The At2g37200 protein is a member of the CASP (Casparian strip membrane domain protein)-like family, though its specific biological role remains under investigation. Key features include:
Molecular weight: Not explicitly reported; inferred from recombinant production methods .
Domain structure: Presumed transmembrane domains based on sequence homology .
Expression system: Recombinant versions are produced in E. coli for antibody generation and functional studies .
Commercial sources provide recombinant At2g37200 protein and associated antibodies:
Parameter | Details |
---|---|
Product Code | CSB-CF764648DOA |
Source | In vitro E. coli expression system |
Purity | High (exact percentage unspecified) |
Applications | Western blotting, immunoprecipitation (inferred from typical uses) |
Cross-reactivity | Specific to Arabidopsis thaliana; untested in other species |
Data derived from manufacturer specifications .
Localization studies: Investigating subcellular distribution in Arabidopsis tissues.
Protein interaction screens: Identifying binding partners via co-immunoprecipitation.
Gene knockout validation: Confirming absence of At2g37200 in mutant lines.
No peer-reviewed studies directly using this antibody were identified in the surveyed literature.
Functional hypotheses remain untested (e.g., potential role in Casparian strip formation).
Structural characterization: Cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography to resolve 3D architecture.
Phenotypic analysis: Comparative studies of Arabidopsis mutants under abiotic stresses.
Interactome mapping: Systematic identification of binding partners using affinity purification.
At2g37200 is the gene locus encoding CASPL5A1 (CASP-LIKE PROTEIN 5A1) in Arabidopsis thaliana, commonly known as mouse-ear cress. This protein belongs to the Casparian strip membrane domain protein-like family, which plays crucial roles in plant development, particularly in forming diffusion barriers in plant roots. Research into this protein contributes to understanding fundamental plant cellular processes, stress responses, and developmental biology. The gene has been identified in comprehensive genomic studies of Arabidopsis, as documented in recent research annotations .
When selecting an At2g37200 antibody, researchers should consider multiple factors that impact experimental success. The antibody should target unique epitopes of CASPL5A1 that don't cross-react with other CASP family members. Given the documented issues with antibody specificity in related research fields, validation is critical . Researchers should evaluate the immunogen used (full protein vs. peptide), host species, clonality (monoclonal vs. polyclonal), and documented validation methods. Additionally, the intended application (Western blot, immunohistochemistry, etc.) should guide selection, as antibodies may perform differently across applications.
At2g37200 antibodies serve multiple purposes in plant molecular biology research:
Western blotting for expression level analysis and protein size verification
Immunolocalization studies to determine subcellular localization
Co-immunoprecipitation for identifying protein interaction partners
Chromatin immunoprecipitation if relevant to transcriptional regulation
ELISA for quantitative analysis of protein abundance
Each application requires specific validation protocols to ensure reliable results, particularly as commercial antibodies have been shown to exhibit variable specificity in research contexts .
Rigorous validation is essential given the documented concerns about commercial antibody specificity . A comprehensive validation approach should include:
Western blot analysis comparing wild-type and knockout/knockdown Arabidopsis lines
Preabsorption tests with the immunizing antigen or recombinant CASPL5A1
Testing for cross-reactivity with other CASP family members
Comparison of immunostaining patterns across multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Mass spectrometry verification of immunoprecipitated proteins
Testing on tissue from knockout plants is particularly critical, as research has shown that some commercial antibodies produce identical immunoreactive patterns in both wild-type and knockout tissues lacking the target protein .
Multiple factors can compromise antibody specificity when working with plant proteins:
Cross-reactivity with related CASP family proteins due to sequence homology
Post-translational modifications that alter epitope accessibility
Protein conformational changes in different experimental conditions
Variability in antibody production methods and quality control
Matrix effects from plant tissue components
Research has shown that commercially available antibodies often recognize multiple unintended proteins, producing different immunostaining patterns even when targeting the same protein . For membrane-associated proteins like CASPL5A1, detergent selection and concentration can significantly impact epitope availability.
Antibody databases like PLAbDab (Patent and Literature Antibody Database) provide valuable resources for antibody selection and validation. These databases contain information on antibody sequences, structures, and functional annotations from both patents and scientific literature . Researchers can:
Identify previously validated antibodies for similar targets
Assess sequence similarity between antibodies for related targets
Reference validation methods used in published research
Compare epitope targets across different commercial antibodies
The PLAbDab contains approximately 150,000 entries, with around 10,000-30,000 new antibody sequences being published annually in recent years .
Optimizing Western blot protocols for At2g37200 detection requires systematic evaluation of multiple parameters:
Parameter | Recommended Optimization Approach |
---|---|
Extraction buffer | Test multiple buffers with different detergents (RIPA, NP-40, Triton X-100) |
Protein loading | Titrate from 10-50 μg of total protein |
Transfer method | Compare wet and semi-dry transfer efficiency |
Blocking agent | Test BSA vs. milk at different concentrations (3-5%) |
Antibody dilution | Test serial dilutions (1:500 to 1:5000) |
Incubation time | Compare overnight at 4°C vs. 2 hours at room temperature |
Secondary antibody | Optimize dilution and incubation parameters |
Detection method | Compare chemiluminescence vs. fluorescent detection |
Each parameter should be systematically evaluated while holding others constant. Additionally, researchers should include appropriate positive controls (recombinant CASPL5A1 protein) and negative controls (knockout plant tissue) .
For successful immunolocalization of At2g37200/CASPL5A1 in plant tissues:
Evaluate multiple fixation methods (paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, methanol)
Test different embedding media for optimal tissue preservation
Compare antigen retrieval techniques if necessary
Optimize permeabilization protocols for membrane protein access
Include co-localization with known subcellular markers
Use super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization studies
Always include knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls
Research on other antibodies has demonstrated that different commercial antibodies for the same target can show dramatically different cellular staining patterns, highlighting the importance of validation .
When investigating protein interactions involving CASPL5A1:
Optimize cell lysis conditions to preserve native interactions
Consider chemical crosslinking to capture transient interactions
Use sequential co-immunoprecipitation to verify complex formation
Confirm interactions with reciprocal pulldowns
Validate findings with orthogonal methods (yeast two-hybrid, BiFC)
Consider proximity labeling approaches (BioID, APEX) for in vivo interactions
Use negative controls (unrelated antibodies, IgG) and positive controls (known interactors)
For membrane proteins like CASPL5A1, detergent selection is particularly critical, as it must solubilize the protein without disrupting native interactions.
For quantitative analysis of CASPL5A1 expression:
Develop calibrated ELISA assays using recombinant protein standards
Employ quantitative Western blotting with internal reference proteins
Use image analysis software for quantification of immunofluorescence signals
Apply multiplexed detection methods to analyze CASPL5A1 alongside other proteins
Integrate protein-level data with transcriptomic information
Normalization approaches similar to those used in studies of autoantibody responses can be applied, such as converting fluorescence values to Z-scores based on reference distributions .
When studying CASPL5A1 regulation under stress conditions:
Include time-course experiments to capture dynamic changes
Compare multiple stress conditions (drought, salt, temperature)
Analyze both soluble and membrane fractions separately
Consider post-translational modifications that may occur during stress
Use phospho-specific antibodies if phosphorylation is relevant
Combine protein-level analysis with transcriptional studies
Include appropriate stress-responsive control proteins
Creating control distributions from diverse sample types, as described in autoantibody research methodologies, can help distinguish specific changes from non-specific binding effects .
Distinguishing CASPL5A1 from related family members requires:
Designing experiments targeting unique sequence regions
Using multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes
Including family member-specific knockout controls
Performing competitive binding assays with recombinant proteins
Validating findings with mass spectrometry
Considering epitope tagging approaches as alternatives
Sequence alignment and epitope mapping are essential to identify regions unique to CASPL5A1 compared to other family members in Arabidopsis.
Multiple factors contribute to experimental variability:
Antibody lot-to-lot inconsistency
Variations in plant growth conditions affecting protein expression
Sample preparation differences (extraction methods, buffers)
Technical variations in experimental protocols
Cross-reactivity with closely related proteins
Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition
Implementing standardized protocols and including appropriate controls can help minimize these variables. Issues with antibody specificity have been extensively documented in other research areas, emphasizing the need for rigorous validation .
When facing contradictory results:
Review the epitopes targeted by each antibody
Verify antibody specificity using knockout/knockdown controls
Consider whether post-translational modifications affect epitope accessibility
Test alternative experimental conditions for each antibody
Use orthogonal, non-antibody-based methods to validate findings
Consider that different antibodies may recognize different isoforms or modified forms
Research has shown that antibodies against the same target can produce dramatically different results, even when obtained from reputable commercial sources .
To ensure reproducible research:
Maintain detailed records of antibody sources, lot numbers, and validation data
Implement standardized protocols for all antibody-based applications
Include appropriate positive and negative controls in each experiment
Periodically revalidate antibodies, especially with new lots
Consider using recombinant antibodies when available for greater consistency
Archive antibody aliquots for long-term studies
Document all experimental conditions in publications
Adopting quality control measures similar to those used in antibody databases like PLAbDab can significantly improve reproducibility .