Immunogen Sequence: The antibody targets the peptide sequence PMIDQRGLPMDGRGGRDSRAMETRAMETEVLETRVMERRGMETCAMETRG .
Species Reactivity:
Applications:
| Species | Identity (%) | Tissue Expression |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 100% | Germ cells, brain |
| Mouse | 88% | Testis, brain |
| Rat | 86% | Testis, brain |
CSTF2T (cleavage stimulation factor 2 tau) is a paralog of CSTF2, functioning as a tissue-specific RNA-binding protein. Its primary roles include:
mRNA Polyadenylation: Facilitates AAUAAA-independent polyadenylation in germ cells .
Gene Expression Regulation: Controls histone and histone-like protein synthesis during spermatogenesis .
Cancer Pathogenesis: Overexpression correlates with aggressive tumor phenotypes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) .
Cancer Studies:
Reproductive Biology:
Neuroscience:
CSTF2T (Cleavage stimulation factor subunit 2 tau variant) plays a significant role in AAUAAA-independent mRNA polyadenylation, particularly in germ cells. It is directly involved in the binding to pre-mRNAs and functions as part of the cellular machinery responsible for RNA processing. The protein is also known by several other names including TauCstF-64, CF-1 64 kDa subunit tau variant, and Cleavage stimulation factor 64 kDa subunit tau variant . Unlike its paralog CSTF2 (which is widely expressed), CSTF2T shows a more restricted expression pattern, primarily in testis among normal tissues .
CSTF2T antibodies have been successfully employed in multiple experimental techniques:
Western blotting (WB): Typically used at 1/1000 dilution
Immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded sections (IHC-P): Effective at 1/250 dilution
Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF)
These applications have been validated with human cell lines including Jurkat, PC3, and HeLa, consistently detecting the predicted 64 kDa band in Western blot analyses . For optimal IHC-P results, heat-mediated antigen retrieval with citrate buffer (pH 6) is recommended before proceeding with the staining protocol .
Proper validation of CSTF2T antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach:
Positive controls: Use cell lines known to express CSTF2T (e.g., Jurkat, PC3, HeLa)
Negative controls: Include CSTF2T knockout models (Cstf2t-/- mice or tissues)
Antibody dilution optimization: Test a range of dilutions to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Comparative antibody testing: Compare results with different antibody clones targeting distinct epitopes (e.g., monoclonal 6A9 vs. polyclonal Bethyl A301-487A)
Western blot analysis: Confirm detection of appropriately sized band (64 kDa)
Cross-reactivity with the paralog CSTF2 is a potential concern, necessitating careful validation in experimental systems .
For optimal CSTF2T detection across different applications:
Western blot preparation:
Lyse tissues/cells in extraction buffer (DPBS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 2 mM PMSF, 0.02% NaN₃)
Brief sonication followed by 10-minute incubation on ice
Centrifugation at 400×g for 10 minutes at 4°C
Load equal protein amounts (typically 10 μg) on gradient gels (4-12% Bis-Tris recommended)
IHC-P preparation:
Fix tissues with 4% paraformaldehyde
Embed in paraffin and section at 5 μm thickness
Perform heat-mediated antigen retrieval with citrate buffer pH 6
Block with 10% normal serum
Incubate with primary antibody (1:200-1:250) overnight at 4°C
Multiple studies have established correlations between CSTF2T expression and cancer prognosis:
In non-small cell lung cancer: Immunohistochemical analysis of 327 lung cancer samples demonstrated that strong CSTF2T expression significantly correlates with poor patient prognosis (P = 0.0079). Multivariate analysis further confirmed CSTF2T positivity as an independent prognostic factor .
In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): CSTF2T expression is associated with enhanced glycolysis and poorer outcomes. Analysis of multiple HCC databases (TCGA, GEO, ICGC) has established CSTF2T as a potential prognostic biomarker for HCC patients .
These findings suggest that CSTF2T expression analysis in tumor biopsies could inform clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy and patient follow-up protocols .
To investigate CSTF2T's role in cancer development and progression, researchers have employed several complementary approaches:
In vitro methodologies:
siRNA-mediated knockdown: Suppression of CSTF2T expression inhibits lung cancer cell growth
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing: Using sgRNAs targeting CSTF2T (e.g., sgRNA-F: CACCGACAGGAAAGCCAAAGGTTA, sgRNA-R: AAACTAACCCTTTGGCTTTCCTGTC)
Overexpression studies: Exogenous expression of CSTF2T promotes growth and invasion of mammalian cells
Cell-based functional assays: Proliferation, invasion, and metabolic analysis of cells with modified CSTF2T expression
In vivo approaches:
Subcutaneous xenograft models: Implantation of CSTF2T-modulated cancer cells in immunocompromised mice
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in mice: Using liver-specific delivery methods
Hydrodynamic tail vein injection: Delivery of plasmid mixtures containing CSTF2T-targeting constructs
These methodologies have demonstrated that CSTF2T plays important roles in cellular proliferation, invasion, and metabolic regulation, particularly glycolysis in cancer cells .
Successful CRISPR-Cas9 targeting of CSTF2T requires careful experimental design:
sgRNA design considerations:
Target sequences with high specificity to avoid off-target effects
For human CSTF2T: sgRNA-F: CACCGACAGGAAAGCCAAAGGTTA, sgRNA-R: AAACTAACCCTTTGGCTTTCCTGTC
For mouse studies: Two complementary sgRNAs can improve knockout efficiency:
Vector system selection:
Lentiviral delivery: Lenti-CRISPR-V2 vector (Addgene #52,961)
Packaging plasmids: psPAX2 (Addgene #12,260) and envelope plasmid pMD2.G (Addgene #12,259)
For stable cell lines: Include puromycin selection marker (typically 5 μg/ml)
Validation protocols:
Western blot analysis using validated antibodies
Functional assays to confirm phenotypic changes
Sequencing of targeted locus to confirm genomic alterations
For in vivo applications, hydrodynamic tail vein injection has proven effective for liver-specific targeting in mouse models .
Gene expression and pathway analyses have identified several biological processes associated with CSTF2T function in cancer:
Cellular energy metabolism: CSTF2T is associated with enhanced glycolysis in cancer cells, potentially contributing to the Warburg effect
Cell proliferation and growth: CSTF2T expression promotes cancer cell growth through mechanisms that may involve alternative RNA processing of cell cycle regulators
Cellular invasion: Exogenous CSTF2T expression enhances invasive properties of cells, suggesting a role in metastatic processes
Bioinformatic analyses of CSTF2T-correlated genes (using Spearman correlation with coefficients ≥0.5) followed by Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analyses have identified specific molecular pathways modulated by this protein. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) comparing high and low CSTF2T-expressing tumors further elucidates the biological processes affected by this RNA processing factor .
CSTF2T's primary function involves mRNA 3' end processing, particularly in AAUAAA-independent polyadenylation. To study this specialized function:
RNA-Seq analysis focusing on 3' UTR usage and polyadenylation site selection
CLIP-Seq (Cross-linking immunoprecipitation) to identify direct CSTF2T binding sites
Reporter assays with constructs containing alternative polyadenylation signals
Comparison between wild-type and CSTF2T-depleted cells to identify differentially processed transcripts
Analysis of poly(A) tail length and stability in CSTF2T-manipulated experimental systems
These approaches can help elucidate how CSTF2T affects the transcriptome through alternative polyadenylation, potentially contributing to cancer-specific gene expression patterns .
CSTF2T represents a promising therapeutic target for cancer treatment for several reasons:
Cancer-specific expression: Limited expression in normal tissues but upregulation in various cancers suggests a favorable therapeutic window
Correlation with aggressive disease: Association with poor prognosis indicates functional importance in disease progression
Functional significance: CSTF2T knockdown inhibits cancer cell growth in experimental models
Metabolic regulation: Association with glycolysis suggests CSTF2T inhibition might disrupt cancer metabolism
Potential therapeutic strategies include:
RNAi-based approaches targeting CSTF2T mRNA
Small molecule inhibitors disrupting CSTF2T protein function
CRISPR-based therapeutic strategies
The development of CSTF2T-targeting therapeutics could provide novel treatment options for patients with CSTF2T-positive tumors, particularly those with aggressive disease features and poor prognosis .
Several animal models have proven effective for CSTF2T research:
Cstf2t knockout mice: Valuable for studying developmental and physiological roles of CSTF2T, particularly in reproductive biology
Xenograft models: BALB/c nude mice implanted with CSTF2T-modified human cancer cells (e.g., Huh7 cells) to study tumor growth and invasion
CRISPR-engineered mouse models: C57BL/6 mice with CSTF2T-targeted CRISPR constructs delivered via hydrodynamic tail vein injection to study liver-specific effects
Hydrodynamic transfection models: Tail vein injection of plasmid mixtures containing CSTF2T-targeting constructs along with oncogenic drivers (e.g., MYC) and transposase for stable integration
These models enable investigation of CSTF2T's role in both normal development and pathological conditions, providing valuable insights for potential therapeutic applications.
While both CSTF2T and CSTF2 function in mRNA 3' end processing, they exhibit important differences:
Expression pattern: CSTF2 is widely expressed across many tissue types, whereas CSTF2T shows restricted expression primarily in testis under normal conditions
Substrate specificity: CSTF2T plays a role in AAUAAA-independent mRNA polyadenylation, suggesting different sequence preferences compared to CSTF2
Cancer relevance: CSTF2T shows stronger association with cancer progression and poor prognosis compared to CSTF2
Evolutionary conservation: While both proteins are conserved across species, they may have evolved distinct functions in RNA processing
Understanding these functional differences is crucial for developing specific therapeutic strategies targeting CSTF2T while minimizing effects on the more ubiquitously expressed CSTF2 .