cox12 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Cox12

Cox12 is a nuclear-encoded subunit of cytochrome c oxidase (CcO), the terminal enzyme in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. It is orthologous to human COX6B1, mutations in which cause severe mitochondrial disorders . Key characteristics:

  • Molecular Role: Essential for full CcO activity but not required for enzyme assembly .

  • Structural Impact: Stabilizes interactions between Cox2 (a core CcO subunit) and respiratory supercomplex factors like Rcf2 .

  • Functional Deficiency: Δcox12 yeast strains show 75–90% reduction in CcO activity, impaired oxidative phosphorylation, and increased sensitivity to oxidative stress .

2.1. Cox12 Mutations and Pathological Effects

MutationPhenotypic ImpactSource
R17H (human COX6B1 analog)Failed complementation in yeast, reduced CIV activity, increased oxidative stress sensitivity
R17C (human COX6B1 analog)Similar to R17H; disrupts Cox12-Rcf2-Cox2 interactions
Δcox12 (yeast knockout)25% residual CcO activity, impaired respiration, temperature-sensitive growth defect

2.2. Compensatory Mechanisms

  • Hsp104 Modulation: Deletion or overexpression of the Hsp104 disaggregase restored CcO activity in Δcox12 strains by clearing cytosolic [PSI+] prions, which indirectly impair mitochondrial metabolism .

  • Evolutionary Adaptation: Experimental evolution of Δcox12 yeast identified mutations (e.g., Hsp104-A375V) that rescue respiration by enhancing proteostasis and reducing [PSI+] prion aggregation .

Implications for Cox12 Antibody Development

While no studies in the provided sources directly describe a Cox12 antibody, insights into its structure and interactions could guide antibody design:

  • Target Regions: Surface-exposed domains involved in Cox2/Rcf2 binding (e.g., N-terminus) .

  • Functional Assays: Antibodies could be validated using:

    • Blue Native PAGE: To assess CcO supercomplex integrity .

    • Oxygen Consumption Measurements: To quantify CcO activity in Δcox12 systems .

    • Heme Spectroscopy: To correlate antibody binding with CcO heme a/a3 content .

Critical Research Gaps

  • No existing data on Cox12 antibody specificity, epitope mapping, or applications in diagnostic/therapeutic contexts.

  • Priority areas for future studies include structural characterization of Cox12 and high-throughput screening for antibody candidates.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300. Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (Made-to-order)
Synonyms
cox12 antibody; SPCC1442.08cCytochrome c oxidase subunit 12 antibody; mitochondrial antibody; Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide VIb antibody
Target Names
cox12
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Cytochrome c oxidase (COX), specifically subunit 1 and 2 (COX1 and COX2), is a crucial component of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC). This terminal enzyme in the ETC drives oxidative phosphorylation. The ETC comprises three multi-subunit complexes: succinate dehydrogenase (Complex II), ubiquinol-cytochrome c oxidoreductase (Complex III), and cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV). These complexes cooperate to transfer electrons from NADH and succinate to molecular oxygen, generating an electrochemical gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane. This gradient powers transmembrane transport and ATP synthase, facilitating ATP production. COX catalyzes the reduction of oxygen to water. Electrons from reduced cytochrome c in the intermembrane space are transferred through the CuA center of subunit 2 and heme a of subunit 1 to the binuclear center (BNC) in subunit 1. The BNC, composed of heme a3 and CuB, reduces molecular oxygen to two water molecules, utilizing four electrons from cytochrome c and four protons from the mitochondrial matrix.
Database Links
Protein Families
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6B family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion inner membrane; Peripheral membrane protein; Intermembrane side.

Q&A

How should I validate the specificity of a COX-2 antibody before using it in my research?

Antibody validation is crucial for ensuring experimental reproducibility and meaningful results. A multi-step validation approach includes:

  • Western blot analysis to confirm single band detection at the expected molecular weight (~72 kDa for human COX-2)

  • Testing on positive control samples with known COX-2 expression (e.g., A549 cells)

  • Comparison with negative control samples lacking COX-2 expression

  • Peptide blocking experiments to confirm epitope specificity

  • siRNA knockdown or CRISPR knockout validation to demonstrate antibody specificity

  • Cross-validation with at least one alternative detection method (qPCR, mass spectrometry)

What controls should I include when using COX-2 antibody for immunocytochemistry?

Proper experimental controls are essential for accurate data interpretation in immunocytochemistry. Include the following controls:

  • Positive tissue/cell control: A549 human lung carcinoma cells serve as an excellent positive control for COX-2 expression

  • Negative control: Cell lines known not to express COX-2 or COX-2 knockdown cells

  • Secondary antibody-only control: Omit primary antibody while maintaining all other steps

  • Isotype control: Use non-specific antibody of the same isotype and concentration

  • Absorption control: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide before staining

For fluorescent detection, include additional controls for autofluorescence and spectral overlap if performing multiplex staining.

How should I design an experiment to study COX-2 inhibition using antibody detection methods?

A comprehensive experimental design for COX-2 inhibition studies should include:

  • Baseline characterization:

    • Quantify COX-2 expression levels using Western blot in your experimental system

    • Document subcellular localization using immunocytochemistry

    • Measure basal prostaglandin production as a functional readout

  • Inhibition strategies:

    • Include both pharmacological (selective COX-2 inhibitors) and genetic approaches (siRNA)

    • Design dose-response experiments with at least 5 concentrations

    • Include time-course analysis to capture dynamic responses

  • Essential controls:

    • Experimental controls: Western blot confirmation of COX-2 knockdown

    • Biological controls: Include COX-1 inhibition comparison as specificity control

    • Calibration controls: Dose-dependent inhibition measurements

    • Interpretation controls: Non-targeting siRNA and vehicle controls

  • Functional validation:

    • Measure prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production

    • Assess downstream biological effects (proliferation, migration, inflammation)

What are the best methods for quantifying COX-2 expression in tissue samples?

Quantitative assessment of COX-2 in tissues requires standardized approaches:

  • Immunohistochemical scoring systems:

    • H-score: Combines staining intensity (0-3) with percentage of positive cells (0-100%)

    • Allred score: Sum of proportion score (0-5) and intensity score (0-3)

    • Automated image analysis: Machine learning algorithms for unbiased quantification

  • Western blot densitometry approach:

    • Use tissue lysate with standardized protein loading

    • Include recombinant COX-2 standards for absolute quantification

    • Normalize to housekeeping proteins suitable for your tissue type

  • RT-qPCR correlation:

    • Parallel analysis of mRNA expression

    • Comparison with protein levels to identify post-transcriptional regulation

  • Single-cell quantification methods:

    • Multiplex immunofluorescence with cell type-specific markers

    • Analysis of expression heterogeneity within tissue regions

For consistent results, maintain identical processing, staining, and analysis protocols across all samples.

How can I resolve discrepancies between COX-2 protein detection and mRNA expression data?

Discrepancies between protein and mRNA levels are common and can be systematically addressed:

  • Technical validation:

    • Confirm antibody specificity through Western blot analysis

    • Verify primer specificity and efficiency for qPCR

    • Check for potential splice variants that may not be detected by your antibody or primers

  • Temporal dynamics analysis:

    • Conduct time-course experiments to account for delays between transcription and translation

    • Consider mRNA and protein half-lives (COX-2 mRNA has AU-rich elements that reduce stability)

  • Post-transcriptional regulation assessment:

    • Investigate miRNA-mediated regulation of COX-2 mRNA

    • Examine RNA-binding proteins that may affect translation efficiency

    • Analyze protein degradation pathways (ubiquitination, proteasomal degradation)

  • Cell-specific expression:

    • Use single-cell approaches to detect heterogeneity masked in bulk analysis

    • Apply cell sorting prior to analysis when working with mixed populations

These methodological approaches can help identify the biological mechanisms underlying observed discrepancies.

How can I use COX-2 antibody for single-cell analysis approaches?

Single-cell analysis with COX-2 antibody enables detection of heterogeneous expression patterns:

  • Flow cytometry protocol:

    • Cell fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde

    • Permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 or commercial permeabilization buffers

    • Blocking with 5% serum from secondary antibody host species

    • Primary COX-2 antibody incubation (optimal concentration determined by titration)

    • Fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody detection

    • Analysis gating strategy incorporating appropriate controls

  • Single-cell immunofluorescence:

    • Use NorthernLights 557-conjugated secondary antibodies for high sensitivity

    • Include DAPI counterstain for nuclear visualization

    • Apply quantitative image analysis for expression levels

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF):

    • Metal-conjugated COX-2 antibodies for multi-parameter analysis

    • Simultaneous detection of COX-2 with >40 other markers

    • Advanced clustering algorithms for cell population identification

  • Integration with scRNA-seq:

    • CITE-seq for simultaneous protein and transcript measurement

    • Correlation of protein expression with transcriptional signatures

These approaches provide insights into cell-specific COX-2 expression patterns within heterogeneous samples.

What are the best practices for studying COX-2 in the tumor microenvironment?

Investigating COX-2 in the tumor microenvironment requires specialized approaches:

  • Multiplexed immunofluorescence panels:

    • COX-2 antibody combined with cell type-specific markers (CD8, CD4, CD68)

    • Include functional markers (PD-1, PD-L1, IFNγ)

    • Add stromal and vascular markers for comprehensive profiling

  • Spatial analysis methods:

    • Measure COX-2 expression at tumor margins vs. tumor core

    • Quantify distances between COX-2+ cells and other cell types

    • Apply neighborhood analysis for cellular interaction patterns

  • Single-cell RNA-seq integration:

    • Identify cell clusters with COX-2 (PTGS2) expression

    • Map transcriptional networks associated with COX-2+ cells

    • Compare with protein expression patterns from multiplexed imaging

  • Functional assessment:

    • Measure PGE2 levels in different tumor regions

    • Correlate COX-2 expression with immune infiltration patterns

    • Assess impact of COX-2 inhibition on immune cell composition

This multifaceted approach provides insights into COX-2's role in modulating the tumor immune microenvironment and may guide therapeutic strategies.

How can I detect post-translational modifications of COX-2 using antibody-based methods?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of COX-2 can significantly impact its function and stability:

  • Phosphorylation analysis:

    • Use phospho-specific antibodies targeting known COX-2 phosphorylation sites

    • Compare with total COX-2 expression using dual staining approaches

    • Include phosphatase inhibitors during sample preparation

    • Validate with phosphatase treatment controls

  • Glycosylation assessment:

    • Use glycan-specific lectins combined with COX-2 antibody

    • Employ enzymatic deglycosylation (PNGase F, O-glycosidase) followed by Western blot to detect mobility shifts

    • Apply periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining with COX-2 immunoprecipitation

  • Ubiquitination detection:

    • Immunoprecipitate COX-2 followed by ubiquitin Western blot

    • Use proteasome inhibitors to stabilize ubiquitinated forms

    • Apply tandem ubiquitin binding entities (TUBEs) for enrichment

  • Mass spectrometry validation:

    • Immunoprecipitate COX-2 for LC-MS/MS analysis

    • Apply targeted methods for specific modification sites

    • Correlate antibody-based findings with MS results

These approaches enable comprehensive characterization of COX-2 PTMs and their functional significance in different cellular contexts.

How can I troubleshoot weak or inconsistent COX-2 antibody staining in immunohistochemistry?

Addressing weak or inconsistent staining requires systematic troubleshooting:

ProblemPossible CausesSolutions
Weak signalInsufficient antigen retrievalOptimize retrieval method (citrate vs. EDTA buffer); extend retrieval time
Low antibody concentrationIncrease antibody concentration; extend incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Epitope maskingTry alternative fixation protocols; test different antibody clones
High backgroundInsufficient blockingIncrease blocking time; use alternative blocking reagents (BSA, casein)
Excessive antibody concentrationTitrate antibody to determine optimal concentration
Non-specific bindingAdd additional washing steps; include detergent in wash buffer
Inconsistent stainingTissue fixation variationsStandardize fixation time and conditions
Uneven reagent distributionUse automated staining platforms; ensure tissue is completely submerged
Batch variation in antibodiesUse the same lot number; include standard positive controls

For human tissue samples, compare your staining patterns with published data on COX-2 expression in specific tissues. A549 human lung carcinoma cells and human breast cancer tissues have been validated for COX-2 antibody testing .

What approaches should I use when comparing COX-2 expression data from different detection methods?

When integrating COX-2 data from multiple detection methods:

  • Method-specific considerations:

    • Western blot: Detects denatured protein based on molecular weight

    • IHC/ICC: Preserves spatial information but may have epitope accessibility issues

    • ELISA: Provides quantitative data but lacks spatial resolution

    • Flow cytometry: Offers single-cell resolution but requires cell isolation

  • Data normalization strategies:

    • Use reference standards across all methods when possible

    • Apply appropriate housekeeping controls for each technique

    • Develop relative quantification approaches rather than comparing absolute values

  • Statistical analysis approach:

    • Focus on relative changes rather than absolute values between methods

    • Apply correlation analysis to determine relationship between methods

    • Use multivariate analysis to integrate data from different platforms

  • Validation framework:

    • Confirm key findings with at least two independent methods

    • Prioritize results from techniques with the most robust controls

    • Consider biological context when resolving discrepancies

This comprehensive approach enables meaningful integration of data from complementary detection methods.

How do I differentiate between COX-1 and COX-2 in my experimental system?

Distinguishing between these closely related isoforms requires careful experimental design:

  • Antibody selection criteria:

    • Choose antibodies raised against non-conserved regions

    • Verify specificity using recombinant COX-1 and COX-2 proteins

    • Test antibodies in systems with known differential expression

  • Western blot approach:

    • COX-1 and COX-2 have different molecular weights (approximately 70 kDa and 72 kDa)

    • Use high-resolution SDS-PAGE (6-8% gels) for better separation

    • Include positive controls for both isoforms

  • Expression pattern analysis:

    • COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most tissues

    • COX-2 is typically induced by inflammatory stimuli

    • Temporal expression analysis after stimulation helps distinguish inducible COX-2

  • Functional differentiation:

    • Use selective inhibitors (SC-560 for COX-1; celecoxib for COX-2)

    • Measure prostaglandin production after selective inhibition

    • Apply gene silencing approaches targeting specific isoforms

These methodological approaches enable reliable differentiation between COX isoforms in experimental systems.

How can I integrate COX-2 antibody detection with single-cell RNA sequencing data?

Integrating protein and transcriptomic data at single-cell resolution provides powerful insights:

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Process matched samples for protein and RNA analysis

    • Consider CITE-seq or REAP-seq for simultaneous measurement

    • Design cell sorting strategies based on COX-2 protein expression

  • Analysis workflow:

    • Identify cell clusters expressing COX-2/PTGS2 in scRNA-seq data

    • Map transcriptional networks associated with COX-2+ cells

    • Correlate protein expression patterns from antibody-based methods

    • Integrate with pseudotime analysis to track expression dynamics

  • Validation approaches:

    • Confirm key gene expression patterns with multiplexed protein detection

    • Use RNA-FISH combined with immunofluorescence for co-localization

    • Apply spatial transcriptomics with antibody staining on adjacent sections

  • Integrative data visualization:

    • Use dimensionality reduction methods (UMAP, t-SNE) incorporating both data types

    • Generate integrated heatmaps showing protein and transcript levels

    • Develop correlation matrices between key genes and proteins

This integration reveals relationships between transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of COX-2 in complex biological systems.

What are the methodological considerations for studying COX-2 in immune cell populations?

Investigating COX-2 in immune cells requires specialized approaches:

  • Cell isolation strategies:

    • Optimize tissue dissociation protocols to preserve epitopes

    • Use gentle FACS sorting to maintain cellular integrity

    • Consider magnetic separation for larger cell numbers

  • Activation state assessment:

    • Combine COX-2 staining with activation markers (CD69, CD25, HLA-DR)

    • Correlate with functional cytokine production

    • Track temporal dynamics of COX-2 expression after stimulation

  • Subset-specific analysis:

    • Apply hierarchical gating strategies for specific immune populations

    • Design panels to identify T cells, monocytes, and DC/macrophage subsets

    • Quantify proportion of COX-2+ cells within each subset

  • Functional significance:

    • Measure PGE2 production by isolated subsets

    • Assess impact of selective COX-2 inhibition on immune cell function

    • Evaluate paracrine effects on other cell populations

These approaches provide insights into the role of COX-2 in immune regulation and inflammatory responses across diverse cellular contexts.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.