CNOT11 (CCR4-NOT transcription complex, subunit 11), also known as C40, is a 510-amino-acid protein encoded by the C2orf29 gene located on human chromosome 2q11.2 . It forms a subcomplex with CNOT10, anchoring to the CNOT1 scaffold, a backbone of the CCR4-NOT complex . The CNOT11 protein features a globular α-helical domain, an extended segment, and a C-terminal HEAT-repeat domain (DUF2363), which mediates interactions with regulatory proteins .
mRNA Decay: CNOT11 facilitates mRNA deadenylation by recruiting the catalytic module (CNOT6/CNOT7) .
Transcriptional Regulation: Interacts with nuclear receptors (e.g., ERα) to repress ligand-dependent transcription .
Stem Cell Maintenance: Suppressed in embryonic stem cells to sustain pluripotency .
Applications: Western blot (WB), immunoprecipitation (IP), immunofluorescence (IF), immunohistochemistry (IHC[P]), and ELISA .
Conjugates: Available as non-conjugated or conjugated (HRP, PE, Alexa Fluor®) .
Immunogen: FRPEFIRPPPP LHICEDELAW LNPTEPDHAI QWDKSMCVKN STGVEIKRIM AKAFKSPLSS PQQTQLLGEL EKDPKLVYHI GLT .
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Elevated CNOT11 expression correlates with poor prognosis and tumor aggressiveness .
Spermatogenesis: CNOT11 interacts with GGNBP2, a tumor suppressor and spermatogenic factor .
The CNOT11 antibody has emerged as a potential diagnostic marker for HCC, with studies showing its expression linked to lymph node metastasis and tumor stages . Additionally, its role in thymic positive selection highlights its importance in immune system development .
CNOT11 (CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 11) is a component of the CCR4-NOT complex, which plays important roles in mRNA deadenylation and transcriptional regulation. The protein is involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression, particularly through modulating mRNA stability . Research has shown that the CCR4-NOT complex is critical for various cellular processes, including β-cell function in the pancreas, where dysregulation can contribute to diabetic phenotypes . The protein is found in both cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, consistent with its dual roles in transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation .
CNOT11 antibodies are primarily used for several key applications in molecular and cellular biology research:
| Application | Typical Dilution Range | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-2000 | Detection of endogenous CNOT11 protein expression in tissue/cell lysates |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50-1:500 | Visualization of CNOT11 in tissue sections |
| Immunofluorescence (IF/ICC) | 1:50-1:500 | Subcellular localization of CNOT11 in cultured cells |
| Immunoprecipitation (IP) | 0.5-4.0 μg per mg lysate | Isolation of CNOT11 and interacting partners |
These applications enable researchers to investigate CNOT11 expression patterns, subcellular localization, and protein-protein interactions in various experimental contexts .
When selecting a CNOT11 antibody, consider these key factors:
Target species compatibility: Verify the antibody has been validated for your species of interest (human, mouse, rat, etc.) through cross-reactivity testing .
Application suitability: Ensure the antibody has been validated for your specific application (WB, IHC, IF, IP) with published validation data .
Epitope recognition: Consider which region of CNOT11 the antibody recognizes. Some antibodies target specific domains (e.g., amino acids 264-314 as in some commercial antibodies), which may be important depending on your research questions .
Clonality: Polyclonal antibodies offer broader epitope recognition but may have batch-to-batch variability, while monoclonal antibodies provide higher specificity for a single epitope .
Validation methods: Look for antibodies validated through multiple techniques, including positive and negative controls, and those that have been verified in knockout/knockdown experiments .
For optimal Western blot results with CNOT11 antibodies:
Sample preparation:
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Use 8-10% SDS-PAGE gels due to CNOT11's molecular weight
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes using standard protocols
Antibody incubation:
Detection:
Expect to observe bands at the predicted molecular weight for CNOT11
Validate specificity using knockdown/knockout controls when possible
Note that the observed molecular weight may vary slightly from the calculated weight due to post-translational modifications or the presence of isoforms .
For successful immunohistochemical detection of CNOT11:
Tissue preparation:
Antigen retrieval (critical step):
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Detection and visualization:
Use appropriate secondary antibody systems (HRP-conjugated or fluorophore-conjugated)
For chromogenic detection, develop with DAB substrate
For fluorescence, use compatible fluorophores and include DAPI nuclear counterstain
Mount with appropriate mounting medium
Controls:
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) using CNOT11 antibodies can help identify RNA transcripts that interact with the CCR4-NOT complex. Based on published methodologies:
Cell lysate preparation:
Immunoprecipitation:
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads
Prepare antibody-bead complexes by incubating CNOT11 antibody with protein A/G beads
Include IgG control antibodies for negative control samples
Incubate lysates with antibody-bead complexes for 4 hours at 4°C
Wash beads extensively with wash buffers containing RNase inhibitors
RNA extraction and analysis:
Extract RNA from immunoprecipitated samples and input controls
Perform reverse transcription followed by qPCR to detect specific transcripts
Calculate enrichment relative to input and IgG control samples
Data interpretation:
Significant enrichment in CNOT11 IP compared to IgG control indicates association
For example, research has shown that specific mRNAs (like Slc16a1, Ldha, Cat) can be enriched in CNOT3 (another CCR4-NOT component) immunoprecipitated samples compared to IgG controls
Similar approaches can be applied to CNOT11 research
CNOT11 antibodies can be leveraged for several advanced applications to study its role in CCR4-NOT complex assembly and function:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) studies:
Use CNOT11 antibodies to pull down the protein along with its interacting partners
Analyze by Western blot using antibodies against other CCR4-NOT components (e.g., CNOT1, CNOT3)
This approach can reveal which subunits directly interact with CNOT11 and how these interactions may be regulated under different conditions
Proximity ligation assays (PLA):
Combine CNOT11 antibodies with antibodies against other complex components
Visualize and quantify protein-protein interactions in situ
Map spatial relationships within the complex at subcellular resolution
ChIP-sequencing:
Use CNOT11 antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing
Identify genomic regions where CNOT11 may be involved in transcriptional regulation
Compare with binding profiles of other CCR4-NOT components to understand cooperative functions
Immunofluorescence co-localization:
Perform dual staining with CNOT11 and other CCR4-NOT component antibodies
Analyze subcellular localization patterns in different cell types or under various conditions
Quantify co-localization coefficients to assess complex integrity
These approaches can provide insights into how CNOT11 contributes to the structural organization and functional diversity of the CCR4-NOT complex in different cellular contexts.
Rigorous validation of CNOT11 antibody specificity is critical for reliable research outcomes. Comprehensive validation strategies include:
Genetic knockout/knockdown controls:
Peptide competition assays:
Pre-incubate the antibody with excess immunizing peptide
Apply this mixture in parallel with regular antibody applications
Specific signals should be blocked in the presence of the competing peptide
Multi-antibody validation approach:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of CNOT11
Compare detection patterns across applications
Consistent results with different antibodies increase confidence in specificity
Orthogonal validation methods:
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression (RT-qPCR)
Compare antibody-based detection with tagged overexpression systems
Analyze if antibody detects expected molecular weight proteins in Western blot
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test antibody performance across multiple species when working with model organisms
Confirm specificity in tissues/cells known to express varying levels of CNOT11
Document any cross-reactivity with highly homologous proteins
Implementing multiple validation approaches provides comprehensive evidence for antibody specificity and reliability in various research applications.
To investigate CNOT11's role in mRNA deadenylation and decay pathways:
RNA stability assays with CNOT11 manipulation:
Perform CNOT11 knockdown/knockout in cellular models
Measure half-lives of candidate mRNAs using actinomycin D chase experiments
Compare mRNA decay rates between control and CNOT11-depleted conditions
Research with other CCR4-NOT components (e.g., CNOT3) has shown altered mRNA stability profiles following depletion
Poly(A) tail length analysis:
Immunoprecipitate CNOT11 and associated mRNAs
Perform PAT (Poly(A) Tail) assays to measure poly(A) tail lengths
Compare tail lengths of CNOT11-bound vs. unbound mRNAs
Assess changes in poly(A) distribution following CNOT11 depletion
RIP-seq to identify CNOT11-associated transcripts:
Perform RNA immunoprecipitation with CNOT11 antibodies followed by sequencing
Identify transcriptome-wide targets of CNOT11
Analyze sequence or structural motifs enriched in CNOT11-bound RNAs
Compare binding profiles with known deadenylation targets
Similar approaches with CNOT3 have identified specific mRNAs that interact with CCR4-NOT components
Co-localization with P-bodies and stress granules:
Perform immunofluorescence to visualize CNOT11 along with markers of RNA decay compartments
Analyze dynamic recruitment to these structures under stress conditions
Correlate localization patterns with mRNA decay rates
Tethering assays:
Tether CNOT11 to reporter mRNAs via MS2 or λN systems
Measure effects on reporter stability, translation, and poly(A) tail length
Determine which domains of CNOT11 are required for deadenylation activity
Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with CNOT11 antibodies. Here are common issues and their solutions:
Weak or absent signal in Western blot:
Increase antibody concentration (try 1:250-1:500 if standard dilutions fail)
Extend primary antibody incubation time to overnight at 4°C
Use enhanced detection systems (e.g., higher sensitivity ECL reagents)
Optimize protein extraction methods to prevent degradation
Ensure transfer efficiency for high molecular weight proteins by using extended transfer times or lower percentage gels
High background in immunostaining:
Increase blocking time and concentration (5% BSA instead of 2%)
Use more stringent washing steps (increase wash buffer volume and duration)
Titrate primary antibody to determine optimal concentration
Try alternative blocking reagents (normal serum from secondary antibody host species)
For tissues with high endogenous peroxidase activity, enhance quenching steps
Non-specific bands in Western blot:
Use freshly prepared samples with protease inhibitors
Optimize antibody dilution and incubation conditions
Perform additional washing steps with higher stringency buffers
Consider using gradient gels for better separation
Compare observed banding patterns with predicted molecular weight (240-250 kDa for CNOT1)
Inconsistent results between experiments:
Standardize protocols including sample preparation, antibody dilutions, and incubation times
Prepare larger batches of working dilutions to reduce variation
Include positive controls in each experiment
Document lot numbers of antibodies and verify consistency between batches
Poor immunoprecipitation efficiency:
Pre-clear lysates thoroughly to reduce non-specific binding
Optimize antibody-to-bead ratios
Extend incubation time for antibody-antigen binding
Use gentler wash conditions to preserve interactions
Consider crosslinking antibodies to beads for cleaner results
Proper storage and handling of CNOT11 antibodies is critical for maintaining their performance over time:
Long-term storage recommendations:
Working solution preparation:
Shipping and temporary storage:
Follow manufacturer guidelines for temporary storage if antibodies cannot be immediately stored at -20°C
Document receipt date and condition upon arrival
Avoid prolonged exposure to room temperature
Contamination prevention:
Use sterile technique when handling antibody solutions
Never return unused antibody to the original stock
Use clean pipette tips for each handling
Check for visible signs of contamination or precipitation before use
Performance monitoring:
Include positive controls in each experiment to verify antibody performance
Document lot numbers and compare results across different lots
Consider benchmarking new antibody lots against previous lots that performed well
Following these storage and handling practices helps ensure consistent antibody performance across experiments and maximizes the useful life of these valuable reagents.
A robust experimental design with appropriate controls is essential when working with CNOT11 antibodies:
Positive controls:
Negative controls:
Specificity controls:
Peptide competition assays (pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide)
Multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of CNOT11
Demonstrate signal reduction following RNA interference
Procedural controls:
For co-immunoprecipitation: input samples, IgG pulldown controls
For RIP experiments: IgG control immunoprecipitations as demonstrated in studies of related proteins like CNOT3
For quantitative applications: loading controls (housekeeping proteins)
For immunostaining: autofluorescence controls, blocking peptide controls
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test antibody in samples from multiple species if cross-reactivity is claimed
Verify specificity in tissues with different expression levels
Validate using recombinant proteins of homologous family members
Including these controls allows for confident interpretation of results and helps troubleshoot any unexpected findings in CNOT11 research.
CNOT11 antibodies can be powerful tools for investigating the protein's involvement in various disease mechanisms:
Diabetes and metabolic disorders:
Research has shown that CCR4-NOT complex components like CNOT3 play critical roles in β-cell function and identity
CNOT11 antibodies can be used to examine expression patterns in diabetic vs. healthy pancreatic tissues
Immunohistochemical analysis can reveal changes in CNOT11 localization or expression levels in disease states
Co-localization studies with other β-cell markers can provide insights into potential dysfunction mechanisms
Cancer biology:
Investigate CNOT11 expression patterns across different tumor types and stages
Correlate expression with clinical outcomes using tissue microarrays
Examine changes in subcellular localization that might indicate altered function
Study interactions with known oncogenes or tumor suppressors through co-immunoprecipitation
Neurological disorders:
Analyze CNOT11 expression in brain tissues from patients with neurodegenerative diseases
Investigate potential role in RNA metabolism dysregulation, which is implicated in several neurological conditions
Examine co-localization with stress granules or other RNA processing bodies in disease models
Research methodologies:
Combine CNOT11 antibody applications with patient-derived samples or disease models
Integrate with multi-omics approaches to correlate protein expression with transcriptomic and proteomic changes
Develop tissue and cell type-specific analysis workflows to identify context-dependent alterations
Understanding CNOT11's roles in disease mechanisms could potentially identify new therapeutic targets or biomarkers for conditions involving RNA metabolism dysregulation.
As single-cell analysis technologies advance, researchers should consider these factors when incorporating CNOT11 antibodies:
Single-cell immunofluorescence applications:
Optimize fixation and permeabilization protocols specific to CNOT11 detection
Validate antibody performance at the single-cell level before large-scale experiments
Consider automated imaging platforms with high-resolution capabilities
Implement quantitative image analysis workflows for objective assessment
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) applications:
Metal-conjugate CNOT11 antibodies following validated protocols
Verify epitope accessibility after conjugation
Optimize antibody concentration for sufficient signal without spillover
Include appropriate controls for batch normalization
Single-cell Western blot considerations:
Adjust lysis conditions to efficiently extract CNOT11 from individual cells
Optimize protein capture and separation parameters
Validate detection sensitivity at the single-cell level
Consider microfluidic platforms designed for low-abundance proteins
Spatial proteomics applications:
Evaluate compatibility with multiplexed immunofluorescence approaches
Optimize signal amplification methods for low-abundance detection
Validate specificity in tissue contexts with appropriate controls
Consider cyclic immunofluorescence methods for co-detection with multiple markers
Data analysis considerations:
Develop analysis pipelines that account for cell-to-cell variability
Implement clustering approaches to identify distinct expression patterns
Correlate CNOT11 expression with cellular phenotypes and functional states
Consider integration with single-cell transcriptomics data
These considerations will help researchers effectively incorporate CNOT11 antibodies into emerging single-cell analysis platforms, enabling new insights into cellular heterogeneity in normal and disease states.
Integrating CNOT11 antibodies with complementary molecular tools creates powerful research approaches:
Combination with CRISPR-based technologies:
Use CNOT11 antibodies to validate knockouts/knockins generated by CRISPR-Cas9
Combine with CRISPRi/CRISPRa to correlate protein levels with phenotypic changes
Implement CRISPR screens followed by CNOT11 immunoprecipitation to identify functional interactions
Develop CRISPR-based tagging approaches that can be detected with existing antibodies
Integration with RNA-protein interaction methods:
Combine CNOT11 RIP with high-throughput sequencing (RIP-seq)
Implement CLIP (Cross-Linking Immunoprecipitation) using CNOT11 antibodies to map direct RNA binding sites
Correlate binding profiles with RNA stability measurements
Study shared and distinct RNA targets across CCR4-NOT complex components
Previous studies with related components like CNOT3 have successfully identified RNA targets using immunoprecipitation approaches
Multi-omics integration:
Correlate CNOT11 protein levels/localization with transcriptome-wide changes
Combine proteomics of CNOT11 interactome with transcriptomics of affected mRNAs
Integrate with genome-wide approaches (ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq) to understand transcriptional impacts
Develop computational frameworks to model CNOT11's role in RNA regulation networks
Live-cell imaging approaches:
Use nanobodies derived from CNOT11 antibodies for live-cell applications
Implement split fluorescent protein systems to visualize dynamic interactions
Correlate spatiotemporal dynamics with RNA fate in real-time
Study assembly/disassembly of CCR4-NOT complexes under various conditions
Therapeutic development applications:
Use antibodies to validate targets in therapeutic screening pipelines
Develop methods to modulate CNOT11 function in disease models
Implement antibody-based proximity labeling to identify novel therapeutic targets
Validate on-target effects of emerging RNA-targeted therapeutics
These integrated approaches combine the specificity of CNOT11 antibodies with complementary technologies to build comprehensive understanding of RNA regulatory mechanisms in normal physiology and disease.