CKL10 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Types of CK10 Antibodies

CK10 antibodies are available in monoclonal and polyclonal formats, each with distinct properties and applications:

TypeClones/ExamplesHostKey Features
MonoclonalCAU36545, MSVA-610M, EP1607IHCYRabbit, MouseHigh specificity; validated for IHC, WB, FCM. CAU36545 (1 mg/mL) targets human CK10 .
PolyclonalCAU25488RabbitBroader epitope recognition; immunogen: Leu153~Glu456. Suitable for WB, IHC, IP .
RecombinantMSVA-610MMouseEngineered for consistent performance; detects cytoplasmic CK10 in squamous epithelia .

Applications of CK10 Antibodies

CK10 antibodies are primarily used in immunohistochemistry (IHC), western blotting (WB), and flow cytometry (FCM) to study epithelial differentiation and pathology.

Key Applications

  • Diagnosis of Squamous Cell Carcinomas: CK10 staining identifies mature squamous differentiation, distinguishing squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) from adenocarcinomas .

  • Tumor Classification: CK10 expression patterns help differentiate benign lesions from laryngeal dysplasia and SCCs .

  • Research in Epidermal Barrier Function: CK10 is essential for maintaining the epidermal barrier, particularly in palmar and plantar skin .

Tumor Expression Patterns

A study analyzing 131 tumor categories found CK10 positivity in 31.3% of cases, with strong expression in squamous cell carcinomas (18.6–66.1%) and Warthin tumors (47.8%) .

Tumor TypeCK10 Positivity (%)Diagnostic Relevance
Squamous Cell Carcinomas18.6–66.1Confirms squamous differentiation .
Warthin Tumors47.8Distinguishes salivary gland tumors .
Urothelial Neoplasms3.1–16.8Indicates squamous differentiation in urothelial cancers .

Laryngeal Lesions

In a study of laryngeal specimens, CK10 staining scores were analyzed across different lesion types:

Lesion TypeCK10 Staining ScorePercentage Positive
Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC)0–466.3% (55/83)
Laryngeal Dysplasia0–438.8% (7/18)
Benign Lesions0–425.3% (21/83)

MSVA-610M (Recombinant Mouse Monoclonal)

  • Positive Control: Skin (suprabasal squamous cells) .

  • Negative Control: Colon (no staining in epithelial or stromal cells) .

  • Localization: Cytoplasmic, with strong staining in keratinizing epithelia .

DE-K13 Antibody (Polyclonal)

  • Target: CK10 (56.5 kDa) and CK13 (53 kDa) in WB; CK13 only in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections .

  • Use Case: Differentiates non-cornifying stratified epithelia (e.g., oral mucosa) from cornifying epithelia (e.g., skin) .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
CKL10 antibody; CKI2 antibody; At3g23340 antibody; MLM24.7Casein kinase 1-like protein 10 antibody; EC 2.7.11.1 antibody; Protein CASEIN KINASE I-LIKE 10 antibody
Target Names
CKL10
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Casein kinases are enzymes characterized by their preference for acidic proteins, such as caseins, as substrates. They have the ability to phosphorylate a wide range of proteins.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G23340

STRING: 3702.AT3G23340.1

UniGene: At.13

Protein Families
Protein kinase superfamily, CK1 Ser/Thr protein kinase family, Casein kinase I subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Cell junction, plasmodesma.

Q&A

What is CKL10 and what role does it play in Arabidopsis thaliana?

CKL10 (Casein Kinase 1-Like Protein 10) is a serine/threonine protein kinase expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana. It belongs to the casein kinase family and plays crucial roles in cellular signaling pathways, particularly in plant developmental processes and stress responses. Antibodies targeting CKL10 are valuable tools for investigating protein expression, localization, and functional interactions within plant cellular networks .

What are the standard applications for CKL10 Antibody in research?

CKL10 Antibody is primarily used for Western blotting (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunocytochemistry (ICC), and immunoprecipitation (IP) applications. These techniques allow researchers to detect, localize, and quantify CKL10 protein in various plant tissues and experimental conditions. The versatility of these applications enables comprehensive analysis of CKL10's role in different physiological and developmental contexts .

What validation methods confirm CKL10 Antibody specificity?

Validating antibody specificity is crucial for reliable research outcomes. For CKL10 Antibody, recommended validation approaches include:

  • Western blot analysis with positive and negative controls

  • Peptide competition assays to confirm binding specificity

  • Immunostaining patterns comparison with literature reports

  • Testing in CKL10 knockout or knockdown plant lines

  • Cross-reactivity testing with related proteins

These validation steps ensure experimental results accurately reflect CKL10 biology rather than non-specific interactions .

How should researchers optimize immunohistochemistry protocols for CKL10 detection?

Optimizing IHC protocols for CKL10 detection requires systematic refinement of several parameters:

  • Fixation method: 4% paraformaldehyde typically preserves CKL10 epitopes while maintaining tissue architecture

  • Antigen retrieval: Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) often improves signal detection

  • Blocking solution: 5% normal serum with 0.3% Triton X-100 minimizes background

  • Antibody dilution: Begin with manufacturer's recommendation (typically 1:100 to 1:500) and titrate as needed

  • Incubation conditions: Overnight incubation at 4°C generally provides optimal signal-to-noise ratio

  • Detection system: Polymer-based detection systems often yield superior results compared to ABC methods

These optimizations should be systematically tested and documented to establish a reliable protocol for specific experimental systems .

What strategies can resolve inconsistent CKL10 antibody binding results?

When faced with inconsistent experimental outcomes, consider these troubleshooting approaches:

  • Epitope accessibility: Different sample preparation methods may affect epitope exposure; compare multiple fixation protocols

  • Antibody batch variation: Compare lot numbers and request validation data from manufacturers

  • Cross-reactivity: Assess potential cross-reactivity with related plant proteins using sequence alignment tools

  • Sample degradation: Implement strict sample handling protocols with appropriate protease inhibitors

  • Technical variables: Standardize incubation times, temperatures, and washing steps

Systematic documentation of these variables across experiments can help identify the source of inconsistency .

How should control experiments be designed when using CKL10 Antibody?

Robust experimental design requires appropriate controls:

Control TypeImplementationPurpose
Positive ControlTissue with confirmed CKL10 expressionVerifies antibody functionality
Negative ControlCKL10 knockout tissue or primary antibody omissionAssesses non-specific binding
Isotype ControlIrrelevant antibody of same isotypeEvaluates background from antibody class
Blocking PeptidePre-incubation with immunizing peptideConfirms epitope specificity
Loading ControlAnti-actin or anti-tubulin antibodyNormalizes protein loading (for WB)

Implementing these controls enables confident interpretation of experimental results and facilitates troubleshooting when necessary .

What are optimal sample preparation techniques for CKL10 detection in plant tissues?

Effective sample preparation is critical for successful CKL10 detection:

  • Tissue collection: Harvest tissues at consistent developmental stages and time points

  • Preservation: Flash-freeze in liquid nitrogen to prevent protein degradation

  • Extraction buffer: Use buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and protease inhibitor cocktail

  • Homogenization: Thoroughly homogenize using bead beater or mortar and pestle under cold conditions

  • Clarification: Centrifuge at 14,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C

  • Protein quantification: Use Bradford or BCA assay to normalize loading

These steps preserve protein integrity and enhance detection specificity across experimental applications .

How can researchers quantify CKL10 expression levels accurately?

Accurate quantification requires rigorous analytical approaches:

  • For Western blot analysis:

    • Use gradient gels (4-12%) for optimal protein separation

    • Transfer proteins to PVDF membranes for higher protein binding capacity

    • Implement densitometric analysis using software like ImageJ

    • Normalize to validated housekeeping proteins (e.g., GAPDH, actin)

    • Include standard curves with recombinant protein when absolute quantification is needed

  • For immunohistochemistry quantification:

    • Use consistent image acquisition parameters

    • Analyze multiple fields per sample

    • Employ automated thresholding methods

    • Normalize signal intensity to cell number or tissue area

    • Implement blind analysis to prevent observer bias

Statistical analysis should include appropriate tests for experimental design with clear reporting of biological and technical replicates .

How should researchers interpret contradictory results between different detection methods?

When facing contradictory results between methods:

  • Analyze methodological differences:

    • Different epitopes recognized by various antibodies

    • Diverse sample preparation affecting protein conformation

    • Method-specific sensitivity thresholds

  • Consider biological variables:

    • Post-translational modifications altering epitope accessibility

    • Subcellular localization affecting detection efficiency

    • Protein-protein interactions masking binding sites

  • Resolution strategies:

    • Employ orthogonal detection methods

    • Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Validate with genetic approaches (overexpression or knockdown)

    • Correlate with mRNA expression data

How can CKL10 Antibody be utilized in protein-protein interaction studies?

CKL10 interaction studies benefit from these methodological approaches:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Use mild lysis conditions to preserve protein complexes

    • Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads

    • Optimize antibody-to-lysate ratios

    • Include appropriate controls (IgG, reverse Co-IP)

  • Proximity ligation assay (PLA):

    • Combine CKL10 antibody with antibodies against suspected interaction partners

    • Optimize fixation to preserve cellular architecture

    • Include positive and negative interaction controls

  • Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) validation:

    • Use BiFC to confirm direct interactions identified by antibody-based methods

    • Compare with Co-IP results for comprehensive validation

These complementary approaches provide robust evidence for CKL10 protein interactions in physiological contexts .

What considerations are important when developing multiplex assays including CKL10 Antibody?

Successful multiplex assays require careful planning:

  • Antibody selection criteria:

    • Host species compatibility (avoid same-species antibodies)

    • Fluorophore spectral separation (minimum 30 nm between emission peaks)

    • Similar optimal dilutions and incubation conditions

  • Technical considerations:

    • Sequential application for antibodies requiring different conditions

    • Thorough blocking between applications

    • Extensive washing to prevent cross-reactivity

    • Appropriate negative controls for each antibody

  • Imaging considerations:

    • Channel bleed-through controls

    • Sequential scanning for closely overlapping spectra

    • Consistent exposure settings across experimental groups

These considerations ensure reliable multiplex detection while minimizing false positive signals from technical artifacts .

What are the most common causes of weak or absent CKL10 signal?

When experiencing weak or absent signal:

  • Antibody-related factors:

    • Degradation due to improper storage

    • Insufficient concentration or incubation time

    • Lot-to-lot variation in binding efficiency

  • Sample-related factors:

    • Low target protein expression

    • Epitope masked by protein-protein interactions

    • Protein degradation during sample preparation

    • Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition

  • Protocol-related factors:

    • Insufficient antigen retrieval

    • Incomplete membrane blocking

    • Excessive washing stringency

    • Suboptimal detection reagents

Systematic evaluation of these factors through controlled experiments can identify and resolve signal detection issues .

How can researchers address non-specific binding in CKL10 immunostaining?

Non-specific binding can be minimized through:

  • Blocking optimization:

    • Test different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)

    • Increase blocking time and concentration

    • Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to blocking solution

  • Antibody optimization:

    • Titrate primary antibody concentration

    • Reduce incubation temperature (4°C rather than room temperature)

    • Increase washing duration and frequency

  • Sample preparation refinement:

    • Optimize fixation protocol

    • Implement additional permeabilization steps

    • Test different antigen retrieval methods

  • Detection system adjustment:

    • Switch between direct and indirect detection methods

    • Try polymer-based detection systems

    • Optimize substrate development time

These adjustments, implemented systematically, can significantly improve signal-to-noise ratio .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.