CPE antibodies are immunoreagents targeting carboxypeptidase E, a metalloprotease that cleaves C-terminal arginine/lysine residues from peptide precursors. This enzyme is essential for processing neuroendocrine peptides like insulin, enkephalins, and neurotransmitters . Antibodies against CPE enable researchers to:
Localize CPE in tissues (e.g., brain, pancreas)
Quantify protein expression levels
Study its role in neurological disorders, cancer, and metabolic diseases .
CPE antibodies are validated for multiple experimental workflows:
CPE Knockout Mice:
Hippocampal neurons in CPE flox/flox mice showed reduced MAP2 (microtubule-associated protein 2) and GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) intensity, indicating impaired neuronal and glial function .
Deficits in BDNF/TrkB signaling and neurogenesis were observed, linking CPE to learning/memory disorders .
Pro-Survival Role:
CPE antibodies detected reduced enzyme levels in Alzheimer’s disease models, correlating with amyloid-beta pathology .
Specificity: Anti-CPE antibodies show <5% cross-reactivity with related enzymes like CPM .
Reproducibility: Rigorous lot-to-lot testing ensures consistent performance in detecting CPE across species .
Functional Assays: Neutralizing antibodies (e.g., 6E10C12, 2G11G7) inhibit CPE-mediated peptide processing in in vitro models .
Isoform Detection: Some antibodies may not distinguish between membrane-bound and soluble CPE isoforms .
Species Cross-Reactivity: Verify antibody compatibility (e.g., mouse vs. human CPE) before experimental design .
Emerging studies explore CPE antibodies for:
Validation requires three parallel approaches:
Positive/Negative Controls: Compare staining in tissues or cell lines with known CPE expression (e.g., HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells ) versus CPE-knockout models .
Cross-Reactivity Testing: Verify antibody specificity using peptide blocking assays. For example, R&D Systems’ MAB3587 binds human CPE residues 42–453 but may cross-react with rodent isoforms .
Dilution Optimization: Titrate antibody concentrations (e.g., 0.1–10 µg/mL) to balance signal-to-noise ratios. The AF3587 antibody achieved optimal staining at 10 µg/mL in mouse embryo sections .
Step 1: Perform a dilution series (e.g., 1:500–1:5,000) using lysates from CPE-overexpressing cell lines (e.g., HEK293T transfected with human CPE).
Step 2: Normalize signals against loading controls (e.g., β-actin). For MAB3587, 1 µg/mL detected CPE in human glioblastoma lysates without nonspecific bands .
Step 3: Pre-absorb antibodies with recombinant CPE protein to confirm band specificity .
Conflicting data often arise from isoform-specific detection or post-translational modifications:
Case Study: AF3587 localized CPE to HepG2 cell membranes via IHC , while WB detected a 50 kDa cytoplasmic isoform . This suggests alternative splicing or cleavage events.
Methodological Fix: Combine RNAi knockdown (to silence specific isoforms) with mass spectrometry to identify detected variants .
Fixation/Permeabilization: Methanol fixation improved AF3587’s intracellular staining in A172 glioblastoma cells .
Multicolor Panels: Pair CPE antibodies with lineage markers (e.g., CD133 for stem cells) to exclude false positives.
Competition Assays: Pre-incubate antibodies with recombinant CPE to quantify nonspecific binding .
The T980C polymorphism (linked to Alzheimer’s risk) truncates CPE, altering antibody binding:
Experimental Design:
Result: T980C mutants show reduced detection by antibodies targeting the C-terminus .
Yes, with modifications:
Case Study: A CPE-based micro-neutralization assay evaluated SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Viral cytopathic effect (CPE) was monitored in Vero E6 cells, with antibody efficacy quantified via TCID50 .
Critical Step: Include a CPE-negative control (e.g., untreated cells) to normalize results .