CST3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Biological Relevance

CST3 antibodies target cystatin C, a 13.3-kDa cysteine protease inhibitor produced by all nucleated cells. This protein regulates extracellular protease activity, maintains protein homeostasis, and modulates cellular processes like autophagy and angiogenesis . Its involvement in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and vascular pathologies makes CST3 antibodies critical for investigating disease mechanisms .

Neurodegenerative Disease Studies

  • Parkinson’s Disease: CST3 antibodies identified cystatin C’s neuroprotective effects in A53T α-synuclein transgenic mice. Treatment with cystatin C reduced phosphorylated α-synuclein and apoptosis markers (cleaved caspase-3) while enhancing autophagy (LC3B) .

  • Bilirubin-Induced Neurotoxicity: Overexpression of CST3 in HT22 cells mitigated cell death caused by unconjugated bilirubin (UCB), as shown via MTT assays and CST3 antibody-based detection .

Aggregation and Cellular Toxicity

  • CST3 forms oligomers and fibrils under physiological conditions (37°C). Antibodies like M00961-1 confirmed aggregated cystatin C’s internalization into astrocytes, correlating with dose-dependent cytotoxicity .

Validation and Technical Performance

  • Western Blot: Both CAB13291 and M00961-1 detect cystatin C at ~15 kDa in human serum and cell lysates .

  • Immunofluorescence: M00961-1 localized cystatin C in MCF7 breast cancer cells and glioma tissues, with signal amplification using DyLight®488 conjugates .

  • Flow Cytometry: M00961-1 demonstrated specificity in permeabilized A549 lung cancer cells, with minimal background noise .

Recent Advances and Clinical Implications

  • Preclinical Kidney Disease: CST3 antibodies help identify early-stage kidney dysfunction by detecting subtle increases in serum cystatin C, outperforming creatinine-based assays .

  • Cancer Prognostics: Elevated cystatin C in tumor microenvironments, detected via CST3 antibodies, correlates with metastasis and poor survival in breast and glioblastoma models .

  • Therapeutic Potential: Recombinant cystatin C reduced amyloid-β aggregation in Alzheimer’s models, validated using CST3 antibodies in immunoassays .

Product Specs

Buffer
PBS with 0.1% Sodium Azide, 50% Glycerol, pH 7.3. Store at -20°C. Avoid freeze / thaw cycles.
Lead Time
Generally, we can ship the products within 1-3 business days after receiving your orders. Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method or location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery times.
Synonyms
AD 8 antibody; AD8 antibody; Amyloid angiopathy and cerebral hemorrhage antibody; ARMD11 antibody; bA218C14.4 (cystatin C) antibody; bA218C14.4 antibody; Cst 3 antibody; Cst3 antibody; CST3 protein antibody; Cystatin 3 antibody; Cystatin-3 antibody; Cystatin-C antibody; Cystatin3 antibody; CystatinC antibody; CYTC_HUMAN antibody; Epididymis secretory protein Li 2 antibody; Gamma trace antibody; Gamma-trace antibody; HCCAA antibody; HEL S 2 antibody; MGC117328 antibody; Neuroendocrine basic polypeptide antibody; Post gamma globulin antibody; Post-gamma-globulin antibody
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
As an inhibitor of cysteine proteinases, this protein is thought to play a significant physiological role as a local regulator of this enzyme activity.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Elevated urinary cystatin-C levels were observed in type 2 diabetic patients exhibiting early diabetic nephropathy. PMID: 29673928
  2. Age and cystatin C were identified as significant risk factors for cardiovascular events in a pre-diabetic cohort. PMID: 29661604
  3. Increased cystatin C levels may be associated with heightened risks of composite endpoints in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. PMID: 29891036
  4. Data indicate that the kinetics of degradation/proteolysis versus aggregation of amyloid beta(1-40) and amyloid beta(1-42) at specific concentrations of amyloid beta, cathepsin B, and cystatin C can be modeled and predicted. PMID: 29046353
  5. Serum CysC, at the time of CRRT (Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy cessation), is an independent predictor of successful weaning from CRRT in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. PMID: 29870981
  6. The serum levels of cystatin C and urine NGAL, urine OPN can serve as a reliable marker for assessing the renal impact of obesity, which can lead to end-stage renal disease in the pediatric population. PMID: 30035656
  7. The average of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRave) based on creatinine (eGFRcre) and eGFR based on cystatin C (eGFRcys) most accurately predicted the exacerbation of renal function in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). PMID: 29086660
  8. Serum Cystatin C was investigated as a biomarker in bladder urothelial neoplasm. Findings revealed that serum Cystatin C is not a dependable marker for predicting bladder urothelial tumors tumorigenesis and clinicopathological characteristics. PMID: 29789781
  9. Patients with bladder cancer (BCa) exhibit lower serum cysC concentration compared to the control group. Serum cysC might be considered a potential marker for BCa but not its aggressiveness. PMID: 29749360
  10. Postoperative serum Cystatin C, IL-18, and Uric acid levels after 24 hours were significantly associated with acute kidney injury. PMID: 29627485
  11. Serum CysC is a strong predictor of AKI and the short-term prognosis of CCU patients. PMID: 29179178
  12. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations in the urine and serum on the second day of intensive care unit admission could be used to predict the development of acute kidney injury in the following three to seven days in the intensive care unit; however, the cystatin C concentration did not possess predictive value. PMID: 28142264
  13. A study demonstrated that the binding of CST3 and PSAP diminished the inhibitory effects of CST3 on proteinase in vitro. The co-localization of both proteins was detected in cultured cells and in Bunina body-containing motor neurons from patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, suggesting their potential involvement in the process of Bunina body formation. PMID: 29249381
  14. Elevated cystatin C is independently associated with unfavorable vascular outcomes in individuals with suspected or established CAD in terms of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and total adverse vascular events [meta-analysis]. PMID: 28599259
  15. Cognitive function was significantly and inversely associated with cystatin C and microalbuminuria, in the relatively younger general Japanese population. PMID: 28865325
  16. This paper delves into the current findings regarding the role of Cyst C in cancer progression and the clinical implications emerging from these studies--{review}. PMID: 29654808
  17. We enrolled 43 stable coronary artery disease (CAD) male patients to examine the relationship between cystatin C-adiponectin (CysC-APN) complex and coronary plaque characteristics. In multivariate analysis, CysC-APN complex levels were identified as the strongest negative factor for fibrotic components and the strongest positive factor for both necrotic and lipidic plus necrotic components. PMID: 28321013
  18. Urinary cystatin C is an independent risk predictor in patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction. PMID: 28778467
  19. Serum Cys-C levels predict renal function in patients with prostate neoplasia but were not a biomarker for the development of prostate neoplasia, and were not correlated with the clinicopathological characteristics of prostate cancer. PMID: 28812020
  20. There were no associations between serum cysC levels and renal involvement in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome. PMID: 25367815
  21. Cystatin-C should be considered an early biomarker of AKI. PMID: 28552392
  22. CysC serves as an early acute kidney injury biomarker and is predictive of persistent acute kidney injury on aminoglycoside treatment. PMID: 27743042
  23. Cystatin C may be considered a biological marker for vascular dysfunction and subclinical atherosclerosis in SCD. PMID: 27582023
  24. Serum cystatin C level was significantly associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. An increase in cystatin C level could serve as a valuable surrogate marker for the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PMID: 29090609
  25. Mild-to-moderate kidney dysfunction modifies the relationship between CysC and high-risk coronary lesion, but not NGAL. PMID: 27680774
  26. Increasing cystatin C and cathepsin B were reported in the serum of colorectal cancer patients. PMID: 28182342
  27. Both cystatin C and beta 2 macroglobulin are elevated in type 2 diabetics with diabetic nephropathy. Cystatin C may be beneficial in the early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy. PMID: 28182344
  28. Results from nuclear magnetic resonance structural data and molecular dynamics modeling point to conformational requirements and special importance of some amino acid residues in cystatin 3 C-terminal for its interaction with amyloid beta fragments. PMID: 27714883
  29. The findings of the current studies may be crucial for the future design of hCC dimerization inhibitors. PMID: 27573935
  30. High cystatin C was associated with an increased risk of mortality but not with a poor functional outcome in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. PMID: 27578255
  31. These results identified cystatin 3 as a biomarker in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. PMID: 28633877
  32. Serum and urine levels of cystatin C were significantly higher in children with acute kidney injury. [Review and Meta-Analysis] PMID: 28372557
  33. Serum level in acute kidney injury patients helps predict the risk of chronic kidney disease stage 3. PMID: 27658322
  34. Circulating CysC and Gal-3 were associated with greater left atrial dilatation in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. PMID: 28830298
  35. Application of the cystatin C-based equations most accurately estimates glomerular filtration rate in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. PMID: 27125433
  36. This study tested the utility of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C (CysC) in addition to standard creatinine for early determination of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) After Heart Operations Using Cardiopulmonary Bypass. The results support the notion that CysC and NGAL should be viewed as comparable for early AKI detection. PMID: 27862029
  37. The strong association between epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and cystatin C demonstrated herein indicates that EAT accumulation may play a significant role in Cystatin C secretion, possibly contributing to cardiometabolic risk in T2DM patients. PMID: 28922364
  38. A high CysC level possessed predictive value regarding the severity of vascular lesions in acute coronary syndrome. PMID: 28143410
  39. Elevated levels of cystatin C were detected in the early diagnosis of right heart failure in patients with systemic sclerosis. PMID: 27414726
  40. Biomarker of renal dysfunction, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and hepatorenal syndrome in decompensated liver cirrhosis. PMID: 28545169
  41. Data suggest that melanoma cells internalize/absorb cystatin C from culture media, leading to increased intracellular cystatin C levels; cystatin E/M is internalized as well but at a modest rate due to down-regulation of cell migration; however, the effect of intracellular cystatin E/M on down-regulation of legumain activity is pronounced. PMID: 28630039
  42. An elevated preoperative Cys-C level was demonstrated to be related to worse survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Measuring preoperative serum Cys-C might be a straightforward way to identify poor prognostic patients, and patients with elevated preoperative Cys-C levels should be more closely monitored. PMID: 28586363
  43. Acute kidney injury is common following deliberate self-poisoning with a combination washing powder containing oxalic acid and potassium permanganate, and cystatin C monitoring may underestimate the severity of poisoning. PMID: 28535124
  44. Cystatin C significantly decreased the lipopolysaccharide-stimulated release and expression of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in monocyte and peripheral blood mononuclear cultures from healthy donors and Crohn's patients. Cystatin C was internalized by monocytes via an active endocytic process, decreased phosphorylation of the MAP kinase pathway ERK-1/2, and altered surface markers. PMID: 27190304
  45. Fibrillation of CysC therefore likely initiates from the monomer and does not require domain-swapping. The non-swapped oligomers likely represent a dead-end offshoot of the amyloid pathway and must dissociate to monomers prior to rearranging to amyloid fibrils. These prefibrillar CysC oligomers were potent inhibitors of aggregation of the Alzheimer's-related peptide, beta-amyloid. PMID: 28487367
  46. CysC plays an important regulatory role in combating cell death via the autophagic pathway in atherosclerosis. PMID: 27079462
  47. Data show that cystatin C deposition in minimally affected samples was limited to the basement membrane (BM) between the dermis and epidermis. PMID: 28067897
  48. Urinary cystatin C levels in the acute kidney injury (AKI) preterm infant group were not significantly higher than in the no-AKI group on day of life 1, 3, and 7. PMID: 27020372
  49. Serum cystatin C level was found to be associated with the development and worsening of AKI [Acute kidney injury] in ICU [intensive care unit] patients with sepsis. PMID: 28332367
  50. Elevated cystatin C levels at admission were independently associated with impaired myocardial perfusion, poor cardiac functional recovery, and development of congestive heart failure in patients with anterior STEMI undergoing PCI. PMID: 26498756

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 2475

OMIM: 105150

KEGG: hsa:1471

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000366124

UniGene: Hs.304682

Involvement In Disease
Amyloidosis 6 (AMYL6); Macular degeneration, age-related, 11 (ARMD11)
Protein Families
Cystatin family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in submandibular and sublingual saliva but not in parotid saliva (at protein level). Expressed in various body fluids, such as the cerebrospinal fluid and plasma. Expressed in highest levels in the epididymis, vas deferens, brain, thymus, and ov

Q&A

What is CST3 and why is it significant in biomedical research?

CST3, also known as Cystatin C, is a cysteine proteinase inhibitor with diverse biological functions related to protein homeostasis and tissue protection. The protein plays a critical role in regulating protease activity throughout the body, making it a significant research target across multiple disciplines. CST3 dysregulation has been implicated in various pathological conditions, including Alzheimer's disease, cardiovascular disorders, and kidney dysfunction, highlighting its importance as a biomarker and potential therapeutic target . The protein is primarily secreted and has a calculated molecular weight of approximately 13kDa, though it typically appears around 15kDa in Western blot applications due to post-translational modifications . Understanding CST3's molecular function provides crucial context for designing experiments with CST3 antibodies and interpreting resulting data within physiological and pathological frameworks.

What types of CST3 antibodies are available for research applications?

Research-grade CST3 antibodies are available in both polyclonal and monoclonal formats, each with distinct advantages depending on experimental requirements:

Antibody TypeHost OptionsCommon ApplicationsKey Characteristics
PolyclonalRabbit, GoatWB, IHC, ELISA, IFRecognizes multiple epitopes, higher sensitivity, greater batch variation
MonoclonalMouse, RabbitWB, ELISA, IHCConsistent specificity, reduced background, epitope-specific

Most commercially available CST3 antibodies target specific amino acid sequences, with common immunogens including regions 1-146, 27-146, and 60-140 of the human Cystatin C protein . When selecting an antibody, researchers should consider the specific experimental application, required species reactivity (human, mouse, rat, or monkey), and whether epitope-specific detection is necessary for their research questions . The choice between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies should be based on whether breadth of detection or consistency across experiments is the priority.

What are the validated applications for CST3 antibodies?

CST3 antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications, each requiring specific optimization:

ApplicationTypical Dilution RangeKey Considerations
Western Blot (WB)1:500 - 1:2000Requires appropriate positive controls (e.g., U-251MG, SKOV3, A-549, Mouse brain)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)1:50 - 1:200Tissue-specific optimization required
ELISAVaries by manufacturerProtocol-dependent sensitivity
Immunofluorescence (IF)Typically 1:100 - 1:500May require specific fixation methods

For optimal results, researchers should validate each antibody within their specific experimental system rather than relying solely on manufacturer recommendations. Cross-validation with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes can significantly enhance confidence in experimental findings, particularly for novel observations or contradictory results . Additionally, considering the secreted nature of CST3, sample collection and preparation methods should be carefully optimized depending on whether intracellular or extracellular CST3 is being investigated.

How should CST3 antibodies be stored and handled to maintain optimal activity?

Proper storage and handling of CST3 antibodies is essential for maintaining their specificity and sensitivity over time:

Storage ConditionRecommendationDuration
Long-term storage-20°CUp to one year
Working stock4°CUp to one month
AvoidRepeated freeze-thaw cyclesN/A

Most CST3 antibodies are supplied in buffer containing PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol at pH 7.2 . This formulation helps maintain stability during storage. When working with the antibody, researchers should:

  • Aliquot stock solutions to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • Use sterile technique when handling

  • Centrifuge briefly before opening vials to collect liquid

  • Keep on ice during experimental procedures

  • Return to appropriate storage conditions immediately after use

These practices will help preserve antibody activity and ensure consistent experimental results across multiple sessions . Degradation of antibody quality often manifests as increased background signal, decreased sensitivity, or loss of specificity, which can significantly impact experimental outcomes and interpretability.

What positive and negative controls should be included when using CST3 antibodies?

Appropriate controls are fundamental to interpreting results from CST3 antibody-based experiments:

Positive Controls:

  • Cell lines: U-251MG, SKOV3, A-549 (human); Mouse brain tissue (rodent)

  • Recombinant CST3 protein at known concentrations

  • Tissues with documented CST3 expression (kidney, brain)

Negative Controls:

  • Primary antibody omission (buffer only)

  • Isotype-matched irrelevant antibody

  • CST3 knockout or knockdown samples when available

  • Pre-absorption of antibody with immunizing peptide

For Western blot applications, molecular weight markers should confirm the expected 13-15kDa band for CST3 . Additionally, treatment controls may be necessary when studying post-translational modifications or context-dependent expression patterns of CST3 . Proper implementation of these controls allows researchers to distinguish genuine CST3 signal from technical artifacts and non-specific binding, substantially enhancing data reliability and interpretability across experimental contexts.

How can I optimize Western blot protocols specifically for CST3 detection?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for CST3 requires attention to several critical parameters:

Gel Selection and Protein Transfer:
CST3 has a calculated molecular weight of 13kDa but typically runs at approximately 15kDa on SDS-PAGE gels. For optimal resolution of this relatively small protein:

  • Use high percentage (12-15%) or gradient (4-20%) Tris-glycine gels

  • Consider Tricine-SDS-PAGE for improved resolution of low molecular weight proteins

  • Optimize transfer conditions (20-25V overnight at 4°C often yields better results than rapid transfers for small proteins)

Sample Preparation:

  • Include protease inhibitors in lysis buffers to prevent CST3 degradation

  • For secreted CST3, concentrate cell culture media or biological fluids using TCA precipitation or centrifugal concentrators

  • Denature samples thoroughly (95°C for 5 minutes) prior to loading

Antibody Incubation:

  • Start with manufacturer's recommended dilution (typically 1:500-1:2000)

  • Extend primary antibody incubation to overnight at 4°C for enhanced sensitivity

  • Use 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for blocking and antibody dilution to reduce background

Detection:

  • Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) is generally sufficient for CST3 detection

  • For challenging samples, consider more sensitive detection methods such as SuperSignal West Femto

  • If quantifying CST3, ensure exposure times remain in the linear range of detection

These optimizations should result in clear, specific detection of CST3 with minimal background interference, enabling confident interpretation of experimental results .

What approaches are recommended for validating CST3 antibody specificity?

Comprehensive validation of CST3 antibody specificity is essential for generating reliable data. Multiple complementary approaches should be employed:

Genetic Approaches:

  • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of CST3

  • siRNA or shRNA-mediated knockdown with confirmation of reduced signal

  • Heterologous expression systems (overexpressing CST3 in low/non-expressing cells)

Biochemical Approaches:

  • Pre-absorption with immunizing peptide should abolish specific signal

  • Competition assays with recombinant CST3 protein

  • Western blot analysis should show a single band at the expected molecular weight (approximately 15kDa)

  • Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated protein

Comparative Analysis:

  • Parallel testing of multiple CST3 antibodies targeting different epitopes

  • Cross-validation with orthogonal detection methods (e.g., mRNA expression)

  • Species-specificity testing when antibody claims cross-reactivity

Functional Correlation:

  • Correlation of antibody signal with known biological functions of CST3

  • Stimulus-dependent changes in expression or localization consistent with literature

Thorough validation enhances confidence in experimental findings and prevents misinterpretation of data due to antibody cross-reactivity or non-specific binding . Researchers should document validation efforts in publications to support the reliability of their findings.

What are the methodological considerations for CST3 immunohistochemistry optimization?

Successful immunohistochemical detection of CST3 requires systematic optimization of multiple parameters:

Tissue Processing and Antigen Retrieval:

  • Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues typically require heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER)

  • Test multiple antigen retrieval methods: citrate buffer (pH 6.0), EDTA buffer (pH 9.0), and enzymatic retrieval

  • Optimize retrieval duration (10-30 minutes) and temperature (95-120°C)

  • For frozen sections, test different fixation methods (acetone, paraformaldehyde, methanol)

Antibody Optimization:

  • Perform titration experiments starting at the manufacturer's recommended dilution (typically 1:50-1:200 for IHC)

  • Test both overnight incubation at 4°C and room temperature incubation for 1-2 hours

  • Optimize secondary antibody concentration to minimize background

  • Consider signal amplification systems for low-abundance detection

Background Reduction:

  • Block endogenous peroxidase activity with H₂O₂ prior to antibody incubation

  • Test different blocking reagents (normal serum, BSA, casein)

  • Include relevant controls to distinguish specific from non-specific staining

  • For tissues with high endogenous biotin, use biotin-free detection systems

Counterstaining and Evaluation:

  • Select appropriate counterstains based on expected CST3 localization

  • Document and quantify staining patterns using standardized scoring systems

  • Consider multiplex staining to correlate CST3 with cell type-specific markers

These methodological optimizations should be systematically documented, as tissue-specific variables can significantly impact staining outcomes . For secreted proteins like CST3, careful attention to fixation timing and conditions is particularly important to prevent loss of target protein.

What are the recommended approaches for detecting post-translational modifications of CST3?

Detecting post-translational modifications (PTMs) of CST3 requires specialized approaches beyond standard antibody detection:

Antibody Selection:

  • Use modification-specific antibodies when available (e.g., phospho-specific)

  • Confirm PTM-specific antibody reactivity using appropriate controls (e.g., phosphatase treatment)

  • Consider using pan-CST3 antibodies in parallel to normalize total protein levels

Sample Preparation:

  • Include appropriate inhibitors to preserve modifications (phosphatase inhibitors, deubiquitinase inhibitors)

  • Use mild lysis conditions to preserve native modifications

  • Consider enrichment strategies for low-abundance modified forms

Analytical Approaches:

  • 2D gel electrophoresis to separate CST3 isoforms based on charge and size

  • Phos-tag gels for enhanced separation of phosphorylated proteins

  • Mass spectrometry for unbiased identification of modification sites

  • Sequential immunoprecipitation to isolate specific modified populations

Functional Validation:

  • Correlate modified forms with functional outcomes

  • Use site-directed mutagenesis to confirm modification sites

  • Apply specific stimuli known to induce the modification of interest

Since CST3 undergoes several post-translational modifications including glycosylation, which contributes to its observed molecular weight being higher than calculated (15kDa vs. 13kDa) , researchers should anticipate heterogeneity in migration patterns. Careful experimental design with appropriate controls is essential for accurate interpretation of PTM-focused experiments.

How can I troubleshoot non-specific binding issues with CST3 antibodies?

Non-specific binding is a common challenge when working with antibodies. For CST3 antibodies, consider these systematic troubleshooting steps:

Identify the Problem Pattern:

  • High background throughout the membrane/tissue

  • Extra bands at unexpected molecular weights

  • Signal in negative control samples

  • Inconsistent results between replicates

Optimization Strategies:

  • For high background:

    • Increase blocking duration and concentration

    • Test alternative blocking agents (milk, BSA, commercial blockers)

    • Increase washing duration and number of washes

    • Dilute primary and secondary antibodies further

    • Use more stringent buffer conditions (increase salt concentration)

  • For extra bands in Western blot:

    • Verify sample integrity (check for degradation or aggregation)

    • Include protease inhibitors during sample preparation

    • Test different antibody concentrations and incubation times

    • Perform peptide competition assays to identify specific bands

    • Consider alternative antibody clones targeting different epitopes

  • For inconsistent results:

    • Standardize sample preparation protocols

    • Prepare fresh buffers and reagents

    • Verify antibody storage conditions

    • Implement more rigorous positive and negative controls

    • Consider batch effects in biological samples

When troubleshooting CST3 specifically, remember that its secreted nature may result in variable levels between samples depending on collection and processing methods . Additionally, the small size of CST3 (approximately 15kDa) may require special attention to gel selection and transfer conditions to prevent loss during electrophoresis or blotting steps .

What methodologies are recommended for quantitative analysis of CST3 in different sample types?

Accurate quantitation of CST3 requires careful selection of appropriate methodologies based on sample type and research objectives:

Protein-Level Quantification:

MethodSample TypeSensitivity RangeKey Considerations
Western BlotCell/tissue lysatesSemi-quantitativeRequires careful normalization to loading controls
ELISASerum, CSF, cell culture mediapg/ml - ng/mlCommercially available kits with high specificity
ImmunohistochemistryFFPE or frozen tissuesSemi-quantitativeRequires standardized scoring and image analysis
Mass SpectrometryAny protein sampleHighly sensitiveRequires specialized equipment and expertise

mRNA-Level Quantification:

  • qRT-PCR for CST3 transcript levels

  • RNA-seq for transcriptome-wide analysis

  • In situ hybridization for spatial expression patterns

Normalization Strategies:

  • For Western blot: Housekeeping proteins (β-actin, GAPDH) or total protein stains

  • For tissue analysis: Area normalization or cell type-specific markers

  • For secreted CST3: Normalize to total protein concentration or reference protein

Quantitative Analysis:

  • Use standard curves with recombinant CST3 for absolute quantification

  • Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution

  • Consider biological variation when interpreting small changes

  • Report both technical and biological replicates

For CST3, which functions both intracellularly and as a secreted protein, comprehensive analysis often requires measuring both cellular content and released protein . When studying CST3 in neurodegenerative diseases or kidney disorders, combining multiple quantitative approaches provides more robust insights into pathological alterations.

What are the technical considerations for studying CST3 in neurodegenerative disease models?

Studying CST3 in neurodegenerative disease contexts presents unique technical challenges that require specialized approaches:

Sample Collection and Processing:

  • CSF collection should be standardized with consistent protocols to minimize variation

  • Brain tissue processing should preserve both soluble and aggregated protein fractions

  • Consider microdissection techniques to isolate specific brain regions of interest

  • Rapid post-mortem processing is essential to prevent protein degradation

Detection Challenges:

  • CST3 forms may be altered in disease states (oligomerization, aggregation)

  • Alternative extraction methods may be needed for insoluble aggregates

  • Consider using native PAGE in addition to SDS-PAGE for aggregation-prone forms

  • Dual immunostaining with disease-specific markers (amyloid-β, tau) for co-localization studies

Animal Models:

  • Validate CST3 antibody reactivity in the specific model organism

  • Consider age-matched controls given age-dependent changes in CST3 expression

  • Account for region-specific expression patterns when analyzing whole brain homogenates

  • Use stereotactic injection models for controlled CST3 manipulation

Human Samples:

  • Careful matching of cases and controls for age, sex, and post-mortem interval

  • Document medication history that might affect CST3 expression

  • Consider genetic factors (CST3 polymorphisms) in analysis

  • Implement blinded assessment protocols to prevent bias

Since CST3 has been implicated in Alzheimer's disease pathology , researchers should include appropriate disease-specific controls and consider the temporal relationship between CST3 alterations and established disease markers. Additionally, correlating CST3 levels with functional outcomes or biomarkers of disease progression can provide valuable insights into its pathophysiological significance.

How can I design multiplexed assays that include CST3 detection?

Designing effective multiplexed assays for simultaneous detection of CST3 and other targets requires careful optimization:

Antibody Selection for Multiplex Immunostaining:

  • Choose primary antibodies from different host species to avoid cross-reactivity

  • Verify that each antibody works independently before combining

  • Ensure spectral separation of fluorophores to minimize bleed-through

  • Validate staining patterns match those seen in single-staining experiments

Sequential Immunostaining Approaches:

  • Start with the weakest signal target first

  • Consider signal amplification for low-abundance targets

  • Document complete removal of previous antibody layers before applying subsequent antibodies

  • Include single-stained controls for each detection cycle

Multiplex Flow Cytometry:

  • Titrate each antibody independently before combining

  • Implement proper compensation controls for each fluorophore

  • Include Fluorescence Minus One (FMO) controls for accurate gating

  • Consider the impact of fixation/permeabilization on CST3 epitope accessibility

Image Analysis for Multiplexed Data:

  • Establish quantitative parameters for co-localization assessment

  • Use automated analysis tools for unbiased quantification

  • Implement batch processing for consistency across samples

  • Document analysis pipelines for reproducibility

When specifically including CST3 in multiplex panels, researchers should consider its cellular localization (primarily secreted) and expression levels relative to other targets of interest . For brain tissue analysis, combining CST3 with cell-type markers (neurons, astrocytes, microglia) can provide valuable insights into cell-specific alterations in neurodegenerative conditions.

What are the best practices for correlating CST3 antibody staining with functional assays?

Establishing meaningful correlations between CST3 detection and functional outcomes requires integrated experimental design:

Temporal Correlation Approaches:

  • Design time-course experiments to track CST3 expression changes

  • Pair protein detection with functional readouts at multiple timepoints

  • Use inducible expression systems to control onset of CST3 alteration

  • Document both immediate and delayed functional consequences

Spatial Correlation Methods:

  • Implement serial section analysis for complementary staining

  • Use laser capture microdissection to isolate specific regions for functional testing

  • Apply in situ functional assays when possible (e.g., cathepsin activity assays)

  • Develop imaging techniques that simultaneously visualize CST3 and functional markers

Cause-Effect Relationship Testing:

  • Apply gain-of-function and loss-of-function approaches

  • Use recombinant CST3 treatment to mimic elevated levels

  • Implement CST3 knockdown or knockout models for deficiency studies

  • Consider rescue experiments to confirm specificity of observed effects

Quantitative Correlation Analysis:

  • Apply appropriate statistical tests for correlation analysis

  • Consider non-linear relationships between expression and function

  • Account for potential confounding variables

  • Report effect sizes alongside statistical significance

Since CST3 functions primarily as a cysteine protease inhibitor, correlating its levels with protease activity assays (e.g., cathepsin B, cathepsin S) provides direct functional relevance . In neurodegenerative disease research, correlating CST3 levels with markers of synaptic function, neuronal viability, or pathological protein accumulation can provide mechanistic insights into its role in disease progression.

How should I interpret conflicting results from different CST3 antibodies?

Conflicting results between different CST3 antibodies require systematic investigation and careful interpretation:

Common Sources of Discrepancy:

  • Epitope differences (accessibility in certain contexts)

  • Antibody format differences (monoclonal vs. polyclonal)

  • Varying sensitivity and specificity profiles

  • Technical variability in experimental conditions

  • Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition

Resolution Strategies:

  • Comprehensive Validation:

    • Validate each antibody independently using knockout/knockdown controls

    • Compare reactivity patterns across multiple applications

    • Test on recombinant protein and endogenous samples

    • Verify epitope availability in different sample preparation methods

  • Technical Standardization:

    • Apply identical experimental conditions for direct comparison

    • Standardize sample preparation protocols

    • Use consistent detection methods and exposure settings

    • Implement blinded analysis to prevent bias

  • Orthogonal Approaches:

    • Employ non-antibody-based detection methods (mass spectrometry)

    • Correlate with mRNA expression data

    • Use genetic manipulation to confirm specificity

    • Consider alternative detection reagents (aptamers, nanobodies)

  • Biological Context:

    • Evaluate whether discrepancies align with known biology

    • Consider isoform-specific or modification-specific detection

    • Test hypotheses that could explain context-dependent results

    • Consult with domain experts for interpretation

When reporting conflicting results, researchers should transparently document all antibodies used (catalog numbers, lots), validation methods employed, and potential biological explanations for observed differences . This approach not only strengthens the credibility of findings but also contributes valuable information to the broader research community regarding antibody performance in specific contexts.

How do CST3 expression patterns differ across tissue types and disease states?

CST3 exhibits distinct expression profiles across tissues and undergoes characteristic alterations in various pathological conditions:

Normal Tissue Expression:

  • Highest expression in secretory tissues (kidney, salivary glands)

  • Moderate expression in brain (neurons, glial cells)

  • Detectable in most body fluids (CSF, serum, urine)

  • Differential cellular distribution (primarily secreted, some intracellular)

Disease-Associated Alterations:

Disease ContextCST3 PatternFunctional Significance
Alzheimer's DiseaseIncreased in plaque-adjacent areasPotential protective response against amyloid pathology
Kidney DysfunctionElevated serum levelsEstablished biomarker of glomerular filtration rate
Cardiovascular DiseaseAltered in atherosclerotic plaquesModulator of cathepsin activity in vascular remodeling
CancerContext-dependent changesBoth tumor-suppressive and promoting roles reported

Cellular Localization:

  • Primarily secreted into extracellular space

  • Some intracellular localization in secretory pathway

  • Potential nuclear localization under specific conditions

  • May associate with membrane structures in pathological states

Understanding these tissue-specific and disease-associated patterns is essential for proper experimental design and interpretation. Researchers should consider these known distributions when selecting appropriate positive controls and evaluating unexpected staining patterns . Additionally, changes in CST3 localization may be as biologically significant as changes in expression level, highlighting the importance of subcellular localization studies alongside quantitative expression analysis.

What are the established CST3 reference ranges in various biological samples?

Accurate interpretation of CST3 measurements requires understanding of typical reference ranges in different biological samples:

Human Samples:

Sample TypeTypical RangeMeasurement MethodConsiderations
Serum/Plasma0.5-1.0 mg/LELISA/ImmunoturbidimetryAge, sex, and kidney function affect levels
Cerebrospinal Fluid3.2-12.5 mg/LELISALumbar puncture technique impacts measurements
Urine<0.3 mg/LELISASignificant increase indicates tubular dysfunction
Cell LysatesVariableWestern BlotNormalize to total protein or housekeeping genes

Experimental Models:

  • Mouse serum: 0.4-0.7 mg/L (strain-dependent variations)

  • Rat CSF: 8.4-14.1 mg/L

  • Cell culture media: Varies by cell type and culture conditions

Factors Affecting Reference Ranges:

  • Age (increases with advancing age)

  • Sex (slightly higher in males)

  • Genetic factors (CST3 polymorphisms)

  • Circadian variations (minimal)

  • Sample processing methods

  • Analytical platform and reagents

Researchers should establish laboratory-specific reference ranges using appropriate controls and standardized methodologies . When studying CST3 in disease contexts, age-matched and sex-matched controls are essential for meaningful comparisons. Additionally, researchers should be aware that reference ranges may differ between antibody-based detection methods and activity-based assays measuring CST3 functional inhibition of cysteine proteases.

How should I design experiments to investigate CST3 interactions with other proteins?

Investigating protein-protein interactions involving CST3 requires carefully designed experimental approaches:

Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

  • Use mild lysis conditions to preserve native interactions

  • Consider both CST3 pull-down and reverse Co-IP strategies

  • Include appropriate negative controls (IgG, irrelevant target)

  • Verify interaction by Western blot with specific antibodies

  • Consider crosslinking for transient or weak interactions

Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):

  • Provides spatial information about protein interactions in situ

  • Requires high-quality antibodies from different host species

  • Include technical controls (single antibody, non-interacting protein pairs)

  • Quantify interaction signals using automated image analysis

  • Correlate with subcellular markers to determine localization

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):

  • Requires fluorescently tagged protein constructs

  • Provides dynamic information about interactions in living cells

  • Control for expression levels of fusion proteins

  • Include positive controls with known interaction pairs

  • Consider photobleaching FRET for more quantitative analysis

Functional Validation:

  • Protease activity assays to confirm functional consequences

  • Structure-guided mutagenesis to identify critical interaction domains

  • Competition assays with peptide fragments or small molecules

  • Cellular assays to assess biological relevance of interaction

Since CST3 primarily functions as a cysteine protease inhibitor, interaction studies should focus on potential protease targets (cathepsins B, H, L, S) and regulatory partners . When designing these experiments, researchers should consider the secreted nature of CST3 and ensure that experimental conditions recapitulate the physiological environment where interactions would naturally occur. Additionally, the relatively small size of CST3 (approximately 15kDa) may require specific considerations when designing fusion constructs for interaction studies.

What are the key considerations for using CST3 as a biomarker in clinical research studies?

Implementing CST3 as a biomarker in clinical research requires attention to several critical factors:

Pre-analytical Variables:

  • Standardize sample collection procedures (time of day, fasting status)

  • Establish consistent processing protocols (centrifugation speed, temperature)

  • Document storage conditions and freeze-thaw cycles

  • Account for medication effects on CST3 levels

  • Consider age, sex, and renal function as covariates

Analytical Considerations:

  • Select validated assay platforms with established performance characteristics

  • Implement regular quality control procedures

  • Include calibration standards with each analytical run

  • Participate in external quality assessment programs

  • Document assay-specific reference ranges

Clinical Study Design:

  • Determine appropriate sample size based on expected effect size

  • Include relevant disease controls and healthy reference groups

  • Collect longitudinal samples when evaluating prognostic value

  • Document comorbidities that may influence CST3 levels

  • Consider genetic factors (CST3 polymorphisms)

Data Analysis and Interpretation:

  • Apply appropriate statistical methods for biomarker evaluation

  • Assess clinical sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values

  • Consider multivariate models incorporating additional biomarkers

  • Validate findings in independent cohorts

  • Correlate with established clinical outcomes

CST3 has established utility as a kidney function biomarker and emerging applications in neurodegenerative disease research . Researchers should be aware of the context-specific interpretation requirements and potential confounding factors when implementing CST3 measurements in clinical studies. Additionally, standardization efforts are essential for cross-study comparisons and eventual clinical translation.

How can I optimize immunofluorescence protocols for CST3 detection in tissue sections?

Achieving optimal immunofluorescence detection of CST3 in tissue sections requires systematic optimization:

Tissue Preparation:

  • Compare fixation methods (4% PFA, methanol, acetone) for epitope preservation

  • Optimize fixation duration to balance morphology and antigen preservation

  • Evaluate antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced, enzymatic, pH variations)

  • Consider thin sections (5-8 μm) for improved antibody penetration

Blocking and Permeabilization:

  • Test multiple blocking agents (normal serum, BSA, commercial blockers)

  • Optimize permeabilization conditions based on CST3 localization

  • Include steps to reduce autofluorescence (Sudan Black, TrueBlack)

  • Consider blocking endogenous biotin if using biotin-streptavidin systems

Antibody Incubation:

  • Titrate primary antibody concentration (starting with 1:100-1:500)

  • Compare overnight 4°C vs. room temperature incubation

  • Optimize secondary antibody concentration to maximize signal:noise ratio

  • Include extensive washing steps to reduce background

Signal Amplification and Detection:

  • Consider tyramide signal amplification for low-abundance detection

  • Select fluorophores with spectral properties compatible with tissue autofluorescence

  • Use nuclear counterstains for orientation (DAPI, Hoechst)

  • Implement anti-fade mounting media to preserve signal

Controls and Validation:

  • Include positive and negative controls in each experiment

  • Perform peptide competition assays to confirm specificity

  • Compare staining patterns with published literature

  • Validate with orthogonal methods (in situ hybridization, Western blot)

For CST3 specifically, researchers should pay particular attention to its predominantly secreted nature, which may require specialized fixation techniques to prevent loss of extracellular protein during processing . Additionally, CST3's involvement in neurodegenerative processes makes co-labeling with disease-specific markers (amyloid-β, tau) particularly informative for understanding its pathophysiological roles.

What experimental approaches are recommended for studying CST3 regulation in cell culture models?

Investigating CST3 regulation in cell culture requires integrated approaches addressing transcriptional, translational, and post-translational mechanisms:

Transcriptional Regulation:

  • Quantitative PCR for mRNA expression analysis

  • Promoter-reporter assays to identify regulatory elements

  • ChIP assays to detect transcription factor binding

  • CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify regulatory regions

Translational and Post-translational Regulation:

  • Pulse-chase experiments to determine protein half-life

  • Inhibitor studies (proteasome, lysosome) to assess degradation pathways

  • Polysome profiling to evaluate translational efficiency

  • Protein modification analysis (glycosylation, phosphorylation)

Secretion and Trafficking:

  • ELISA of culture media to quantify secreted CST3

  • Brefeldin A treatment to block secretion

  • Live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged CST3

  • Subcellular fractionation to track intracellular localization

Functional Consequences:

  • Cysteine protease activity assays (cathepsin substrates)

  • Cell-based assays relevant to CST3 function (migration, invasion)

  • Co-culture systems to assess paracrine effects

  • Knockdown/overexpression to establish causality

Experimental Design Considerations:

  • Select appropriate cell models with detectable CST3 expression

  • Include time-course analyses for dynamic processes

  • Standardize culture conditions to reduce variability

  • Implement appropriate normalizing controls

When studying CST3 in disease models, researchers should consider physiologically relevant stimuli (inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, amyloid-β) and assess both intracellular and secreted CST3 pools . Additionally, since CST3 is widely expressed but exhibits tissue-specific regulation, cell models should be selected based on relevance to the specific biological question under investigation.

What are the emerging applications of CST3 antibodies in understanding disease mechanisms?

CST3 antibodies are enabling novel insights into disease mechanisms across multiple research domains:

Neurodegenerative Disease Research:

  • Tracking CST3 distribution in relation to amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles

  • Investigating CST3 polymorphisms and their impact on protein function

  • Exploring CST3's role in microglial activation and neuroinflammation

  • Assessing CST3 as a potential therapeutic target for neuroprotection

Cardiovascular Research:

  • Mapping CST3 distribution in atherosclerotic plaques

  • Investigating the relationship between CST3 and vascular smooth muscle cell behavior

  • Exploring CST3's role in cardiac remodeling after injury

  • Assessing CST3 as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes

Renal Research:

  • Characterizing CST3 expression in different nephron segments

  • Investigating mechanisms underlying CST3's superior performance as a GFR biomarker

  • Exploring CST3's role in tubular epithelial cell homeostasis

  • Assessing CST3 as a predictor of acute kidney injury progression

Cancer Research:

  • Mapping CST3 distribution in tumor microenvironments

  • Investigating CST3's role in regulating tumor-associated proteases

  • Exploring context-dependent pro- and anti-tumorigenic functions

  • Assessing CST3 as a biomarker for cancer progression or response to therapy

These emerging applications leverage CST3 antibodies for both basic mechanistic studies and translational research . As technology advances, novel applications including high-resolution imaging techniques, single-cell analysis, and spatial transcriptomics are being integrated with traditional antibody-based approaches to provide more comprehensive insights into CST3's diverse biological functions.

How can I effectively analyze and quantify CST3 expression in complex tissue environments?

Analyzing CST3 expression in complex tissues requires integrating multiple methodological approaches and advanced quantification techniques:

Sample Preparation Strategies:

  • Consider tissue heterogeneity when planning sampling approaches

  • Implement microdissection techniques for region-specific analysis

  • Preserve spatial organization with whole-section analysis

  • Process samples consistently to minimize technical variation

Multiple Detection Methodologies:

  • Immunohistochemistry for cellular localization and distribution patterns

  • In situ hybridization for transcript localization

  • Western blot for quantitative protein assessment

  • Mass spectrometry for unbiased profiling and PTM detection

Advanced Imaging Approaches:

  • Multiplex immunofluorescence for co-localization with cellular markers

  • Confocal microscopy for improved spatial resolution

  • Super-resolution techniques for subcellular localization

  • Digital pathology for whole-slide quantification

Quantitative Analysis Methods:

  • Develop standardized scoring systems for manual assessment

  • Implement automated image analysis algorithms

  • Apply machine learning approaches for pattern recognition

  • Correlate protein expression with morphological features

Validation and Contextual Interpretation:

  • Confirm findings with orthogonal methods

  • Correlate with functional outcomes in the same tissue

  • Compare distributions across disease states

  • Integrate with other molecular data (transcriptomics, proteomics)

For CST3 specifically, researchers should consider its primarily secreted nature when interpreting localization patterns, as extracellular CST3 may require special attention during sample processing and imaging . Additionally, CST3's involvement in diverse physiological processes necessitates careful interpretation of expression changes within the context of specific cell types and disease states under investigation.

How can I troubleshoot and validate unexpected CST3 antibody results?

When encountering unexpected results with CST3 antibodies, a systematic troubleshooting approach is essential for distinguishing genuine biological findings from technical artifacts:

Systematic Validation Protocol:

  • Technical Verification:

    • Repeat experiment with fresh reagents and samples

    • Test multiple antibody dilutions and incubation conditions

    • Verify sample integrity and preparation methods

    • Implement comprehensive positive and negative controls

  • Antibody-Specific Validation:

    • Test alternative CST3 antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Perform pre-absorption with immunizing peptide

    • Verify findings in CST3 knockout/knockdown systems

    • Check for potential cross-reactivity with related proteins

  • Biological Context Evaluation:

    • Consider whether results align with known biology of CST3

    • Evaluate potential post-translational modifications or proteolytic processing

    • Assess sample-specific factors that might affect detection

    • Research literature for similar observations in comparable systems

  • Orthogonal Confirmation:

    • Validate with non-antibody-based methods (mass spectrometry)

    • Correlate protein findings with mRNA expression

    • Employ functional assays related to CST3 activity

    • Consider genetic approaches to manipulate CST3 expression

When reporting unexpected findings, researchers should thoroughly document validation efforts and consider alternative biological explanations before concluding novel CST3 properties or functions . The small size and secreted nature of CST3 may present unique technical challenges that require specialized approaches for accurate detection and interpretation . By implementing rigorous validation protocols, researchers can confidently distinguish genuine discoveries from technical artifacts.

What future directions are anticipated in CST3 antibody development and applications?

The field of CST3 antibody research continues to evolve, with several promising developments on the horizon:

Advanced Antibody Technologies:

  • Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) for improved tissue penetration and stability

  • Recombinant antibody fragments with enhanced specificity

  • Bispecific antibodies for simultaneous targeting of CST3 and interacting proteins

  • Conformation-specific antibodies to distinguish native and pathological forms

Emerging Applications:

  • Spatial transcriptomics integration with antibody-based protein detection

  • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) for high-dimensional analysis of CST3 in cellular contexts

  • Live-cell imaging with non-perturbing antibody-based probes

  • Therapeutic applications targeting CST3 in neurodegeneration or cancer

Technological Integration:

  • AI-assisted image analysis for complex tissue pattern recognition

  • Microfluidic systems for single-cell protein analysis

  • Antibody-based biosensors for real-time monitoring of CST3 dynamics

  • Multimodal imaging combining antibody detection with functional readouts

Translational Development:

  • Standardized CST3 assessment protocols for clinical research

  • Companion diagnostic applications in personalized medicine

  • Therapeutic antibodies modulating CST3 function in disease contexts

  • Point-of-care testing platforms for rapid CST3 quantification

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.