shRNA knockdown of CHCHD7 (validate knockdown efficiency by qRT-PCR)
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout cell lines
Compare protein expression between control and KD/KO samples
Cross-Reactivity Assessment:
Multiple Species Testing:
Multi-Antibody Validation:
Test multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Concordant results from antibodies recognizing distinct regions strongly support specificity
Documentation Requirements:
Maintain detailed records of lot numbers and validation experiments
Include representative images of all controls in supplementary materials
Document antibody concentration, incubation time/temperature, and detection methods
This comprehensive validation approach ensures that experimental observations can be confidently attributed to specific CHCHD7 detection rather than non-specific or artifactual signals.
While detailed functional characterization of CHCHD7 remains limited, several lines of evidence point to its role in mitochondrial biology:
Current Knowledge:
It belongs to the CHCHD protein family, several members of which are involved in mitochondrial respiration
CHCHD7 has been annotated as COX23 cytochrome c oxidase assembly homolog , suggesting potential involvement in respiratory complex IV assembly or function
Experimental Approaches to Study CHCHD7's Mitochondrial Function:
Subcellular Localization Studies:
Immunofluorescence with mitochondrial compartment-specific markers
Biochemical fractionation followed by Western blotting
Protease protection assays to confirm intermembrane space localization
Functional Assessment After Genetic Manipulation:
Measure key mitochondrial parameters after CHCHD7 knockdown/knockout:
Oxygen consumption rate (Seahorse XF analyzer)
Mitochondrial membrane potential (TMRM, JC-1 dyes)
ATP production
Reactive oxygen species generation
mtDNA copy number
Protein Interaction Studies:
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Proximity labeling approaches (BioID, APEX)
Yeast two-hybrid screening
Focus on interactions with known respiratory chain components
Rescue Experiments:
Complementation studies in knockout cells with wild-type vs. mutant CHCHD7
Cross-species rescue to assess functional conservation
Technical Considerations:
For oxygen consumption measurements, use permeabilized cells to directly assess respiratory complex activities
Include appropriate controls (positive: cells with known mitochondrial defects; negative: non-targeted siRNA)
Consider tissue-specific effects, as mitochondrial function varies across tissues
Emerging Research Directions:
Investigation into whether CHCHD7 functions similarly to other CHCHD family proteins (e.g., CHCHD3, CHCHD10) which have established roles in mitochondrial cristae organization, respiratory complex assembly, and mitochondrial DNA maintenance.
CHCHD7 has been specifically implicated in salivary gland pleomorphic adenomas through a novel gene fusion mechanism:
Current Understanding:
CHCHD7-PLAG1 gene fusion is a recurrent event in pleomorphic salivary gland adenomas
This fusion results from cryptic, intrachromosomal 8q rearrangements
CHCHD7 and PLAG1 are located head-to-head approximately 500 bp apart in chromosome 8q12
The breakpoints occur in the 5′-noncoding regions of the genes, leading to activation of PLAG1 by promoter swapping/substitution
PLAG1 protein is overexpressed in epithelial, myoepithelial, and mesenchymal-like tumor cells in fusion-positive tumors
Experimental Approaches to Study the CHCHD7-PLAG1 Connection:
Detection of CHCHD7-PLAG1 Fusion:
RT-PCR using primers spanning the fusion junction
FISH analysis using break-apart probes
RNA sequencing to identify fusion transcripts
Long-read sequencing for detailed breakpoint characterization
Functional Studies:
Reporter assays to study promoter activity of CHCHD7 driving PLAG1 expression
CRISPR-mediated recreation of the fusion in normal salivary gland cells
Transcriptomic analysis comparing fusion-positive vs. fusion-negative tumors
Chromatin immunoprecipitation to study altered transcription factor binding
Clinical Correlation Studies:
IHC analysis of PLAG1 protein expression in patient samples
Correlation of fusion status with clinical parameters (tumor size, recurrence, etc.)
Comparison with other known genetic alterations in pleomorphic adenomas
Methodological Considerations:
Due to the cryptic nature of these rearrangements, conventional cytogenetics may miss the CHCHD7-PLAG1 fusion
Combined approaches (FISH on interphase nuclei and nuclear chromatin fibers) may be necessary for detection
Western blot and IHC analyses should be used to confirm PLAG1 protein overexpression
Research Implications:
The identification of CHCHD7-PLAG1 fusion emphasizes the significance of PLAG1 activation in pleomorphic adenomas and demonstrates that the gene is more frequently activated than previously anticipated . Future studies could explore whether targeting this fusion or its downstream effects might have therapeutic potential.
The CHCHD protein family shares a conserved (coiled coil 1)-(helix 1)-(coiled coil 2)-(helix 2) domain structure, but members appear to have diverse functions. Exploring the functional distinctions between CHCHD7 and other family members requires a systematic comparative approach:
Sequence and Structure Analysis:
Comparative Sequence Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment of CHCHD family proteins
Identification of conserved vs. variable regions
Evolutionary analysis to determine functional divergence points
Structural Modeling:
Homology-based structural prediction for CHCHD7
Comparison with known structures of other CHCHD proteins
Identification of potential functional motifs unique to CHCHD7
Experimental Approaches:
Localization Studies:
Comparative subcellular localization of all CHCHD family proteins using consistent methodology
Super-resolution microscopy to determine precise submitochondrial localization
Create chimeric proteins swapping domains between CHCHD7 and other family members to identify localization determinants
Interactome Mapping:
Systematic immunoprecipitation of each CHCHD protein followed by mass spectrometry
Proximity labeling (BioID, APEX) of each family member
Network analysis to identify shared vs. unique interaction partners
Focus on mitochondrial function-related interactors
Functional Redundancy Assessment:
Single and combinatorial knockdown/knockout of CHCHD family members
Cross-complementation experiments (can one family member rescue defects caused by loss of another?)
Phenotypic profiling (growth, mitochondrial function, stress responses)
Expression Pattern Analysis:
Comprehensive tissue expression profiling of all family members
Response to cellular stressors (oxidative stress, hypoxia, nutrient deprivation)
Developmental expression patterns
Technical Considerations:
Use epitope-tagged versions of each protein where antibody cross-reactivity is a concern
Include proper controls for overexpression artifacts
Consider tissue-specific functions in experimental design
Emerging Research Questions:
Does CHCHD7 participate in the same mitochondrial processes as other family members or has it evolved distinct functions?
Are there functional redundancies that explain why single gene mutations/knockouts may have subtle phenotypes?
How do post-translational modifications differ between family members and affect function?
Investigating these questions will provide insights into the specific role of CHCHD7 in the context of this protein family and broader mitochondrial biology.
Selecting the optimal CHCHD7 antibody requires careful consideration of epitope characteristics based on the intended application:
Epitope Mapping of Available Antibodies:
Application-Specific Epitope Considerations:
Western Blotting:
Linear epitopes are preferred (all available antibodies suitable)
Consider epitope accessibility in denatured conditions
Avoid antibodies targeting regions prone to post-translational modifications
C-terminal antibodies may be preferred for detecting full-length protein vs. truncated forms
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence:
Immunoprecipitation:
Epitope must be accessible in the protein's native conformation
Avoid epitopes that might be masked by protein-protein interactions
Consider using antibodies recognizing different epitopes for IP and detection
Peptide Design for Custom Antibodies:
When designing custom antibodies against CHCHD7, consider:
Regions with high antigenicity and surface probability
Avoidance of hydrophobic regions (amino acids 70-85)
Exclusion of regions with high sequence similarity to other CHCHD family members
Inclusion of the CHCH domain for functional studies, but with careful validation against other family members
Cross-Reactivity Considerations:
CHCHD7 shares structural similarities with other CHCHD family proteins
When studying novel tissues/species, validate antibody specificity using recombinant protein controls
Consider epitope conservation across species for comparative studies
Proper epitope selection based on the intended application will significantly enhance experimental outcomes and data reliability.
Different validation methods provide complementary evidence for antibody specificity, each with distinct advantages and limitations. A comprehensive validation approach for CHCHD7 antibodies should incorporate multiple methods:
Comparison of Validation Approaches:
Integrated Validation Strategy for CHCHD7 Antibodies:
Primary Validation (Minimum Requirements):
Secondary Validation (Enhanced Confidence):
siRNA knockdown with quantified reduction in signal
Recombinant protein detection
Concordant results with ≥2 antibodies
Tertiary Validation (Highest Confidence):
Knockout cell line/tissue
Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated protein
Cross-species conservation of detection pattern
Quantitative Assessment:
Document validation results with quantitative metrics:
Signal-to-noise ratio
Percent signal reduction in competition/knockdown
Correlation coefficients between multiple antibodies
Detection sensitivity (minimum protein amount detectable)
Implementing this multi-level validation strategy provides robust evidence for CHCHD7 antibody specificity, enhancing experimental reproducibility and data interpretation confidence.