AN Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Structure and Composition

Antibodies (immunoglobulins) are Y-shaped glycoproteins composed of four polypeptide chains:

  • Two identical heavy chains (H) and two identical light chains (L) linked by disulfide bonds .

  • Variable (V) domains form the antigen-binding site (Fab fragment), while constant (C) domains mediate effector functions (Fc fragment) .

ComponentFunctionKey Features
Fab FragmentBinds antigens via hypervariable regionsContains VL and VH domains; forms paratope
Fc FragmentInteracts with immune cells/complementDetermines antibody class (e.g., IgG, IgA)
Hinge RegionFlexibility for antigen bindingConnects Fab and Fc; varies by isotype

Antibody Isotypes and Their Biological Roles

Antibodies are classified into five isotypes, each with distinct functions and tissue distributions:

IsotypeHeavy ChainPrimary FunctionsDistribution
IgGγNeutralizes toxins; crosses placentaBlood, lymph, extracellular
IgAαMucosal immunity; traps pathogens in secretionsMucus, saliva, breast milk
IgMμFirst-line defense; activates complementBlood, lymph (pentameric form)
IgEεAnti-parasitic; mediates allergic responsesBound to mast cells/basophils
IgDδB-cell receptor; signals antigen recognitionLymphatic tissues
  • IgG dominates intravascular spaces and is critical for long-term immunity .

  • IgA aggregates pathogens at mucosal surfaces, preventing invasion .

Antibody Diversity Mechanisms

Antibody diversity arises from:

  1. V(D)J Recombination: Random assembly of V, D, and J gene segments during B-cell development .

  2. Somatic Hypermutation: Introduces point mutations in mature B cells for affinity maturation .

  3. Class-Switch Recombination: Changes antibody isotype (e.g., IgM → IgG) to adapt to pathogens .

Example: A single B cell can produce ~10⁹ distinct antibodies through these mechanisms .

Diagnostic Uses

Antibody tests detect past or current infections:

Assay TypeTarget AntibodiesClinical UtilityAccuracy (3+ Weeks Post-Infection)
IgG/IgM TestsSARS-CoV-2 N/S proteinsCOVID-19 diagnosis~91.4% sensitivity
ELISAViral antigensDetecting HIV, Lyme disease~98% specificity
Western BlotSpecific epitopesConfirming autoimmune diseasesHigh specificity for autoantibodies

Limitations: Early infection (1–7 days) yields <30% sensitivity due to delayed antibody production .

Therapeutic Applications

Therapy TypeMechanismExamples
Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs)Target-specific bindingTrastuzumab (breast cancer), COVID-19 mAbs
Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs)Deliver cytotoxic agents to antigen-expressing cellsAdo-trastuzumab emtansine (HER2+ cancers)
Broadly Neutralizing mAbsCross-reactive binding to viral epitopesC179 (influenza), A6p4 (H5N1)

Innovation: Vanderbilt’s LIBRA-seq identifies rare cross-reactive antibodies, including those targeting HIV and HCV simultaneously .

Challenges and Future Directions

  1. Reproducibility: Antibody specificity must be validated in complex biological matrices .

  2. Cross-Reactivity: Broadly neutralizing antibodies (e.g., C179) require advanced screening .

  3. Synthetic Biology: Golden Gate vectors enable rapid antibody expression and phenotyping .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
AN antibody; DOQ antibody; At1g01510 antibody; F22L4.6C-terminal binding protein AN antibody; CtBP antibody; Protein ANGUSTIFOLIA antibody; Protein DETORQUEO antibody
Target Names
AN
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
ANGUSTIFOLIA plays a critical role in regulating the balance between tubular and stacked structures within the Golgi complex. This protein is essential for the proper arrangement of cortical microtubules (MTs), which in turn determines cell shape. It further regulates leaf width by controlling the polar elongation of leaf cells. Additionally, ANGUSTIFOLIA is involved in regulating trichome branching. Interestingly, it appears to lack the ability to directly regulate gene transcription. However, it exerts control over epidermal cell divisions and elongation in a non-cell-autonomous manner (regulated by subepidermal cells). Conversely, it regulates epidermal cell polarity, shape, trichome branching, and elongation in a cell-autonomous manner. ANGUSTIFOLIA negatively regulates growth in petiole elongation. Moreover, it prevents lipid peroxidation as part of the abiotic stress response. This protein is also implicated in the SUB-dependent signaling mechanism and may participate in membrane trafficking events around the trans-Golgi network.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. ANGUSTIFOLIA is involved in regulating cell morphogenesis, as well as responses to abiotic and biotic stress. PMID: 23672620
  2. Research indicates that subepidermal rescue of leaf width is accompanied by an increase in cell number within the epidermis, suggesting that ANGUSTIFOLIA can trigger cell divisions in a non-autonomous manner. PMID: 19843316
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G01510

STRING: 3702.AT1G01510.1

UniGene: At.214

Protein Families
D-isomer specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family, Plant AN subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Golgi apparatus, trans-Golgi network.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in cotyledons, leaves, roots, stems and floral buds.

Q&A

What is the estimated diversity of human antibodies and what are its implications for research?

The human immune system can generate an extraordinarily diverse range of antibodies. Researchers at Scripps Research have genetically sequenced antibodies in people's blood and estimated that the human body may be able to make up to one quintillion (10^18) unique antibodies . This diversity is achieved through genetic recombination and somatic hypermutation.

When examining the antibody repertoires of different individuals, researchers found that any two people shared an average of 0.95% of antibody clonotypes (groups of antibodies with similar genetic composition), while 0.022% of clonotypes were shared among all studied individuals . This level of sharing is actually higher than would be expected by random chance, suggesting certain antibody types may be common across the human population.

The vast diversity of antibodies has significant implications for research:

  • It provides a massive natural library for developing new diagnostic tools

  • It offers potential for designing highly specific therapeutic antibodies

  • It creates challenges for predicting antibody responses across populations

  • It necessitates careful selection and validation when using antibodies as research tools

How should researchers select and validate antibodies for their experiments?

Selecting an appropriate antibody requires careful consideration of several factors to ensure experimental success. The process should follow a systematic approach:

Step 1: Preliminary Selection

  • Define your experimental application (Western blot, IHC, ELISA, etc.)

  • Determine target protein characteristics (native vs. denatured state)

  • Review vendor validation data relevant to your specific application

  • Check literature for previously validated antibodies for your target

Step 2: Validation Process
Test each antibody for three critical parameters :

  • Specificity: Determine whether the antibody binds only to the intended target.

    • Use knockout or knockdown models where the target protein is absent

    • Test in tissues known to express vs. not express the target

    • Perform peptide competition assays

  • Sensitivity: Establish the detection limit and dynamic range.

    • Use serial dilutions of your sample

    • Determine signal-to-noise ratio at different antibody concentrations

    • Quantify detection limits using standard curves with purified protein

  • Reproducibility: Ensure consistent performance across experiments.

    • Test multiple antibody lots when possible

    • Document consistent results across repeated experiments

    • Standardize protocols with detailed methods

Failure to validate antibodies properly contributes to an estimated $800 million wasted annually on poorly performing antibodies and approximately $350 million lost in irreproducible biomedical research .

What are the major antibody-based techniques and when should each be applied?

Antibodies serve as critical tools across numerous laboratory techniques. Here is a methodological overview of major antibody-based techniques:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

  • Application: Quantitative detection and measurement of antigens in liquid samples

  • Methodology: Antigen is immobilized (directly or via capture antibody) to a solid surface, then detected using antibodies linked to enzymes that produce measurable signals

  • Variants: Direct, indirect, sandwich, and competitive formats with varying sensitivity and specificity profiles

  • Best used when: Precise quantification of protein concentration is needed in complex biological samples

Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT)

  • Application: Detection of proteins secreted by individual cells

  • Methodology: Similar to ELISA but optimized to visualize secretions from individual cells as spots

  • Best used when: Analyzing specific cytokine-producing cells in immune responses

Western Blotting

  • Application: Detecting specific proteins in complex mixtures

  • Methodology: Proteins separated by electrophoresis are transferred to membranes and probed with specific antibodies

  • Best used when: Confirmation of protein presence and approximate molecular weight is needed

Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence

  • Application: Visualizing protein localization in tissues or cells

  • Methodology: Fixed samples are treated with antibodies and visualized using chromogenic or fluorescent detection

  • Best used when: Spatial information about protein distribution is required

When selecting a technique, researchers should consider:

  • Required sensitivity and specificity

  • Sample type and preparation constraints

  • Quantitative vs. qualitative needs

  • Equipment availability

  • Need for multiplexing (detecting multiple targets simultaneously)

What controls should be included in antibody-based experiments?

Proper controls are essential for interpreting antibody-based experimental results. All antibody-generated data should include appropriate controls :

Essential controls for all antibody experiments:

  • Positive control: Sample known to contain the target protein

  • Negative control: Sample known to lack the target protein

  • No primary antibody control: To assess background from secondary detection systems

  • Isotype control: Primary antibody of the same isotype but irrelevant specificity

Application-specific controls:

  • Western blotting:

    • Loading controls (housekeeping proteins)

    • Molecular weight markers

    • Recombinant protein standards when available

  • Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence:

    • Tissue/cells known to express target

    • Tissue/cells known not to express target

    • Blocking peptide competition controls

  • ELISA:

    • Standard curves with purified proteins

    • Background wells (no antigen)

    • Dilution linearity checks

  • Flow cytometry:

    • Unstained controls

    • Single-color controls for compensation

    • Fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls

How are computational approaches transforming antibody design?

Computational approaches, particularly AI-driven methods, are revolutionizing antibody design by enabling the creation of novel antibodies with customized properties. Recent advances demonstrate significant progress in this area:

RFdiffusion for antibody design
The Baker Lab has developed a fine-tuned version of RFdiffusion specifically for designing human-like antibodies . This AI model can:

  • Generate functional antibodies with atomic precision

  • Design both nanobodies and more complete single chain variable fragments (scFvs)

  • Create antibody loops—the intricate, flexible regions responsible for binding

  • Produce novel antibody blueprints unlike any seen during training

The researchers have experimentally validated this approach by creating antibodies against disease-relevant targets, including influenza hemagglutinin and bacterial toxins .

Biophysics-informed models for specificity design
Another computational approach involves biophysics-informed models that can predict and design antibody specificity profiles . This method:

  • Associates each potential ligand with a distinct binding mode

  • Enables prediction and generation of specific variants beyond those observed experimentally

  • Can generate antibodies with customized specificity profiles

  • Potentially mitigates experimental artifacts and biases in selection experiments

These computational tools provide several advantages over traditional antibody development methods:

  • Accelerated design process

  • Reduced reliance on animal immunization

  • Ability to target challenging antigens

  • Lower development costs

  • Creation of antibodies with precisely engineered properties

What strategies can improve antibody specificity for closely related targets?

Developing antibodies that can distinguish between closely related target proteins remains a significant challenge in research. Several methodological approaches can enhance specificity:

Experimental selection strategies:

  • Phage display with counter-selection:

    • Expose antibody libraries to the target antigen

    • Remove binders that also recognize closely related "decoy" antigens

    • Iterate selection to enrich for specific binders

    • This method can be enhanced computationally to improve efficiency

  • Epitope-focused design:

    • Identify regions that differ between related targets

    • Design antibodies specifically targeting these unique epitopes

    • Test binding against both target and related proteins

Computational approaches:

  • Machine learning prediction:

    • Train models on experimental data from one set of ligands

    • Predict binding outcomes for other ligand combinations

    • Use models to generate novel antibody variants not present in initial libraries

  • Specificity engineering:

    • Systematically introduce mutations in complementarity-determining regions (CDRs)

    • Evaluate impact on binding to target vs. off-targets

    • Select mutations that enhance discriminatory power

A study examining antibody binding interactions used a dataset containing quantitative binding scores for 104,972 scFv-format antibodies against a SARS-CoV-2 target peptide . The antibodies were created by introducing mutations in the complementary-determining regions (CDRs), resulting in predicted affinity measurements ranging from 37 pM to 22 mM .

This dataset provides a valuable resource for benchmarking antibody-specific representation models for machine learning approaches to specificity engineering .

What are antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and how are they advancing therapeutic applications?

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a significant advancement in targeted therapy by combining the specificity of antibodies with the potency of cytotoxic drugs.

ADC Structure and Function:
ADCs are targeted immunoconjugate constructs that integrate:

  • The selectivity of monoclonal antibodies that recognize specific cellular targets

  • The potency of cytotoxic drugs that would otherwise be too toxic for systemic use

  • Linker chemistry that controls drug release at the target site

This design allows for higher doses of cytotoxic drugs to be administered while minimizing damage to healthy cells and reducing systemic toxicity .

Beyond Oncology Applications:
While ADCs have primarily been developed for cancer treatment, recent research is expanding their application to non-oncological indications:

Immunomodulatory ADCs:
A notable example is ABBV-3373, developed by conjugating a dexamethasone derivative to the anti-TNF-α antibody adalimumab for treating autoimmune diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis . This approach works through:

  • Targeted delivery of glucocorticoids to activated immune cells

  • Activation of the glucocorticoid receptor pathway upon cell internalization

  • Initiation of an anti-inflammatory cascade in the nucleus

  • Enhanced efficacy against immune-mediated diseases while minimizing systemic adverse effects associated with standard glucocorticoid treatment

Other examples include:

  • Glucocorticoid-conjugated anti-CD74 antibodies targeting B-cells

  • Antibody-coupled anti-inflammatory agents for targeted immunosuppression

These advances demonstrate how the ADC platform can be adapted beyond cancer therapy to address other medical challenges requiring targeted drug delivery.

How can researchers troubleshoot inconsistent antibody performance across experiments?

Inconsistent antibody performance is a common challenge that can undermine experimental reproducibility. A systematic troubleshooting approach includes:

Identify potential sources of variability:

  • Antibody-related factors:

    • Lot-to-lot variations

    • Storage conditions and freeze-thaw cycles

    • Antibody concentration and dilution errors

    • Degradation over time

  • Sample-related factors:

    • Protein degradation during sample preparation

    • Epitope masking due to fixation or denaturation

    • Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition

    • Batch variations in cell or tissue samples

  • Protocol-related factors:

    • Incubation time and temperature differences

    • Buffer composition variations

    • Detection system inconsistencies

    • Equipment calibration issues

Methodological approach to troubleshooting:

ProblemPotential CausesMethodological Solutions
No signal- Wrong antibody
- Target protein absent
- Epitope inaccessible
- Detection system failure
- Verify antibody with positive control
- Confirm target expression
- Try alternative epitope retrieval
- Test detection system separately
Weak signal- Insufficient antibody
- Low target abundance
- Incomplete epitope retrieval
- Suboptimal incubation
- Titrate antibody concentration
- Enrich target protein
- Optimize retrieval conditions
- Extend incubation time/adjust temperature
High background- Excessive antibody
- Insufficient blocking
- Non-specific binding
- Cross-reactivity
- Reduce antibody concentration
- Optimize blocking conditions
- Include additional washing steps
- Use more specific antibody
Inconsistent results- Variable sample preparation
- Environmental factors
- Reagent instability
- Protocol deviations
- Standardize sample handling
- Control temperature and humidity
- Prepare fresh reagents
- Follow detailed protocols

Standardization recommendations:

  • Maintain detailed records of antibody source, lot number, and dilution

  • Prepare master mixes of reagents when possible

  • Include standard samples across experiments for normalization

  • Pay attention to protein-specific antigen retrieval methods, following vendor recommendations

  • Document all protocol steps in detail, including timing and temperature

By systematically addressing these variables, researchers can significantly improve the consistency and reproducibility of antibody-based experiments.

What methodologies are used to evaluate antibody binding kinetics and affinity?

Understanding antibody binding kinetics and affinity is crucial for characterizing antibody function and predicting in vivo efficacy. Several methodological approaches provide quantitative measurements of these parameters:

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):

  • Principle: Measures changes in refractive index when antibodies bind to immobilized antigens

  • Parameters measured: Association rate (kon), dissociation rate (koff), and equilibrium dissociation constant (KD)

  • Advantages: Real-time, label-free measurements with minimal sample consumption

  • Methodology:

    • Immobilize antigen on a sensor chip

    • Flow antibody solutions over the surface at different concentrations

    • Monitor association and dissociation phases

    • Fit data to binding models to extract kinetic parameters

Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI):

  • Principle: Measures interference patterns of white light reflected from a biosensor surface

  • Parameters measured: Similar to SPR (kon, koff, KD)

  • Advantages: No microfluidics required, higher throughput than SPR

  • Methodology:

    • Load antigen onto biosensor tips

    • Dip tips into antibody solutions

    • Monitor binding in real-time

    • Analyze binding curves to determine kinetic constants

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):

  • Principle: Measures heat released or absorbed during antibody-antigen binding

  • Parameters measured: KD, binding stoichiometry, enthalpy (ΔH), entropy (ΔS)

  • Advantages: Provides complete thermodynamic profile

  • Methodology:

    • Titrate antibody into antigen solution (or vice versa)

    • Measure heat changes for each injection

    • Fit binding isotherms to determine thermodynamic parameters

Microscale Thermophoresis (MST):

  • Principle: Measures changes in movement of molecules along microscopic temperature gradients

  • Parameters measured: KD

  • Advantages: Low sample consumption, works in complex biological fluids

  • Methodology:

    • Label one binding partner (typically the protein)

    • Mix with varying concentrations of the unlabeled partner

    • Apply temperature gradient and measure fluorescence changes

    • Calculate binding affinity from dose-response curve

High-Throughput Approaches:
The development of high-throughput assays has enabled researchers to analyze binding kinetics for large antibody panels:

A dataset containing quantitative binding scores for 104,972 scFv-format antibodies against a SARS-CoV-2 target peptide exemplifies this approach . This dataset includes antibodies with predicted affinity measurements ranging from 37 pM to 22 mM, providing a comprehensive range for benchmarking binding characteristics .

What documentation should be included when publishing antibody-based research?

When publishing research using antibodies, proper documentation is essential for reproducibility. According to best practices , researchers should include:

Essential antibody information:

  • Complete antibody identification (manufacturer, catalog number, lot number, RRID)

  • Clone name for monoclonal antibodies

  • Host species and isotype

  • Antigen used for immunization

  • Epitope information (if known)

  • Antibody format (whole IgG, Fab, scFv, etc.)

Validation documentation:

  • Specific validation performed for the particular application

  • Positive and negative controls utilized

  • Evidence of antibody specificity (e.g., western blot showing single band of correct size)

  • For new antibodies, comprehensive validation data should be presented, even if in supplementary materials

  • For established antibodies used in new applications, application-specific validation data

Methodological details:

  • Complete protocol including buffer compositions

  • Antibody concentration or dilution used

  • Incubation times and temperatures

  • Blocking conditions

  • Detection method details

  • Image acquisition parameters

  • Quantification methods with statistical approaches

Quantitative assessments:

  • Present complete data and describe all quantitative methods

  • Include signal-to-noise ratios where applicable

  • Document dynamic range for quantitative applications

  • Provide standard curves for concentration determinations

Failure to include this crucial information makes published data difficult to evaluate and potentially irreproducible, contributing to the estimated $350 million lost annually in biomedical research due to irreproducible results .

How can researchers ensure reproducibility in antibody-based experiments?

Ensuring reproducibility in antibody-based research requires systematic approaches across the experimental workflow:

Antibody Selection and Validation:

  • Use antibodies with established track records where possible

  • Validate each antibody for your specific application and experimental conditions

  • Test each antibody for specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility in your model system

  • Maintain detailed records of antibody sources, lot numbers, and performance

Experimental Design:

  • Include all necessary controls (positive, negative, technical)

  • Design experiments with sufficient statistical power

  • Pre-plan analysis methods before generating data

  • Use randomization and blinding where appropriate

  • Consider testing critical findings with alternative antibodies

Protocol Standardization:

  • Develop detailed standard operating procedures (SOPs)

  • Document all steps, including seemingly minor details

  • Establish quality control checkpoints throughout protocols

  • Standardize sample collection and processing

  • Maintain consistent reagent preparation methods

Data Collection and Analysis:

  • Set objective criteria for data inclusion/exclusion

  • Document all image acquisition parameters

  • Use automated analysis where possible to reduce bias

  • Maintain raw data and analysis code

  • Consider independent replication of key findings

Reporting:

  • Follow field-specific reporting guidelines

  • Document reagents completely, including catalog numbers

  • Present all relevant controls in publications

  • Include validation data for antibodies, especially in supplementary materials

  • Be transparent about limitations and failed approaches

A systematic application of these principles can substantially improve the reproducibility of antibody-based research and reduce the waste of resources on irreproducible experiments.

How are high-throughput sequencing approaches advancing antibody research?

High-throughput sequencing technologies have transformed our understanding of antibody diversity and enabled new approaches to antibody discovery and engineering:

Antibody Repertoire Analysis:
Researchers at Scripps Research examined antibody-producing B cells from blood samples of 10 individuals (ages 18-30), discovering that while human antibody repertoires are highly diverse, there are commonalities across individuals . This research revealed:

  • Any two people shared an average of 0.95% of antibody clonotypes

  • 0.022% of clonotypes were shared among all studied individuals

  • This level of sharing was higher than would be expected by random chance

These findings suggest that while there's great diversity among people's antibody collections, there are some types that most people share, which has implications for vaccine development and immunotherapy .

Applications of repertoire sequencing:

  • Diagnostics: "Antibody repertoire information could soon be used to diagnose autoimmune diseases and chronic infections"

  • Vaccine design: Identifying commonly shared antibody types that could be targeted by vaccines

  • Immune monitoring: Tracking changes in antibody repertoires during disease or treatment

  • Therapeutic antibody discovery: Mining natural repertoires for therapeutic candidates

High-throughput binding assays:
Modern techniques enable the parallel analysis of thousands to millions of antibody variants. For example, a dataset containing binding scores for 104,972 antibodies against a SARS-CoV-2 target has been developed . These antibodies were created through systematic mutation:

  • All possible single (k=1) mutations in complementary-determining regions (CDRs)

  • Random double (k=2) and triple (k=3) mutations

  • Resulting in a comprehensive affinity landscape from 37 pM to 22 mM

Such datasets provide unprecedented resources for building computational models of antibody-antigen interactions and benchmarking antibody design algorithms .

What role do artificial intelligence and machine learning play in modern antibody research?

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are revolutionizing multiple aspects of antibody research:

Antibody Design:
The RFdiffusion model developed by the Baker Lab represents a significant advancement in using AI to generate antibodies . This approach:

  • Uses a diffusion model fine-tuned specifically for human-like antibodies

  • Can design antibody loops—the intricate, flexible regions responsible for binding

  • Produces new antibody blueprints that bind user-specified targets

  • Has been experimentally validated against disease-relevant targets

  • Is available as free software for both non-profit and for-profit research

Specificity Prediction and Engineering:
Biophysics-informed models are being used to predict and design antibody specificity profiles beyond what can be observed experimentally :

  • Models trained on data from one ligand combination can predict outcomes for other combinations

  • These models can generate novel antibody variants not present in the initial library

  • This approach has been validated through phage display experiments

  • The models can disentangle multiple binding modes associated with specific ligands

Applications of AI/ML in antibody research include:

  • Epitope prediction: Identifying likely binding sites on antigens

  • Developability assessment: Predicting manufacturing challenges before experimental work

  • Humanization: Reducing immunogenicity while maintaining binding properties

  • Affinity maturation: Improving binding strength through computational mutation analysis

  • Multi-parameter optimization: Simultaneously optimizing multiple antibody properties

These AI/ML approaches offer several advantages:

  • Reduced experimental burden and associated costs

  • Ability to explore sequence space beyond what's accessible experimentally

  • Integration of multiple data types to inform design decisions

  • Potential for faster development timelines

As computational methods continue to advance, they will likely play an increasingly important role in antibody discovery and engineering workflows.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.