The CTHRC1 antibody is critical in studying CTHRC1’s role in tumor progression. In pancreatic cancer, CTHRC1 promotes angiogenesis by recruiting Tie2-expressing bone marrow-derived cells to the tumor microenvironment, enhancing neovascularization . The antibody has been used to validate CTHRC1 overexpression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) models, where it correlates with increased tumor vascularity and metastasis .
In RA research, the antibody facilitates the detection of elevated CTHRC1 plasma levels, which serve as a sensitive biomarker distinguishing RA from healthy controls and other arthritides (e.g., osteoarthritis, reactive arthritis) . Studies employing this antibody have shown that CTHRC1 levels correlate with disease activity (DAS28-CRP) and inflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and IL-8 .
The antibody is used to investigate CTHRC1’s role in arterial repair. Overexpression of CTHRC1 inhibits collagen deposition and promotes cell migration during vascular remodeling, as evidenced by its downregulation of TGF-β signaling pathways .
Key Research Findings
Angiogenesis: CTHRC1 activates endothelial cells via the ERK/AP-1 pathway, upregulating pro-angiogenic factors like Ang-2 and HGF .
RA Pathogenesis: CTHRC1 plasma levels are 2–3-fold higher in RA patients than in healthy controls, with strong correlations to RF and ACPA autoantibodies .
Pancreatic Stellate Cells (PSCs): The antibody has shown that CTHRC1 activates PSCs to differentiate into myofibroblast-like cancer-associated fibroblasts (myCAFs), promoting ECM remodeling and metastasis in pancreatic cancer .
CTHRC1 is a glycosylated, secreted protein that functions as a negative regulator of collagen matrix deposition. It is transiently expressed in the arterial wall in response to injury and contributes to vascular remodeling by inhibiting collagen expression and promoting cell migration . CTHRC1 is expressed in various cell types including renal epithelium, neurons, osteoblasts, and smooth muscle cells .
Research significance includes:
Marker for differentiated smooth muscle in its unprocessed form
Highly expressed in multiple human cancers (pancreatic, gastric, colon, lung)
Associated with cancer progression and metastasis through regulation of tumor cell migration and adhesion
Role in pancreatic stellate cells and fibroblast response to TGF-β1
CTHRC1 exists in multiple molecular forms that researchers should consider when selecting antibodies:
In research settings, CTHRC1 can be detected as a mixture of monomer, dimer, and trimer forms, with respective molar percentages of approximately 25%, 27%, and 48% . The selection of antibodies should consider which form(s) you need to detect and whether the antibody recognizes the N-terminal region (propeptide) or other epitopes that may be masked in certain complexes .
CTHRC1 antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications:
Each application requires optimization as sensitivity is sample-dependent .
The choice between monoclonal and polyclonal CTHRC1 antibodies depends on your experimental goals:
Advantages: Highly specific for single epitopes, consistent lot-to-lot performance
Best for: Detecting specific forms or domains of CTHRC1
Example applications: When epitope specificity is critical, such as distinguishing processed vs. unprocessed forms
Research has demonstrated that domain-specific antibodies (such as antipro antibodies against the N-terminal peptide sequence) can localize full-length CTHRC1 in the cytoplasm of various tissues, while antibodies raised against the full-length protein may miss certain complexed forms .
Based on published research, recommended positive controls include:
Recombinant Proteins:
Cell Lines:
Tissue Samples:
The choice of positive control should be based on the specific form of CTHRC1 you aim to detect, as expression levels and forms vary across tissues and cell types.
Distinguishing between intracellular and secreted CTHRC1 requires careful antibody selection and experimental design:
Intracellular CTHRC1:
Domain-specific antibodies against the N-terminus (antipro antibodies) can localize full-length CTHRC1 in the cytoplasm of vascular, gastrointestinal, and uterine smooth muscle cells as well as some neurons
In differentiated smooth muscle, full-length CTHRC1 appears to form a complex with cytoplasmic proteins, making detection challenging with antibodies raised against aggregating forms
Secreted CTHRC1:
Antibodies detecting the mature region can identify secreted forms in conditioned media
When using CHO cells transduced with CTHRC1 adenovirus, secreted forms can be detected in the medium by immunoblotting with antibodies at concentrations of 50 ng/mL and below
For comprehensive analysis, researchers should consider:
Collecting both cell lysates and conditioned media
Using multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes
Comparing reducing and non-reducing conditions to identify complexes
CTHRC1 undergoes proteolytic processing, generating various fragments with different molecular weights and potentially different functions. To study this process:
Experimental Approach:
Plasmin Cleavage Analysis:
Inhibition of Endogenous Plasmin:
Fragment Identification:
These approaches can help elucidate the biological significance of CTHRC1 processing in different cellular contexts.
CTHRC1 is highly expressed in multiple human cancers and plays significant roles in progression and metastasis. For cancer research applications, consider:
Tissue Selection and Processing:
CTHRC1 overexpression has been documented in pancreatic, gastric, colon, hepatocellular, and lung cancers
For prostate cancer, CTHRC1 expression has been correlated with tumor recurrence and may interact with PD-1/PD-L1 pathways
Antibody Selection:
For tumor microenvironment studies, choose antibodies that can detect CTHRC1 in both tumor cells and stromal components
Consider antibodies that specifically recognize secreted forms as these may be relevant for metastasis studies
Technical Approaches:
Immunohistochemistry protocols should include antigen retrieval in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer for 15 minutes before staining for optimal results
For comparative expression analysis between normal and tumor tissues, standardize tissue processing and staining conditions
When studying CTHRC1's role in fibrotic processes in cancer, consider its interactions with the TGF-β pathway
Data Interpretation:
Verify CTHRC1 localization (intracellular vs. extracellular) as this may provide insights into its functional state
Consider CTHRC1 as a potential prognostic marker, particularly in gastric cancer
When faced with conflicting results using CTHRC1 antibodies across different applications, consider these troubleshooting approaches:
Analysis of Protein Structure and Complexes:
Under non-reducing conditions, CTHRC1 can form higher-order structures (monomers, dimers, trimers, tetramers)
Under reducing conditions, most CTHRC1 runs as an apparent monomer
In tissue samples (e.g., aorta), CTHRC1 can form high molecular weight complexes (>130 kDa) under non-reducing conditions
Epitope Accessibility Issues:
Antibodies raised against different epitopes may give conflicting results due to epitope masking
The N-terminal propeptide remains accessible in CTHRC1 complexes and can be detected by antipro antibodies, while other epitopes may be masked
Some antibodies specifically recognize certain molecular weight forms
Experimental Design Solutions:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to cross-validate results
Compare results under both reducing and non-reducing conditions
Include appropriate positive controls (recombinant protein, cell lines known to express CTHRC1)
Consider tissue-specific processing - CTHRC1 in brain primarily corresponds to fragment a, while fragment b is prevalent in lung tissue
During wound healing in skin, CTHRC1 is processed into fragments c and d
By understanding these factors and implementing comprehensive validation strategies, researchers can resolve conflicting results and gain more accurate insights into CTHRC1 biology.
For optimal CTHRC1 detection in tissue samples by immunohistochemistry:
Tissue Preparation:
Use paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues
Cut sections at standard thickness (4-5 μm)
Antigen Retrieval:
Heat-mediated antigen retrieval in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer for 15 minutes is essential for detecting CTHRC1
Allow sections to cool to room temperature before proceeding
Antibody Selection and Dilution:
For detecting full-length (unprocessed) CTHRC1: Use antipro serum at 1:500 dilution
For general CTHRC1 detection: Start at 5 μg/mL and optimize as needed
Include appropriate controls with preimmune serum (1:500 dilution) to assess non-specific staining
Visualization Systems:
Standard secondary antibody detection systems are suitable
DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) is commonly used for chromogenic detection
For fluorescent detection, select secondary antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity
Tissue-Specific Considerations:
CTHRC1 shows distinct localization patterns in different tissues:
CTHRC1 exhibits complex molecular weight patterns that require specific considerations for Western blot analysis:
Expected Molecular Weights:
Higher molecular weight forms: dimer (~52 kDa), trimer (~78 kDa)
Processed fragments: multiple bands below 30 kDa (fragments b, c, d)
High molecular weight complexes: >130 kDa (in tissue samples under non-reducing conditions)
Protocol Adjustments:
Sample Preparation:
Gel Selection:
Use gradient gels (4-20%) to resolve both low and high molecular weight forms
For high-resolution separation of fragments: consider using higher percentage gels (12-15%)
Transfer Conditions:
For comprehensive detection of all forms, optimize transfer time and buffer composition
For high molecular weight complexes: extend transfer time or use semi-dry transfer systems
Antibody Selection:
Validation Strategy:
Include positive controls (recombinant protein, cell lines with known CTHRC1 expression)
When comparing samples, standardize protein loading (typically 50 μg per lane)
Consider exposure time optimization (10 seconds has been reported as effective)
To investigate CTHRC1 protein-protein interactions, several complementary approaches have been validated:
Immunoprecipitation (IP):
Use 0.5-4.0 μg antibody for 1.0-3.0 mg of total protein lysate
For analysis of immunoprecipitates, Western blot with alternative anti-CTHRC1 antibodies can confirm specificity
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Effective for identifying binding partners of CTHRC1
Consider using crosslinking reagents to stabilize transient interactions
Both cell lysates and concentrated conditioned media can be used depending on whether investigating intracellular or secreted complex formation
Analysis of Multimeric Forms:
Compare non-reducing and reducing conditions to identify covalent and non-covalent interactions
In non-reduced CHO cell lysates, antibodies recognize bands consistent with monomer, dimer, trimer, and tetramer forms
In aortic samples, high molecular weight complexes (>130 kDa) can be detected under non-reducing conditions
Plasmin Cleavage Analysis:
Purified His-tagged CTHRC1 from CHO cells can be used to study proteolytic processing
Incubation with human plasmin generates specific fragments that can be identified by N-terminal sequencing
For studying endogenous processing, inhibitors like ε-aminocaproic acid can block plasmin activity
These approaches, used individually or in combination, can provide insights into CTHRC1's interactions with other proteins and its processing mechanisms in different cellular contexts.
CTHRC1 has emerged as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in cancer research, with antibodies playing crucial roles in these investigations:
Biomarker Applications:
CTHRC1 expression predicts tumor recurrence in prostate cancer, particularly when analyzed alongside PD-1/PD-L1 expression
Serves as an independent prognostic marker in gastric cancer
Overexpression detected in multiple cancers including pancreatic, hepatocellular, gastric, colon, and lung cancers
Therapeutic Target Research:
An anti-CTHRC1 humanized monoclonal antibody has been developed (Patent KR102487687B1)
For therapeutic antibody development research, understanding CTHRC1's oligomeric forms is crucial - the protein exists as a mixture of monomer (26 kD, 25%), dimer (52 kD, 27%), and trimer (78 kD, 48%)
Average molecular weight of the CTHRC1 mixture has been calculated as 57.98 kD, with a molar concentration of 100 ng/mL CTHRC1 equivalent to 1.7 nM
Methodological Approaches:
Antibody-mediated inhibition studies:
Functional domains mapping:
Biomarker validation:
Standardized immunohistochemistry protocols for tissue microarrays
Correlation with clinical outcomes data
Detecting CTHRC1 in fibrotic disease models presents unique challenges that researchers should address:
Technical Challenges:
Variable expression patterns:
Complex regulation:
CTHRC1 is induced by BMP-2 and blocks TGF-β-induced collagen type I and III synthesis
Pirfenidone attenuates lung fibrotic fibroblast responses to TGF-β1, potentially involving CTHRC1 pathways
NEDD4L-induced β-catenin ubiquitination suppresses interstitial pulmonary fibrosis via inhibiting the CTHRC1/HIF-1α axis
Methodological Solutions:
Model-specific approaches:
Multi-antibody detection strategy:
Use antibodies targeting different epitopes to capture the full spectrum of CTHRC1 forms
Domain-specific antibodies can help distinguish between processed and unprocessed forms
Functional correlation:
By addressing these challenges with appropriate experimental designs and antibody selection strategies, researchers can better understand CTHRC1's complex roles in fibrotic diseases.