CHX1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Research Applications

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling

  • Investigation of stem cell pluripotency mechanisms [Hall et al., 2007]

  • Analysis of transcriptional regulation in cancer models [Nagarajan et al., 2009]

Clinical Findings in Cerebrovascular Disease

GroupCBX1-Abs Level (Mean ± SD)Positivity Rate
Healthy Donants30,297 ± 5,6712.4%
TIA Patients33,969 ± 6,76410.4%
Acute CI Patients32,642 ± 6,83511.4%
Data from AlphaLISA analysis of 158 samples

Functional Properties

  • Recognizes H3K9me3-modified histones

  • Maintains heterochromatin integrity through lamin B receptor interactions

  • Commercial availability: ab10811 (Abcam), rat IgG2b monoclonal

Disease Associations

  • Regulator of cell cycle progression in carcinomas

  • Potential biomarker in breast cancer progression [Gaspar-Maia et al., 2009]

Comparative Analysis of CHD1 vs CBX1 vs CUX1 Antibodies

FeatureCHD1 AntibodyCBX1 AntibodyCUX1 Antibody
Structural RoleChromatin remodelingHeterochromatin organizationTranscriptional regulation
Key DomainsHelicase ATP-bindingChromo shadow domainHomeobox DNA-binding
Therapeutic PotentialCancer epigeneticsStroke biomarkersOncogene regulation
Commercial SourcesCell Signaling TechAbcamProteintech
Citations8+ studies 15+ publications 35+ IF applications

Critical Research Considerations

  1. Specificity Validation: All three antibodies require rigorous validation due to:

    • CHD1's large molecular weight (220 kDa) requiring extended electrophoresis

    • CBX1's cross-reactivity concerns with other HP1 family members

    • CUX1's multiple splice variants affecting detection

  2. Technical Optimization:

    • CHD1 ChIP requires 10⁶ cells per IP

    • CBX1 staining needs NaBH₄ treatment to reduce autofluorescence

    • CUX1 shows optimal IHC performance in EDTA-antigen retrieval

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
CHX1 antibody; CHX01 antibody; At1g16380 antibody; F3O9.18Cation/H(+) antiporter 1 antibody; Protein CATION/H+ EXCHANGER 1 antibody; AtCHX1 antibody
Target Names
CHX1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody may function as a cation/H(+) antiporter.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G16380

STRING: 3702.AT1G16380.1

UniGene: At.51636

Protein Families
Monovalent cation:proton antiporter 2 (CPA2) transporter (TC 2.A.37) family, CHX (TC 2.A.37.4) subfamily
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.
Tissue Specificity
Specifically expressed in pollen.

Q&A

What are the primary research applications for CHD1 antibodies?

Human CHD1 antibodies are primarily used in Western blotting, immunocytochemistry, and immunofluorescence applications. Western blot analysis has been validated using multiple cell lines including Jurkat (human acute T cell leukemia), K562 (human chronic myelogenous leukemia), Raji (human Burkitt's lymphoma), and BaF3 (mouse pro-B cell) lines, where CHD1 appears as a band at approximately 220 kDa under reducing conditions . For immunofluorescence applications, CHD1 antibodies can detect nuclear localization in human embryonic stem cells, providing insight into chromatin regulation during differentiation .

How does CHK1 function in cellular processes and why is it a significant research target?

CHK1 is a serine/threonine-protein kinase critical for checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest and DNA repair activation in response to DNA damage or unreplicated DNA . It functions by:

  • Recognizing the substrate consensus sequence [R-X-X-S/T]

  • Binding to and phosphorylating CDC25A, CDC25B, and CDC25C

  • Creating binding sites for 14-3-3 proteins through phosphorylation of CDC25A at Ser-178 and Thr-507, and CDC25C at Ser-216

  • Promoting proteolysis of CDC25A through phosphorylation at Ser-76, Ser-124, Ser-178, Ser-279, and Ser-293

This central role in cell cycle regulation and DNA damage response makes CHK1 a critical target for cancer research and therapeutic development .

What strategies should researchers use to validate CHD1 antibody specificity?

Proper validation of CHD1 antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Knockout cell line validation: Compare results between parental and CHD1-knockout cell lines (e.g., HEK293T). A specific band should be detected at approximately 210-220 kDa in parental lines but absent in knockout lines .

  • Multi-cell line verification: Test reactivity across multiple relevant cell lines to ensure consistent detection at the expected molecular weight.

  • Loading control inclusion: Always include appropriate loading controls (e.g., GAPDH) to normalize protein loading across samples .

  • Multiple detection methods: Confirm findings using both Western blot and immunofluorescence to verify nuclear localization pattern.

How can researchers distinguish between specific and non-specific binding in CHK1 antibody applications?

Distinguishing specific from non-specific binding requires systematic controls:

  • Blocking peptide experiments: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide to block specific binding sites.

  • Antibody titration: Perform a dilution series to determine the optimal antibody concentration that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background.

  • Knockout/knockdown controls: Use CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts or siRNA knockdowns to demonstrate signal reduction in CHK1-depleted samples .

  • Multiple antibody verification: Use antibodies targeting different epitopes of CHK1 to confirm consistent detection patterns.

What are the optimal conditions for Western blot detection of CHD1?

For optimal Western blot detection of CHD1, researchers should follow these protocols:

ParameterRecommended ConditionNotes
Membrane typePVDFProvides better protein retention for high molecular weight proteins
Antibody concentration0.5 μg/mLFor Human CHD1 Monoclonal Antibody
Secondary antibodyHRP-conjugated Anti-Mouse IgGFollow manufacturer recommendations for dilution
Buffer systemImmunoblot Buffer Group 1Optimized for nuclear proteins
Reducing conditionsRequiredUse standard reducing agents
Expected band size210-220 kDaSize may vary slightly between cell types
Loading controlGAPDHFor normalization of protein loading

These conditions have been verified with Jurkat, K562, Raji, and BaF3 cell lines .

What methodological approaches improve immunofluorescence detection of CHD1 in stem cells?

For successful immunofluorescence detection of CHD1 in stem cells:

  • Fixation: Use immersion fixation methods that preserve nuclear architecture.

  • Antibody concentration: Apply Human CHD1 Monoclonal Antibody at 10 μg/mL.

  • Incubation conditions: Incubate for 3 hours at room temperature.

  • Detection system: Use fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (e.g., NorthernLights™ 557-conjugated Anti-Mouse IgG).

  • Nuclear counterstaining: Apply DAPI for nuclear visualization.

  • Image acquisition: Use confocal microscopy with appropriate filter sets for optimal resolution of nuclear structures .

How do post-translational modifications impact antibody recognition and CHK1 function?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) critically affect both CHK1 function and antibody recognition:

  • Impact on CHK1 function: Phosphorylation of CHK1 by ATR kinase at sites including Ser-317 and Ser-345 activates CHK1 in response to DNA damage, triggering downstream phosphorylation of target proteins like CDC25A .

  • Antibody recognition challenges: PTMs can alter epitope accessibility, charge distribution, and protein conformation, potentially affecting antibody binding.

  • Epitope selection strategies: When developing or selecting antibodies, researchers should consider:

    • Whether the target epitope contains potential modification sites

    • If detection of specific modified forms is desired

    • Using modification-specific antibodies when studying particular PTM states

Ion-exchange chromatography (IEX) is an effective method for characterizing charge variants of antibodies that may arise from PTMs, providing important quality parameters for stability and process consistency .

What analytical techniques are most effective for comprehensive characterization of antibody binding to CHD1/CHK1?

Modern antibody characterization requires multiple complementary techniques:

Analytical MethodApplicationAdvantage
Capillary Electrophoresis (CE)High-resolution separationEffective for separating antibodies and analogues with high resolving power
Capillary Gel Electrophoresis (CGE)Size-based heterogeneity assessmentIdentifies antibody fragments and aggregates
Capillary Isoelectric Focusing (cIEF)Charge variant profilingResolves subtly different charge states
Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (CZE)Charge heterogeneity analysisDetects subtle modifications altering charge
Ion-Exchange Chromatography (IEX)Charge variant characterizationStandard mode for process consistency monitoring
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)Structural characterizationProvides detailed structural information at atomic level

These techniques are essential for characterizing antibody quality parameters including structure, post-translational modifications, and biological activities .

What strategies can improve antibody stability for long-term CHD1/CHK1 research?

Antibody stability can be enhanced through several approaches:

  • Computational design strategies: Apply heuristic sequence analysis to systematically modify antibodies showing precipitation tendencies, as demonstrated in antibody optimization studies .

  • Biophysical characterization: Use thermal stability experiments to assess modifications that improve stability under formulation conditions typical for therapeutic proteins .

  • Expression optimization: Sequence modifications that improve stability often correlate with improved expression levels, providing dual benefits .

  • Storage optimization:

    • Aliquot antibodies to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

    • Store at appropriate temperature (-20°C or -80°C) in manufacturer-recommended buffer

    • Add stabilizing proteins (BSA) for diluted working solutions

    • Consider adding preservatives for solutions stored at 4°C

How can researchers address inconsistent antibody performance across different experimental systems?

When facing inconsistent antibody performance:

  • Validate epitope accessibility: Different fixation methods, sample preparation techniques, or protein conformations can affect epitope accessibility. Test multiple preparation methods if inconsistencies appear.

  • Consider cell type variability: Expression levels, post-translational modifications, and protein interactions vary between cell types. For example, CHD1 antibody performance has been validated in multiple cell lines including Jurkat, K562, Raji, and BaF3, but may require optimization for other systems .

  • Adjust detection protocols: Different detection systems (chemiluminescence, fluorescence) have varying sensitivities and dynamic ranges. Optimize exposure times and detection methods accordingly.

  • Review buffer compatibility: Ensure buffers used for lysate preparation, antibody dilution, and washing are compatible with the specific antibody and application.

  • Establish quantitative standards: Include calibration standards when possible to normalize results across experiments and establish quantitative relationships.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.