The petA antibody (Catalog Number: orb858463) is a rabbit polyclonal antibody developed against the recombinant petA protein from potato . It specifically targets plant antigens and is validated for use in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), western blot (WB), and immunoassay applications . Its development aligns with traditional polyclonal antibody production methods, which involve animal immunization.
The petA antibody has been utilized in the following experimental contexts:
Western Blot (WB): Detects petA protein expression in plant tissue lysates.
ELISA: Quantifies petA protein levels in soluble fractions.
Immunoassays: Supports functional studies of petA in photosynthetic mechanisms .
While specific studies using this antibody are not detailed in publicly available literature, its validation data confirm:
The petA antibody represents a traditional polyclonal approach, whereas recent advancements emphasize recombinant antibody technologies (see table below).
Sources: Comparative data from Biorbyt , PETA Science Consortium , and Abcam .
The scientific community is increasingly adopting recombinant alternatives to address reproducibility challenges and ethical concerns associated with animal-derived antibodies . For petA research, transitioning to recombinant multiclonal antibodies could enhance specificity and scalability while eliminating animal use .
KEGG: ath:ArthCp035
STRING: 3702.ATCG00540.1
PETA-3/CD151 is a member of the tetraspanin family of proteins that has been identified as a positive effector of metastasis. This cell surface protein plays a critical role in mediating tumor cell migration but does not appear to significantly affect cell adhesion to various purified matrix proteins. Research has demonstrated that PETA-3/CD151 is specifically involved in early steps of metastatic foci formation, making it a valuable target for cancer research .
The protein has a molecular weight of approximately 29,000 daltons in its glycosylated form, with a nonglycosylated form appearing at approximately 25,000 daltons. This is slightly smaller than its predicted mass of 27.8 kDa, likely due to the hydrophobic nature of the protein and/or the presence of disulfide bonds resulting from its 15 cysteine residues .
Monoclonal antibodies targeting PETA-3/CD151, including mAb 50-6 and mAb 1A5, have demonstrated significant capabilities in inhibiting both spontaneous and experimental metastasis in cancer models. These antibodies do not affect primary tumor growth or in vitro cell proliferation, making them valuable tools for specifically studying metastatic processes .
In experimental models using HEp-3 human epidermoid carcinoma cells, these antibodies have shown impressive inhibition of metastasis:
mAb 50-6 and mAb 1A5 inhibited HEp-3 migration by approximately 45% and 44%, respectively, compared to controls (P = 0.034)
Previous studies with mAb 1A5 demonstrated inhibition of spontaneous HEp-3 metastasis by approximately 90%
These antibodies appear to specifically block an early step in the formation of metastatic foci, providing researchers with valuable tools to study the mechanisms of metastasis.
Several established methods exist for detecting and quantifying PETA-3/CD151 expression in experimental settings:
Whole-Cell ELISA:
Seed cells (2.0 × 10^4/0.1 ml) in 96-well culture plates and culture for 36 hours
Wash with PBS, fix with 0.25% glutaraldehyde for 5 minutes at room temperature
Quench with 1.0 M glycine (pH 8.0) for 2 hours
Block overnight at 4°C
Incubate with primary antibody (1 μg/ml) for 2 hours
Detect with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody
Develop with o-phenylene diamine substrate (0.34 mg/ml, 0.1 M sodium citrate, pH 4.5, 0.012% H2O2)
Western Blotting:
This technique can distinguish between the glycosylated (29 kDa) and nonglycosylated (25 kDa) forms of PETA-3/CD151. Treatment with tunicamycin or N-glycanase generates the nonglycosylated form that can be detected with specific antibodies .
| Parameter | Animal-Derived Antibodies | Recombinant Antibodies |
|---|---|---|
| Production method | Requires animal immunization | Produced in cell culture systems using DNA technology |
| Specificity | Nearly one-third don't actually bind to their intended targets | Highly specific binding to target molecules |
| Batch consistency | Significant batch-to-batch variation | Consistent and reproducible across batches |
| Long-term supply | Limited and variable | Scalable and reliable |
| Ethical considerations | Requires animal use and sacrifice | Animal-free production |
| Scientific reliability | May contribute to research irreproducibility | Improves quality and reproducibility of research |
| Cost efficiency | Variable costs | Potential for time and cost savings in long-term |
According to recent scientific studies, almost one-third of antibodies produced using animals don't effectively bind to their specific target molecules, potentially contributing to the high failure rate in scientific studies .
PETA-3/CD151's role in promoting metastasis appears to be primarily mediated through its effects on cell migration rather than proliferation or adhesion. Evidence supporting this mechanism includes:
Migration vs. Adhesion Distinction: Studies show that PETA-3/CD151 expression levels correlate with migratory capability but not with adhesion properties. HeLa cells transfected with and overexpressing PETA-3/CD151 demonstrated enhanced migration compared to control transfectants expressing minimal CD151 .
Antibody Inhibition Specificity: Both mAb 50-6 and mAb 1A5 antibodies targeting PETA-3/CD151 specifically inhibit migration without affecting:
Tetraspanin Functionality: As part of the tetraspanin family, PETA-3/CD151 likely functions as a "molecular facilitator" that influences cell migration through interactions with integrins, consistent with known tetraspanin functions .
These findings collectively suggest that PETA-3/CD151 promotes metastasis by specifically enhancing the migratory capabilities of cancer cells, making it the first tetraspanin family member identified as a positive effector of metastasis.
Accurately predicting antibody structures faces several significant challenges:
Underrepresentation in Databases: Antibodies constitute only approximately 4% of structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), with only around 8,000 antibody structures out of more than 200,000 total protein structures. This underrepresentation limits the training data available for machine learning models .
Conformational Flexibility: Antibody loops are highly flexible, making their structure prediction particularly challenging. Current tools like AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold provide rigid structure outputs that may not capture this flexibility adequately .
Developability Parameter Inconsistency: Even when prediction tools produce structures that closely resemble ground truth structures, developability measurements often vary across different structure prediction tools, creating consistency challenges .
Dynamic vs. Static Structures: Developability parameters measured on rigid predicted structures may not align with those measured on experimental structures. Implementing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is often necessary to achieve higher agreement with experimental measurements .
These challenges highlight why antibody structure prediction remains more difficult than prediction for other protein types, despite recent advancements in the field.
To maximize the validity and impact of PETA-3/CD151 metastasis research, consider these research design optimizations:
Select Appropriate Metastasis Models:
Control for Growth vs. Metastasis Effects:
Expression Level Validation:
Functional Validation Through Transfection:
Several advanced methodologies are being developed and refined to replace traditional animal-derived antibodies:
Recombinant Antibody Technology:
Aptamer Development:
Implementation Strategy Example:
The PETA Science Consortium International project with the USDA demonstrates a practical approach:
Identified an existing animal-derived antibody used in leptospirosis vaccine testing
Funded biotech company Absolute Antibody to determine its DNA sequence
Produced a recombinant version with identical binding properties
Validated the recombinant antibody in the same in vitro potency test
Created a sustainable, animal-free antibody supply for ongoing testing needs
These methodologies not only address ethical concerns but also improve scientific reliability by reducing batch variation and enhancing specificity.
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations offer significant advantages for antibody developability assessment:
Beyond Static Structures: While tools like AlphaFold provide static antibody structures, MD simulations capture the crucial dynamic behavior of antibodies, particularly in flexible loop regions .
Improved Measurement Accuracy: Studies have demonstrated that developability parameters measured using MD simulations show higher agreement with experimental measurements compared to those calculated from rigid structures alone .
Implementation Methodology:
Begin with a predicted antibody structure from tools like AlphaFold
Place the structure in a solvated environment that mimics physiological conditions
Run simulations over nanosecond to microsecond timescales
Analyze the resulting conformational ensemble rather than a single structure
Calculate developability parameters across the ensemble for more robust predictions
Parameter Stability Assessment: MD simulations allow researchers to assess how stable developability parameters remain across different conformational states, providing confidence metrics for predictions .
By incorporating MD simulations into antibody developability workflows, researchers can achieve more accurate predictions that better align with experimental results, potentially reducing development failures and accelerating research timelines.