Anti-CCP antibodies are autoantibodies targeting citrullinated peptides—post-translationally modified proteins where arginine residues are converted to citrulline by enzymes like peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs) . These antibodies are highly specific for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with a diagnostic specificity of 87.8–96.4% .
Key characteristics:
Pathogenic role: Promote joint inflammation by forming immune complexes in synovial tissues .
Subtypes: Include IgG, IgA, and IgM isotypes, with IgG being the most common in RA .
Anti-CCP testing is integral to RA diagnosis, often paired with rheumatoid factor (RF) to improve accuracy .
Anti-CCP antibodies outperform RF in specificity and predictive value for erosive disease . For example, in a 5-year prospective study:
Disease Severity: Higher anti-CCP titers correlate with accelerated joint damage (OR = 10.2 for erosions at 5 years) .
Extra-Articular Manifestations: Anti-CCP+ patients have a 2.1-fold increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) .
Therapeutic Targeting: Antibody therapies (e.g., rituximab) show enhanced efficacy in anti-CCP+ RA due to B-cell depletion .
Recent studies highlight anti-CSP (citrullinated scavenger receptor-A peptide) antibodies as complementary biomarkers, particularly in anti-CCP− RA:
Biomarker | Sensitivity (Anti-CCP− RA) | Specificity |
---|---|---|
Anti-CSP | 37.97% | 93.96% |
RF | 19.44% | 96.90% |
Data pooled from four Chinese cohorts . |
False Negatives: 27% of anti-CCP− patients still develop erosions .
Assay Variability: Sensitivity ranges from 35% to 80% depending on cohort and assay generation .
CIPC Antibody (such as the PAC041582) is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits that targets the CLOCK-interacting pacemaker protein encoded by the CIPC gene. This protein functions as a transcriptional repressor in the circadian clock mechanism by acting as a negative-feedback regulator of CLOCK-ARNTL/BMAL1 transcriptional activity . The antibody allows researchers to detect and analyze the presence, distribution, and function of CIPC protein in various experimental contexts.
The target protein has the following characteristics:
Protein Attribute | Information |
---|---|
Full Name | CLOCK-interacting pacemaker |
UniProt Code | Q9C0C6 |
Molecular Weight | 42,692 Da |
Gene ID | 85457 |
Chromosomal Location | 14q24.3 |
Primary Function | Negative regulation of circadian rhythm; transcriptional repression |
Cellular Localization | Nucleus |
The CIPC protein interacts with CLOCK and forms a ternary complex with the CLOCK-ARNTL/BMAL1 heterodimer, thereby regulating circadian rhythms at the molecular level .
CIPC Antibody specifically targets the CLOCK-interacting pacemaker protein, distinguishing it from antibodies that target other components of the circadian machinery such as CLOCK, BMAL1, PER, or CRY proteins. While these other antibodies detect core components of the positive and negative feedback loops of the circadian oscillator, CIPC Antibody recognizes a modulator that fine-tunes the activity of the CLOCK-BMAL1 complex .
This specificity makes CIPC Antibody particularly valuable for investigating the regulatory mechanisms that adjust circadian oscillations. When designing experiments involving multiple circadian proteins, researchers should consider using complementary antibodies with compatible host species to enable co-detection and co-localization studies .
According to available data, CIPC Antibody has been validated for several key experimental applications:
Application | Recommended Dilution | Validation Status |
---|---|---|
Western Blot (WB) | 1:1000-1:5000 | Validated with 43 kDa bands in A431 and NIH/3T3 cell lysates |
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:20-1:200 | Validated on human stomach tissue and liver cancer samples |
ELISA | 1:2000-1:10000 | Validated |
The antibody demonstrates reactivity with both human and mouse samples, making it suitable for comparative studies across these species . When utilizing this antibody for these applications, researchers should carefully consider the recommended dilutions to optimize signal-to-noise ratios.
For maintaining optimal activity of CIPC Antibody, adhere to these storage and handling guidelines:
Store the antibody in its preservative buffer (0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4) at -20°C for long-term storage .
Aliquot the antibody upon receipt to minimize freeze-thaw cycles, as repeated freezing and thawing can reduce antibody activity.
When handling the antibody, maintain cold chain conditions using an ice bucket.
Prior to use, centrifuge the antibody vial briefly to collect the liquid at the bottom.
For dilutions, use freshly prepared buffers appropriate for the intended application.
Proper storage and handling significantly impact experimental reproducibility. Researchers should maintain detailed records of antibody lot numbers, receipt dates, and freeze-thaw cycles to track potential variations in performance across experiments .
To achieve optimal results with CIPC Antibody in Western blot applications:
Sample preparation:
Use RIPA or NP-40 buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors
Load 20-40 μg of total protein per lane
Include both positive controls (A431 or NIH/3T3 cell lysates) and negative controls
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels to optimally resolve the 43 kDa CIPC protein
Transfer to PVDF membranes at 100V for 1-1.5 hours in cold transfer buffer
Immunoblotting:
Block with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with primary CIPC Antibody at 1:1000-1:5000 dilution overnight at 4°C
Wash 3-5 times with TBST
Incubate with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:10000) for 1 hour
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence substrate
Expected results:
For circadian rhythm studies, consider harvesting cells at different time points across a 24-hour cycle to capture temporal variations in CIPC protein expression.
For successful immunohistochemistry with CIPC Antibody:
Tissue preparation:
Antigen retrieval:
Perform heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
Boil sections for 15-20 minutes followed by cooling to room temperature
Immunostaining protocol:
Block endogenous peroxidase with 3% H₂O₂
Apply protein block (5% normal goat serum)
Incubate with CIPC Antibody (1:20-1:200 dilution) overnight at 4°C
Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and DAB substrate for detection
Counterstain with hematoxylin
Controls and validation:
Include negative controls (omitting primary antibody)
Validate nuclear localization pattern consistent with CIPC's function
Compare staining patterns in normal versus diseased tissues
When interpreting IHC results, note that CIPC expression may vary with circadian timing, so documenting the time of tissue collection is advisable for circadian studies .
To employ CIPC Antibody for studying circadian disruptions in disease contexts:
Experimental design considerations:
Establish a time-course sampling protocol (every 4 hours across 24-48 hours)
Compare CIPC expression and localization between healthy and disease models
Synchronize cells prior to analysis (serum shock or dexamethasone treatment)
Multi-method approach:
Use Western blot to quantify total CIPC protein levels across time points
Employ immunofluorescence to track subcellular localization changes
Complement protein data with CIPC mRNA expression analysis (qPCR)
Functional analysis:
Combine with co-immunoprecipitation to assess CIPC-CLOCK interactions
Investigate CIPC phosphorylation states using phospho-specific antibodies
Correlate CIPC expression patterns with circadian output genes
This approach has revealed altered CIPC expression and localization patterns in metabolic disorders, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases, providing insights into how circadian disruption contributes to pathogenesis .
For cancer research specifically, comparing CIPC expression between tumor and adjacent normal tissues can reveal associations between circadian dysregulation and malignant transformation .
When facing contradictory results with CIPC Antibody:
Systematic validation:
Confirm antibody specificity using knockout/knockdown controls
Test multiple antibody lots and sources if available
Validate with orthogonal detection methods (mass spectrometry)
Technical troubleshooting:
Optimize protein extraction methods for different sample types
Adjust antibody concentration and incubation conditions
Evaluate potential interfering factors (detergents, fixatives)
Biological considerations:
Account for circadian timing differences between experiments
Consider species-specific variations in CIPC structure and expression
Assess potential post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition
Data interpretation:
Document complete experimental conditions and timing
Consider contextual differences between in vitro and in vivo systems
Analyze whether contradictions reflect biological complexity rather than technical issues
One common source of apparent contradictions is the time-dependent nature of CIPC expression. Standardizing the time of sample collection across experiments is crucial for meaningful comparisons .
A multi-faceted approach to studying circadian transcriptional regulation:
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) strategies:
Use CIPC Antibody for ChIP to identify genomic binding sites
Perform sequential ChIP with CLOCK and BMAL1 antibodies to identify co-occupied regions
Integrate with RNA-Seq to correlate binding with transcriptional outcomes
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Employ co-immunoprecipitation with CIPC Antibody to pull down interaction partners
Use proximity ligation assays to visualize CIPC-CLOCK interactions in situ
Complement with live-cell imaging using fluorescently tagged proteins
Functional genomics integration:
Combine with CRISPR-Cas9 editing of CIPC to assess functional consequences
Correlate with rhythmic transcriptome and proteome datasets
Develop mathematical models incorporating CIPC regulatory dynamics
This integrated approach provides mechanistic insights into how CIPC modulates circadian transcription by stimulating ARNTL/BMAL1-dependent phosphorylation of CLOCK and repressing CLOCK-ARNTL/BMAL1 transcriptional activity .
Understanding and addressing potential sources of error:
False-positive results:
Non-specific binding due to excessive antibody concentration or insufficient blocking
Cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins
Endogenous peroxidase activity in tissue samples not properly quenched
Sample contamination during processing
Secondary antibody binding in the absence of primary antibody
False-negative results:
Epitope masking due to improper fixation or inadequate antigen retrieval
Protein degradation during sample preparation
Insufficient antibody concentration or incubation time
Sub-optimal detection system sensitivity
Time-dependent expression fluctuations (CIPC levels vary throughout circadian cycle)
Mitigation strategies:
Always include positive and negative controls
Validate with multiple detection methods when possible
For circadian proteins like CIPC, document sampling time and synchronization status
Consider performing pilot experiments with a dilution series to determine optimal antibody concentration
For rigorous quantitative analysis of CIPC expression across the circadian cycle:
Experimental design:
Sample at minimum 6 time points across 24 hours (ideally every 4 hours)
Include at least 3 biological replicates per time point
Synchronize cells/tissues before beginning time course (serum shock, dexamethasone, or light-dark cycles)
Western blot quantification:
Use housekeeping proteins unaffected by circadian rhythms for normalization
Apply densitometry software with appropriate background subtraction
Present data as relative expression normalized to peak expression or time-point zero
Image analysis for immunofluorescence/IHC:
Quantify nuclear vs. cytoplasmic signal intensities
Measure percentage of CIPC-positive cells across time points
Track changes in subcellular localization
Statistical analysis:
Apply cosinor analysis to test for rhythmicity
Determine amplitude, period, and phase of oscillations
Use appropriate statistical tests to compare parameters between experimental groups
Data presentation:
Plot expression values against circadian/zeitgeber time
Include error bars representing standard error or deviation
Fit rhythmic data with cosine curves when appropriate
This approach allows for precise characterization of how experimental manipulations affect CIPC's circadian expression pattern and subsequent effects on cellular rhythmicity .
Comprehensive validation requires these essential controls:
Positive controls:
Negative controls:
CIPC knockout/knockdown samples
Secondary antibody-only controls
Isotype controls (irrelevant antibody from same species/isotype)
Specificity controls:
Peptide competition assay (pre-incubation with immunizing peptide)
Detection of expected molecular weight band (43 kDa)
Correlation with mRNA expression data
Application-specific controls:
For Western blots: loading controls and molecular weight markers
For IHC/IF: tissue controls with known expression patterns
For circadian studies: time-course controls with known rhythmic proteins
Cross-validation:
Comparison with alternative CIPC antibodies (different clones/epitopes)
Correlation with orthogonal detection methods
Multi-species validation if working with non-human models
Thorough validation not only ensures reliable results but also helps identify optimal experimental conditions for each new system or application .
CIPC Antibody enables investigation of the circadian-metabolic interface through:
Co-localization studies:
Dual immunofluorescence with CIPC Antibody and metabolic sensors
Tracking CIPC localization in response to metabolic perturbations
Visualizing interactions with metabolic transcription factors
Temporal coordination analysis:
Monitoring CIPC expression/activity alongside metabolic oscillations
Correlating CIPC dynamics with fluctuations in cellular energy status
Investigating phase relationships between CIPC and metabolic rhythms
Mechanistic investigations:
Examining how CIPC mediates cross-talk between circadian and metabolic pathways
Determining how metabolic signals modulate CIPC's repressive function
Investigating CIPC's role in synchronizing peripheral clocks to feeding cycles
Disease model applications:
Analyzing CIPC dysregulation in metabolic disorders
Investigating therapeutic interventions targeting CIPC-mediated pathways
Studying how time-restricted feeding impacts CIPC function
This research direction has significant implications for understanding metabolic diseases with circadian components, including diabetes, obesity, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease .
For successful multiplexed imaging with CIPC Antibody:
Antibody compatibility planning:
Select primary antibodies from different host species
When using multiple rabbit antibodies, employ sequential immunostaining with stripping steps
Consider using directly conjugated CIPC Antibody for one channel
Signal separation strategies:
Use fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Apply linear unmixing algorithms for closely adjacent emissions
Employ sequential scanning for confocal microscopy
Validation for multiplexed applications:
Test antibodies individually before combining
Include single-stained controls for spectral overlap assessment
Verify that multiplexing doesn't alter individual staining patterns
Sample preparation optimization:
Select fixation methods compatible with all target epitopes
Optimize antigen retrieval conditions for multiple targets
Adjust blocking to prevent cross-reactivity in multiplexed settings
Analysis considerations:
Employ computational methods to quantify co-localization
Use machine learning approaches for pattern recognition
Apply spatial statistics to characterize protein distribution relationships
Multiplexed imaging with CIPC Antibody is particularly valuable for simultaneously visualizing interactions between clock proteins and their regulatory partners or downstream targets .