CIPK25 antibodies are immunochemical reagents designed to specifically bind to the CIPK25 protein, enabling its detection, quantification, and functional analysis. These antibodies are typically produced using recombinant CIPK25 epitopes or synthetic peptides corresponding to conserved domains.
CIPK25 antibodies are utilized in diverse experimental workflows:
CIPK25 coordinates auxin and cytokinin signaling by regulating PIN1/PIN2 auxin transporters and SHY2 (an Aux/IAA transcriptional repressor) .
Loss of CIPK25 reduces root meristem cell numbers, while its restoration rescues growth defects .
CIPK25 maintains potassium uptake under hypoxia by interacting with AKT1, a key potassium channel .
cipk25 mutants exhibit sensitivity to potassium deficiency during waterlogging .
CIPK25 antibodies must be validated for specificity using:
Knockout controls: Absence of signal in cipk25 mutants.
Subcellular fractionation: Enrichment in cytosolic/membrane fractions .
Cross-reactivity checks: Ensure no binding to homologous kinases (e.g., CIPK23) .
CIPK25 is a member of the calcineurin B-like interacting protein kinase family that functions as a calcium-regulated protein kinase. It plays a crucial role in coordinating auxin and cytokinin signaling in root meristem development . Additionally, CIPK25 is involved in regulating potassium homeostasis under low-oxygen conditions through direct interaction with AKT1, the main inward rectifying potassium channel in plants . Its dual role in developmental processes and stress responses makes it an important target for understanding signaling networks in plants.
CIPK25 antibodies are specifically generated against unique epitopes of the CIPK25 protein that distinguish it from other CIPK family members. While all CIPKs contain a conserved kinase domain, CIPK25 antibodies typically target either the variable C-terminal regulatory domain or unique peptide sequences to ensure specificity. When selecting a CIPK25 antibody, researchers should verify cross-reactivity testing against other CIPK proteins, especially CIPK23, which has functional overlap in potassium regulation pathways . Western blot validation using both wild-type and cipk25 mutant lines is essential to confirm specificity before experimental use.
CIPK25 antibodies are versatile tools employed in multiple techniques:
Western blotting: For detecting CIPK25 protein expression in various tissues and under different treatment conditions
Immunoprecipitation: To isolate CIPK25 and its interacting proteins
Immunolocalization: For visualizing subcellular localization of CIPK25
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): When studying transcription factors that might regulate CIPK25 expression
The selection of appropriate antibody depends on the specific technique. For example, immunolocalization studies may require antibodies with minimal background binding, while co-immunoprecipitation experiments benefit from antibodies that don't interfere with protein-protein interaction domains .
Thorough validation of CIPK25 antibodies is crucial to ensure experimental reliability. A comprehensive validation protocol should include:
Genetic validation: Testing antibody reactivity against protein extracts from wild-type plants versus cipk25 mutant lines (such as SALK_079011 or SALK_029271) and CIPK25-overexpression lines
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubating the antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm binding specificity
Cross-reactivity assessment: Testing against recombinant proteins of closely related CIPK family members
Subcellular fractionation validation: Confirming detection in appropriate cellular compartments using fraction-specific markers (similar to those used in CIPK25 studies: anti-histone H3 for nuclear fraction, anti-plasma membrane H⁺ ATPase for membrane fraction, and anti-cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase for cytosolic fraction)
This multi-step validation process ensures that experimental results truly reflect CIPK25 biology rather than artifacts or cross-reactivity.
For optimal Western blotting results with CIPK25 antibodies, consider the following protocol adaptations:
Sample preparation: Extract proteins from tissues with documented CIPK25 expression, particularly flowers and roots , using buffers containing phosphatase inhibitors to preserve phosphorylation status
Protein separation: Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels to properly resolve the ~54 kDa CIPK25 protein
Transfer conditions: Semi-dry transfer at 15V for 30 minutes or wet transfer at 30V overnight at 4°C
Blocking: 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Antibody incubation: Primary antibody dilution typically at 1:1000-1:2000, overnight at 4°C
Signal detection: Enhanced chemiluminescence with exposure times optimized based on expression levels
When analyzing CIPK25 in different experimental conditions, include appropriate controls such as constitutively expressed proteins (actin, tubulin) to normalize loading and expression.
CIPK25 antibodies are valuable tools for investigating protein-protein interactions within calcium signaling networks. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments can be designed to:
Confirm known interactions: CIPK25 has been shown to interact with CBL4 and CBL5 in yeast two-hybrid assays . Antibodies can validate these interactions in plant tissues.
Identify interaction conditions: Determine whether interactions are calcium-dependent by manipulating Ca²⁺ concentrations in binding buffers
Map interaction domains: When combined with truncated protein constructs (such as CIPK25ΔC lacking the C-terminal domain) , antibodies can help map specific interaction regions
Investigate dynamic interactions: Study how stimuli like auxin, cytokinin, or hypoxic conditions affect CIPK25 interactions with partners
A typical co-immunoprecipitation protocol would include:
Tissue extraction in non-denaturing buffer
Incubation with CIPK25 antibody coupled to protein A/G beads
Washing to remove non-specific bindings
Elution and analysis of bound proteins by Western blotting or mass spectrometry
CIPK25 uniquely functions in both auxin/cytokinin signaling pathways and potassium homeostasis under stress conditions. Antibodies enable researchers to investigate this dual functionality through:
Differential expression analysis: Comparing CIPK25 protein levels in response to hormone treatments versus ion stress conditions
Phosphorylation state assessment: Using phospho-specific antibodies to determine how different stimuli affect CIPK25 activation
Subcellular localization studies: Tracking CIPK25 movement between cellular compartments using immunofluorescence microscopy
Interactome shifts: Identifying stimulus-specific interaction partners through comparative immunoprecipitation
When researchers encounter contradictory results with CIPK25 antibodies, several systematic approaches can help resolve discrepancies:
Antibody epitope mapping: Different antibodies may recognize distinct regions of CIPK25 that could be masked in certain protein complexes or conformational states
Post-translational modification analysis: Phosphorylation or other modifications may affect antibody recognition; use phosphatase treatments to test this hypothesis
Tissue-specific expression patterns: CIPK25 shows differential expression across tissues, with notable absence in the cell proliferation domain of the root apical meristem
Genetic background considerations: Ensure consistent genetic backgrounds when comparing results; the cipk25-2 (SALK_070911c) and cipk25-3 (SALK_059092) mutant lines have been well-characterized
Stimulus conditions standardization: CIPK25 response varies with different stimuli; standardize treatment conditions when comparing across studies
Recent research suggests connections between CIPK family proteins and respiratory burst oxidase homologs (RBOHs) that generate reactive oxygen species. While CIPK6 has been shown to form a complex with CBL1/9 that negatively regulates RbohD , the potential role of CIPK25 in oxidative stress responses represents an emerging area of investigation. CIPK25 antibodies can contribute to this research through:
Comparative co-immunoprecipitation: Determining whether CIPK25, like CIPK6, interacts with components of the ROS production machinery
Stress-induced phosphorylation: Monitoring CIPK25 phosphorylation status during oxidative stress using phospho-specific antibodies
Protein complex analysis: Identifying stress-specific interactors that might connect CIPK25 to ROS signaling networks
In vitro kinase assays: Determining whether CIPK25 can phosphorylate RBOH proteins using purified components and immunoprecipitated CIPK25
Researchers should compare findings between cipk25 mutants and other cipk family mutants (particularly cipk6) to establish functional relationships in oxidative stress signaling pathways.
Detecting low-abundance CIPK25 in specific cell types presents technical challenges that can be addressed through several methodological improvements:
Signal amplification techniques:
Use tyramide signal amplification (TSA) with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies
Apply multiplexed detection with quantum dot-conjugated antibodies
Tissue-specific enrichment:
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Detect protein-protein interactions with higher sensitivity than conventional co-immunoprecipitation
Particularly useful for studying CIPK25 interactions with CBLs or AKT1 in specific cell types
Mass spectrometry enhancement:
Use sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS) for more sensitive detection
Apply targeted proteomics approaches like selected reaction monitoring (SRM)
These approaches can significantly improve detection sensitivity when conventional immunoblotting techniques fail to detect CIPK25 in specific cell types or under certain conditions.
Researchers frequently encounter specific challenges when working with CIPK25 antibodies. Here are common issues and their solutions:
High background signal:
Increase blocking time/concentration (try 5% BSA instead of milk for phospho-detection)
Use more stringent washing conditions (increase salt concentration in wash buffer)
Pre-absorb antibody with plant extract from cipk25 mutant
Weak or absent signal:
Multiple bands/non-specific binding:
Increase antibody dilution
Perform peptide competition assay to identify specific band
Use gradient gels to better resolve proteins of similar molecular weights
Inconsistent results between experiments:
Optimizing immunoprecipitation for subsequent CIPK25 kinase activity assays requires special considerations:
Buffer composition optimization:
Antibody selection and coupling:
Choose antibodies raised against regions distant from the kinase domain
Covalently couple antibodies to beads to prevent heavy chain contamination in eluates
Consider using tagged CIPK25 and anti-tag antibodies if native antibodies interfere with activity
Washing conditions:
Use gentle washing to preserve protein-protein interactions
Include 0.1% non-ionic detergent to reduce non-specific binding
Maintain consistent salt concentration to preserve kinase activity
Elution for activity preservation:
By implementing these optimizations, researchers can obtain more consistent and physiologically relevant results in CIPK25 kinase activity assays.