Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K16) Antibody binds selectively to histone H4 where lysine 16 is modified by crotonylation. This PTM involves the enzymatic addition of a crotonyl group (CH₂CH₂CO-) to the ε-amino group of lysine, distinct from acetylation (CH₃CO-) or other acylations. The antibody’s specificity is achieved through immunization with a synthetic peptide containing the crotonylated K16 site, ensuring recognition of this unique modification .
This antibody is validated for multiple techniques critical to studying histone modifications and chromatin biology:
Key differences among commercial antibodies include reactivity, applications, and pricing:
Cancer Biology: Crotonylation is implicated in oncogenesis, with H4K16 modifications linked to altered chromatin states in tumors .
Epigenetics: This antibody enables mapping of crotonyl-H4K16 in specific genomic contexts, aiding studies of PTM crosstalk and regulatory pathways.
Diagnostic Potential: While not FDA-approved, its use in research models could inform biomarker discovery for diseases involving chromatin dysregulation.
Cross-Reactivity: Verify species compatibility, as some antibodies are human-specific , while others claim broader reactivity .
Validation: Confirm antibody performance in your experimental system, as PTM-specific antibodies may show background noise in non-denaturing conditions.
Storage: Store at -20°C to -80°C to preserve activity, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles .
Histone H4K16 crotonylation is a post-translational modification that occurs at lysine 16 of histone H4. Like acetylation, crotonylation is associated with transcriptionally active chromatin regions. Crotonylation at H4K16 contributes to chromatin decondensation by disrupting histone-DNA interactions, which subsequently affects DNA accessibility to cellular machinery involved in transcription, DNA repair, and replication. This modification appears to work in concert with other histone marks to regulate gene expression and genome maintenance .
While both modifications neutralize the positive charge of lysine residues, crotonylation involves the addition of a four-carbon crotonyl group, which is bulkier than the two-carbon acetyl group. This structural difference results in distinct functional outcomes:
Binding partners: Crotonylation and acetylation are recognized by different reader proteins
Stability: Crotonyl marks are generally more resistant to deacylation than acetyl marks
Gene regulation: H4K16 crotonylation appears in specific genomic contexts that may differ from those of H4K16 acetylation
Cellular metabolism: Crotonylation is more closely linked to cellular metabolic state through crotonyl-CoA levels
H4K16 acetylation is known to be associated with euchromatin formation, transcriptional regulation, DNA damage repair, and cell senescence, while crotonylation may have overlapping but distinct functions .
Based on validation data, the Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K16) Polyclonal Antibody has been confirmed for the following applications:
Application | Validated | Recommended Dilution |
---|---|---|
ELISA | Yes | 1:1000 - 1:5000 |
Western Blot (WB) | Yes | 1:500 - 1:2000 |
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) | Yes | 1:100 - 1:500 |
Immunofluorescence (IF) | Yes | 1:100 - 1:500 |
The antibody specifically recognizes the crotonylation at lysine 16 of human histone H4 (accession number P62805) and shows minimal cross-reactivity with other histone modifications .
For rigorous experimental design, researchers should include the following controls:
Positive control: Cell lines or tissues known to exhibit H4K16 crotonylation (e.g., actively dividing cells)
Negative control: Samples treated with histone decrotonylase enzymes
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubation of antibody with crotonylated and non-crotonylated peptides
Isotype control: Non-specific rabbit IgG to assess background binding
Cross-reactivity control: Recombinant histone H4 with various modifications (acetylation, methylation) to ensure specificity
These controls help validate antibody specificity and enhance the reliability of experimental results.
For optimal ChIP results using Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K16) Antibody, consider the following modifications to standard protocols:
Crosslinking: Use dual crosslinking with 1.5 mM EGS (ethylene glycol bis[succinimidylsuccinate]) for 30 minutes followed by 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes to better preserve crotonylation marks
Sonication conditions: 10-12 cycles (30 seconds ON/OFF) to generate fragments of 200-500 bp
Antibody incubation: 4-8 μg of chromatin DNA with antibody pre-bound to magnetic beads at 4°C overnight with rotation
Washing conditions: Two washes with ChIP buffer followed by two washes with TE buffer
Elution: TE containing 1% SDS at 65°C overnight with proteinase K
This optimized protocol has been adapted from successful ChIP procedures for other histone modifications .
Comprehensive validation of Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K16) Antibody should include:
Peptide array analysis: Testing antibody against a panel of modified and unmodified histone peptides
Dot blot analysis: Using synthetic peptides with various modifications at K16 and surrounding residues
Western blot with mutation constructs: Expressing K16A mutants of histone H4 to confirm specificity
Mass spectrometry validation: Confirming the identity of immunoprecipitated proteins
Knockout/knockdown validation: Using CRISPR to delete histone variants or enzymes responsible for crotonylation
Competition assays: Pre-incubating antibody with crotonylated and non-crotonylated peptides before immunostaining
This multi-method approach ensures high confidence in antibody specificity, critical for interpreting experimental results.
When analyzing potentially overlapping signals:
Perform sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) to determine co-occurrence of modifications
Use high-resolution microscopy with spectral unmixing for co-localization studies
Compare ChIP-seq datasets with publicly available datasets for other modifications
Employ bioinformatic tools to identify statistically significant overlaps
Validate functional relationships using genetic or chemical perturbation of specific modification pathways
Remember that H4K16 can be modified by various acylations, including acetylation, which is known to be associated with transcriptional activation and chromatin decondensation .
Common causes of inconsistency include:
Sample preparation variability: Inconsistent fixation or extraction methods
Cellular metabolic state: Variations in crotonyl-CoA levels affecting global crotonylation
Technical factors:
Antibody storage conditions (avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles)
Incubation time and temperature variations
Buffer composition differences
Biological factors:
Cell cycle stage (crotonylation patterns change during cell cycle)
Culture conditions affecting metabolic state
Cell density variations
To minimize inconsistency, standardize protocols and maintain detailed records of experimental conditions .
To address cross-reactivity concerns:
Perform ELISA testing against a panel of modified peptides (acetylation, methylation, other acylations)
Include appropriate blocking agents (5% BSA or 5% non-fat milk) in antibody diluent
Pre-absorb antibody with potential cross-reactive peptides
Validate specificity using recombinant histones with defined modifications
Compare results with alternative antibody clones from different vendors
Include lysine-to-alanine substitution controls in overexpression studies
This systematic approach helps distinguish genuine signals from potential artifacts due to cross-reactivity .
For accurate quantification of H4K16 crotonylation:
Method | Advantages | Limitations | Normalization Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
Western blot | Simple implementation | Semi-quantitative | Total H4 or housekeeping proteins |
ELISA | High throughput | Limited context | Standard curve with synthetic peptides |
Flow cytometry | Single-cell resolution | Limited spatial information | Total H4 or isotype control |
Immunofluorescence | Spatial information | Observer bias | DAPI or total H4 staining |
Mass spectrometry | Absolute quantification | Complex sample preparation | Internal standards |
For all methods, include appropriate controls and reference standards for accurate quantification .
Buffer optimization is critical for antibody performance across applications:
Application | Recommended Buffer | pH | Additives |
---|---|---|---|
Western Blot | TBS-T (0.1% Tween-20) | 7.4 | 5% BSA or non-fat milk |
Immunofluorescence | PBS | 7.4 | 1% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100 |
ChIP | ChIP buffer | 7.5 | 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitors |
ELISA | PBS | 7.4 | 1% BSA |
When working with crotonylation antibodies, including HDAC inhibitors (e.g., sodium butyrate) in buffers can help preserve the modification during extraction and processing .
To correlate H4K16 crotonylation with gene expression:
Perform ChIP-seq for H4K16cr and RNA-seq on matching samples
Use bioinformatic tools to correlate crotonylation peaks with transcript levels
Generate heatmaps showing distribution of crotonylation relative to transcription start sites
Perform perturbation experiments:
Modulate cellular crotonyl-CoA levels
Inhibit or overexpress enzymes responsible for crotonylation/decrotonylation
Validate findings using reporter assays for specific target genes
Analysis typically reveals that H4K16 crotonylation, like acetylation, is enriched around transcription start sites of active genes .
Integrative approaches include:
ChIP-seq followed by RNA-seq to correlate chromatin state with transcriptional output
CUT&RUN or CUT&Tag for higher resolution mapping of crotonylation sites
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify reader proteins recognizing H4K16cr
Mass spectrometry for comprehensive histone modification profiling
Live-cell imaging with fluorescently labeled antibody fragments
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) to detect co-occurrence with other modifications
These combinatorial approaches provide deeper insights into the functional significance of H4K16 crotonylation in different biological contexts .
Understanding developmental dynamics of H4K16 crotonylation requires:
Temporal profiling across differentiation stages
Tissue-specific mapping in developing organisms
Correlation with metabolic changes that affect crotonyl-CoA levels
Comparison with other histone modifications during development
Analysis of writer/eraser enzyme expression patterns during differentiation
Current research suggests that histone crotonylation, like acetylation, undergoes significant remodeling during cellular differentiation and development, often correlating with changes in gene expression programs .
For robust ChIP-seq analysis of H4K16 crotonylation:
Quality control: Assess sequencing depth (>20 million mapped reads recommended)
Peak calling: Use MACS2 with broad peak settings for histone modifications
Normalization: Apply input control and spike-in normalization for quantitative comparisons
Visualization: Generate heatmaps centered on transcription start sites or enhancers
Comparative analysis: Overlay with other histone modifications and transcription factor binding sites
Motif analysis: Identify DNA sequences enriched in crotonylated regions
Pathway analysis: Associate crotonylation patterns with biological functions
As with acetylation marks, H4K16 crotonylation is typically enriched around transcription start sites and correlates with gene activity .
For effective sequential ChIP (re-ChIP):
First immunoprecipitation: Use standard ChIP protocol with Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K16) Antibody
Elution: Use 10 mM DTT at 37°C for 30 minutes (preserves modifications)
Dilution: Dilute eluted chromatin 1:10 in ChIP buffer before second IP
Second immunoprecipitation: Use antibody against the second modification of interest
Final elution: Use standard elution buffer with 1% SDS
Controls: Include single ChIP and reverse order re-ChIP as controls
This approach allows determination of whether different histone modifications co-occur on the same nucleosomes, providing insights into their functional relationships .