CREB3L2 Human

CAMP Responsive Element Binding Protein 3-Like 2 Human Recombinant
Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

CREB3L2 Human Recombinant produced in E.Coli is a single, non-glycosylated polypeptide chain containing 401 amino acids (1-378 a.a) and having a molecular mass of 44kDa.
CREB3L2 is fused to a 23 amino acid His-tag at N-terminus & purified by proprietary chromatographic techniques.

Product Specs

Introduction
CREB3L2, also known as CAMP Responsive Element Binding Protein 3-Like 2, is a member of the oasis bZIP transcription factor family. These proteins can form homodimers but not heterodimers. CREB3L2 acts as a transcriptional activator. Translocations involving CREB3L2 on chromosome 7 and the gene fused in sarcoma on chromosome 16 have been observed in certain tumors. Myxofibrosarcoma is one disease associated with CREB3L2.
Description
Recombinant human CREB3L2, expressed in E. coli, is a single, non-glycosylated polypeptide chain. It consists of 401 amino acids (amino acids 1-378) and has a molecular weight of 44 kDa. The protein features a 23 amino acid His-tag fused at the N-terminus and is purified using proprietary chromatographic techniques.
Physical Appearance
Clear, colorless solution, sterile-filtered.
Formulation
CREB3L2 protein solution at a concentration of 0.25 mg/ml in 20mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), 0.2M NaCl, 50% glycerol, and 1mM DTT.
Stability
For short-term storage (2-4 weeks), keep at 4°C. For extended periods, store frozen at -20°C. Adding a carrier protein like HSA or BSA (0.1%) is recommended for long-term storage. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Purity
Purity exceeds 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis.
Synonyms
CAMP Responsive Element Binding Protein 3-Like 2, BBF2H7, CAMP-Responsive Element-Binding Protein 3-Like Protein 2, BBF2 Human Homolog On Chromosome 7, Cyclic AMP-Responsive Element-Binding Protein 3-Like Protein 2, Basic Transcription Factor 2, B-ZIB Transcription Factor, FUS/BBF2H7 Protein, TCAG_1951439, Cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 2, cAMP-responsive element-binding protein 3-like protein 2.
Source
Escherichia Coli.
Amino Acid Sequence
MGSSHHHHHH SSGLVPRGSH MGSMEVLESG EQGVLQWDRK LSELSEPGDG EALMYHTHFS ELLDEFSQNV LGQLLNDPFL SEKSVSMEVE PSPTSPAPLI QAEHSYSLCE EPRAQSPFTH ITSDSFNDDE VESEKWYLST DFPSTSIKTE PITDEPPPGL VPSVTLTITA ISTPLEKEEP PLEMNTGVDS SCQTIIPKIK LEPHEVDQFL NFSPKEAPVD HLHLPPTPPS SHGSDSEGSL SPNPRLHPFS LPQTHSPSRA APRAPSALSS SPLLTAPHKL QGSGPLVLTE EEKRTLIAEG YPIPTKLPLS KSEEKALKKI RRKIKNKISA QESRRKKKEY MDSLEKKVES CSTENLELRK KVEVLENTNR TLLQQLQKLQ TLVMGKVSRT CKLAGTQTGT C.

Q&A

What is CREB3L2 and what is its basic function in human cells?

CREB3L2, also known as BBF2H7 (BBF2 human homolog on chromosome 7), is a transcription factor belonging to the CREB3 subfamily. It was identified through its fusion with FUS genes in low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma resulting from chromosomal translocation . CREB3L2 functions as an ER-Golgi stress transducer that regulates cellular homeostasis.

The primary function of CREB3L2 involves regulation of genes essential for secretory pathway function, particularly those encoding components of the COPII complex, which mediates vesicular transport from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. Specifically, CREB3L2 activates Sec23a, Sec23b, and Sec24c genes . This transcription factor also contributes to cell survival mechanisms, particularly under ER stress conditions, as demonstrated in neuroblastoma cell lines where CREB3L2 reduces sensitivity to ER stress-induced cell death .

To investigate CREB3L2's function, researchers typically employ:

  • Gain-of-function approaches through overexpression of wild-type or constitutively active forms

  • Loss-of-function methods via siRNA knockdown or CRISPR-mediated knockout

  • Stress induction experiments using agents like thapsigargin to activate CREB3L2

  • Transcriptional activity assays to measure target gene activation

How does CREB3L2 compare to other members of the CREB3 transcription factor family?

CREB3L2 is one of five members of the CREB3 subfamily of transcription factors (CREB3, CREB3L1, CREB3L2, CREB3L3, and CREB3L4). While these family members share structural similarities, they exhibit distinct tissue expression patterns and regulate partially overlapping but distinct sets of target genes .

Key differences include:

  • Tissue expression: CREB3 mRNA is widely expressed but highest in liver and nervous system . CREB3L2 is expressed in various tissues including brain and appears enriched in neurons rather than astrocytes .

  • Target gene specificity:

    • CREB3 regulates COPII components and Golgi proteins such as GBF1 and Arf4

    • CREB3L1 regulates genes involved in matrix protein production (Col1a1, Col1a2)

    • CREB3L2 activates Sec23a, Sec23b, Sec24c genes involved in protein secretion

    • CREB3L3 stimulates genes important in acute phase response and lipid metabolism

    • CREB3L4 regulates genes involved in protein sorting

  • Neurological functions: While multiple family members are expressed in the CNS, they have distinct roles. CREB3L1 and CREB3L2 are involved in neurite outgrowth, while CREB3 and CREB3L1 modulate axonal growth after injury .

For experimental research comparing CREB3 family members, selective antibodies and isoform-specific knockdown approaches are essential to distinguish their individual functions in a given cellular context.

How does CREB3L2 expression vary across different human tissues?

CREB3L2 exhibits a tissue-specific expression pattern with significant implications for its biological functions. Methodologies for analyzing CREB3L2 tissue expression typically include qRT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and mining of tissue-specific transcriptome databases.

In the nervous system, studies have shown that CREB3L2 is expressed in both normal brain tissue and neural-derived cancer cells, though malignant glioma shows higher expression than normal brain tissue . In mouse models of focal brain ischemia, immunohistochemistry revealed CREB3L2 expression specifically in neurons (identified by MAP2 labeling) near the infarction region in the striatum, but notably, unlike CREB3L1, CREB3L2 was not detected in astrocytes .

In breast cancer cell lines, CREB3L2 expression varies significantly, with MDA-MB231 cells showing the highest expression and MCF7 cells showing the lowest . This expression pattern correlates with breast cancer subtypes, with 62.5% of basal-like cell lines showing increased CREB3L2 expression .

CREB3L2 has also been implicated in the differentiation of hepatic stellate cells to myofibroblast-like cells during hepatic fibrosis, suggesting significant expression and function in liver tissues during pathological processes .

For tissue-specific CREB3L2 research, investigators should consider:

  • Baseline expression levels in the tissue of interest

  • Cell-type specific expression within heterogeneous tissues

  • Expression changes under stress or pathological conditions

  • Potential compensatory expression of other CREB3 family members

What methodologies are most effective for measuring CREB3L2 expression in human samples?

For accurate and comprehensive analysis of CREB3L2 expression in human samples, researchers should consider multiple complementary approaches:

  • RNA-based methods:

    • qRT-PCR remains the gold standard for quantitative analysis of CREB3L2 mRNA expression, offering high sensitivity and specificity

    • RNA-seq provides comprehensive transcriptome profiling and enables discovery of alternative splicing variants

    • In situ hybridization allows visualization of mRNA expression in specific cells within tissue architecture

  • Protein-based methods:

    • Western blotting can detect both the full-length (inactive) and cleaved (active) forms of CREB3L2

    • Immunohistochemistry enables visualization of protein expression in tissue sections while preserving histological context

    • Proximity ligation assays can detect CREB3L2 interactions with other proteins in situ

  • Activity-based methods:

    • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assesses CREB3L2 binding to target gene promoters

    • Reporter assays with CREB3L2-responsive promoter elements measure transcriptional activity

    • Subcellular fractionation combined with Western blotting can assess nuclear translocation of the active form

For clinical samples, researchers should be aware that CREB3L2 activation involves proteolytic cleavage and nuclear translocation, meaning that total protein levels may not correlate with activity. Additionally, sample processing time is critical as stress-responsive transcription factors like CREB3L2 may be activated during ex vivo handling.

What is the role of CREB3L2 in the cellular response to ER stress?

CREB3L2 plays a significant role in mediating cellular responses to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, particularly in adapting the secretory pathway to meet increased demands during stress conditions. The activation of CREB3L2 was first observed in various cell types including C6 glioma, HEK293, and MEF cells treated with thapsigargin, a compound that induces ER stress by disrupting calcium homeostasis .

In the ER stress response, CREB3L2 acts as a stress transducer that undergoes regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) when activated. This process involves cleavage of the membrane-bound precursor form, releasing the N-terminal fragment which translocates to the nucleus to regulate gene expression. This mechanism allows cells to rapidly respond to ER stress conditions by modulating the transcription of stress-responsive genes.

Methodologically, researchers investigate CREB3L2's role in ER stress by:

  • Inducing ER stress with agents such as thapsigargin, tunicamycin, or brefeldin A

  • Monitoring CREB3L2 processing from its full-length form to the cleaved, active N-terminal fragment using Western blotting

  • Analyzing translocation of the active fragment to the nucleus via immunofluorescence or subcellular fractionation

  • Measuring expression of CREB3L2 target genes using qRT-PCR or RNA-seq

  • Assessing cell survival outcomes through viability assays in cells with normal, enhanced, or reduced CREB3L2 expression

Experimental evidence shows that CREB3L2 activation under ER stress conditions leads to upregulation of genes involved in the secretory pathway, particularly COPII components, which helps cells adapt to increased protein processing demands . In SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells, CREB3L2 overexpression protected against thapsigargin-induced cell death, while CREB3L2 depletion increased cell death under similar conditions, indicating its protective role during ER stress .

How does CREB3L2 contribute to the regulation of the secretory pathway?

CREB3L2 plays a crucial role in regulating the secretory pathway, particularly through transcriptional activation of genes encoding COPII components that mediate vesicular transport from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. This function is essential for cells with high secretory demands and during adaptation to ER stress.

The most direct evidence for CREB3L2's role in secretory pathway regulation comes from studies showing that it activates Sec23a, Sec23b, and Sec24c genes , which encode essential components of the COPII vesicle coat. This function appears to be evolutionarily conserved, as a similar role was demonstrated for the Xenopus CREB3L2 homolog, which is required for activation of the secretory pathway during notochord formation .

In specific physiological contexts, CREB3L2 regulates secretory pathway adaptation:

  • During differentiation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) to myofibroblast-like cells, a critical event in hepatic fibrosis, CREB3L2 mediates the upregulation of Sec23A and Sec24D. This process is characterized by enlargement of the ER and Golgi complex to accommodate increased protein processing demands .

  • In neurons, CREB3L2 may contribute to specialized secretory functions, though this is less well-characterized than for other family members like CREB3L1, which has been implicated in maintaining Golgi outposts and dendrite development .

Research methodologies to study CREB3L2's regulation of the secretory pathway include:

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation to confirm direct binding to promoters of secretory pathway genes

  • Secretory capacity assays using reporter proteins (e.g., luciferase, GFP) fused to secretory signals

  • Morphological analysis of secretory organelles using electron microscopy or fluorescent markers

  • Vesicular trafficking assays to measure ER-to-Golgi transport kinetics

The ability of CREB3L2 to coordinate upregulation of multiple secretory pathway components makes it a key transcriptional regulator for cellular adaptation to increased secretory demands, whether during normal development, differentiation, or response to stress conditions.

What is the significance of CREB3L2 expression in different cancer types?

CREB3L2 expression varies significantly across cancer types and appears to have context-dependent roles in cancer biology. The significance of CREB3L2 expression has been documented in several cancers, with particularly notable findings in gliomas and breast cancer.

In malignant glioma, CREB3L2 expression is higher than in normal brain tissue . Studies have identified CREB3L2 as one of 12 genes required for the expression of ATF5 (activating transcription factor 5), an anti-apoptotic factor critical for glioma cell survival . The relationship between CREB3L2, ATF5, and the oncogene MCL1 appears significant, as these proteins are enriched in undifferentiated glioma cells and decrease during differentiation. Importantly, patients with ATF5-positive glioblastomas showed shorter survival times than those with ATF5-negative tumors, suggesting that the CREB3L2-ATF5 axis may contribute to more aggressive disease .

In breast cancer, CREB3L2 expression patterns correlate with both treatment response and prognosis. Analysis of human breast cancer cell lines revealed an association between CREB3L2 expression and sensitivity to sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor . Experimental validation showed that MDA-MB231 cells with high CREB3L2 expression were more sensitive to sorafenib treatment compared to MCF7 cells with low CREB3L2 expression .

Prognostically, reduced CREB3L2 expression was associated with poor recurrence-free survival specifically in ER-positive breast cancer, as demonstrated through analyses using web-based prognostic tools including KM plotter and Breastmark . This association was not observed in HER2-amplified or basal-like breast cancers, indicating subtype-specific prognostic relevance.

Breast Cancer SubtypeCREB3L2 ExpressionSorafenib SensitivityPrognostic Significance
Basal-like (62.5% of cell lines)HighIncreasedNot prognostic
ER-positiveLow (in resistant cells)ReducedPoor RFS when expression is low
HER2-amplifiedVariableNot establishedNot prognostic

RFS = Recurrence-free survival

What is the relationship between CREB3L2 expression and treatment response in cancer?

The relationship between CREB3L2 expression and treatment response has been most thoroughly investigated in breast cancer, particularly regarding response to sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor with anti-proliferative, anti-angiogenic, and pro-apoptotic effects.

Research using the Oncomine database and Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database revealed a significant association between CREB3L2 expression levels and sensitivity to sorafenib treatment in breast cancer cell lines . This association was experimentally validated through:

  • Quantification of CREB3L2 expression in five breast cancer cell lines using qRT-PCR, confirming highest expression in MDA-MB231 and lowest in MCF7 cells

  • Dose-response experiments with sorafenib treatment across cell lines with varying CREB3L2 expression

  • Analysis of cell viability following treatment, demonstrating that MCF7 cells (low CREB3L2) were more resistant to sorafenib compared to MDA-MB231 cells (high CREB3L2)

The experimental data showed that at various concentrations of sorafenib (0.1-1000 mM), MDA-MB231 cells consistently showed a higher percentage reduction in growth compared to MCF7 cells, with the difference becoming more pronounced at higher concentrations .

While the exact mechanism underlying this relationship has not been fully elucidated, these findings suggest CREB3L2 could potentially serve as a predictive biomarker for sorafenib response in breast cancer. This is particularly significant given that no validated biomarkers currently exist for appropriately selecting cancer patients for sorafenib treatment .

For translational research, these findings suggest several approaches:

  • Development of CREB3L2 expression assays as companion diagnostics for sorafenib therapy

  • Investigation of CREB3L2-modulating compounds as potential sensitizers to enhance sorafenib efficacy

  • Extension of these findings to other kinase inhibitors with similar mechanisms of action

The relationship between CREB3L2 and treatment response highlights the potential value of stress response transcription factors as biomarkers for cancer therapy efficacy.

How can researchers effectively identify CREB3L2 target genes?

Identifying the target genes of CREB3L2 is crucial for understanding its function in various cellular contexts. Several complementary approaches can be employed to effectively identify CREB3L2 target genes:

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Approaches:

    • ChIP-seq allows genome-wide identification of CREB3L2 binding sites using antibodies specific to CREB3L2 to immunoprecipitate bound chromatin fragments, followed by high-throughput sequencing

    • ChIP-qPCR offers targeted validation of CREB3L2 binding to promoter regions of candidate genes

  • Expression Profiling After CREB3L2 Modulation:

    • RNA-seq or microarray analysis following CREB3L2 overexpression, knockdown, or knockout identifies genes whose expression changes in response to altered CREB3L2 levels

    • Most robust results come from both gain-of-function (overexpression of full-length or constitutively active N-terminal fragment) and loss-of-function (siRNA, shRNA, or CRISPR) approaches

    • Time-course experiments help distinguish between direct and indirect targets

  • Motif Analysis and Reporter Assays:

    • Bioinformatic analysis identifies potential CREB3L2 binding motifs in gene promoters

    • Luciferase reporter assays with wild-type and mutated binding sites validate direct transcriptional regulation

    • Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) confirm direct binding to specific DNA sequences

  • Integrated Multi-omics Approach:

    • Combining ChIP-seq with RNA-seq or proteomics data identifies genes both bound by CREB3L2 and affected by its modulation

    • Integration with epigenomic data (e.g., ATAC-seq, histone modification ChIP-seq) helps understand chromatin context of binding

From the available literature, several CREB3L2 target genes have been identified:

  • Secretory pathway components: Sec23a, Sec23b, and Sec24c genes, all involved in COPII-mediated vesicular transport

  • A subset of innate immunity-related genes, including MxA

Researchers should consider cell type specificity, stress conditions, potential redundancy with other CREB3 family members, and the activation state of CREB3L2 when designing experiments to identify target genes.

What experimental approaches are best for studying CREB3L2 function in neurological contexts?

Studying CREB3L2 function in neurological contexts requires specialized experimental approaches that account for the unique features of neural cells and tissues. Based on current research, the following methodologies are recommended:

  • Neuronal Culture Systems:

    • Primary neuronal cultures from rodent brains provide a physiologically relevant system for studying endogenous CREB3L2 function

    • Human iPSC-derived neurons allow investigation of CREB3L2 in a human genetic background

    • Organotypic brain slice cultures maintain neural circuit architecture while allowing experimental manipulation

  • In Vivo Models:

    • Conditional knockout mouse models using neuron-specific Cre drivers (e.g., Neuron-specific enolase, CaMKII, or Syn1) provide temporal and spatial control of CREB3L2 deletion

    • Stereotactic injection of viral vectors expressing CREB3L2, dominant-negative forms, or shRNAs allows region-specific manipulation

    • Ischemia models are particularly relevant given CREB3L2's expression in neurons near infarction regions

  • Stress Induction Specific to Neural Contexts:

    • Excitotoxicity models using glutamate or NMDA to induce stress relevant to neurodegenerative conditions

    • Oxygen-glucose deprivation to model ischemic conditions

    • Protein misfolding inducers relevant to neurodegenerative diseases

  • Specialized Readouts for Neural Function:

    • Dendritic complexity analysis using Sholl analysis or similar methods

    • Golgi outpost quantification, given the importance of these structures in dendritic development

    • Electrophysiological recordings to assess functional consequences of CREB3L2 manipulation

    • Synaptic protein expression and localization

Studies have shown that in mouse models of permanent focal brain ischemia, CREB3L2 is expressed in neurons (MAP2-positive cells) near the infarction region in the striatum, but unlike CREB3L1, it is not expressed in astrocytes . In neuroblastoma cells, CREB3L2 has been shown to reduce sensitivity to ER stress-induced cell death, suggesting a neuroprotective role .

When designing neurological studies of CREB3L2, researchers should consider:

  • Cell-type specificity (neurons vs. glia)

  • Region-specific expression and function

  • Developmental stage, as expression patterns may change during neuronal maturation

  • Potential compensatory mechanisms by other CREB3 family members

What are the current debates about CREB3L2's role in tumor suppression versus oncogenesis?

The role of CREB3L2 in cancer biology presents a complex and seemingly contradictory picture, with evidence suggesting both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic functions depending on the cancer type and cellular context.

Evidence supporting CREB3L2's oncogenic potential:

  • In malignant glioma, CREB3L2 expression is higher than in normal brain tissue

  • CREB3L2 has been identified as one of 12 genes required for expression of ATF5, an anti-apoptotic factor that promotes glioma cell survival

  • Expression of CREB3L2, ATF5, and the oncogene MCL1 decreases after serum-induced GS9-6 differentiation, indicating enrichment in undifferentiated cells with greater proliferative potential

  • Patients with ATF5-positive glioblastomas exhibited shorter survival times than those with ATF5-negative glioblastomas

  • Basal-like breast cancer cell lines (62.5%) had increased expression of CREB3L2, suggesting potential involvement in this aggressive subtype

Evidence supporting CREB3L2's tumor-suppressive potential:

  • In ER-positive breast cancer, reduced CREB3L2 expression is associated with poor recurrence-free survival

  • Higher CREB3L2 expression in breast cancer cell lines is associated with increased sensitivity to sorafenib, suggesting it may enhance the efficacy of anti-cancer therapies

  • CREB3L2's role in promoting proper protein folding and secretion could potentially counteract the unfolded protein response often hijacked by cancer cells

Methodological approaches to address this controversy:

  • Context-specific functional studies across multiple cancer types

  • Mechanistic investigations to identify downstream targets and pathways regulated by CREB3L2

  • Analysis of post-translational modifications and protein interactions that could direct CREB3L2 toward pro- or anti-tumorigenic functions

  • In vivo models with tissue-specific and inducible CREB3L2 manipulation

  • Comprehensive clinical correlations across cancer types and subtypes

This duality may reflect CREB3L2's complex role in cellular homeostasis, where its function in maintaining proper protein secretion and ER stress response can be either beneficial or detrimental depending on the specific requirements and adaptations of different cancer types.

How do researchers reconcile conflicting data on CREB3L2 function across different cell types?

Reconciling conflicting data on CREB3L2 function across different cell types requires systematic approaches to understand context-dependent mechanisms. Researchers can address these apparent contradictions through several strategies:

  • Comprehensive Characterization of Cellular Context:

    • Catalog baseline expression levels of CREB3L2 and other CREB3 family members across cell types

    • Profile cellular stress states (ER stress levels, secretory load, etc.) that might influence CREB3L2 function

    • Identify cell type-specific co-factors that might modify CREB3L2 activity or target gene selection

  • Direct Comparison Under Standardized Conditions:

    • Study multiple cell types simultaneously under identical experimental conditions

    • Use isogenic cell lines with targeted modifications to isolate the effect of specific cellular characteristics

    • Employ rescue experiments to determine if context-specific factors can transfer CREB3L2 function between cell types

  • Molecular Mechanism Investigation:

    • Identify cell type-specific post-translational modifications of CREB3L2

    • Map differential protein interaction networks across cell types

    • Compare CREB3L2 chromatin binding profiles and epigenetic landscapes between cell types

    • Examine alternative splicing of CREB3L2 that might generate cell type-specific isoforms

  • Integrative Analysis Approaches:

    • Employ computational modeling to predict how cellular context might affect CREB3L2 function

    • Use systems biology approaches to map context-dependent signaling networks

    • Develop mathematical models that incorporate cell type-specific parameters to predict CREB3L2 activity

  • Technology-Specific Considerations:

    • Control for technical variables such as antibody specificity across different cell types

    • Standardize activation conditions when comparing CREB3L2 function

    • Use multiple complementary techniques to validate observations

Examples of context-dependent functions include:

  • Protection against ER stress-induced cell death in neuroblastoma cells

  • Regulation of secretory pathway genes during hepatic stellate cell differentiation

  • Association with ATF5 expression and cell survival in glioma cells

  • Correlation with sorafenib sensitivity in breast cancer cells

These divergent findings likely reflect the integration of CREB3L2 into cell type-specific regulatory networks and stress response systems, rather than fundamental differences in its molecular mechanism of action.

What are the most promising therapeutic applications of CREB3L2 research?

Based on current understanding of CREB3L2 biology, several promising therapeutic applications emerge:

  • Cancer Treatment Stratification:

    • Development of CREB3L2 expression assays as companion diagnostics for sorafenib therapy in breast cancer, potentially improving patient selection

    • CREB3L2 expression profiling to predict prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer

    • Targeting the CREB3L2-ATF5-MCL1 axis in glioblastoma, where this pathway appears to support cancer cell survival

  • Neuroprotective Strategies:

    • Modulation of CREB3L2 activity to protect neurons from ER stress-induced cell death, particularly relevant to ischemic stroke where CREB3L2 is expressed near infarction regions

    • Potential applications in neurodegenerative diseases characterized by protein misfolding and ER stress

  • Fibrosis Management:

    • Targeting CREB3L2 to modulate hepatic stellate cell differentiation to myofibroblast-like cells, a critical event in hepatic fibrosis

    • Potential applications in other fibrotic disorders involving secretory pathway adaptations

  • Drug Development Approaches:

    • Small molecule modulators of CREB3L2 processing to control its activation

    • Peptide inhibitors targeting specific protein-protein interactions of CREB3L2

    • Gene therapy approaches to deliver constitutively active or dominant-negative CREB3L2 variants

  • Combination Therapies:

    • Pairing CREB3L2 modulators with ER stress-inducing chemotherapeutics to enhance cancer cell death

    • Combining CREB3L2-targeting approaches with sorafenib to overcome resistance mechanisms in low-CREB3L2 expressing tumors

For clinical translation, several challenges must be addressed:

  • Development of specific pharmacological tools to modulate CREB3L2 activity

  • Better understanding of tissue-specific effects to minimize off-target consequences

  • Identification of reliable biomarkers of CREB3L2 activity in patient samples

  • Clinical validation of the predictive and prognostic value of CREB3L2 expression

The most immediate translational potential appears to be in using CREB3L2 expression as a biomarker for treatment selection and prognostication in specific cancer subtypes, particularly ER-positive breast cancer .

What technological advances would most benefit CREB3L2 research?

Several technological advances would significantly accelerate progress in CREB3L2 research:

  • Improved Molecular Tools:

    • Development of highly specific antibodies that distinguish between full-length and cleaved forms of CREB3L2

    • Generation of fluorescent reporters for real-time monitoring of CREB3L2 activation in live cells

    • Creation of inducible, tissue-specific CREB3L2 transgenic and knockout animal models

    • Design of small molecule modulators specific to CREB3L2 versus other CREB3 family members

  • Advanced Imaging Technologies:

    • Super-resolution microscopy techniques to visualize CREB3L2 trafficking between ER, Golgi, and nucleus

    • Live-cell imaging approaches to track CREB3L2 activation dynamics in real-time

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy to relate CREB3L2 activity to ultrastructural changes in secretory organelles

  • Single-Cell Technologies:

    • Single-cell transcriptomics to map CREB3L2-regulated gene networks in heterogeneous tissues

    • Single-cell proteomics to profile CREB3L2 protein levels and post-translational modifications

    • Spatial transcriptomics to visualize CREB3L2 activity patterns within tissue architecture

  • Computational and Systems Biology Approaches:

    • Machine learning algorithms to predict CREB3L2 binding sites and target genes across cell types

    • Network analysis tools to map CREB3L2 interactions within stress response pathways

    • Predictive modeling of CREB3L2 activation dynamics under various stress conditions

  • Clinical Research Technologies:

    • Multiplexed immunohistochemistry platforms for simultaneous detection of CREB3L2 and related proteins in patient samples

    • Liquid biopsy approaches to monitor CREB3L2 activity in circulating tumor cells or exosomes

    • Development of standardized assays for CREB3L2 expression and activation that could be used in clinical settings

  • Genome Engineering Advances:

    • Base editing or prime editing technologies for precise modification of CREB3L2 regulatory elements

    • Optogenetic or chemogenetic control of CREB3L2 activity for temporal precision in functional studies

    • CRISPR screening approaches to systematically identify modulators of CREB3L2 function

These technological advances would enhance our ability to understand CREB3L2's dynamic function across tissues, its role in disease processes, and its potential as a therapeutic target or biomarker.

Product Science Overview

Introduction

CAMP Responsive Element Binding Protein 3-Like 2 (CREB3L2) is a member of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor family. This protein plays a crucial role in various cellular processes, including the unfolded protein response (UPR) and chondrogenesis. It is encoded by the CREB3L2 gene, located on chromosome 7q33 .

Gene and Protein Structure

The CREB3L2 gene consists of 12 exons and spans approximately 122,064 base pairs. The gene produces multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms . The protein itself is composed of 519 amino acids, with a molecular weight of approximately 57 kDa . It contains several key domains:

  • bZIP domain: This domain is involved in DNA binding and dimerization, essential for its function as a transcription factor .
  • Transmembrane domain: Located between residues 376-397, this domain anchors the protein to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane .
Function

CREB3L2 is primarily involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR). Under normal conditions, it is inserted into the ER membrane, with its N-terminal DNA-binding and transcription activation domains facing the cytosol . Upon ER stress, CREB3L2 is transported to the Golgi apparatus, where it is cleaved by resident proteases. The cleaved N-terminal domain then translocates to the nucleus to activate the transcription of target genes .

In addition to its role in UPR, CREB3L2 is critical for chondrogenesis. It activates the transcription of SEC23A, a gene involved in the transport and secretion of cartilage matrix proteins .

Clinical Significance

Mutations or translocations involving the CREB3L2 gene have been implicated in various cancers, including myxofibrosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma . The most common translocation is t(7;16)(q33;p11), which results in the fusion of CREB3L2 with the FUS gene. This fusion protein is thought to contribute to tumorigenesis by deregulating genes normally controlled by CREB3L2 .

Expression

The expression of CREB3L2 is tissue-specific. It is highly expressed in the placenta, lung, spleen, and intestine, while lower levels are found in the heart, brain, skeletal muscle, thymus, colon, and leukocytes . In fetal tissues, the weakest expression is detected in the brain and heart .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.