Functional Role of AT2G39518: The gene encodes a protein of unknown function, though its homologs in other plants suggest potential roles in stress responses or cellular metabolism.
Experimental Use: The antibody was utilized in a 2023 study to immunoprecipitate RNA-protein complexes in Arabidopsis infected with Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, indicating its utility in plant-pathogen interaction research .
Specificity Concerns: While not directly tested for AT2G39518, independent studies highlight widespread issues with nonspecific binding in commercial plant antibodies. For example, angiotensin II receptor antibodies showed identical staining patterns in wild-type and knockout mice, raising questions about reliability .
Recommended Verification: Users should perform knockout controls or mass spectrometry validation to confirm target specificity.
Functional Studies: Reverse genetics using CRISPR/Cas9 could clarify AT2G39518’s role, with the antibody serving as a detection tool.
Cross-Reactivity Screening: Given epitope similarities in plant proteins, testing against phylogenetically related species (e.g., Brassica napus) is advised.
At2g39518 is an Arabidopsis thaliana gene locus coding for a protein involved in plant cellular processes. Antibodies against this protein are essential research tools for studying protein localization, expression patterns, and functional characterization in plant biology. The development of specific antibodies enables researchers to track this protein's distribution at subcellular, cellular, and tissue levels, providing critical insights into its biological function and regulatory networks in plant development .
Antibodies targeting Arabidopsis proteins like At2g39518 have become invaluable for integrative systems biology approaches, where understanding protein localization contributes to deciphering protein-protein interactions and regulatory networks. These antibodies facilitate research in multiple experimental contexts including immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and co-immunoprecipitation studies .
Antibodies against Arabidopsis proteins like At2g39518 are typically generated using two main approaches:
The recombinant protein approach is generally more successful, with studies showing that approximately 55% (38 of 70) of antibodies generated using this method could detect their target proteins with high confidence .
Validation of At2g39518 antibody specificity should follow a multi-step process to ensure reliability:
| Validation Method | Description | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Western blotting | Detection of protein band at expected molecular weight | Single band of predicted size; absence in knockout/mutant |
| Immunolocalization | In situ detection in fixed tissues | Specific signal pattern; absence in knockout/mutant |
| RNA expression correlation | Comparison with RNA-seq or RT-PCR data | Medium to high consistency between protein and RNA expression patterns |
| Independent antibody validation | Testing with two independently raised antibodies | Similar staining patterns between different antibodies |
| Orthogonal validation | Verification using complementary methods (e.g., GFP fusion) | Consistent localization between antibody and orthogonal method |
For enhanced validation, the antibody should meet stringent criteria based on orthogonal validation or independent antibody validation strategies . When possible, the antibody should be tested against corresponding mutant backgrounds to confirm specificity. A complete absence of signal in the mutant background provides strong evidence for antibody specificity .
For optimal results in immunolocalization studies with At2g39518 antibody, follow this methodological approach:
Tissue preparation: Fix Arabidopsis root or shoot tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. After fixation, embed tissues in paraffin or prepare for whole-mount immunolocalization.
Sectioning and permeabilization: For paraffin sections, cut 5-10 μm sections. For whole-mount, permeabilize with 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 minutes. Block non-specific binding with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 hour.
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute the At2g39518 antibody at 1:100 to 1:500 (determine optimal dilution empirically) in blocking solution. Incubate overnight at 4°C.
Washing and secondary antibody: Wash 3 times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20. Incubate with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500 dilution) for 2 hours at room temperature.
Final washes and mounting: Wash 3 times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20. Mount in anti-fade mounting medium containing DAPI for nuclear counterstaining.
Controls: Always include negative controls (secondary antibody only, pre-immune serum) and, if available, tissues from At2g39518 knockout/mutant plants .
The success rate of immunocytochemistry-grade antibodies for Arabidopsis proteins is approximately 30% (22 of 70 antibodies), so optimization may be necessary for specific experimental conditions .
When performing Western blot analysis with At2g39518 antibody, consider these critical methodological factors:
Protein extraction: Use a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitor cocktail. Plant tissues often contain interfering compounds, so include 2% PVPP and 5 mM DTT to prevent oxidation.
Sample preparation: Heat samples at 70°C for 10 minutes (rather than boiling) to reduce protein aggregation. Load 10-30 μg total protein per lane.
Gel electrophoresis and transfer: Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels and transfer to PVDF membranes (preferred over nitrocellulose for plant proteins).
Blocking and antibody incubation: Block with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST. Use At2g39518 antibody at 1:1000 to 1:5000 dilution (optimize empirically). Extend primary antibody incubation to overnight at 4°C for better results.
Detection: Use enhanced chemiluminescence with exposure times of 30 seconds to 5 minutes. For low abundance proteins, consider using more sensitive detection systems or signal enhancement methods.
Validation: Always include positive controls (tissues known to express At2g39518) and negative controls (At2g39518 mutant/knockdown tissues if available) .
The expected molecular weight of the At2g39518 protein should be determined based on its amino acid sequence, and the observed band size should match this prediction for proper identification.
For detecting At2g39518 protein in tissues with low expression levels, implement these methodological enhancements:
Antibody affinity purification: Affinity purification of antibodies can significantly improve detection sensitivity. Studies have shown that affinity purification "massively improved the detection rate" for plant protein antibodies .
Signal amplification methods:
Use tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for immunohistochemistry, which can increase sensitivity 10-100 fold
Employ biotin-streptavidin amplification systems for Western blots
Consider using quantum dot-conjugated secondary antibodies for enhanced fluorescence detection
Sample enrichment techniques:
Perform subcellular fractionation to concentrate the protein of interest
Use immunoprecipitation prior to Western blotting
Enrich for membrane proteins if At2g39518 is membrane-associated
Reducing background:
Extend blocking times to 2-3 hours
Include 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 in antibody dilution buffers
Use more stringent washing conditions (higher salt concentration)
Pre-absorb antibodies with plant extracts from At2g39518 knockout plants
Detection optimization:
Implementing these techniques can improve detection sensitivity by 2-10 fold, making it possible to detect proteins even when expressed at very low levels.
Computational modeling approaches can significantly enhance At2g39518 antibody development through these methodological strategies:
Epitope prediction and optimization:
Implement Rosetta-based approaches to model the protein-antibody binding interface
Use dTERMen, an informatics approach, to generate predictions for mutations that improve binding
Apply sliding window analysis to identify epitopes with <40% sequence similarity to other Arabidopsis proteins
Structural modeling for discontinuous epitopes:
Model tertiary structure to identify discontinuous epitopes that involve distant subsequences brought together by protein folding
Predict conformational stability of epitopes to ensure they maintain native structure
Affinity maturation pipelines:
Integrate computational modeling with experimental library screening to increase antibody affinity
Create phage display libraries of scFvs incorporating predicted mutations
Screen libraries for binding affinity to the recombinant antigen
Incorporate favorable mutations into final antibody constructs
This integrated approach can improve antibody affinity by up to 60-fold (KD improvement from 0.63 nM to 0.01 nM has been demonstrated in similar applications) . For plant proteins like At2g39518, computational modeling should account for potential post-translational modifications specific to plant systems.
When At2g39518 belongs to a multi-gene family with high sequence similarity among members, these specialized approaches can minimize cross-reactivity:
Unique region targeting:
Validation in genetic backgrounds:
Test antibody specificity in plants with mutations in At2g39518
Examine cross-reactivity with closely related family members using overexpression lines
Use RNA interference or CRISPR knockdown lines to validate specificity
Epitope engineering:
Introduce subtle mutations in recombinant proteins to enhance uniqueness
Design peptides spanning junctions between domains that are less conserved
Generate competitive peptides for blocking cross-reactive epitopes
Advanced purification strategies:
Perform negative selection against related family members
Use sequential affinity purification to remove cross-reactive antibodies
Consider subtractive immunization protocols
When it is impossible to obtain a unique sequence of sufficient size, researchers should consider developing "family-specific" antibodies and then using genetic or biochemical approaches to distinguish between family members in experimental contexts .
At2g39518 antibody can be leveraged for sophisticated protein interaction and regulatory network analyses through these methodological applications:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) studies:
Use At2g39518 antibody conjugated to magnetic or agarose beads
Isolate protein complexes from plant tissues under native conditions
Identify interaction partners using mass spectrometry
Validate interactions with reciprocal Co-IP using antibodies against putative partners
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) applications:
If At2g39518 protein has DNA-binding properties, perform ChIP to identify genomic binding sites
Combine with sequencing (ChIP-seq) for genome-wide binding profile
Integrate with transcriptome data to identify regulated genes
Proximity-dependent labeling:
Engineer fusion proteins combining At2g39518 with BioID or APEX2
Use antibodies to validate expression and localization of fusion proteins
Identify proximal proteins through streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry
Dynamic protein localization:
Track protein redistribution during different developmental stages or stress responses
Perform co-localization studies with markers for different organelles
Quantify protein levels in different subcellular compartments
Protein modification analysis:
These approaches enable researchers to move beyond simple localization studies to understand the functional role of At2g39518 in plant cellular systems, particularly in protein-protein interactions and regulatory networks important for plant development and response to environmental conditions.
When facing discrepancies between antibody detection and RNA expression data for At2g39518, implement this systematic troubleshooting approach:
Assess antibody reliability score:
Analyze potential biological explanations:
Post-transcriptional regulation may cause protein levels to differ from RNA levels
Protein turnover rates can affect steady-state protein abundance
Tissue-specific translational control may explain localized discrepancies
Examine technical factors:
RNA detection methods may have different sensitivity than protein detection
Protein extraction efficiency can vary between tissues
Antibody accessibility to epitopes may be affected by protein folding or interactions
Apply RNA similarity scoring:
| RNA Similarity Score | Definition | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| High consistency | Strong correlation between RNA and protein | Reliable antibody performance |
| Medium consistency | Moderate correlation with some variation | Generally reliable with caveats |
| Low consistency | Poor correlation with significant discrepancies | Requires additional validation |
| Very low consistency | No correlation between RNA and protein data | May indicate antibody problems |
| Cannot be evaluated | Insufficient data for comparison | Additional tests needed |
Validation strategies:
A comprehensive analysis combining these approaches can help determine whether discrepancies represent technical issues with the antibody or interesting biological phenomena worth further investigation.
For rigorous quantification of At2g39518 protein levels in comparative studies, implement these statistical and methodological approaches:
Experimental design considerations:
Quantification methods:
For Western blots: Use densitometry with appropriate normalization to loading controls
For immunohistochemistry: Implement fluorescence intensity measurement with background subtraction
For flow cytometry: Calculate mean fluorescence intensity with appropriate gating strategies
Statistical analysis framework:
| Analysis Type | Application | Statistical Method |
|---|---|---|
| Two-group comparison | Comparing mutant vs. WT | Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test |
| Multi-group comparison | Multiple treatments or genotypes | One-way ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests |
| Time-course or developmental series | Expression changes over time | Repeated measures ANOVA or mixed-effects models |
| Correlation analysis | Relationship to physiological parameters | Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient |
Data normalization strategies:
Normalize to stable reference proteins (not housekeeping genes that may vary)
Consider global normalization methods for large-scale studies
Implement variance stabilizing transformations for heteroscedastic data
Reporting standards:
Following these rigorous quantification approaches ensures that comparative studies of At2g39518 protein expression yield reliable, reproducible, and statistically sound results.
To effectively differentiate between specific and non-specific binding in At2g39518 antibody applications, implement this comprehensive validation framework:
Controls for specificity determination:
Genetic controls: Test in At2g39518 knockout/mutant tissues (gold standard)
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide/protein
Isotype controls: Use matched isotype antibody from non-immunized animals
Secondary-only controls: Omit primary antibody to detect non-specific secondary binding
Signal evaluation criteria:
| Observation | Interpretation | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| Single band of expected size | Likely specific binding | Proceed with experiments |
| Multiple bands including expected size | Partial specificity | Consider affinity purification |
| Bands in knockout tissue | Non-specific binding | Optimize conditions or reject antibody |
| Background staining in all tissues | Poor signal-to-noise ratio | Modify blocking or antibody concentration |
Optimization approaches:
Test a range of antibody dilutions (1:100 to 1:10,000)
Modify blocking agents (BSA, non-fat milk, normal serum)
Adjust detergent concentration in wash buffers
Implement antigen retrieval methods for fixed tissues
Advanced validation methods:
For immunohistochemistry applications, the pattern of staining should be consistent with the expected subcellular localization and tissue distribution based on transcript data. The signal should be absent or significantly reduced in knockout/mutant tissues, providing strong evidence for antibody specificity .
Nanobody technology offers several methodological advantages for At2g39518 protein research compared to conventional antibodies:
Enhanced epitope accessibility:
Nanobodies (15 kDa) are significantly smaller than conventional antibodies (150 kDa)
Their small size allows access to epitopes in protein complexes or membrane proteins that may be inaccessible to conventional antibodies
This is particularly valuable for studying structural proteins or those in crowded cellular environments
Superior specificity for active sites:
Improved intracellular applications:
Nanobodies can be expressed intracellularly as "intrabodies"
They maintain stability in the reducing intracellular environment
This allows real-time tracking of native At2g39518 in living cells
Research applications comparison:
| Application | Conventional Antibodies | Nanobodies | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western blotting | Standard practice | Comparable performance | Similar results |
| Immunoprecipitation | Requires secondary capture | Direct coupling possible | Cleaner results |
| Live cell imaging | Limited to surface proteins | Intracellular expression | Dynamic studies |
| Crystallography | Rare success | Frequent crystallization chaperones | Structural insights |
| Therapeutic potential | Clinical use established | Clinical trials underway | Less immunogenicity |
Production advantages:
The ability of nanobodies to target At2g39518 could provide new insights into protein function while offering research tools with potentially superior specificity and versatility compared to conventional antibodies.
Recent technological advances enable sophisticated multiplexed detection of At2g39518 alongside other proteins through these methodological approaches:
Multiplex immunofluorescence techniques:
Sequential multiplexing: Sequential staining and stripping/quenching approaches
Spectral unmixing: Using spectrally overlapping fluorophores with computational separation
DNA-barcoded antibodies: Antibodies tagged with unique DNA sequences for multiplexed detection
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) adaptations for plant tissues:
Metal-tagged antibodies enable simultaneous detection of >40 proteins
Sample preparation protocols adapted for plant cell walls
Computational analysis approaches for high-dimensional data interpretation
Proximity ligation assays (PLA):
Detect protein-protein interactions involving At2g39518
Only generate signal when two target proteins are within 40 nm
Can be multiplexed using different oligonucleotide pairs
Multiplexed Western blotting approaches:
| Method | Principle | Protein Capacity | Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescent multiplex | Different fluorophores | 4-5 proteins | No stripping required |
| Sequential ECL | Strip and reprobe | Unlimited (sequential) | Works with existing antibodies |
| Capillary immunoassay | Size separation in capillaries | 12+ proteins | Minimal sample requirement |
Spatial transcriptomics integration:
These multiplexed approaches enable researchers to study At2g39518 in the context of its interacting partners and signaling networks, providing a systems-level understanding of its function in plant biology.
The implementation of enhanced validation standards for At2g39518 antibodies will transform research reliability through these systematic improvements:
Multi-tier validation framework:
Validation criteria integration:
| Validation Level | Required Evidence | Impact on Research |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced | Orthogonal validation or independent antibody validation | Highest confidence for critical studies |
| Supported | RNA consistency and literature consistency | Suitable for exploratory research |
| Approved | Partial RNA consistency or literature support | Requires additional controls |
| Uncertain | Inconsistent with RNA or literature | Should be used with extreme caution |
Methodology standardization benefits:
Reduction in contradictory research findings
Improved reproducibility across laboratories
Enhanced ability to compare results between studies
More efficient resource utilization by preventing use of unreliable reagents
Implementation in repository systems:
Impact on discovery of poorly characterized proteins:
The adoption of these enhanced validation standards will significantly increase confidence in At2g39518 antibody research, leading to more reproducible results and accelerating scientific discovery in plant biology.