Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) antibodies target histone H4 proteins modified by crotonylation at lysine 8. Histone crotonylation involves the addition of a crotonyl group (derived from crotonyl-CoA) to lysine residues, altering chromatin structure and gene expression . This PTM is implicated in transcriptional activation, DNA repair, and diseases like cancer .
Key Features of Histone H4 Crotonylation:
Structural Role: Modifies nucleosome dynamics, influencing DNA accessibility .
Regulatory Function: Part of the "histone code" that recruits chromatin-modifying enzymes .
Disease Relevance: Dysregulation observed in acute kidney injury (AKI) and cancer .
The Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) antibody (e.g., ab201075, ab251336, CAC15418) is a rabbit-derived recombinant monoclonal antibody validated across multiple platforms:
Specificity Controls:
Negative Controls: No signal observed with secondary antibody alone .
Cross-Reactivity: No binding to unmodified or unrelated histone peptides (e.g., acetylated H4K8) .
Chromatin Remodeling: Used to study crotonylation's role in transcriptional regulation. For example, Gcn5 and Esa1 complexes were identified as crotonyltransferases using similar antibodies .
Disease Models: Detects increased histone crotonylation in AKI, correlating with nephroprotective gene expression (e.g., PGC1α, Sirt-3) .
Western Blotting: Detects crotonylated H4 in 10 µg of whole-cell lysates .
ChIP-Seq: Validated for chromatin immunoprecipitation to map crotonylation sites genome-wide .
Crotonylation vs. Acetylation: Unlike acetylation, crotonylation is associated with distinct transcriptional outcomes, potentially due to its larger hydrophobic moiety .
Therapeutic Insights: Crotonate supplementation in AKI models increases histone crotonylation, reducing inflammation and preserving renal function .
Species Specificity: Limited to human, mouse, and rat samples .
Antibody Competition: Cross-reactivity with other acylations (e.g., acetylation) has not been fully ruled out .
The Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits against a peptide sequence surrounding the crotonylated lysine 8 (K8) residue of human histone H4 (HIST1H4A). This antibody specifically recognizes the post-translational modification of crotonylation at the K8 position of histone H4, one of the core histone proteins that comprise the nucleosome. The immunogen used for antibody production is a peptide sequence around the site of Crotonyl-Lys (8) derived from Human Histone H4 . This specificity allows researchers to detect this particular modification in various experimental applications including ELISA, Western blotting (WB), immunocytochemistry (ICC), immunofluorescence (IF), and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) .
Histone H4K8 crotonylation involves the addition of a crotonyl group to the lysine 8 residue of histone H4. Unlike more common modifications such as acetylation or methylation, crotonylation features a larger, more hydrophobic modification with a distinctive structure that includes a C=C double bond. This structural difference results in unique biological functions and protein interactions. While acetylation typically neutralizes the positive charge of lysine and promotes open chromatin states, crotonylation creates a more substantial modification that may recruit specific reader proteins distinct from those that recognize acetylation. H4K8 crotonylation is one of several crotonylation sites identified on different histones, including HIST1H3A (K18), HIST1H3A (K4), HIST1H3A (K9), and HIST1H4A (K5) .
The Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody has been validated for multiple research applications that are essential for epigenetic studies. According to product specifications, this antibody has been verified for use in ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay), which allows for quantitative detection of the modification in protein samples . It has also been validated for Western blotting (WB), enabling researchers to detect the presence and relative abundance of H4K8 crotonylation in cell and tissue lysates . For cellular localization studies, the antibody has been confirmed effective in immunocytochemistry (ICC) and immunofluorescence (IF), allowing visualization of the modification within cellular contexts . Importantly, it has been validated for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), a crucial technique for investigating the genomic distribution of histone modifications and their association with specific DNA sequences . This range of validated applications makes the antibody a versatile tool for comprehensive studies of H4K8 crotonylation in epigenetic research.
For optimal chromatin immunoprecipitation with the Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody, careful attention to experimental conditions is essential. The recommended protocol begins with proper chromatin preparation by crosslinking cells with formaldehyde, followed by cell lysis and sonication to generate chromatin fragments of appropriate size (200-500 bp). For the immunoprecipitation step, researchers should use approximately 10 μg of chromatin and an antibody dilution of 1:50 . This ratio has been validated to provide optimal enrichment while minimizing background. The antibody-chromatin mixture should be incubated overnight at 4°C with rotation, followed by addition of protein A/G magnetic beads. After thorough washing to remove non-specific binding, the crosslinks can be reversed and the DNA purified for subsequent analysis. Including appropriate controls, such as IgG or input samples, is critical for validating the specificity of the immunoprecipitation.
For effective Western blotting with the Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody, histone extraction protocols are critical. Acid extraction methods are recommended to enrich for histones from cellular samples. After protein quantification, 5-10 μg of histone extract should be loaded per lane on a 15% SDS-PAGE gel to achieve optimal separation of the relatively small histone proteins. Following transfer to a PVDF membrane, blocking should be performed with 5% BSA in TBST. The Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody should be used at a 1:1000 dilution and incubated overnight at 4°C . It is crucial to include deacetylase and decrotonylase inhibitors in all buffers to preserve the modification. Researchers should verify specificity using appropriate controls such as crotonylation-depleted samples or peptide competition assays, as cross-reactivity with acetylation marks can sometimes occur.
For successful immunofluorescence with the Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody, cell fixation and permeabilization protocols significantly impact epitope accessibility. The recommended procedure involves fixing cells with 4% paraformaldehyde followed by permeabilization with Triton X-100. For immunostaining, the antibody should be used at a dilution range of 1:200 to 1:500 and incubated overnight at 4°C . This dilution range provides optimal signal-to-noise ratio for detecting the H4K8 crotonylation mark within cellular contexts. When analyzing results, researchers should be aware that the distribution pattern of H4K8 crotonylation may vary significantly between cell types and in response to different cellular states or treatments affecting metabolic pathways. For dual staining with other histone mark antibodies, considerations regarding antibody compatibility based on host species and implementation of proper controls to ensure specificity are essential.
For genome-wide mapping of H4K8 crotonylation, ChIP-seq with the Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody provides comprehensive insights into the distribution of this modification across the genome. The antibody has been specifically validated for ChIP applications, making it suitable for this advanced technique . When designing such experiments, sufficient sequence depth is crucial—researchers should aim for at least 20 million uniquely mapped reads per sample. For bioinformatic analysis, specialized peak-calling algorithms optimized for histone modifications should be used rather than those designed for transcription factor binding sites. To interpret the biological significance of identified enrichment patterns, integration with other genomic datasets including RNA-seq, accessibility assays, and other histone modifications is recommended. This approach can reveal patterns of co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity with other epigenetic marks, providing insights into the regulatory functions of H4K8 crotonylation.
To isolate the specific effects of H4K8 crotonylation from other histone modifications, researchers should implement a multi-faceted approach. First, utilizing site-specific histone mutants where lysine 8 is replaced with residues that either mimic crotonylation or prevent it in appropriate model systems can provide direct functional evidence. Second, employing CRISPR-based epigenome editing by fusing catalytically inactive Cas9 with crotonyl writers or erasers directed to specific genomic loci can establish causality between the modification and observed phenotypes. Third, modulating cellular crotonyl-CoA levels through metabolic interventions while monitoring effects on H4K8cr levels and gene expression can reveal the interplay between metabolism and epigenetic regulation. Finally, conducting competition assays with recombinant nucleosomes containing specifically modified histones can identify proteins that preferentially bind to H4K8cr versus other modifications at the same residue, elucidating specific downstream effectors.
The specificity of the Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody should be considered in relation to other available crotonylation antibodies. As shown in the comparative data below, this antibody specifically recognizes the K8 position of histone H4, while related antibodies target different lysine residues on histones H3 and H4.
| Antibody | Target Residue | Host | Clonality | Validated Applications | Species Reactivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) | Lysine 8 (H4) | Rabbit | Polyclonal | ELISA, WB, ICC, IF, ChIP | Human |
| Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K5) | Lysine 5 (H4) | Rabbit | Polyclonal | ELISA, WB, IF, IP, ChIP | Human |
| Crotonyl-HIST1H3A (K18) | Lysine 18 (H3) | Rabbit | Polyclonal | ELISA, IF, ChIP | Human |
| Crotonyl-HIST1H3A (K9) | Lysine 9 (H3) | Rabbit | Polyclonal | ELISA, WB, ICC, IP, ChIP | Human |
This comparison highlights that while all these antibodies target crotonylation modifications, each recognizes a specific lysine residue in a distinct sequence context . When designing experiments to study crotonylation patterns, researchers should consider using multiple antibodies to gain a comprehensive understanding of the distribution and function of different crotonylation sites.
Common specificity issues with the Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody include potential cross-reactivity with other acyl modifications on the same residue (particularly acetylation) or crotonylation at similar sequence contexts on different histones. To address these concerns, researchers should implement multiple validation approaches. Peptide competition assays using crotonylated, acetylated, and unmodified H4K8 peptides can confirm specificity. Western blots with recombinant histones bearing defined modifications can directly assess cross-reactivity. Comparing samples from cells treated with HDAC inhibitors versus crotonate supplementation can determine if the antibody discriminates between acetylation and crotonylation. Additionally, validation with an alternative Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody from a different manufacturer or raised against a different epitope region can provide further confidence in observed results. For definitive analysis in critical experiments, orthogonal approaches such as mass spectrometry should be considered to independently confirm the presence and abundance of H4K8 crotonylation.
When facing contradictory results between different methods detecting H4K8 crotonylation, researchers should implement a systematic analytical approach. First, the strengths and limitations of each methodology should be evaluated: ChIP detects genomic localization but may be affected by antibody specificity issues; Western blotting provides a global view but may miss site-specific dynamics; mass spectrometry offers absolute identification but may have sensitivity limitations for low-abundance modifications. Second, biological variables that could explain genuine differences should be considered, such as cell-type specificity, dynamic temporal changes, or response to unrecognized environmental factors. Third, technical variables should be examined, including extraction protocols, fixation methods, or buffer compositions that might affect the preservation of the modification. Implementing method-specific controls and combinatorial approaches where multiple methods target the same biological question from different angles can help resolve apparent contradictions and reveal the true biological complexity of H4K8 crotonylation dynamics.
Optimal detection with the Crotonyl-HIST1H4A (K8) Antibody requires careful attention to experimental conditions across different applications. The table below summarizes recommended parameters for various techniques:
| Application | Sample Preparation | Antibody Dilution | Incubation Conditions | Critical Controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Acid extraction of histones | 1:1000 | Overnight at 4°C | Peptide competition, crotonylation-depleted samples |
| Immunofluorescence | 4% PFA fixation, 0.2% Triton X-100 permeabilization | 1:200-1:500 | Overnight at 4°C | Secondary-only control, pre-immune serum |
| ChIP | 1% formaldehyde crosslinking, sonication to 200-500bp | 1:50 | Overnight at 4°C | IgG control, input sample (10%) |
| ChIP-seq | As above, plus library preparation | As above | As above | Input sequencing, IgG ChIP-seq |
| ELISA | Histone coating at 1-10 μg/ml | 1:1000-1:5000 | 2 hours at RT | Unmodified peptide, competitive ELISA |
Across all applications, inclusion of deacetylase and decrotonylase inhibitors (such as sodium butyrate, trichostatin A, and nicotinamide) in buffers is essential to preserve the modification during sample processing . Additionally, researchers should be aware that storage conditions and freeze-thaw cycles can affect antibody performance, so aliquoting the antibody and following manufacturer-recommended storage protocols is advisable.