CXCL8 (IL-8) is a proinflammatory chemokine belonging to the CXC family, primarily involved in neutrophil recruitment and angiogenesis . It binds to receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2, activating pathways that promote inflammation, tumor progression, and immune modulation .
CXCL8 antibodies are tools for detecting or neutralizing CXCL8 in research and clinical settings. Key features include:
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC): Anti-CXCL8 autoantibodies showed diagnostic potential with AUC values of 0.713–0.751 in distinguishing ESCC patients from controls .
Table: Diagnostic Performance of Anti-CXCL8 Autoantibody in ESCC
| Cohort | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verification Set | 0.713 | 35.7% | 82.9% |
| Validation Set | 0.751 | 47.1% | 77.9% |
Acute Lung Injury (ALI): Humanized anti-CXCL8 antibodies reduced neutrophil infiltration and lung damage in rabbit models .
Cancer Therapy: CXCL8 blockade enhanced anti-tumor immunity in preclinical studies, particularly when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors .
Neutralization: Antibodies like MAB208 inhibit CXCL8-induced chemotaxis (ND₅₀: 0.08–0.4 µg/mL) .
Epitope Specificity: Most antibodies target the N-terminal ELR motif (e.g., MAB208), critical for CXCR1/2 binding .
Post-Translational Regulation: Antibodies detect truncated or citrullinated CXCL8 forms, which alter bioactivity .
Biomarker Potential: Elevated serum CXCL8 correlates with poor prognosis in cancers (e.g., gastric, lung) .
Therapeutic Limitations: Rodents lack CXCL8 orthologs, complicating translational studies .
Structural Insights: CXCL8 forms homodimers or heterodimers with CXCL4, influencing receptor binding .
Autoantibody Role: Anti-CXCL8 autoantibodies may stabilize CXCL8 in serum, enhancing diagnostic utility .
Dual Roles in Cancer: CXCL8 promotes angiogenesis via VEGF induction while suppressing anti-tumor immunity .
Here’s a structured FAQ collection for researchers working with CXE8 antibodies, derived from current scientific literature and technical data:
Methodological Answer:
Perform immunoblotting using recombinant CXE8 protein (36.4 kDa) and compare with plant tissue lysates. Include negative controls (e.g., cxe8 knockout mutants) to confirm absence of nonspecific binding .
Use competitive ELISA with pre-incubation of the antibody against recombinant CXE8 to block antigen-binding activity .
Validate with immunohistochemistry on Arabidopsis tissue sections, comparing staining patterns to known CXE8 expression profiles (e.g., root or leaf tissues) .
Methodological Answer:
| Application | Protocol Notes | Key Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Use 12% SDS-PAGE; reduce samples with β-mercaptoethanol | Include recombinant CXE8 and cxe8 mutant lysates |
| ELISA | Coat plates with 0.5–1 µg/mL recombinant CXE8 | Block with 5% BSA; test serial antibody dilutions |
| Immunoprecipitation | Crosslink antibody to Protein A/G beads | Pre-clear lysates with empty beads |
Methodological Answer:
Hypothesis-driven approach: Compare oxidative stress markers (e.g., H₂O₂ levels) in wild-type vs. cxe8 mutants under drought or pathogen exposure.
Multi-omics integration: Pair antibody-based CXE8 localization (immunofluorescence) with transcriptomic data to identify co-regulated pathways .
Functional complementation: Express epitope-tagged CXE8 in mutants and track rescue phenotypes using antibody-based detection .
Methodological Answer:
Cross-reactivity testing: Screen the antibody against carboxylesterases from closely related species (e.g., Brassica napus) via immunoblot .
Epitope mapping: Identify the antibody’s binding region using peptide arrays or alanine scanning mutagenesis of recombinant CXE8 .
Structural alignment: Compare the target epitope’s sequence (e.g., residues 120–150 in CXE8) with homologs using tools like CLUSTAL Omega .
Methodological Answer:
Use mixed-effects models to account for batch effects in Western blot/ELISA data.
Apply ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for multi-group comparisons (e.g., WT vs. heterozygous vs. homozygous mutants).
For imaging data (e.g., fluorescence intensity), employ nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U) if normality assumptions fail .
Methodological Answer:
Pre-absorption: Incubate the antibody with fixed cxe8 mutant tissue lysates to remove nonspecific binders .
Optimize fixation: Reduce paraformaldehyde concentration (<4%) to preserve epitope accessibility .
Signal amplification: Use tyramide-based systems (e.g., TSA) to enhance specificity in low-abundance targets .
| Validation Strategy | Outcome Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Knockout validation | Loss of band/staining in mutants confirms specificity |
| Peptide competition | ≥80% signal reduction indicates epitope specificity |
| Orthogonal assay (e.g., enzymatic activity) | Correlation between antibody signal and hydrolase activity strengthens validity |