Database Coverage: Sources included peer-reviewed journals (e.g., Cell, eLife), NIH-funded initiatives (e.g., CPTAC, DSHB), and commercial antibody repositories (e.g., Abcam, GeneTex).
Keywords: "CRRSP50 Antibody," "CRRSP50," and permutations (e.g., "CRRSP-50," "CRRSP50 protein").
Temporal Scope: Publications and resources from 2019–2025 were prioritized to ensure relevance.
Typographical Errors: "CRRSP50" may represent a misspelling. For example:
The term might reference an internal identifier from a private biotech entity or prepublication study not yet indexed in public databases .
Hypothetical proteins or abandoned research targets occasionally retain legacy identifiers without functional characterization .
Verify Nomenclature: Cross-check with databases like UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org) or the Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org).
Consult Antibody Repositories:
CiteAb (https://www.citeab.com)
Antibody Registry (https://antibodyregistry.org)
Explore Patent Filings: Use USPTO (https://uspto.gov) or WIPO (https://wipo.int) for unpublished commercial claims.
While "CRRSP50" remains uncharacterized, contemporary antibody research frameworks from the sources include:
KEGG: ath:AT4G20580
The CRRSP50 Antibody (CSB-PA315622XA01DOA) has been validated for:
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Western Blot (WB)
These applications allow researchers to detect CRRSP50 protein in complex biological samples, quantify its expression levels, and examine changes in protein abundance under different experimental conditions.
For optimal performance and longevity:
Store at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
The antibody is supplied in liquid form containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4, with 0.03% Proclin 300 as preservative
Working aliquots can be prepared to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Proper validation should include:
Positive controls: Using recombinant CRRSP50 protein or Arabidopsis thaliana samples known to express the protein
Negative controls: Using samples from knockout plants or tissues where CRRSP50 is not expressed
Testing for cross-reactivity with related proteins in the CRRSP family
Comparing results across multiple detection techniques (e.g., Western blot and ELISA)
Including appropriate blocking controls to identify non-specific binding
For Western blot applications with CRRSP50 Antibody:
Sample preparation:
Extract proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana tissues using appropriate buffer
Measure protein concentration (BCA or Bradford assay)
Prepare samples with reducing loading buffer
Gel electrophoresis parameters:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels
Load 10-30 μg of total protein per lane
Include molecular weight markers
Transfer conditions:
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane
Wet transfer at 100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight
Antibody incubation:
Block membrane with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 hour
Incubate with CRRSP50 Antibody (1:1000 to 1:2000 dilution) at 4°C overnight
Wash 3x with TBST
Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody
Wash 3x with TBST
Detection:
A systematic approach to optimizing ELISA conditions includes:
Checkerboard titration:
Plate coating: Test antigen concentrations from 0.1-10 μg/ml
Primary antibody: Test dilutions from 1:500 to 1:10,000
Secondary antibody: Test dilutions from 1:1,000 to 1:20,000
Optimization guidelines:
Start with manufacturer's recommended dilution (typically 1:1000)
Prepare standard curves with recombinant CRRSP50 protein
Identify optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Confirm linearity of detection within expected concentration range
Controls to include:
For researchers interested in identifying the specific epitopes recognized by the polyclonal CRRSP50 Antibody:
Peptide array approach:
Design overlapping peptides (15-20 amino acids) spanning the CRRSP50 sequence
Synthesize peptides directly on cellulose membrane (SPOT array)
Incubate membrane with CRRSP50 Antibody
Detect binding using secondary antibody and imaging
Mutational analysis:
Generate truncated or point-mutated variants of CRRSP50
Express recombinant variants
Test antibody reactivity against each variant
Identify critical residues for antibody binding
Computational prediction:
Evaluating cross-reactivity is essential for antibody specificity:
Sequence alignment analysis:
Align sequences of CRRSP family proteins (CRRSP47, CRRSP43, CRRSP53, CRRSP57, etc.)
Identify regions of high homology that might lead to cross-reactivity
Cross-reactivity testing:
Express recombinant CRRSP family proteins
Perform Western blots and ELISAs with each protein
Compare binding affinity and signal intensity
Create a cross-reactivity profile table
Competition assays:
For enhanced CRRSP50 detection in complex plant samples:
Signal amplification methods:
Use tyramide signal amplification
Employ biotin-streptavidin amplification systems
Consider poly-HRP secondary antibody conjugates
Sample enrichment techniques:
Perform immunoprecipitation to concentrate CRRSP50
Use subcellular fractionation to reduce sample complexity
Apply protein extraction methods optimized for cysteine-rich proteins
Advanced detection platforms:
Multiple bands can indicate several possibilities that require systematic investigation:
Potential causes:
Post-translational modifications of CRRSP50
Proteolytic processing or degradation products
Splice variants of CRRSP50
Non-specific binding
Cross-reactivity with other CRRSP family proteins
Validation approaches:
Compare observed band sizes to predicted molecular weights
Test protease inhibitors in sample preparation
Include reducing/non-reducing conditions if disulfide bonds are present
Use knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls
Perform peptide competition assays to confirm specificity
Reporting guidelines:
Several variables can impact experimental reproducibility:
Antibody-related factors:
Lot-to-lot variation inherent to polyclonal antibodies
Antibody storage conditions and freeze-thaw cycles
Dilution protocols and buffer composition
Sample-related factors:
Protein extraction efficiency from plant tissues
Protein degradation during sample handling
Plant growth conditions affecting CRRSP50 expression
Developmental stage of plant samples
Technical considerations:
For rigorous quantitative analysis:
Normalization strategies:
Use housekeeping proteins (e.g., actin, tubulin) as loading controls
Apply total protein normalization methods
Consider spike-in controls for absolute quantification
Quantification methods:
Densitometry analysis for Western blots
Standard curve approach for ELISA
Consider digital PCR for transcript-level validation
Statistical analysis:
While not explicitly validated for immunohistochemistry, researchers may develop protocols for CRRSP50 localization:
Sample preparation:
Fix plant tissues with paraformaldehyde
Embed in paraffin or prepare frozen sections
Perform antigen retrieval if needed
Protocol optimization:
Test antibody dilutions (starting at 1:100-1:500)
Optimize blocking conditions to reduce background
Include absorption controls with recombinant protein
Compare chromogenic vs. fluorescent detection methods
Colocalization studies:
Adapting CRRSP50 Antibody for immunoprecipitation studies:
Protocol development:
Conjugate antibody to protein A/G beads or magnetic beads
Optimize antibody:bead ratio (typically 5-10 μg per reaction)
Test various lysis buffers to maintain protein interactions
Include appropriate negative controls (non-specific IgG)
Co-immunoprecipitation applications:
Identify interaction partners through mass spectrometry
Validate specific interactions through reciprocal co-IP
Map interaction domains through truncation mutants
Study interaction dynamics under different conditions
Proximity labeling alternatives:
Advanced applications leveraging CRRSP50 Antibody technology:
Recombinant antibody development:
Sequence analysis of CRRSP50 Antibody variable regions
CDR grafting onto stable frameworks
Development of single-chain variable fragments (scFvs)
Creation of bispecific antibodies targeting CRRSP50 and another protein
RosettaAntibodyDesign implementation:
Computational optimization of binding affinity
In silico prediction of antibody-antigen complexes
Sequence and structure sampling strategies
Energy minimization approaches
SpyTag/SpyCatcher applications:
A systematic comparison framework:
| Feature | CRRSP50 Antibody | Other CRRSP Family Antibodies | Plant Protein Antibodies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specificity | Target-specific with defined cross-reactivity profile | Variable depending on epitope conservation | Generally high when properly validated |
| Sensitivity | Detection limit ~10-100 ng | Similar range for polyclonal antibodies | Highly variable (5-500 ng) |
| Applications | Validated for ELISA, WB | Often similar application profile | Broader validation including IHC, IP |
| Host Species | Rabbit | Typically rabbit or mouse | Various (rabbit, mouse, goat) |
| Reproducibility | Moderate (polyclonal) | Similar variability | Higher for monoclonal antibodies |
Forward-looking approaches include:
Next-generation sequencing integration:
Combined antibody-seq and RNA-seq approaches
Single-cell protein and RNA detection
Spatial transcriptomics with protein detection
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for subcellular localization
Multiplex imaging with spectral unmixing
Intravital imaging in plant tissues
Label-free detection methods
Computational approaches:
Critical assessment of research challenges:
Technical limitations:
Variability inherent to polyclonal antibodies
Limited validation across diverse applications
Potential cross-reactivity with related proteins
Need for additional controls in complex plant samples
Knowledge gaps:
Incomplete understanding of CRRSP50 function
Limited structural information
Few studies on regulation and expression patterns
Unclear role in plant stress responses
Future research directions: