CNDP1 Mouse

CNDP Dipeptidase 1 Mouse Recombinant
Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

CNDP1 Protein Characteristics

Recombinant murine CNDP1 is produced in Baculovirus-infected insect cells (Sf9) with a C-terminal His tag. Key properties include:

PropertyDetailsSource
Molecular Weight50–70 kDa (SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions)
Amino Acid Range1–492 aa (full-length protein)
Purity>95% (SDS-PAGE)
Expression SystemBaculovirus-infected Sf9 cells
Endotoxin Level<1 EU/µg
ActivityHydrolyzes carnosine and anserine; optimal stability at -20°C with 10% glycerol

The enzyme’s structure includes a catalytic zinc-binding site and glycosylation modifications critical for secretion and stability .

Overexpression Models

  • hCN1 Transgenic Mice:

    • BTBR ob/ob mice overexpressing human CNDP1 (hCN1) under the transthyretin promoter exhibited:

      • Accelerated DN: Increased albuminuria, glomerular hypertrophy, and mesangial matrix expansion compared to wild-type (WT) ob/ob mice .

      • Reduced HCD Levels: Plasma HCD concentrations dropped >100-fold (0.003 ± 0.007 µM vs. 0.28 ± 0.16 µM in ob/ob controls) .

      • Serum CN1 Activity: Elevated hydrolyzing activity (6.04 ± 0.94 µmol·mL⁻¹·h⁻¹) .

Knockout (KO) Models

  • Global Cndp1-KO Mice:

    • Renal HCD Accumulation: 2–9-fold higher carnosine and anserine levels in kidneys, particularly in the cortex, with no changes in other organs or serum .

    • Gender-Specific Effects: Male KO mice showed improved glucose tolerance and reduced body weight gain compared to females .

    • Diabetic Protection:

      • Reduced interstitial fibrosis and oxidative stress in type-1 diabetic mice .

      • Correlation between renal HCD levels and DN severity (r = -0.70 for anserine) .

Diabetic Nephropathy (DN)

  • CNDP1 Overexpression: Exacerbates glomerular damage in diabetic models by depleting renal HCDs, which normally mitigate glycation and oxidative stress .

  • CNDP1 Knockout:

    • Increases renal HCDs, reducing advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and fibrosis in diabetic kidneys .

    • Upregulates renal HSP70 expression, enhancing cellular stress resistance .

Metabolic Impact

  • HCD Homeostasis:

    ParameterWT MiceCndp1-KO Miceob/ob hCN1 Mice
    Plasma Carnosine (µM)0.36 ± 0.320.11 ± 0.080.003 ± 0.007
    Kidney Anserine (nmol/g)15.2 ± 4.162.8 ± 18.38.9 ± 3.2
  • Glucose Metabolism: Male KO mice displayed enhanced insulin sensitivity and reduced fasting glucose levels .

Therapeutic Implications

  • Renal HCD Augmentation: Strategies to boost renal carnosine/anserine (e.g., CN1 inhibitors) may protect against DN .

  • Gender-Specific Responses: The protective 5-5 homozygous CNDP1 genotype in humans correlates with lower DN risk, particularly in women .

Research Gaps and Future Directions

Product Specs

Introduction
CNDP Dipeptidase 1, also known as CNDP1, is a member of the peptidase M20A family. The CNDP1 Mannheim variant, the shortest allelic form, has been linked to a lower risk of nephropathy and is associated with reduced serum carnosinase levels. Carnosine, a dipeptide broken down by CNDP1, has been shown to inhibit the increased production of fibronectin, collagen type VI in podocytes, and TGF-beta in mesangial cells. These findings suggest that diabetic patients with the CNDP1 Mannheim variant may have a lower risk of developing nephropathy. Additionally, carnosine exhibits protective effects against the detrimental effects of high glucose levels on renal cells.
Description
CNDP1, produced in Sf9 Baculovirus cells, is a single, glycosylated polypeptide chain containing 500 amino acids (1-492 a.a.) with a molecular mass of 56.1 kDa. On SDS-PAGE, the molecular size will appear between 50-70 kDa. This CNDP1 protein is expressed with an 8 amino acid His tag at the C-terminus and purified using proprietary chromatographic techniques.
Physical Appearance
Clear, colorless, and sterile-filtered solution.
Formulation
The CNDP1 protein solution is provided at a concentration of 0.25 mg/ml and is formulated in Phosphate Buffered Saline (pH 7.4) with 10% glycerol.
Stability
For short-term storage (2-4 weeks), the CNDP1 protein should be stored at 4°C. For extended storage, it is recommended to store the protein at -20°C. The addition of a carrier protein (0.1% HSA or BSA) is recommended for long-term storage. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Purity
The purity of CNDP1 is greater than 95.0% as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis.
Synonyms
Beta-Ala-His dipeptidase, CNDP dipeptidase 1, Carnosine dipeptidase 1.
Source
Sf9, Baculovirus cells.
Amino Acid Sequence
MFSSAHSGLL EKLFHYIDLH QDEFVQTLKE WVAIESDSVQ PVPRLRQKLF QMMALAADKL RNLGAGVESI DLGSQQMPDG QSLPIPPILL AELGSDPEKP TVCFYGHLDV QPAQKDDGWL TDPYTLTEVD GKLYGRGATD NKGPVLAWIN AVSTFRALQQ DLPVNIKLIL EGMEEAGSIA LEELVMREKD HFFSSVDYIV ISDNLWLSQR KPALTYGTRG NCYFTVEVKC RDQDFHSGTF GGILNEPMAD LVALLGSLVD SSGHILIPGI YDQMAPITEG EKTMYKNIDM DLEEYQNINQ VEKFLFDTKE ELLMHLWRYP SLSIHGIEGA FDEPGTKTVI PGRVLGKFSI RLVPTMSPSV VEKQVTQHLE AVFSKRNSFN KMAVSMVLGL HPWTANVNDT QYLAAQRTIK TVFGVNPDMI RDGSTIPIAK IFQAITQKSV MMLPLGAVDD GEHSQNEKIN RWNYIQGSKL FAAFFLELSK QHSGHQMPSS VYLEHHHHHH.

Q&A

What is CNDP1 and what is its primary function in mouse models?

CNDP1 (carnosine dipeptidase 1) is a secreted zinc metalloprotease that cleaves the dipeptide carnosine into L-histidine and β-alanine . In mouse models, CNDP1 is predominantly expressed in the brain and liver, playing a critical role in carnosine metabolism . The enzyme's function appears to be particularly important in metabolic adaptation during metastatic progression, especially in the brain microenvironment. Researchers studying CNDP1 should note that it serves as a protective factor for tumor cells by preventing carnosine-induced copper toxicity, which has significant implications for metastatic disease models .

How does CNDP1 differ from its homologue CNDP2 in mouse expression patterns?

While CNDP1 shows tissue-specific expression primarily in the brain and liver of mouse models, its homologue CNDP2 demonstrates ubiquitous expression across tissues . This differential expression pattern is crucial for researchers designing tissue-specific knockout models or when interpreting experimental results. The counterpart enzyme in carnosine metabolism, CARNS1 (carnosine synthase 1), also shows ubiquitous expression, creating a tissue-specific balance of carnosine synthesis and degradation that should be considered in experimental design .

What experimental approaches are recommended for initial CNDP1 characterization in mouse models?

For initial characterization of CNDP1 in mouse models, researchers should employ a multi-omics approach combining RNA-sequencing with proteomics. This methodology successfully identified CNDP1 as significantly upregulated in brain metastases versus non-brain metastases . When establishing baseline CNDP1 expression, researchers should examine both transcript and protein levels across multiple tissues, as post-transcriptional regulation may affect final enzyme activity. Initial phenotyping should include assessment of carnosine levels in relevant tissues using mass spectrometry techniques alongside CNDP1 activity assays to establish the functional relationship between the enzyme and its substrate in the model system .

How has CNDP1 been implicated in brain metastasis in mouse models?

CNDP1 has been established as a critical driver of brain metastasis in multiple mouse models. Experimental evidence demonstrates that CNDP1 inhibition suppresses both the establishment and maintenance of melanoma brain metastasis in xenograft models . Mechanistically, CNDP1 upregulation in metastatic cells provides an adaptive advantage in the brain microenvironment by cleaving excess carnosine, which protects cells from intracellular copper overload and subsequent toxicity . In well-designed mouse experiments, both constitutive and inducible CNDP1 knockdown approaches showed strongly reduced brain and liver metastatic burden, supporting its role across cancer types including both melanoma and breast cancer brain metastatic models .

What methodologies are most effective for studying CNDP1 in mouse metastasis models?

For studying CNDP1 in mouse metastasis models, researchers should implement a comprehensive methodological approach that includes:

  • In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) - Used for weekly monitoring of metastatic progression in live animals

  • MetFinder machine learning tool - For segmentation, measurement, and quantification of metastases in H&E-stained tissue sections

  • Controlled CNDP1 expression modulation using:

    • Constitutive knockdown (administered before tumor cell injection) to study metastasis establishment

    • Inducible knockdown (administered after metastases are seeded) to study maintenance and growth

  • RNA-seq of GFP-positive cells sorted from metastatic lesions to confirm maintained CNDP1 silencing in vivo

These methodologies allow for both visual and quantitative assessment of metastatic burden while verifying successful genetic manipulation throughout the experimental timeframe.

How does ectopic Cndp1 expression alter metastatic behavior in syngeneic mouse models?

In syngeneic mouse models, ectopic expression of Cndp1 confers specific brain tropism to poorly metastatic cells . Experiments with B16F1 melanoma cells demonstrate that Cndp1-expressing cells gained exclusive brain tropism with significantly higher incidence (62%) compared to parental cells (0%) and Akt1-E17K transduced cells (40%) . Unlike Akt1-E17K cells which formed metastases in multiple organs, Cndp1-expressing cells specifically targeted the brain, highlighting CNDP1's specialized role in promoting brain metastasis . This experimental model provides strong evidence that CNDP1 is not merely associated with brain metastasis but functionally contributes to organ-specific metastatic potential.

How does CNDP1 knockdown affect mitochondrial function in mouse tumor cells?

CNDP1 knockdown profoundly disrupts mitochondrial function in mouse tumor cells through several interconnected mechanisms. Electron microscopy studies reveal significant morphological alterations in mitochondria of CNDP1 KD cells, including a reduced number of cristae per mitochondria, a phenotype associated with functional defects . In vivo studies demonstrated reduced expression of the mitochondrial transport protein Tom20 in brain metastases upon acute CNDP1 KD, indicating dysfunctional mitochondrial structures . Functionally, both CNDP1 KD and carnosine treatment elicited a significant decrease in oxygen consumption rate (OCR) measured by Seahorse assays (p<0.02), confirming impaired mitochondrial respiration . These findings suggest that carnosine accumulation resulting from CNDP1 inhibition directly impacts mitochondrial integrity and function.

What metabolomic approaches reveal the impact of CNDP1 knockdown in mouse models?

Several complementary metabolomic approaches effectively reveal the impact of CNDP1 knockdown:

  • U-13C5 labeled glutamine tracing with GC/MS analysis - This approach demonstrated that CNDP1 KD cells display significantly reduced glutamine usage in the TCA cycle within 24 hours of silencing, as evidenced by lower levels of glutamine-derived metabolites: α-Ketoglutarate (M+5), Fumarate, Malate, and Citrate (M+4)

  • Integrated MS/MS proteomics with LC/MS metabolomics - This integrated analysis revealed accumulation of amino acids (phenylalanine, arginine, tyrosine, and leucine) together with their respective aminoacyl tRNA-synthetases upon CNDP1 silencing

  • MetaboAnalyst algorithm analysis - Using hypergeometric tests to identify enrichment of both transcript-based and mass spectra-based data in metabolic pathways, this approach identified "Aminoacyl tRNA-synthesis" as the most deregulated metabolic pathway in tumor cells upon CNDP1 suppression

These methodologies collectively provide a comprehensive view of metabolic reprogramming induced by CNDP1 modulation.

How does CNDP1 modulation affect copper homeostasis in mouse tumor models?

CNDP1 plays a critical role in copper homeostasis in mouse tumor models through its enzymatic degradation of carnosine. Mechanistically, carnosine functions as a copper ionophore, and its accumulation in CNDP1-depleted cells leads to elevated intracellular copper levels . This copper overload induces toxicity through multiple mechanisms, including disruption of mitochondrial function and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production . The study demonstrates that CNDP1 upregulation represents a metabolic adaptation that increases cancer cell fitness during brain metastasis by overcoming copper toxicity induced by carnosine accumulation in the brain metastatic niche . This finding highlights the importance of considering metal ion homeostasis when studying CNDP1 function in experimental models.

What are the most effective genetic approaches for modulating CNDP1 expression in mouse models?

For effective CNDP1 modulation in mouse models, researchers should consider multiple complementary genetic approaches:

  • Doxycycline-inducible shRNA systems - These allow for temporal control of CNDP1 knockdown, enabling researchers to distinguish between effects on metastasis establishment versus maintenance

  • Constitutive shRNA expression - For studying long-term effects of CNDP1 suppression throughout the entire disease course

  • Ectopic expression systems - Using viral vectors for stable overexpression of CNDP1 in poorly metastatic cell lines to assess gain-of-function phenotypes, particularly important for studying brain tropism

  • Cell sorting with GFP reporters - For isolation and analysis of CNDP1-modulated cells from metastatic lesions to confirm maintained expression changes in vivo

Each approach offers distinct advantages depending on the specific research question, with inducible systems providing the most versatile platform for therapeutic relevance.

How can researchers effectively analyze the Integrated Stress Response (ISR) triggered by CNDP1 knockdown?

To effectively analyze the Integrated Stress Response triggered by CNDP1 knockdown, researchers should employ a multi-faceted approach:

  • Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling - These techniques reveal changes in translation initiation, elongation, RNA metabolism, and stress response pathways following CNDP1 silencing

  • Assessment of ISR pathway activation markers - Including phosphorylation of eIF2α, expression of ATF4, and activation of heme-regulated inhibitor kinase (HRI)

  • Polysome profiling - To assess translational efficiency of specific mRNAs and identify shifts in translation patterns toward survival transcripts and mitochondrial genes

  • Pathway analysis tools - Such as MetaboAnalyst algorithm to identify enrichment of metabolic pathways affected by CNDP1 knockdown

This comprehensive approach allows researchers to characterize how CNDP1 modulation triggers cellular stress responses that ultimately influence metastatic potential.

What imaging techniques provide the most comprehensive assessment of CNDP1-modulated metastasis in mouse models?

A combination of complementary imaging techniques provides comprehensive assessment of CNDP1-modulated metastasis:

  • In vivo Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) - Allows for longitudinal monitoring of metastatic progression in live animals on a weekly basis, providing quantitative temporal data on tumor burden

  • Histological analysis with MetFinder - A machine learning-powered tool that segments, measures, and quantifies metastases in H&E-stained sections, providing detailed spatial information at the endpoint

  • Immunohistochemistry for mitochondrial markers - Such as Tom20, which is reduced in brain metastases upon acute CNDP1 knockdown, providing functional correlates to the observed phenotypes

  • Electron microscopy - For ultrastructural analysis of mitochondrial morphology in CNDP1-modulated cells, revealing detailed changes such as reduced cristae numbers

This multi-modal imaging approach allows researchers to connect macroscopic metastatic behavior with cellular and subcellular changes resulting from CNDP1 modulation.

How do findings from mouse CNDP1 studies translate to human disease?

Findings from mouse CNDP1 studies show promising translational relevance to human disease. Integrative multi-omics approaches comparing brain metastases versus extracranial tumor samples identified CNDP1 as significantly upregulated in both mouse models and human patient samples . CNDP1 upregulation was observed not only in melanoma brain metastases but also in lung and breast cancer brain metastases compared to primary tumors across multiple databases, suggesting a conserved mechanism across cancer types . The observation that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) impairing CNDP1 secretion protect diabetic patients from developing nephropathy has sparked interest in developing CNDP1 inhibitors, some of which have shown promising activity in preclinical models . These parallel findings between mouse models and human disease strengthen the translational potential of targeting CNDP1.

What therapeutic strategies targeting CNDP1 show promise in preclinical mouse models?

Several therapeutic strategies targeting CNDP1 show promise in preclinical mouse models:

  • RNA interference approaches - Both constitutive and inducible shRNA-mediated knockdown of CNDP1 effectively reduced metastatic burden in brain and liver

  • Small molecule CNDP1 inhibitors - The study provides a rationale for further developing compounds targeting CNDP1, building on existing work in diabetic nephropathy models

  • Antibody-based approaches - Targeting the secreted CNDP1 enzyme represents another potential therapeutic strategy mentioned in the research

  • Combination approaches - Targeting CNDP1 alongside other metabolic vulnerabilities could potentially enhance therapeutic efficacy

The inducible knockdown approach, which demonstrated efficacy when administered after metastases were already seeded, is particularly promising from a clinical translation perspective as it more closely resembles the therapeutic scenario in patients .

What are the current limitations in mouse models for studying CNDP1 and future research directions?

Current limitations in mouse models for studying CNDP1 and promising future research directions include:

  • Model system variations - Further work is needed to fully understand whether CNDP1 expression is induced once cells arrive in the brain, or if CNDP1-high cells inherently have increased ability to seed in the brain parenchyma

  • Cell state heterogeneity - Recent studies have shown melanoma cells can adopt different transcriptional states with varying metastatic potential, but the relationship between CNDP1 expression and these cell states remains unexplored

  • Therapeutic delivery challenges - Developing strategies to effectively deliver CNDP1-targeting therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier represents a critical challenge

  • Biomarker development - Identifying reliable biomarkers to predict which patients might benefit from CNDP1-targeted therapies requires further investigation

Future research should address these limitations while expanding into complementary areas such as immune interactions and combination therapeutic approaches to maximize translational impact.

What are the key considerations for experimental endpoint selection in CNDP1 mouse studies?

When designing CNDP1 mouse studies, researchers should carefully consider experimental endpoints based on established protocols. In the referenced studies, mice were monitored weekly for metastatic progression using in vivo Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) . Humane endpoints were established as when any group started to show symptoms of distress or more than 20% weight loss from their maximum weight . This approach balances scientific rigor with animal welfare considerations. Additionally, comprehensive tissue collection protocols should be established for histological analyses using both H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for markers of CNDP1 expression and mitochondrial function . This multi-parameter endpoint assessment provides complementary data on both the macroscopic metastatic burden and underlying cellular mechanisms.

How should researchers integrate multi-omics data in CNDP1 mouse studies?

For effective integration of multi-omics data in CNDP1 mouse studies, researchers should implement a systematic approach:

  • Parallel transcriptomic and proteomic profiling - Compare differential expression at both RNA and protein levels to identify consistently modulated pathways

  • Metabolomic integration - Combine LC/MS metabolomics with MS/MS proteomics data to connect changes in metabolite levels with alterations in metabolic enzymes

  • Pathway analysis algorithms - Utilize tools such as MetaboAnalyst that employ hypergeometric tests to identify enrichment of both transcript-based and mass spectra-based data in metabolic pathways

  • Cross-validation between in vitro and in vivo findings - Confirm that molecular changes observed in cultured cells are maintained in sorted cells from in vivo metastases

This integrated approach provided critical insights in the referenced study, identifying aminoacyl tRNA-synthesis as the most deregulated pathway upon CNDP1 suppression and revealing the connection between CNDP1, carnosine metabolism, and copper homeostasis .

What methods enable effective isolation and analysis of CNDP1-expressing cells from mouse tissues?

Effective isolation and analysis of CNDP1-expressing cells from mouse tissues require specialized techniques:

  • Fluorescent reporter systems - Using GFP or other fluorescent reporters co-expressed with CNDP1 modulation constructs enables identification and sorting of transduced cells

  • Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) - For selective isolation of tumor cells from metastatic lesions, particularly important when confirming maintained CNDP1 expression changes in vivo

  • Short-term cultures (STCs) - Establishing STCs from resected metastases provides sufficient material for multi-omics analyses while maintaining the phenotypic characteristics of the original tumor cells

  • Single-cell approaches - Though not explicitly discussed in the provided materials, single-cell analyses would provide valuable insights into heterogeneity of CNDP1 expression within tumor populations

Product Science Overview

Structure and Function

The recombinant form of CNDP1 from mice is typically produced with a C-terminal His-tag and corresponds to the amino acids 1-492 of the native mouse protein . The enzyme is expressed using a baculovirus system in insect cells, which allows for proper folding and post-translational modifications . The molecular weight of the recombinant mouse CNDP1 is approximately 56.1 kDa .

CNDP1 functions by degrading carnosine and homocarnosine, which are dipeptides found in human plasma and brain . This degradation process is crucial for maintaining the balance of these dipeptides, which play roles in protecting cells from oxidative stress and regulating neurotransmitter activity .

Applications and Research

Recombinant CNDP1 is widely used in research to study its role in various physiological processes and its potential therapeutic applications. For instance, it has been investigated for its neuroprotective properties and its involvement in metabolic pathways related to diabetes and kidney function .

The enzyme’s activity is measured by its ability to cleave carnosine in a two-step assay, with a specific activity greater than 250 pmoles/min/μg . This high activity makes it a valuable tool for biochemical studies and drug development.

Storage and Handling

Recombinant CNDP1 is typically stored at 4°C for short-term use and at -20°C for long-term storage to prevent degradation . It is supplied in a buffer containing PBS (pH 7.4) and 10% glycerol, without any preservatives . Proper storage and handling are essential to maintain the enzyme’s stability and activity.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.