The At2g36330 antibody is a polyclonal antibody targeting the Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress) protein encoded by the AT2G36330 gene. This antibody is primarily used for research applications, including ELISA and Western blotting, to study the expression, localization, and function of the At2g36330 protein . The AT2G36330 gene encodes a member of the CASP-like protein family (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 proteins), which are implicated in plant cell wall organization and transmembrane signaling .
The At2g36330 antibody enables detection of the endogenous protein in Arabidopsis tissues via Western blotting, aiding in studies of its spatiotemporal expression patterns .
Preliminary data suggest At2g36330 localizes to the plasma membrane, consistent with its predicted transmembrane domains .
Researchers utilize this antibody to investigate knockout or overexpression mutants, linking At2g36330 to stress responses and developmental pathways .
Limited cross-reactivity: Specific to Arabidopsis thaliana; no confirmed reactivity in other plant species .
Therapeutic exclusion: Not approved for diagnostic or therapeutic use .
Functional ambiguity: Further studies are needed to elucidate its mechanistic role in cell wall dynamics .
Cusabio (2025): Technical specifications and validation data for At2g36330 antibody .
CD BioSciences (2024): Recombinant At2g36330 protein production and functional assays .
KEGG Database: Annotation of AT2G36330 as a member of the UPF0497 family .
PLOS ONE (2019): Structural insights into antibody-antigen interactions .
KEGG: ath:AT2G36330
UniGene: At.44754
The At2g36330 is a gene found in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes proteins involved in specific cellular functions. When investigating this gene product, researchers often utilize antibodies targeting the protein to understand its expression, localization, and interaction patterns. Methodologically, it's important to verify the specificity of your antibody through techniques like Western blotting against wild-type and knockout plant tissues to ensure accurate detection of your target protein .
Antibody validation is critical for ensuring experimental reliability. The most robust validation approach involves a multi-method strategy:
Western blot analysis comparing wild-type and knockout/knockdown plants
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Immunohistochemistry with appropriate controls
Pre-adsorption tests with the immunizing antigen
Similar to how researchers validate antibodies in other systems, this step is crucial before proceeding with extensive experimentation. Validation techniques should address both sensitivity and specificity concerns, as antibody performance can vary significantly based on the application context .
For optimal Western blot performance:
| Parameter | Recommended Condition | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Blocking solution | 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST | Minimizes background while preserving epitope accessibility |
| Primary antibody dilution | 1:1000 to 1:5000 (optimize) | Balance between signal strength and background |
| Incubation temperature | 4°C | Promotes specific binding while reducing background |
| Incubation time | Overnight | Allows complete antibody-antigen interaction |
| Washing buffer | TBST (0.1% Tween-20) | Removes unbound antibody effectively |
These parameters should be optimized for each specific antibody lot, as subtle variations in antibody production can affect optimal conditions. Advanced researchers might consider epitope mapping to understand antibody binding characteristics, similar to approaches used in therapeutic antibody development .
For investigating protein-protein interactions involving At2g36330-encoded proteins, consider these methodological approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use the At2g36330 antibody to pull down the target protein and its interacting partners, followed by mass spectrometry analysis. This approach allows identification of protein complexes in their native state.
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID): This technique can reveal transient or weak interactions that might be missed by traditional Co-IP.
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy: When combined with immunolabeling, this can visualize protein interactions in situ.
Similar to how researchers investigate complex antibody binding mechanisms in therapeutic contexts, these techniques allow exploration of functional protein networks in plant systems .
Cross-reactivity challenges can significantly impact experimental outcomes. Advanced strategies include:
Epitope mapping to identify unique regions for antibody generation
Competitive binding assays with recombinant proteins
Sequential immunoprecipitation to remove cross-reactive proteins
Computational analysis of potential cross-reactive epitopes
These approaches mirror strategies used in therapeutic antibody development, where specificity is crucial. For example, bispecific antibody engineering techniques have demonstrated that careful epitope selection can minimize unwanted cross-reactivity while maintaining target binding efficiency .
Genetic modifications can significantly impact antibody recognition in several ways:
Point mutations may alter epitope structure
Alternative splicing can remove binding regions
Post-translational modifications can mask epitopes
Protein conformational changes can affect accessibility
When interpreting contradictory results, consider performing epitope mapping to identify which specific regions your antibody recognizes. This approach is similar to how researchers analyze escape variants in SARS-CoV-2, where specific mutations can prevent antibody recognition .
The choice of fixation method significantly impacts antibody performance in immunolocalization studies:
| Fixation Method | Advantages | Disadvantages | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paraformaldehyde (4%) | Preserves protein structure | May mask some epitopes | General localization studies |
| Methanol | Enhances accessibility of some epitopes | Can denature proteins | Cytoskeletal proteins |
| Glutaraldehyde | Superior ultrastructure preservation | Strong autofluorescence | Electron microscopy |
| Acetone | Minimal epitope masking | Poor structural preservation | Hydrophobic proteins |
The optimal fixation method should be empirically determined for each antibody-antigen pair. In cases where standard methods fail, consider employing modern approaches like expansion microscopy to improve epitope accessibility .
For quantitative analysis of protein expression:
Quantitative Western blotting: Use internal loading controls and standard curves with recombinant protein standards.
ELISA: Develop a sandwich ELISA using capture and detection antibodies for absolute quantification.
Immunohistochemistry with digital image analysis: Employ machine learning algorithms to quantify signal intensity across tissue sections.
Flow cytometry: When working with protoplasts or isolated cells, this technique allows high-throughput quantification at the single-cell level.
Each method has specific advantages for different research questions. When analyzing contradictory results between methods, consider whether differences reflect technical artifacts or biological variability .
When encountering non-specific binding:
Titrate antibody concentration to find optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Modify blocking conditions (type, concentration, time)
Increase washing stringency (higher salt, detergent concentration)
Pre-adsorb antibody with total protein extract from knockout plants
Consider different antibody clones that recognize different epitopes
These approaches are similar to strategies used in therapeutic antibody development, where non-specific binding can lead to off-target effects. Careful optimization of experimental conditions is essential for reliable results .
Single-molecule analysis can provide unique insights into protein behavior:
Single-molecule pull-down (SiMPull): Combining immunoprecipitation with single-molecule fluorescence imaging to analyze protein complexes at the individual molecule level.
Single-molecule tracking: Label antibodies with quantum dots or fluorescent dyes for long-term tracking of protein movement in living cells.
Quantitative super-resolution microscopy: Techniques like STORM or PALM combined with antibody labeling can reveal nanoscale protein organization.
These advanced approaches require careful antibody validation to ensure that labeling doesn't interfere with protein function. Similar considerations are important when engineering therapeutic antibodies, where binding should not disrupt normal protein activities unless intended .
When developing monoclonal antibodies:
Antigen design: Consider using full-length protein versus specific domains or peptides
Immunization strategy: Compare conventional approaches versus phage display technologies
Screening method selection: Design screens that reflect the intended application
Epitope diversity: Select clones recognizing different regions for comprehensive analysis
This approach mirrors strategies used in therapeutic antibody development, where careful epitope selection and antibody engineering can significantly impact functionality. Modern antibody engineering techniques can also be applied to improve specificity, affinity, or other desired characteristics .
Computational methods can significantly enhance antibody-based research:
Epitope prediction: Identify likely antibody binding regions through sequence and structural analysis
Cross-reactivity assessment: Predict potential off-target binding through proteome-wide sequence similarity searches
Structural modeling: Predict antibody-antigen interactions through molecular modeling
Machine learning for image analysis: Enhance detection and quantification in immunofluorescence studies
These computational approaches can guide experimental design and interpretation, similar to how such tools are used in therapeutic antibody development to optimize binding properties and minimize unwanted interactions .
CRISPR technologies offer powerful approaches when combined with antibody-based detection:
CRISPR knock-in of epitope tags: Generate plants with tagged At2g36330 protein for enhanced detection
CUT&Tag: Combine CRISPR-based targeting with antibody recognition for high-resolution chromatin mapping
CRISPR activation/repression: Use antibodies to verify protein level changes following CRISPR-mediated gene expression modulation
CRISPR screens with antibody-based readouts: Identify factors affecting At2g36330 protein expression or localization
These advanced applications represent the cutting edge of plant molecular biology research, integrating genomic and proteomic approaches for comprehensive functional analysis .
Post-translational modification (PTM)-specific antibodies require special considerations:
Modification-mimicking peptides: Design immunogens that accurately represent the desired PTM
Negative selection: Remove antibodies that bind unmodified protein during screening
Validation with PTM-blocking treatments: Verify specificity using phosphatase, deacetylase, or other enzyme treatments
Mass spectrometry confirmation: Verify that the recognized PTM occurs naturally and at the correct position
These approaches are similar to strategies used in developing therapeutic antibodies that target specific protein conformations or modifications. Careful validation is essential to ensure the antibody recognizes only the modified form of interest .