CSLB3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Molecular and Functional Context of CSLB3

CSLB3 is a member of the cellulose synthase-like B (CSLB) family, which participates in synthesizing polysaccharides critical for plant cell wall integrity . Key characteristics include:

  • Role in cell wall formation: CSLB3 is upregulated during early seed development in plants, correlating with enhanced cellulose and hemicellulose synthesis .

  • Transcriptional regulation: Its expression is influenced by auxin signaling pathways and transcription factors such as ARF12 and AGL36 .

Antibody Development and Applications

While no direct studies on CSLB3-specific antibodies were identified, insights from analogous antibody discovery workflows suggest potential strategies:

Table 1: Antibody Discovery Methodologies Relevant to CSLB3

MethodDescriptionExample Antibody TargetsCitation
NanOBlast ScreeningRapid on-chip screening of ASCs for antigen-specific antibodies.Anti-idiotype IgGs (e.g., 1A3)
LIBRA-seqHigh-throughput pairing of BCR sequences with antigen specificity.HIV/SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies
Phage DisplayIn vitro selection of antibodies via combinatorial libraries.βc receptor antagonist (CSL311)

Research Implications

  • Plant biology: Antibodies against CSLB3 could enable precise localization studies of cellulose synthase complexes in plant tissues, aiding in understanding cell wall dynamics .

  • Biotechnological applications: Engineered CSLB3 antibodies might enhance crop resilience by modulating cell wall composition under stress .

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Antigen design: CSLB3’s transmembrane domains and glycosylation sites (common in plant enzymes) pose challenges for immunogen preparation .

  • Validation: Functional assays (e.g., ELISA, immunofluorescence) would require recombinant CSLB3 protein or plant tissue samples .

Table 2: Transcriptomic Regulation of CSLB3 in Seed Development

ConditionCSLB3 Expression (Fold Change)Associated PathwaysCitation
Wild-type (3W vs 5W)↓ 7.9Cellulose biosynthesis
naa15 mutant↑ 4.2Auxin signaling, microtubule dynamics

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
CSLB3 antibody; At2g32530 antibody; T26B15.9Cellulose synthase-like protein B3 antibody; AtCslB3 antibody; EC 2.4.1.- antibody
Target Names
CSLB3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
CSLB3 Antibody targets a protein believed to be a Golgi-localized beta-glycan synthase. This enzyme is responsible for polymerizing the backbones of noncellulosic polysaccharides (hemicelluloses) found within the plant cell wall.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT2G32530

STRING: 3702.AT2G32530.1

UniGene: At.38058

Protein Families
Glycosyltransferase 2 family, Plant cellulose synthase-like B subfamily
Subcellular Location
Golgi apparatus membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in young seedlings, primarily in the vascular tissue.

Q&A

What are the optimal flow cytometry protocols for CSLB3 Antibody?

For optimal flow cytometry results with CSLB3 Antibody, follow this validated protocol:

  • Harvest cells and wash twice with flow cytometry staining buffer

  • Resuspend cells at 1×10^6 cells/100 μL in staining buffer

  • Add CSLB3 Antibody at recommended working dilution (typically 1:100-1:500, but titration is advised)

  • Incubate for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark

  • Wash cells twice with staining buffer

  • If using a biotinylated format, add fluorochrome-conjugated streptavidin (similar to the protocol used for Siglec-3/CD33 detection)

  • Analyze on flow cytometer with appropriate laser/filter configuration

This approach is similar to established protocols for membrane-associated proteins, where U937 human histiocytic lymphoma cell lines have been effectively stained with biotinylated antibodies followed by APC-conjugated streptavidin detection .

What cell types are most appropriate for validating CSLB3 Antibody specificity?

When validating CSLB3 Antibody specificity, select cell lines expressing the target antigen. Based on similar research antibody validation approaches:

  • Positive control cells: Cell lines known to express the target (based on RNA-seq or proteomic data)

  • Negative control cells: Cell lines with confirmed absence of the target

  • Engineered cells: Cells with genetic knockdown/knockout of the target gene

For validation, analytical methods typically employ flow cytometry, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence to confirm binding specificity across multiple techniques. This multi-platform validation approach mirrors methods used for therapeutic antibodies like Gemtuzumab, where U937 human histiocytic lymphoma cells serve as positive controls for target expression .

How should storage and handling conditions be optimized for CSLB3 Antibody?

For maximum stability and performance of CSLB3 Antibody:

  • Store concentrated stocks at 2-8°C (do not freeze, similar to biotinylated antibodies like anti-Siglec-3/CD33)

  • For long-term storage, prepare small aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • Add carrier protein (0.1-1% BSA) for dilute antibody solutions

  • Use sterile techniques when handling

  • Monitor stability via functional assays after extended storage

  • Expected shelf life is approximately 12 months when stored properly at 2-8°C

What are the optimal dilution ratios for CSLB3 Antibody across different applications?

The optimal working dilution for CSLB3 Antibody varies by application. Based on similar research-grade antibodies, recommended starting dilutions are:

ApplicationSuggested Starting DilutionOptimization RangeNotes
Flow Cytometry1:2001:100-1:500Similar to anti-CD33 protocols
Western Blot1:10001:500-1:5000Requires titration
Immunohistochemistry1:1001:50-1:200May require antigen retrieval
ELISA1:10001:500-1:5000For plate coating or detection
Immunoprecipitation5 μg/mg lysate2-10 μg/mg lysateProtein A/G beads recommended

Always perform titration experiments for new lots and applications. Similar to antibodies used in longitudinal analysis studies, optimal dilution may depend on target expression levels in different cell types or tissues .

How should CSLB3 Antibody be validated in multiplex immunoassays?

For validating CSLB3 Antibody in multiplex immunoassays:

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against all components in the multiplex panel to confirm absence of non-specific binding

  • Competitive binding evaluation: Ensure CSLB3 does not compete with other antibodies for epitope access

  • Signal interference testing: Verify that detection systems (fluorophores, enzymes) do not create spectral overlap

  • Dynamic range determination: Establish the concentration range where signal remains linear

  • Reproducibility testing: Perform replicate measurements across different days and operators

This approach mirrors methodology used in B cell phenotyping panels, where multiple antibodies (anti-CD3, anti-CD19, anti-CD20, anti-CD27, anti-CD38, etc.) are combined to identify specific cell populations .

What controls are essential when using CSLB3 Antibody in immunoprecipitation experiments?

Essential controls for CSLB3 Antibody immunoprecipitation:

  • Isotype control: Use matched isotype antibody to assess non-specific binding

  • Input control: Analyze 5-10% of pre-cleared lysate to confirm target presence

  • No-antibody control: Process lysate with beads alone to identify non-specific bead binding

  • Irrelevant target control: Immunoprecipitate with antibody against unrelated protein to evaluate specificity

  • Knockout/knockdown validation: When possible, use cells lacking the target as negative controls

These controls help distinguish specific signal from background, similar to the approach used in detection of Siglec-3/CD33, where irrelevant biotinylated antibodies serve as controls in flow cytometry applications .

How can CSLB3 Antibody be integrated into CAR-T cell engineering strategies?

For integrating CSLB3 Antibody into CAR-T cell engineering:

  • scFv derivation: Clone the variable regions from CSLB3 to create single-chain variable fragments

  • CAR construct design: Incorporate the scFv into CAR constructs with appropriate costimulatory domains (CD28 or 41BB) and CD3ζ signaling sequences

  • Universal CAR adaptation: Consider adapting CSLB3 for universal CAR platforms such as the Fabrack-CAR system, where antibody specificity guides CAR-T targeting

  • Binding kinetics optimization: Evaluate whether affinity modulation is needed for optimal CAR function

  • Functionality testing: Assess CAR-T activation markers (CD107a, IFNγ) in response to target cells

This approach builds on established CAR-T technologies like the Fabrack-CAR system, which uses antibodies to confer antigen specificity to universal CAR-T cells . The CSLB3 antibody sequence could potentially be engineered to include meditope-binding sites, enabling it to work with universal CAR platforms that address tumor heterogeneity challenges.

What strategies exist for overcoming epitope masking when using CSLB3 Antibody in complex samples?

To overcome epitope masking with CSLB3 Antibody:

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Test multiple fixation protocols (PFA, methanol, acetone)

    • Evaluate different antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced, enzymatic)

    • Try various detergents to improve epitope accessibility

  • Antibody engineering approaches:

    • Consider fragment antibodies (Fab, F(ab')2) if steric hindrance is suspected

    • Evaluate different clones targeting distinct epitopes

    • Test antibodies raised against different regions of the target

  • Advanced techniques:

    • Proximity ligation assays to detect proteins in close proximity

    • Sequential staining protocols with epitope stripping between rounds

    • Super-resolution microscopy to improve spatial resolution

These approaches are particularly relevant when studying membrane proteins or protein complexes where epitope accessibility may be compromised by protein-protein interactions or post-translational modifications.

How can AI-based approaches improve antibody design for targets similar to CSLB3?

AI-based approaches for improved antibody design:

  • De novo CDRH3 sequence generation: AI algorithms can generate antigen-specific antibody CDRH3 sequences using germline-based templates, as demonstrated in recent SARS-CoV-2 antibody development

  • Developability prediction:

    • AI models can predict antibody properties like solubility and stability

    • These predictions help select candidates with favorable biophysical characteristics

    • Parameters include aggregation propensity, thermal stability, and expression levels

  • Epitope mapping optimization:

    • AI can predict optimal epitopes based on antigen structure

    • This guides antibody engineering toward regions with high specificity

    • Structural models predict binding interactions at atomic resolution

  • Affinity maturation in silico:

    • Machine learning algorithms can suggest mutations to increase binding affinity

    • This accelerates traditional directed evolution approaches

    • Multiple candidates can be evaluated computationally before experimental testing

These AI approaches mimic natural antibody generation processes but bypass the complexity, offering efficient alternatives to traditional experimental antibody discovery methods .

What are the most common causes of false positives when using CSLB3 Antibody, and how can they be mitigated?

Common causes of false positives with CSLB3 Antibody and mitigation strategies:

CauseMechanismMitigation Strategy
Non-specific bindingFc receptor interactionsBlock with serum/commercial blockers; use F(ab')2 fragments
Cross-reactivityAntibody binds similar epitopesValidate with knockout controls; perform competitive binding assays
Endogenous peroxidase/phosphataseEnzyme activity creates signalUse appropriate blocking steps; include enzyme inhibitors
AutofluorescenceCellular components emit fluorescenceInclude unstained controls; use spectral unmixing
Inadequate washingResidual antibody creates backgroundOptimize wash steps; include detergent in wash buffers

Validation protocols should include appropriate negative controls, similar to approaches used in flow cytometry with irrelevant biotinylated antibodies as controls to determine specific binding .

How should researchers interpret contradictory results between CSLB3 Antibody and other detection methods?

When facing contradictory results:

  • Evaluate antibody validity:

    • Confirm antibody specificity using knockout/knockdown models

    • Assess lot-to-lot variation with standardized positive controls

    • Verify epitope accessibility under your experimental conditions

  • Consider methodological differences:

    • Flow cytometry detects surface expression while Western blot shows total protein

    • Fixation methods affect epitope preservation differently

    • Sample preparation may alter protein conformation or post-translational modifications

  • Reconcile discrepancies:

    • Use orthogonal methods to validate findings (e.g., mass spectrometry)

    • Employ genetic approaches (siRNA, CRISPR) to confirm target specificity

    • Consider that different detection methods have different sensitivity thresholds

  • Biological considerations:

    • Evaluate splice variants that may lack specific epitopes

    • Assess post-translational modifications that might mask epitopes

    • Consider that protein complexes may sequester epitopes in certain assays

How can CSLB3 Antibody be effectively used in longitudinal studies to track changes in target expression?

For effective use of CSLB3 Antibody in longitudinal studies:

  • Standardization protocol:

    • Use the same antibody lot throughout the study when possible

    • Include calibration standards in each experiment

    • Maintain consistent instrument settings for flow cytometry or imaging

    • Process all timepoints in parallel when feasible

  • Control implementation:

    • Include stable reference samples in each experiment

    • Use internal controls (housekeeping proteins/invariant markers)

    • Employ spike-in standards for normalization

  • Data normalization approaches:

    • Calculate relative expression compared to baseline

    • Use ratio measurements rather than absolute values

    • Apply appropriate statistical methods for repeated measurements

  • Validation of changes:

    • Confirm expression changes with orthogonal methods

    • Correlate with functional outcomes

    • Use appropriate statistical tests for longitudinal data

This approach parallels methodologies used in tracking antibody responses following vaccination, where standardized ELISAs measure changes in antibody levels over time .

How might CSLB3 Antibody be adapted for use with universal CAR platforms like Fabrack-CAR?

Adaptation of CSLB3 Antibody for universal CAR platforms:

  • Meditope engineering: Incorporate meditope-binding sites into the CSLB3 antibody framework to make it compatible with Fabrack-CAR systems, which use a cyclic 12-residue meditope peptide (CQFDLSTRRLQC) as their extracellular domain

  • Optimization considerations:

    • Confirm that meditope engineering doesn't affect antigen binding

    • Test various linker lengths (e.g., PAS linkers like SAPASSASAPSAASAPA)

    • Evaluate inclusion of IgG4 CH3 domains for optimal spacing

  • Combination strategies:

    • CSLB3 could be used alongside other meditope-enabled antibodies to target multiple antigens

    • This approach addresses tumor heterogeneity by targeting multiple antigens simultaneously

    • Sequential or simultaneous administration protocols can be developed

  • Safety mechanisms:

    • Engineer antibody clearance mechanisms to control CAR-T activity

    • Include safety switches responsive to small molecules

    • Develop dosing strategies for the antibody component

This approach builds directly on the Fabrack-CAR technology described in the research, where the antigen specificity of universal CAR-T cells is conferred by administering engineered monoclonal antibodies .

What role might AI-based antibody design play in developing next-generation alternatives to CSLB3?

AI-based approaches for next-generation antibody development:

  • CDRH3 optimization: AI algorithms can generate and optimize CDRH3 sequences for specific antigens, potentially improving upon CSLB3's binding characteristics

  • Multi-parameter optimization:

    • Balance affinity, specificity, and developability simultaneously

    • Design antibodies with optimal tissue penetration

    • Predict and minimize immunogenicity

  • Novel format design:

    • Create bispecific or multispecific variants

    • Optimize antibody-drug conjugate attachment sites

    • Design novel scaffolds with improved tissue penetration

  • Integration with structural biology:

    • Use cryo-EM structures to guide epitope selection

    • Perform in silico affinity maturation based on structural insights

    • Model antibody-antigen interactions at atomic resolution

These approaches parallel the AI-based technologies described for SARS-CoV-2 antibody development, where computational methods bypass the complexity of natural antibody generation while maintaining efficacy .

How can CSLB3 Antibody contribute to understanding target protein dynamics in single-cell studies?

Applications of CSLB3 Antibody in single-cell studies:

  • Single-cell phenotyping:

    • Combine CSLB3 with antibody panels for multi-parameter flow cytometry

    • Integrate into CyTOF/mass cytometry panels for high-dimensional analysis

    • Use for index sorting followed by single-cell sequencing

  • Spatial analysis:

    • Apply in multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging

    • Incorporate into imaging mass cytometry workflows

    • Utilize for CODEX or other highly multiplexed imaging platforms

  • Temporal dynamics:

    • Track protein expression changes in live cells over time

    • Investigate protein relocalization during cellular processes

    • Study protein degradation kinetics at single-cell resolution

  • Correlation with transcriptomics:

    • Combine protein detection with RNA analysis in CITE-seq approaches

    • Correlate protein levels with transcriptional state

    • Identify post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.