CSU2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Barzolvolimab

Barzolvolimab (CDX-0159) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT (c-Kit), which regulates mast cell survival, proliferation, and activation . Mast cells play a central role in CSU pathogenesis by releasing histamine and other inflammatory mediators, leading to hives, angioedema, and pruritus .

Structure and Mechanism

Barzolvolimab’s structure adheres to the classical antibody framework:

  • Heavy and light chains: Humanized IgG1 format optimized for high specificity to KIT .

  • Function: Blocks KIT signaling, depleting mast cells and preventing their inflammatory activity .

Key Mechanism

TargetMechanismOutcome
KIT receptorInhibits binding of stem cell factor (SCF)Reduces mast cell numbers and mediator release

Phase 2 Trials

  • Population: Patients with moderate-to-severe CSU refractory to H1 antihistamines .

  • Results:

    • 71% achieved complete response (UAS7 = 0) at Week 52 .

    • 82% reported no disease impact on quality of life (DLQI) at Week 52 .

    • Rapid symptom improvement observed within 2–4 weeks .

Phase 3 Trials (EMBARQ-CSU1/2)

ParameterDetails
DesignRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Population~1,830 adults with CSU unresponsive to H1 antihistamines
Dosing150 mg (Q4W) or 300 mg (Q8W) + loading doses
Primary EndpointChange in UAS7 (urticaria activity) at Week 12
Secondary EndpointsDLQI, UCT (Urticaria Control Test), ISS7 (itch severity)

Efficacy in CSU

  • Phase 2:

    • 95% of patients reported meaningful quality-of-life improvements (DLQI) .

    • Durability: Responses sustained through 52 weeks .

Comparative Advantages

FeatureBarzolvolimabOmalizumab (Standard Care)
TargetKIT (mast cells)IgE (immune modulation)
MechanismMast cell depletionBlocks IgE-FcεRI interaction
Refractory Population EfficacyActive in omalizumab-resistant patients Limited in non-responders

Future Directions

  • Phase 3 Topline Data: Expected in 2026 for EMBARQ-CSU1/2 .

  • CIndU Expansion: Phase 3 trials for cold urticaria (ColdU) and symptomatic dermographism (SD) planned for 2025 .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
CSU2 antibody; At1g02330 antibody; T6A9.2Protein COP1 SUPPRESSOR 2 antibody
Target Names
CSU2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
CSU2 antibody inhibits the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity of COP1, a key repressor of seedling photomorphogenesis. It suppresses COP1-mediated degradation of HY5 in the dark. CSU2 is essential for primary root development under standard light growth conditions.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. CSU2 interacts with COP1 through its coiled-coil domain. CSU2 negatively regulates COP1 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. [CSU2] PMID: 26714275
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G02330

STRING: 3702.AT1G02330.1

UniGene: At.16090

Protein Families
TLS1 family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus. Nucleus speckle.

Q&A

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) research involving antibodies like those in type IIb autoimmune CSU (aiCSU) requires rigorous experimental frameworks. Below are structured FAQs addressing key methodological challenges and advanced research considerations, informed by current mechanistic studies and biomarker validation approaches .

What experimental designs address contradictory findings in CSU2 antibody pathogenicity studies?

Advanced strategy:

  • Longitudinal profiling: Track antibody titers, complement activation (C5a), and mast cell degranulation markers (tryptase) over 6–12 months .

  • Multi-center validation: Standardize BAT protocols across sites to reduce inter-lab variability .

  • Control cohorts: Include patients with non-autoimmune urticaria and healthy subjects with elevated anti-TPO .

Contradiction resolution workflow:

  • Replicate findings in independent cohorts using cell-free expression systems for antibody validation .

  • Apply transcriptomic analysis (CIBERSORT/xCell) to identify confounding immune cell signatures .

How should researchers validate antibody specificity in novel CSU2 detection platforms?

Technical validation pipeline:

  • In vitro testing: Use human FcεRI-transfected RBL-2H3 cells to confirm IgG-mediated mast cell activation .

  • Epitope mapping: Employ hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for anti-FcεRI binding sites .

  • Cross-reactivity screens: Test against IgE Fc regions and thyroid antigens (e.g., thyroglobulin) .

Platform comparison:

MethodSensitivityThroughputKey Limitation
Cell-free expression 90%HighLimited post-translational modifications
BAT 85%MediumRequires fresh basophils
ELISA (anti-TPO) 95%HighDoesn’t confirm functionality

What multi-omics approaches enhance CSU2 antibody mechanism discovery?

Integrated analysis framework:

  • Transcriptomics: Apply xCell to biopsy samples to quantify mast cell-eosinophil interaction scores .

  • Proteomics: Use Olink panels to measure 92 inflammation-related proteins in serum .

  • Clinical metadata: Correlate antibody titers with UAS7 scores and treatment resistance patterns .

Key finding: Patients with triple positivity (ASST+/anti-TPO+/BAT+) show upregulated Th17 pathways (IL-17A, CCL20) .

How can researchers optimize antibody therapeutic efficacy studies for type IIb CSU?

Trial design considerations:

  • Stratification: Enroll patients with ≥2 type IIb biomarkers (e.g., low IgE + anti-TPO+) .

  • Outcome measures: Include time to complete symptom remission (vs partial response) .

  • Mechanistic endpoints: Monitor FcγRIIb expression on basophils pre/post treatment .

Advanced tool: Implement microfluidic single-cell sequencing to track clonal B-cell responses to biologics .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.