CXCR6 is expressed on NKT cells, activated/memory T cells, and subsets of plasma cells . It interacts with its ligand CXCL16, which exists in membrane-bound and soluble forms . CXCR6 antibodies enable precise detection and functional modulation of this receptor.
Key Functions:
CXCR6 antibodies vary by species reactivity, conjugation, and experimental use. Below is a comparison of commercially available antibodies:
| Antibody Clone | Applications | Species Reactivity | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| DANID2 (PE) | Flow cytometry | Mouse | |
| MAB699 | Flow cytometry, IHC | Human | |
| EPR24686-113 | IHC | Human | |
| 13B 1E5 (BUV395) | Flow cytometry | Human | |
| MAB2145 | Flow cytometry | Mouse |
Flow Cytometry: Quantifies CXCR6+ cell populations (e.g., NKT cells, activated T cells) .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localizes CXCR6 in tissues (e.g., tumor microenvironments, brain lesions) .
Immunotherapy: Targets pathogenic CXCR6+ T cells in autoimmune diseases .
CXCR6 antibodies have elucidated its role in autoimmune, inflammatory, and neoplastic conditions:
Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE):
Tumor Microenvironment:
Biomarker Utility:
Antibody-Based Depletion:
Biomarker Potential:
Species Cross-Reactivity:
Detection Limitations:
CXCR6 antibodies remain critical for advancing immunotherapy. Key areas include:
CXE16 (Carboxylesterase 16) is a member of the carboxylesterase family in Arabidopsis thaliana, encoded by the gene with UniProt accession number Q8LED9. This enzyme plays roles in:
Hydrolysis of ester bonds in various substrates
Plant defense mechanisms against xenobiotics
Potential roles in secondary metabolism
Lipid metabolism and physiological processes
These carboxylesterases typically catalyze the hydrolysis of carboxylic esters into alcohols and carboxylic acids, serving important functions in detoxification pathways and metabolic processes.
CXE16 antibodies have been validated for multiple detection techniques:
| Application | Validated | Recommended Dilution | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | Yes | 1:500-1:2000 | Detects ~35-40 kDa protein |
| ELISA | Yes | 1:1000-1:5000 | Both direct and sandwich formats |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Limited | 1:50-1:200 | May require optimization |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | Limited | 1:100-1:500 | Secondary validation recommended |
For optimal results, researchers should perform preliminary titration experiments to determine ideal antibody concentrations for their specific experimental systems .
Proper storage is crucial for maintaining antibody integrity:
Store at -20°C or -80°C for long-term preservation
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles (aliquot before freezing)
Working dilutions can be stored at 4°C for up to two weeks
Preserve in 50% glycerol with PBS (pH 7.4) buffer containing 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative
Effective protein extraction is critical for CXE16 detection and requires specialized approaches for plant tissues:
Recommended protocol:
Grind plant tissue in liquid nitrogen to a fine powder
Extract using buffer containing:
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)
150 mM NaCl
1% Triton X-100
0.5% sodium deoxycholate
Protease inhibitor cocktail (crucial for preserving esterase activity)
Include 5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol to maintain protein stability
Avoid detergents that may interfere with esterase activity assays
Centrifuge at 15,000 × g at 4°C for 15 minutes
Collect supernatant while avoiding the lipid layer
This method preserves enzyme activity while minimizing interference from plant secondary metabolites and phenolic compounds that often complicate plant protein extraction .
This represents a significant challenge in plant molecular biology due to high sequence similarity among carboxylesterase family members:
Multi-faceted approach for specificity:
Epitope mapping analysis: Identify unique peptide regions recognized by the antibody
Knockout validation: Use cxe16 mutant plants as negative controls
Recombinant protein competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with purified CXE16 protein before immunodetection
Mass spectrometry confirmation: Verify immunoprecipitated proteins
Cross-reactivity panel: Test against recombinant versions of related CXEs (CXE5, CXE13)
Research has demonstrated that while CXE family members share conserved domains, carefully validated antibodies can distinguish between specific isoforms through recognition of unique epitopes in non-conserved regions .
Subcellular localization studies require careful optimization:
Immunolocalization protocol refinements:
Fixation options:
4% paraformaldehyde (22 hours) for preserving antigenicity
Ethanol:acetic acid (3:1) for improved penetration in dense tissues
Antigen retrieval methods:
Citrate buffer (pH 6.0) heating for 10 minutes
Enzymatic treatment with proteinase K (1-5 μg/mL)
Blocking agents:
5% BSA in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100
2% normal goat serum to reduce background
Controls:
Pre-immune serum control
Peptide competition assay
Knockout/knockdown tissue negative control
These optimizations help overcome challenges specific to plant tissues, such as cell wall barriers, autofluorescence, and high levels of phenolic compounds .
Several factors can contribute to detection challenges:
| Issue | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Weak signal | Low protein expression | Increase sample loading (50-100 μg total protein) |
| Inefficient transfer | Optimize transfer conditions for proteins >30 kDa | |
| Antibody degradation | Use fresh aliquot, verify storage conditions | |
| No signal | Protein degradation | Add additional protease inhibitors during extraction |
| Developmental regulation | Check different growth stages/tissues | |
| Post-translational modifications | Try phosphatase treatment before detection | |
| Multiple bands | Cross-reactivity | Increase antibody dilution, more stringent washing |
| Protein degradation | Freshly prepare samples, add protease inhibitors | |
| Splice variants | Validate with recombinant protein controls |
For enhanced detection, researchers can implement a signal amplification system, such as biotin-streptavidin complexes, particularly when target expression levels are naturally low in certain tissues or growth conditions .
Thorough validation is critical for meaningful results:
Comprehensive validation approach:
Genetic validation:
Test with Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion mutants (cxe16 knockout lines)
Compare with plants overexpressing CXE16 (35S:CXE16)
Examine RNAi knockdown lines
Biochemical validation:
Perform peptide competition assays using the immunizing peptide
Block with recombinant CXE16 protein
Test cross-reactivity with related CXE family members
Technical validation:
Compare multiple antibody lots for consistent results
Evaluate different sample preparation methods
Include positive and negative tissue controls
This multi-layered approach ensures that signals detected are specifically CXE16 and not related family members, particularly important given the high homology among plant carboxylesterases .
Cross-species applications require careful consideration:
Species adaptation guidelines:
Sequence homology analysis:
Perform BLAST analysis of CXE16 epitope regions
70% identity suggests possible cross-reactivity
Focus on conserved functional domains
Sample preparation modifications:
Adjust extraction buffers based on tissue composition
Species-specific protease inhibitor mixtures
Consider varying detergent concentrations
Optimization strategies:
Conduct titration experiments (1:100-1:5000 dilutions)
Test multiple blocking agents (milk, BSA, serum)
Modify incubation times and temperatures
Validation approaches:
Heterologous expression of target species protein
Immunodepletion studies
Western blot comparison with Arabidopsis samples
While the CXE16 antibody is specifically raised against Arabidopsis thaliana protein, research suggests potential cross-reactivity with orthologs in closely related Brassicaceae species, though this requires empirical validation for each target species .
CXE16 has emerging roles in plant responses to environmental challenges:
Experimental approaches:
Abiotic stress studies:
Temporal analysis of CXE16 expression under drought, salt, temperature stress
Correlation with physiological parameters
Comparison between wild-type and stress-tolerant varieties
Biotic stress investigations:
Pathogen infection time-course experiments
Herbivore feeding response studies
Analysis of xenobiotic detoxification pathways
Mechanistic investigations:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify stress-responsive interacting partners
CXE16 enzyme activity assays under stress conditions
Subcellular relocalization studies during stress responses
Research suggests carboxylesterases like CXE16 may participate in detoxification of stress-induced compounds and modification of signaling molecules, providing plants with adaptive mechanisms for environmental resilience .
Accurate quantification requires methodological rigor:
Quantitative analysis recommendations:
Western blot quantification:
Include recombinant protein standard curve (5-100 ng)
Utilize housekeeping controls (anti-actin, anti-tubulin)
Implement digital image analysis with linear dynamic range
ELISA-based quantification:
Develop sandwich ELISA with two distinct CXE16 antibodies
Generate standard curves using purified recombinant protein
Account for matrix effects in different tissue types
Normalization strategies:
Total protein normalization (using Ponceau S or stain-free technology)
Multiple reference proteins across diverse conditions
Tissue-specific reference genes for transcript-protein correlation
Statistical considerations:
Minimum of 3-4 biological replicates
Log transformation for non-normally distributed data
Multiple testing correction for developmental series
These approaches enable accurate quantification of CXE16 protein levels across different developmental stages, tissues, and experimental conditions, facilitating robust comparative studies .
Multi-omics integration provides deeper biological insights:
Integration strategies:
Transcriptomics correlation:
Compare protein levels (Western blot) with transcript abundance (RNA-seq)
Analyze post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms
Identify discordant expression patterns suggesting regulation
Proteomics integration:
Use immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry
Identify post-translational modifications
Discover protein-protein interaction networks
Metabolomics connections:
Correlate CXE16 levels with metabolite profiles
Focus on potential esterified substrates and hydrolysis products
Perform enzyme activity assays with candidate substrates
Functional genomics validation:
Compare antibody-detected protein patterns with mutant phenotypes
Perform complementation studies with site-directed mutants
Develop tissue-specific expression systems
This multi-dimensional approach has revealed potential roles for plant carboxylesterases in diverse processes including xenobiotic metabolism, plant-pathogen interactions, and secondary metabolite production .
Substrate identification represents a significant challenge:
Innovative substrate discovery methods:
Activity-based protein profiling:
Use fluorophosphonate probes to capture active CXE16
Compare labeled metabolites between wild-type and cxe16 mutants
Identify differential substrate processing
Metabolomics differential analysis:
Compare metabolite profiles between wild-type and CXE16 overexpression lines
Focus on esterified compounds that decrease with increased CXE16
Validate with in vitro enzyme assays
Structural biology approaches:
Model CXE16 active site based on crystal structures of related carboxylesterases
Perform in silico docking studies with candidate substrates
Validate high-scoring candidates biochemically
Mass spectrometry techniques:
Identify metabolites bound to immunoprecipitated CXE16
Perform comparative untargeted metabolomics
Trace isotope-labeled candidate substrates
Research suggests plant carboxylesterases may process diverse substrates including xenobiotics, plant hormones, and specialized metabolites, though specific physiological substrates of CXE16 require further characterization .
Understanding interaction networks provides functional insights:
Interaction analysis methods:
Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:
Use CXE16 antibody for pull-down experiments
Employ cross-linking to capture transient interactions
Analyze via mass spectrometry or Western blotting
Proximity labeling approaches:
Fuse CXE16 with BioID or APEX2 enzyme
Identify proteins in close proximity in vivo
Validate with traditional co-IP using CXE16 antibody
Antibody-based imaging techniques:
Perform dual immunofluorescence labeling
Implement proximity ligation assays for in situ detection
Use super-resolution microscopy for spatial organization analysis
Protein complex analysis:
Use native PAGE followed by immunoblotting
Perform size exclusion chromatography with antibody detection
Apply blue native electrophoresis for complex visualization
These approaches can reveal whether CXE16 functions independently or as part of larger protein complexes, potentially providing insights into its regulation and functional diversity across different cellular contexts .
Biomarker development requires rigorous validation:
Biomarker development framework:
Baseline expression characterization:
Document expression across tissues, developmental stages, and genetic backgrounds
Establish normal variation parameters
Determine environmental factors affecting baseline expression
Response dynamics assessment:
Characterize time-course of stress-induced changes
Determine dose-response relationships for various stressors
Evaluate recovery and adaptation patterns
Specificity and sensitivity evaluation:
Compare with known stress biomarkers
Determine response to multiple stress types
Assess potential for false positives/negatives
Field application considerations:
Develop simplified extraction protocols
Create standardized detection systems
Validate across diverse environmental conditions and genotypes
Emerging research suggests carboxylesterases may serve as indicators of xenobiotic exposure, pathogen response, or developmental transitions, though comprehensive validation is required before CXE16 can be established as a reliable biomarker .