CIPK5 antibodies are validated for use in:
Western Blotting: Detects CIPK5 expression in plant tissues under stress conditions .
Immunoprecipitation: Isolates CIPK5-CBL complexes for interaction studies .
Immunofluorescence: Localizes CIPK5 to cellular compartments (e.g., plasma membrane, tonoplast) .
qRT-PCR Validation: Confirms transgenic overexpression or knockout lines .
To ensure reliability, CIPK5 antibodies undergo rigorous testing:
Knockout Controls: Comparison of wild-type and CIPK5 CRISPR-Cas9 knockout lines .
Orthogonal Methods: Cross-validation using mass spectrometry or enzymatic assays .
Epitope Mapping: Confirmation of antibody binding to conserved regions (e.g., NAF domain) .
| Assay | Specificity Score | Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | 89% | None with CIPK1/9 |
| Immunofluorescence | 76% | Low (<5%) |
Salt Stress: Overexpression of AdCIPK5 in transgenic plants enhances salinity tolerance by reducing oxidative damage (MDA levels ↓30%) and increasing antioxidant enzyme activity (POD ↑2.5x) .
Osmotic Stress: CIPK5-silenced lines show reduced root growth (↓40% RAM size) under drought .
CIPK proteins are calcium-regulated protein kinases that interact with Calcineurin B-like (CBL) proteins to form signaling modules that relay calcium signals in plants. Antibodies against CIPKs, particularly CIPK25, are crucial for studying their role in developmental processes such as root meristem development. CIPK25 has been shown to play an important role in coordinating auxin and cytokinin signaling during root development . Antibodies allow researchers to detect and quantify these proteins in various tissues, confirm protein-protein interactions, and validate gene expression findings at the protein level.
CIPK25 antibodies are designed to specifically recognize the unique epitopes of CIPK25, which may include regions distinguishing it from other CIPK family members. Unlike antibodies against more general kinase domains, CIPK25 antibodies typically target protein-specific regions outside the conserved kinase domain to ensure specificity. Validation of CIPK antibody specificity should include western blot analysis comparing wild-type and mutant (cipk25) tissues to confirm absence of signal in the mutant . When selecting a CIPK25 antibody, researchers should evaluate cross-reactivity with other CIPK family members, particularly those with high sequence homology.
CIPK antibodies are utilized across multiple experimental approaches:
Western blotting: For detection and quantification of CIPK proteins in tissue lysates (using protocols similar to those described in search result 4)
Immunoprecipitation (IP): To isolate CIPK-protein complexes, such as CIPK-CBL interactions
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence: To localize CIPK proteins within tissues or cells
Flow cytometry: For quantitative assessment of protein expression in individual cells, using techniques similar to those employed for other cellular markers
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): To visualize protein-protein interactions in vivo, as mentioned for CIPK25 and CBL proteins
When studying CIPK25 interactions with CBL proteins, consider a multi-method approach:
Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H) screening:
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):
Co-immunoprecipitation with CIPK25 antibodies:
Prepare protein extracts from plant tissues
Immunoprecipitate with CIPK25 antibodies
Analyze precipitates for CBL proteins via western blotting
Include appropriate controls (IgG isotype, CIPK25 knockout tissues)
This comprehensive approach provides multiple lines of evidence for protein-protein interactions.
When using CIPK antibodies in flow cytometry, several controls are essential:
Single-color compensation controls:
Isotype controls:
Blocking controls:
Fluorescence Minus One (FMO) controls:
Biological controls:
For optimal western blotting detection of CIPK25:
Sample preparation:
Gel electrophoresis:
Load 30 μg of protein on 10% Bis-Tris gels
Include molecular weight markers appropriate for the expected size of CIPK25
Transfer and blocking:
Antibody incubation:
Controls:
Include positive control (tissue known to express CIPK25)
Include negative control (CIPK25 knockout tissue if available)
Probe for loading control (e.g., β-actin or GAPDH)
Validation:
Confirm specificity by comparing signal between wild-type and mutant samples
Consider peptide competition assay to confirm specificity
Validating CIPK antibody specificity requires multiple approaches:
Western blot analysis:
Compare signal between wild-type and CIPK knockout/knockdown tissues
Verify the molecular weight matches the predicted size for CIPK (specific to each CIPK family member)
Perform peptide competition assay by pre-incubating antibody with the immunizing peptide
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry:
Immunoprecipitate using the CIPK antibody
Analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Confirm presence of target CIPK and expected interacting partners
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence:
Compare staining patterns with known expression patterns from transcriptomic data
Include knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls
Compare with an alternative antibody targeting a different epitope of the same protein
Recombinant protein detection:
Test antibody against purified recombinant CIPK protein
Include related CIPK family members to assess cross-reactivity
Sibling line comparison:
Compare antibody performance in genetically similar lines with and without CIPK expression
Several factors can impact reproducibility:
Antibody quality and batch variation:
Different lots may have varying affinities or specificities
Always record lot numbers and request the same lot for crucial experiments
Consider validating each new lot against a reference standard
Sample preparation:
Inconsistent lysis methods or buffer compositions
Variations in protein extraction efficiency
Sample degradation during storage
Experimental conditions:
Variations in incubation times and temperatures
Inconsistent blocking or washing steps
Variable detection methods or exposure times
Biological variables:
Plant growth conditions (for plant CIPK studies)
Developmental stage variations
Stress conditions affecting CIPK expression
Technical expertise:
Variations in technique between researchers
Follow standardized protocols and document all deviations
To maximize reproducibility, maintain detailed protocols, standardize all reagents and conditions, and include appropriate controls in each experiment.
To investigate novel CIPK protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry:
Immunoprecipitate with CIPK antibody from relevant tissues
Analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Validate potential interactions with targeted western blots
Proximity labeling approaches:
Generate CIPK-BioID or CIPK-APEX fusion proteins
Express in target tissues to biotinylate proximal proteins
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry
Confirm interactions using reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation with CIPK antibodies
Pull-down assays with recombinant proteins:
Express tagged CIPK protein and purify using affinity chromatography
Incubate with cell/tissue lysates
Analyze bound proteins by western blotting with antibodies against suspected interactors
Compare with pull-downs using mutant CIPK versions
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):
When facing non-specific binding in immunoprecipitation:
Optimize blocking conditions:
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads before adding antibody
Increase BSA concentration (2-5%) in blocking buffer
Add 0.1-0.5% non-ionic detergent (e.g., NP-40 or Triton X-100)
Modify washing stringency:
Increase salt concentration (150-500 mM NaCl)
Add low concentrations of detergent to wash buffers
Increase number of washes (3-5 washes)
Antibody considerations:
Use affinity-purified antibodies when possible
Cross-link antibody to beads to prevent antibody leaching
Consider different antibody clones targeting different epitopes
Pre-absorption strategy:
Pre-incubate antibody with extracts from knockout tissues
Remove antibodies binding to non-specific proteins before use
Control experiments:
Include isotype control antibodies
Include immunoprecipitation from CIPK knockout tissue
Perform reciprocal immunoprecipitation with antibodies against interacting partners
To investigate CIPK post-translational modifications:
Phosphorylation-specific antibodies:
Use or develop antibodies against known or predicted CIPK phosphorylation sites
Validate specificity using phosphatase-treated samples and phospho-mimetic mutants
Apply in western blotting to monitor phosphorylation status under different conditions
2D gel electrophoresis with CIPK antibodies:
Separate proteins by isoelectric point and molecular weight
Detect CIPK using specific antibodies
Compare spot patterns under different conditions or treatments
Immunoprecipitation followed by modification-specific detection:
Immunoprecipitate CIPK using specific antibodies
Probe with antibodies against common modifications (phospho-Ser/Thr/Tyr, ubiquitin, SUMO)
Alternatively, analyze by mass spectrometry for comprehensive modification mapping
In vitro kinase assays with immunoprecipitated CIPK:
Immunoprecipitate CIPK from tissues under different conditions
Perform in vitro kinase assay with appropriate substrates
Compare activity levels to infer regulation by post-translational modifications
For accurate quantification of CIPK western blot data:
Loading controls:
Always include appropriate loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH, histone H3 for nuclear fractions)
Verify that loading control expression is stable under your experimental conditions
For cell fractionation studies, use fraction-specific markers: histone H3 (nuclear), plasma membrane H+ ATPase (membrane), and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (cytosolic)
Image acquisition:
Capture images within the linear dynamic range of your detection system
Avoid saturated pixels which prevent accurate quantification
Use the same exposure settings for comparative samples
Quantification approaches:
Use densitometry software (ImageJ, Image Lab) to quantify band intensities
Subtract background signal from each band
Normalize CIPK signal to loading control signal from the same lane
Statistical analysis:
Perform experiments with at least three biological replicates
Apply appropriate statistical tests (t-test for two conditions, ANOVA for multiple conditions)
Report means, standard deviations, and p-values
Data presentation:
Present both representative blot images and quantification graphs
Include all relevant controls in the images
Indicate molecular weight markers on all blot images
When faced with discrepancies between protein and mRNA data:
Validate both approaches:
Confirm antibody specificity using knockout controls
Verify primer specificity for qRT-PCR through melt curve analysis and sequencing
Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Consider biological mechanisms:
Post-transcriptional regulation (miRNAs, RNA stability)
Translational efficiency differences
Protein stability and degradation rates
Post-translational modifications affecting antibody recognition
Temporal considerations:
Spatial considerations:
Experimental approach:
Use reporter constructs (e.g., CIPK25-GFP) to track expression in vivo
Perform polysome profiling to assess translational status
Consider absolute quantification methods for both mRNA and protein
To properly interpret CIPK localization data:
Establish baseline localization:
Controls for specificity:
Include CIPK knockout tissues as negative controls
Use pre-immune serum or isotype controls
Consider peptide competition to confirm specificity
Co-localization studies:
Use markers for cellular compartments (nucleus, plasma membrane, cytosol)
Quantify co-localization using appropriate statistical measures
For CIPK-CBL interactions, consider co-staining for both partners
Dynamic changes:
Study localization under relevant physiological conditions
Document time-course of localization changes
Consider calcium signaling events that may trigger CBL-CIPK interactions
Functional implications: