CHX9 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Terminology Analysis

The term "CHX9" does not correspond to:

  • Standard antibody nomenclature (e.g., WHO’s INN system for monoclonal antibodies like "tocilizumab" or "pembrolizumab")

  • Known antigen targets (e.g., CD20, HER2, SARS-CoV-2 spike)

  • Established research antibodies (e.g., BE0309 anti-CXCL9 , SC27 anti-SARS-CoV-2 , or C102/C105 anti-COVID )

Possible Typographical Errors

Candidate NameRelevance to Search Results
CXCL9 AntibodyBE0309 targets mouse CXCL9 (MIG)
SC27 AntibodyBroadly neutralizing anti-COVID monoclonal antibody
CH25 AntibodyHypothetical (no matches in sources)

Hypothetical Constructs

If "CHX9" refers to a chimeric antibody (e.g., combining CH domains from two antibodies), no such construct is documented in the provided materials or major antibody databases .

Recommendations for Further Investigation

  1. Verify nomenclature with original sources or collaborators.

  2. Explore repositories:

    • The Antibody Society’s therapeutic antibody database

    • ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing studies

    • UniProt for antigen designations (e.g., CXCL9 = P42830)

  3. Review patent filings for proprietary antibody codes.

Limitations of Current Data

  • No structural, functional, or clinical data for "CHX9" exists in the reviewed sources [1–10].

  • The term does not align with current antibody classification frameworks (IgG subclasses, Fc engineering strategies , or neutralizing mechanisms ).

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
CHX9 antibody; CHX09 antibody; At5g22910 antibody; MRN17.14Cation/H(+) antiporter 9 antibody; Protein CATION/H+ EXCHANGER 9 antibody; AtCHX9 antibody
Target Names
CHX9
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
May function as a cation/H(+) antiporter.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G22910

STRING: 3702.AT5G22910.1

UniGene: At.54955

Protein Families
Monovalent cation:proton antiporter 2 (CPA2) transporter (TC 2.A.37) family, CHX (TC 2.A.37.4) subfamily
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is CA9 and why are antibodies against it important in research?

Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CA9) is a transmembrane protein that belongs to the carbonic anhydrase family. It is highly expressed in several pathological conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, colitis, type 2 diabetes, and various tumors . CA9 antibodies are crucial research tools that enable scientists to detect, quantify, and study CA9 expression patterns in biological samples. They play a significant role in understanding disease mechanisms, particularly in cancer research where CA9 serves as an important biomarker for hypoxic tumors. The development of specific monoclonal antibodies against CA9 has substantially advanced our understanding of its role in disease progression and potential as a therapeutic target .

How do monoclonal antibodies differ from polyclonal antibodies in research applications?

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are derived from a single B-cell clone, ensuring uniformity in their binding specificity to a single epitope on an antigen. In contrast, polyclonal antibodies are obtained from multiple B-cell lineages and recognize various epitopes on the same antigen. The key differences in research applications include:

CharacteristicMonoclonal AntibodiesPolyclonal Antibodies
SpecificityHigh (single epitope)Lower (multiple epitopes)
Batch-to-batch variationMinimalSignificant
Production complexityHigher (hybridoma technology)Lower
Research applicationsFlow cytometry, immunotherapy, precise epitope targetingImmunoprecipitation, detection of native proteins

Monoclonal antibodies like those developed against CA9 provide consistent experimental results and are preferred for applications requiring high specificity, such as flow cytometry, where the CA9 antibody can precisely identify cells expressing this marker .

What generations of monoclonal antibodies exist and how do they affect research applications?

Monoclonal antibodies have evolved through four generations, each with distinct characteristics affecting their research and therapeutic applications:

  • First generation: Murine antibodies (-momab) - 100% mouse protein with high immunogenicity, limiting their long-term use in humans but still valuable in laboratory research applications .

  • Second generation: Chimeric antibodies (-ximab) - Containing 33% mouse protein, these combine variable domains from murine mAbs with constant domains from human antibodies, reducing immunogenicity .

  • Third generation: Humanized antibodies (-zumab) - Created through CDR (complementarity determining regions) or SDR (specificity determining residues) grafting, these contain >90% human content, significantly reducing immunogenicity while maintaining target specificity .

  • Fourth generation: Fully human antibodies (-umab) - Containing 100% human protein, these offer very low immunogenicity and are ideal for both research and therapeutic applications .

The generation of antibody used in research impacts experimental design, particularly for in vivo studies or when developing potential therapeutic applications. For CA9 research, humanized or fully human antibodies would be preferred for translational studies aiming at therapeutic development.

What are the most effective methods for developing antibodies against membrane proteins like CA9?

Developing antibodies against membrane proteins like CA9 presents unique challenges due to their complex structure and potential instability when removed from the membrane environment. The Cell-Based Immunization and Screening (CBIS) method has proven particularly effective for such targets. This approach involves:

  • Overexpressing the target protein (e.g., CA9) in mammalian cells such as CHO-K1 cells

  • Immunizing mice with these intact cells expressing the native conformation of the protein

  • Screening hybridomas by flow cytometry, selecting those that show strong signals against the target protein-expressing cells but not against control cells

This method was successfully used to develop anti-human CCR9 monoclonal antibodies (a different membrane protein with similar challenges) and could be applied to CA9. The advantage of this approach is that it presents the target protein in its native conformation during immunization, increasing the likelihood of generating antibodies that recognize the naturally folded protein .

How can I optimize experimental conditions when using CA9 antibodies in flow cytometry?

Optimizing flow cytometry experiments with CA9 antibodies requires careful consideration of several parameters:

  • Antibody titration: Determine the optimal antibody concentration by testing a range of dilutions (typically 0.1-10 μg/mL) to identify the concentration that provides the best signal-to-noise ratio.

  • Buffer composition: Test different buffer systems with varying pH, salt concentration, and additives (BSA, serum, detergents) to minimize non-specific binding.

  • Incubation conditions: Optimize both temperature (4°C, room temperature, or 37°C) and time (15-60 minutes) for antibody binding.

  • Fixation protocol: If fixation is necessary, compare different fixatives (paraformaldehyde, methanol) and their impact on epitope recognition.

  • Controls: Always include:

    • Isotype controls to assess non-specific binding

    • Positive controls (cell lines known to express CA9, such as certain tumor cell lines)

    • Negative controls (cell lines known not to express CA9)

For CA9 antibodies specifically, researchers have found that including L-arginine in the buffer can improve stability and reduce non-specific binding. Additionally, using freshly prepared samples rather than frozen ones typically yields better results .

How should I approach the purification of monoclonal antibodies for research applications?

Purification of monoclonal antibodies like those against CA9 requires a systematic approach to ensure high yield, purity, and maintained functionality. An optimized purification strategy typically involves:

  • Design of Experiments (DOE) approach: Rather than changing one factor at a time, use statistical design to simultaneously evaluate multiple parameters affecting purification. This approach has been shown to reduce experimental time from months to weeks while providing more comprehensive results .

  • Key factors to optimize:

    • Process step sequence (e.g., determining optimal column order)

    • Residence time (duration sample is exposed to chromatography material)

    • Protein loading (ratio of protein to column material)

    • pH conditions

  • Performance metrics to measure:

    • Aggregate percentage (<3% is typically desired)

    • Host cell protein contamination (<100 ppm)

    • DNA contamination (<25 ppb)

    • Yield (>85% is typically targeted)

  • Chromatography methods: Typically employing a combination of:

    • Protein A affinity chromatography (for IgG antibodies)

    • Ion exchange chromatography

    • Size exclusion chromatography

Using this systematic approach, researchers were able to optimize a purification process for monoclonal antibodies that exceeded all performance goals in a fraction of the time required by traditional one-factor-at-a-time experimentation .

What analytical techniques are most appropriate for characterizing CA9 antibodies?

Comprehensive characterization of CA9 antibodies requires multiple complementary analytical techniques to assess different quality attributes:

  • Chromatographic methods:

    • Reverse-Phase Liquid Chromatography (RPLC): Effective for determining average drug-to-antibody ratio in antibody-drug conjugates and analyzing hydrophobic variants

    • Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC): Essential for detecting aggregates and fragments

    • Ion Exchange Chromatography (IEX): Useful for analyzing charge variants

  • Electrophoretic methods:

    • Capillary Isoelectric Focusing (cIEF): Provides high-resolution separation of charge variants

    • SDS-PAGE: Determines size heterogeneity under reducing and non-reducing conditions

    • Capillary Electrophoresis-Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (CE-SDS): Offers automated, quantitative analysis of size variants

  • Spectroscopic methods:

    • Circular Dichroism (CD): Assesses secondary structure

    • Fluorescence Spectroscopy: Evaluates tertiary structure

    • Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR): Provides complementary structural information

  • Mass Spectrometry:

    • Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS): Identifies post-translational modifications

    • Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI): Determines molecular weight

The selection of methods should be tailored to the specific quality attributes being investigated. For example, when analyzing a CA9 antibody for research applications, SEC would be critical for ensuring the absence of aggregates that could affect experimental results, while cIEF would verify consistent charge profiles between batches .

How do post-translational modifications affect CA9 antibody function and how can they be characterized?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly impact CA9 antibody functionality and must be carefully characterized:

  • Common PTMs affecting antibody function:

    • Glycosylation: Affects stability, half-life, and effector functions

    • Deamidation: Can alter charge profile and binding properties

    • Oxidation (particularly of methionine residues): May reduce binding affinity

    • C-terminal lysine clipping: Impacts charge heterogeneity

    • Pyroglutamic acid formation: Affects N-terminal structure

  • Functional impacts:

    • Modified pharmacokinetics and half-life

    • Altered antigen binding capability

    • Changed effector functions

    • Potentially increased immunogenicity

  • Characterization methods:

    • Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS): Provides detailed PTM mapping

    • Capillary Isoelectric Focusing (cIEF): Detects charge variations from PTMs

    • Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography (HILIC): Analyzes glycan patterns

  • Optimization approach:

    • Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology optimizes sample preparation for cIEF analysis

    • Key parameters include ampholyte concentration, L-arginine content, and urea concentration

    • These factors significantly impact separation, resolution, peak positions, and counts

Understanding and controlling PTMs is crucial for ensuring consistent antibody performance in research applications. For CA9 antibodies specifically, maintaining consistent glycosylation patterns is particularly important for applications involving effector functions or in vivo studies .

What are the critical quality attributes (CQAs) to evaluate when developing CA9 antibodies for research?

When developing CA9 antibodies for research applications, several critical quality attributes (CQAs) must be evaluated to ensure consistent performance:

  • Structural integrity and purity:

    • Primary sequence confirmation (amino acid sequence)

    • Secondary and tertiary structure analysis

    • Aggregate and fragment levels (<3% aggregates typically desired)

    • Host cell protein contamination (<100 ppm)

    • DNA contamination (<25 ppb)

  • Binding characteristics:

    • Specificity (exclusive binding to CA9)

    • Affinity (strength of binding to target)

    • Epitope identification

    • Cross-reactivity profile (potential binding to related proteins)

  • Functional properties:

    • Activity in intended research applications (flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, etc.)

    • Lot-to-lot consistency

    • Stability under experimental conditions

  • Post-translational modifications:

    • Glycosylation patterns

    • Charge variants

    • Oxidation levels

    • Deamidation

  • Process-related attributes:

    • Yield (>85% typically targeted)

    • Reproducibility

    • Scalability for research needs

To effectively monitor these CQAs, a combination of analytical methods should be employed, including chromatography (SEC, IEX), electrophoresis (cIEF, CE-SDS), spectroscopy (CD, fluorescence), and mass spectrometry techniques. The Design of Experiments approach has proven valuable for optimizing both production processes and analytical methods for antibody characterization .

What strategies can address inconsistent results when using CA9 antibodies in research?

Inconsistent results with CA9 antibodies may stem from various factors. Implementing these strategic approaches can significantly improve experimental reliability:

  • Antibody validation and quality control:

    • Verify antibody specificity using positive and negative control cell lines

    • Perform batch-to-batch testing to ensure consistent performance

    • Consider using Cell-Based Immunization and Screening (CBIS) developed antibodies for membrane proteins like CA9, which have shown improved specificity

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Standardize cell culture conditions to ensure consistent target expression

    • Optimize fixation protocols if applicable (type of fixative, concentration, duration)

    • Consider the impact of sample processing on epitope accessibility

  • Experimental protocol standardization:

    • Develop detailed standard operating procedures (SOPs)

    • Implement a Design of Experiments (DoE) approach to systematically identify critical parameters

    • Document all variables that might affect results (reagent lots, instrument settings, etc.)

  • Buffer and reagent considerations:

    • Test different buffer compositions (pH, ionic strength, detergents)

    • For flow cytometry applications, optimize ampholyte concentration, L-arginine, and urea levels

    • Consider the impact of carrier proteins (BSA, gelatin) on background signal

  • Instrument and data analysis standardization:

    • Calibrate instruments regularly

    • Use consistent gating strategies for flow cytometry

    • Implement appropriate statistical methods for data analysis

By systematically addressing these aspects, researchers can significantly improve the consistency and reliability of experiments utilizing CA9 antibodies. Documentation of optimization experiments is crucial for establishing robust protocols .

How can I develop advanced antibody formats against CA9 for specialized research applications?

Developing advanced antibody formats against CA9 for specialized research applications involves several sophisticated approaches:

  • Antibody engineering strategies:

    • Antibody fragments (Fab, scFv): Smaller size allows better tissue penetration for imaging applications

    • Bispecific antibodies: Enable simultaneous binding to CA9 and another target (e.g., CD3 on T cells)

    • Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs): Attach cytotoxic payloads for targeted delivery to CA9-expressing cells

    • pH-sensitive antibodies: Engineering antibodies with pH-dependent binding for enhanced tumor specificity

  • Production optimization:

    • Expression system selection (mammalian cells preferred for complex formats)

    • Cell line development and screening using flow cytometry

    • Process optimization using Design of Experiments (DoE) approach:

      • Optimize critical parameters like temperature, pH, and nutrient feeding

      • Monitor multiple responses simultaneously (titer, glycosylation, aggregation)

  • Analytical characterization:

    • Reverse-Phase Liquid Chromatography (RPLC) for analyzing hydrophobic variants and drug-antibody ratio in ADCs

    • Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) for detecting aggregates (critical for complex formats)

    • Mass spectrometry for detailed structural characterization

  • Functional validation:

    • Flow cytometry to confirm binding to CA9-expressing cells

    • Cell-based assays to verify specialized functions (e.g., T-cell redirection, internalization)

    • Imaging studies to assess tissue penetration and distribution

  • Stability engineering:

    • Identify and modify unstable regions through computational analysis

    • Introduce stabilizing mutations or post-translational modifications

    • Develop specialized formulations for maintaining stability

When developing advanced antibody formats against CA9, the Cell-Based Immunization and Screening (CBIS) method has proven particularly valuable for generating antibodies that recognize the native conformation of membrane proteins, which can serve as excellent starting points for further engineering .

What are the most effective experimental designs for optimizing CA9 antibody purification?

Optimizing CA9 antibody purification requires sophisticated experimental design approaches to efficiently identify optimal conditions. The Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology has proven particularly effective:

This systematic approach has been demonstrated to optimize purification processes for antibodies while maintaining high selectivity, with results exceeding performance goals for all measured responses. The statistical rigor of DoE provides high confidence in the robustness of the optimized process .

How are emerging analytical technologies changing CA9 antibody characterization?

Emerging analytical technologies are revolutionizing CA9 antibody characterization, offering unprecedented resolution and insight:

  • Advanced mass spectrometry applications:

    • Native mass spectrometry: Allows analysis of intact antibodies while preserving higher-order structure

    • Ion mobility mass spectrometry: Provides information on conformational dynamics

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS): Maps epitope binding sites and structural changes

    • High-resolution multiple-attribute monitoring: Enables simultaneous quantification of multiple quality attributes

  • Multi-dimensional chromatographic approaches:

    • 2D-LC coupling orthogonal separation mechanisms for improved resolution

    • Multi-angle light scattering (MALS) detection for absolute molecular weight determination

    • Automated multi-attribute method (MAM) workflows for comprehensive characterization

  • Single-molecule techniques:

    • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for real-time binding kinetics

    • Bio-layer interferometry for label-free interaction analysis

    • Single-molecule fluorescence for heterogeneity assessment

  • Computational and data analysis advances:

    • Machine learning algorithms for spectral interpretation

    • Predictive modeling of antibody properties

    • Automated data processing pipelines for multi-attribute monitoring

  • Cell-based analytical methods:

    • Advanced flow cytometry incorporating spectral analysis

    • High-content imaging for spatial resolution of binding

    • Reporter cell lines for functional assessment

These emerging technologies enable more comprehensive characterization of CA9 antibodies, facilitating improved understanding of structure-function relationships and supporting the development of antibodies with enhanced specificity and functionality for research applications .

What novel applications of CA9 antibodies are emerging in cancer research?

CA9 antibodies are finding increasingly sophisticated applications in cancer research, leveraging the elevated expression of CA9 in many tumor types:

  • Advanced imaging applications:

    • Immuno-positron emission tomography (immuno-PET) using radiolabeled CA9 antibodies for non-invasive tumor detection

    • Fluorescence-guided surgery to help surgeons visualize tumor margins in real-time

    • Multimodal imaging combining different contrast mechanisms for comprehensive tumor characterization

  • Therapeutic targeting strategies:

    • Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) linking CA9 antibodies with cytotoxic payloads

    • Bispecific antibodies simultaneously targeting CA9 and immune effector cells

    • Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy using CA9 as the target antigen

    • Radioimmunotherapy delivering therapeutic radiation specifically to CA9-expressing tumors

  • Biomarker applications:

    • Liquid biopsy development using anti-CA9 antibodies to detect circulating tumor cells

    • Multiplex immunohistochemistry panels incorporating CA9 for tumor microenvironment analysis

    • Prognostic and predictive biomarker development correlating CA9 expression with treatment outcomes

  • Combination therapy approaches:

    • Integration with hypoxia-modifying treatments

    • Synergistic combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors

    • Use in pH-sensitive drug delivery systems targeting the acidic tumor microenvironment

  • Fundamental biology investigations:

    • Studying the role of CA9 in tumor metabolism and microenvironment acidification

    • Investigating CA9's contribution to cancer stem cell maintenance

    • Examining CA9's involvement in treatment resistance mechanisms

The continued development of highly specific CA9 antibodies, particularly through advanced methods like Cell-Based Immunization and Screening (CBIS), is enabling these novel applications by providing tools with superior specificity and functionality .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.