KEGG: ath:AT4G37235
UniGene: At.49765
At4g37235 (also known as AP22.102, CASP-like protein 5C1, or AtCASPL5C1) is a gene encoding a member of the Casparian strip membrane proteins (CASP) family in Arabidopsis thaliana. This protein is localized to the cell membrane as a multi-pass membrane protein, suggesting its involvement in membrane transport or signaling processes. The CASP family proteins are primarily known for their role in forming Casparian strips in plant roots, which are critical barrier-like structures that control the selective passage of water and nutrients.
The At4g37235 Antibody is typically available as a liquid formulation preserved in 0.03% Proclin 300 with 50% Glycerol in 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) at pH 7.4. Commercial preparations are often made-to-order with extended lead times (approximately 14-16 weeks), reflecting the specialized nature of this research reagent. The antibody targets the product of the At4g37235 gene, which has the UniProt accession number Q66GI1.
The At4g37235 Antibody can be utilized in various molecular and cellular biology techniques, including:
Western blotting for protein expression analysis
Immunohistochemistry for localization studies in plant tissues
Immunoprecipitation for protein-protein interaction studies
Immunofluorescence for subcellular localization
ELISA for quantitative protein detection
For optimal results in each application, researchers should conduct preliminary validation experiments to determine appropriate dilutions and conditions.
To preserve antibody activity, At4g37235 Antibody should be stored according to manufacturer recommendations, typically at -20°C to -70°C for long-term storage . For working solutions, storage at 2-8°C under sterile conditions is generally appropriate for up to one month . Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as these can significantly reduce antibody affinity and specificity. When handling the antibody, use sterile techniques and avoid contamination with microorganisms.
When designing Western blot experiments with At4g37235 Antibody, include the following controls:
Positive control: Known sample expressing At4g37235 protein
Negative control: Sample from knockout or knockdown plants
Loading control: Detection of a constitutively expressed protein (e.g., actin or tubulin)
Primary antibody control: Omitting primary antibody to detect non-specific binding
Secondary antibody control: Using secondary antibody alone to detect background
Blocking peptide control: Pre-incubating the antibody with the immunizing peptide
These controls help distinguish specific signals from background and validate antibody specificity.
For optimal immunohistochemistry results with At4g37235 Antibody:
Fixation: Test different fixatives (4% paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde) to preserve epitope accessibility
Antigen retrieval: Compare heat-induced and enzymatic methods
Blocking: Use 3-5% BSA or normal serum from the species of the secondary antibody
Antibody dilution: Test a range of antibody dilutions (typically starting at 1:100 to 1:1000)
Incubation conditions: Compare overnight incubation at 4°C versus shorter periods at room temperature
Detection system: Select appropriate secondary antibodies and visualization methods
Counterstaining: Use suitable counterstains to provide tissue context
Document each parameter systematically to identify optimal conditions for specific plant tissues.
As a member of the CASP family, At4g37235 (AtCASPL5C1) likely contributes to the highly organized membrane domain formation necessary for Casparian strip development. The CASP proteins act as scaffolds that define the location of the Casparian strip by recruiting lignin biosynthesis machinery. Research methodologies to study this include:
Confocal microscopy with fluorescently-tagged At4g37235 to track localization during Casparian strip formation
Immunogold electron microscopy using At4g37235 Antibody to determine precise subcellular localization
Co-immunoprecipitation with At4g37235 Antibody to identify interaction partners
Genetic approaches using knockout/knockdown lines to assess functional significance
Propidium iodide penetration assays to assess barrier function in mutant plants
These techniques help establish the spatial and temporal dynamics of At4g37235 during barrier formation.
To investigate post-translational modifications (PTMs) of At4g37235:
Phosphorylation analysis:
Immunoprecipitate At4g37235 and analyze by phospho-specific antibodies
Use mass spectrometry to identify phosphorylation sites
Apply phosphatase inhibitors during protein extraction
Glycosylation studies:
Use glycosidase treatments followed by Western blotting
Perform lectin binding assays
Employ mass spectrometry for glycan identification
Ubiquitination detection:
Immunoprecipitate with At4g37235 Antibody and probe with anti-ubiquitin antibodies
Use proteasome inhibitors to accumulate ubiquitinated proteins
Sequential extraction techniques to assess protein compartmentalization and modification states
These approaches can reveal regulatory mechanisms controlling At4g37235 function.
To identify and validate protein-protein interactions involving At4g37235:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use At4g37235 Antibody to pull down protein complexes
Analyze interacting partners by mass spectrometry
Proximity labeling techniques:
Express At4g37235 fused to BioID or APEX2
Identify nearby proteins through biotinylation and subsequent purification
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Use At4g37235 as bait to screen plant cDNA libraries
Validate interactions with directed Y2H assays
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):
Express At4g37235 and candidate interactors as fusion proteins with split fluorescent protein fragments
Visualize interactions through reconstituted fluorescence
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):
Tag At4g37235 and potential partners with appropriate fluorophores
Measure energy transfer indicating molecular proximity
These methods provide complementary information about the At4g37235 interactome.
To minimize non-specific binding in immunoassays:
Optimize blocking solutions:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, non-fat milk, normal serum)
Adjust blocking time and temperature
Improve antibody conditions:
Titrate antibody concentration to determine optimal dilution
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 or Tween-20 to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Pre-absorb antibody with plant extract from negative control samples
Modify wash steps:
Increase number and duration of washes
Use higher salt concentration in wash buffers (150-500 mM NaCl)
Filter primary antibody solution through 0.22 μm filter before use to remove aggregates
For tissue sections, include an avidin/biotin blocking step if using biotin-based detection systems
Systematically test these modifications to determine which provides optimal signal-to-noise ratio.
If antibody performance deteriorates:
Assess storage conditions:
Verify proper storage temperature
Check for evidence of contamination
Confirm absence of repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Test activity with a reference sample:
Compare current results with historical positive controls
Quantify signal intensity decrease
Perform antibody validation:
Re-test specificity using knockout/knockdown samples
Confirm epitope integrity using peptide competition
Consider antibody stabilization:
Add carrier protein (BSA) to diluted antibody
Supplement with sodium azide (0.02%) as preservative
Aliquot stock solution to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
If necessary, request a new lot of antibody and perform lot-to-lot comparison
Document all troubleshooting steps to identify the source of performance decline.
To evaluate cross-reactivity across plant species:
Sequence homology analysis:
Perform BLAST searches to identify At4g37235 homologs in target species
Align protein sequences to assess conservation of the antibody epitope
Western blot validation:
Test protein extracts from multiple species in parallel
Include positive (Arabidopsis) and negative controls
Verify band size corresponds to predicted molecular weight in each species
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry:
Confirm pulled-down protein identity matches expected homolog
Preabsorption control:
Preincubate antibody with recombinant proteins or synthetic peptides from target species
Compare immunostaining with and without preabsorption
Validate with genetic approaches:
Test antibody on knockout/knockdown lines from related species if available
Cross-reactivity assessment is crucial for comparative studies across plant lineages.
When analyzing differential expression patterns:
Establish baseline expression:
Quantify At4g37235 levels in multiple tissue types under standard conditions
Create expression maps showing relative protein abundance
Consider developmental context:
Compare expression at different developmental stages
Correlate with known physiological transitions
Analyze expression in response to environmental stimuli:
Test effects of abiotic stressors (drought, salinity, temperature)
Examine responses to biotic factors (pathogens, symbionts)
Employ quantitative approaches:
Use densitometry for Western blots
Apply fluorescence intensity measurements for immunohistochemistry
Develop ELISA-based quantification methods
Integrate with transcriptomic data:
Compare protein expression with mRNA levels
Identify potential post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms
These analytical frameworks help distinguish biological variability from technical artifacts.
For robust statistical analysis of immunoblot data:
Experimental design considerations:
Use appropriate biological replicates (n≥3)
Include technical replicates for each biological sample
Randomize sample loading order
Quantification methods:
Apply densitometry to measure band intensity
Use digital image analysis software with background subtraction
Normalize to loading controls (actin, tubulin, or total protein)
Statistical tests:
For comparing two groups: t-test or Mann-Whitney U test
For multiple groups: ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests
For non-normally distributed data: non-parametric alternatives
Data presentation:
Report fold-changes relative to control
Include error bars representing standard deviation or standard error
Present representative blots alongside quantification
Reporting requirements:
Document antibody dilution, exposure times, and image processing steps
Specify normalization method and statistical tests applied
Report p-values and confidence intervals
These approaches enhance reproducibility and statistical validity of immunoblot analyses.
When protein and transcript data appear inconsistent:
Consider post-transcriptional regulation:
Assess mRNA stability using actinomycin D chase experiments
Investigate potential microRNA-mediated regulation
Examine alternative splicing patterns
Evaluate post-translational mechanisms:
Measure protein half-life using cycloheximide chase assays
Assess proteasomal degradation with proteasome inhibitors
Investigate compartmentalization effects on protein detection
Review methodological factors:
Check antibody specificity against recombinant protein standards
Verify primer specificity for transcript quantification
Compare extraction methods for protein and RNA
Temporal considerations:
Perform time-course analyses to identify delays between transcription and translation
Sample at multiple time points following experimental treatments
Integration approaches:
Use computational modeling to integrate transcriptomic and proteomic datasets
Apply systems biology frameworks to identify regulatory nodes
These strategies help identify biological mechanisms underlying transcript-protein discrepancies.
To implement At4g37235 Antibody in high-throughput screening:
Automated immunoassay platforms:
Adapt to microplate-based ELISA formats
Develop high-content imaging workflows for immunofluorescence
Implement automated Western blot systems
Multiplexing strategies:
Combine At4g37235 detection with other protein markers
Use differentially labeled secondary antibodies
Integrate with high-content imaging systems
Flow cytometry applications:
Detect At4g37235 in protoplast preparations
Combine with other cellular markers
Sort cells based on expression levels
Screening platform adaptation:
Optimize for 96 or 384-well formats
Develop standardized protocols for consistent detection
Implement automated image analysis algorithms
Data management:
Create analysis pipelines for large-scale data processing
Implement machine learning for pattern recognition
Develop databases for phenotypic correlations
These approaches enable systematic exploration of At4g37235 function across genetic or environmental variables.
Computational approaches to leverage antibody-derived data include:
Structural modeling:
Predict 3D structure of At4g37235 using homology modeling
Simulate membrane integration based on localization data
Model structural changes under different conditions
Network analysis:
Construct protein-protein interaction networks centered on At4g37235
Identify functional modules and pathways
Predict cellular outcomes of perturbations
Integration with multi-omics data:
Correlate protein expression with transcriptomic, metabolomic data
Develop mathematical models of regulatory circuits
Simulate cellular responses to environmental stimuli
Machine learning applications:
Classify cellular phenotypes based on immunostaining patterns
Predict protein function from localization data
Identify novel regulatory relationships
Virtual screening:
Model binding sites for potential interacting partners
Simulate effects of post-translational modifications
Predict functional consequences of genetic variants
These computational approaches complement experimental data to generate testable hypotheses about At4g37235 function.
For rigorous validation in published studies:
Specificity controls:
Test on knockout/knockdown lines
Peptide competition assays
Detect recombinant protein at appropriate molecular weight
Application-specific validation:
For Western blotting: include molecular weight markers and loading controls
For immunohistochemistry: show negative controls and known expression patterns
For immunoprecipitation: demonstrate enrichment compared to input
Reproducibility standards:
Use multiple biological replicates (minimum n=3)
Test multiple antibody lots when possible
Validate key findings with complementary techniques
Reporting requirements:
Document complete antibody information (catalog number, lot, dilution)
Specify exact experimental conditions
Include all control experiments in supplementary materials
Method transparency:
Provide detailed protocols for antibody use
Describe image acquisition and processing methods
Make original, unprocessed images available
These standards enhance research reproducibility and facilitate comparison across studies.
To maintain consistency across antibody lots:
Lot comparison strategy:
Test new lots side-by-side with previous lot
Generate standard curves for quantitative applications
Document optimal working dilutions for each lot
Reference sample system:
Maintain frozen aliquots of positive control samples
Create standardized lysates as reference standards
Develop recombinant protein standards for calibration
Validation protocol:
Test each new lot on known positive and negative samples
Verify expected staining pattern in key tissues
Confirm specificity through peptide competition
Documentation practices:
Record lot-specific performance characteristics
Maintain detailed protocol adjustments for each lot
Document images from standard samples for comparison
Supplier communication:
Request certificate of analysis for each lot
Inquire about manufacturing changes
Report inconsistencies to manufacturer