Terminology Mismatch: The term "CPRD49" does not appear in any cited sources. Antibody nomenclature typically follows standardized conventions (e.g., CD markers like CD49d, CD49e) or proprietary names tied to specific clones (e.g., PS/2, 9F10).
Possible Typos or Mislabeling: The closest matches to "CPRD49" in the search results are antibodies targeting CD49d (integrin α4) or CD49e (integrin α5), which are well-documented in autoimmune, oncology, and muscular dystrophy research .
For context, below is a comparison of validated CD49 antibodies discussed in the search results:
Nonstandard Nomenclature:
Database Gaps:
Typographical Error:
Verify Target Specificity: Confirm whether "CPRD49" refers to CD49d, CD49e, or another integrin subunit.
Explore Commercial Sources: Screen antibody vendors (e.g., BD Biosciences , Bio-Rad , Thermo Fisher ) using alternate search terms.
Consult Patent Databases: Use PLAbDab or Thera-SAbDab to identify unpublished sequences linked to cryptic identifiers.
CD49d (also known as α4 integrin, VLA-4 α chain, integrin α4, or ITGA4) is a 150 kD glycoprotein and member of the integrin family. It associates noncovalently with either β1 (CD29) to form the VLA-4 (α4β1) heterodimer or with β7 to form the α4β7 heterodimer. These complexes play critical roles in:
Cell adhesion and T cell costimulation
Leukocyte migration from blood to tissue at sites of inflammation
Binding to ligands including VCAM-1, MAdCAM-1, and fibronectin
CD49d is expressed on T and B cells, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, mast cells, thymocytes, NK cells, and dendritic cells, with notable absence on neutrophils .
Different antibody clones recognize distinct epitopes and demonstrate varying functionalities:
R1-2 clone (anti-mouse CD49d): Partially blocks CD49d-mediated interactions and can be used in combination with 9C10 (MFR4.B) antibody to completely block VCAM-1 binding to VLA-4
7.2 clone (anti-human CD49d): Widely used for flow cytometry and other applications with human samples
DX5 clone: Reacts with CD49b (different subunit) expressed on mouse NK cells and T cell subsets
Each clone has been validated for specific applications including flow cytometry, blocking assays, immunoprecipitation, and immunohistochemistry depending on the clone.
For effective flow cytometry applications:
Titrate antibodies for optimal performance (typically ≤0.25 μg per test for 10^5-10^8 cells)
Use appropriate buffer (PBS with <0.1% sodium azide and stabilizer)
Include proper controls:
Isotype controls (Rat IgG2b, κ for R1-2; Mouse IgG1κ for 7.2)
Unstained and single-color controls for compensation
Storage recommendations include keeping antibodies at 2-8°C, avoiding exposure to light (especially for fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies), and not freezing the preparations .
For blocking experiments:
Ultra-LEAF™ purified antibody formulations (Endotoxin < 0.01 EU/μg, Azide-Free, 0.2 μm filtered) are recommended for functional assays
The R1-2 antibody provides partial blocking of CD49d-mediated interactions
For complete blocking of VCAM-1 binding to VLA-4, combine R1-2 with 9C10 (MFR4.B) antibody
Establish appropriate concentration through titration experiments
When using CD49d antibodies for immunohistochemistry:
Frozen sections are recommended over paraffin-embedded tissues
Fixation protocols should be optimized to preserve epitope integrity
Signal amplification systems may be necessary for detecting low expression levels
Include appropriate positive controls (tissues known to express CD49d)
Validate staining patterns with alternative detection methods
CD49d antibodies serve as valuable markers in multiparameter immunophenotyping:
Include in panels targeting lymphocyte and leukocyte subsets
Combine with lineage markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19) and activation markers
Use with computational analysis methods like machine learning for identifying distinct immunotypes
Apply standardized z-scores for cross-cohort comparisons
In COVID-19 research, CD49d has been used alongside cytokine measurements and other antibodies to identify three distinct immunotypes: balanced response immunotype (BRI), excessive inflammation immunotype (EXI), and low antibody immunotype (LAI) .
When applying computational analysis to CD49d expression data:
Normalize data appropriately (e.g., using log transformation and z-scores)
For hierarchical clustering:
Use appropriate distance metrics (e.g., Euclidean distance)
Apply Ward's Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method (ward.d2)
Determine optimal cluster numbers using multiple indices
For network analysis:
Table: Computational Analysis Methods for CD49d Expression Data
| Method | Application | Key Parameters | Software/Packages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hierarchical Clustering | Patient stratification | Ward's method, Euclidean distance | R (ward.d2), NbClust |
| Principal Component Analysis | Dimensionality reduction | Variance explained by components | R (prcomp function) |
| Network Analysis | Marker relationships | Edge weight normalization | Biolayout, R |
CD49d expression analysis provides insights into disease mechanisms:
Expression patterns differ between health and disease states
Can be used to monitor therapeutic responses, particularly for treatments targeting adhesion molecules
Correlates with inflammatory activity in autoimmune conditions
Serves as a potential biomarker for predicting disease progression
In COVID-19 patients, analysis of CD49d alongside other markers helped identify distinct immunotypes that correlated with disease severity and clinical outcomes, demonstrating the utility of this approach for patient stratification .
Researchers may encounter several challenges:
Background staining issues:
Solution: Optimize blocking protocols and use proper isotype controls
Ensure filter settings are appropriate for the fluorochrome
Poor signal intensity:
Solution: Titrate antibody concentration, adjust incubation times and temperatures
Verify target expression levels in positive control samples
Cross-reactivity concerns:
Validation approaches include:
Comparing results across multiple antibody clones targeting different epitopes
Using positive and negative control samples with known CD49d expression levels
Confirming expression through complementary techniques (flow cytometry, Western blot, qPCR)
Testing blocking efficiency using functional assays that measure adhesion
Analyzing co-expression with known interaction partners (CD29, CD106)
CD49d antibodies are increasingly important in therapeutic development:
As tools for identifying patient subgroups likely to respond to integrin-targeting therapies
For monitoring therapy-induced changes in immune cell trafficking
In developing blocking strategies that could reduce inflammatory cell recruitment
For understanding resistance mechanisms to existing therapies
Research combining CD49d assessment with machine learning approaches helps identify patient immunotypes that might benefit from personalized therapeutic strategies .
Understanding CD49d in memory responses involves:
Assessing differential expression on naive versus memory T and B cell populations
Examining the role of CD49d in bone marrow homing of memory cells
Investigating CD49d-dependent retention of memory cells in specific tissue niches
Studying how CD49d-dependent interactions influence recall responses
These investigations can benefit from comprehensive immunophenotyping approaches that incorporate CD49d antibodies within broader panels examining memory marker expression.