CYSRT1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (12-14 weeks)
Target Names
CYSRT1
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is CYSRT1 and where is it expressed in human tissues?

CYSRT1 is a protein specifically expressed in cutaneous and oral epithelia that has demonstrated antimicrobial properties. The protein is primarily localized in the upper layers of the suprabasal epidermis, where it colocalizes with Late Cornified Envelope (LCE) proteins. CYSRT1 expression is constitutive in fully differentiated epidermis and can be further induced in vivo following disruption of the skin barrier upon stratum corneum removal .

Methodologically, when studying CYSRT1 expression:

  • Use immunohistochemistry with validated antibodies on skin biopsy sections

  • Compare expression patterns between normal skin, barrier-disrupted skin, and oral mucosa

  • Consider double-staining with LCE proteins to confirm colocalization patterns

  • Include both healthy and inflammatory skin conditions (e.g., psoriasis) in experimental designs

How does CYSRT1 interact with Late Cornified Envelope (LCE) proteins?

CYSRT1 has been identified as an interacting partner of members of all LCE groups except LCE6. This interaction was initially discovered through yeast two-hybrid screening and subsequently confirmed in mammalian cell systems via coimmunoprecipitation techniques .

For researchers investigating these interactions:

  • Design coimmunoprecipitation experiments using anti-CYSRT1 antibodies in primary keratinocyte lysates

  • Include proper negative controls (IgG isotype) and positive controls (known interacting proteins)

  • Consider crosslinking approaches to stabilize transient interactions

  • Validate findings using reciprocal coimmunoprecipitation with anti-LCE antibodies

  • Employ proximity ligation assays for in situ visualization of protein-protein interactions

What are the optimal methods for detecting CYSRT1 protein in tissue samples?

When designing experiments to detect CYSRT1 in tissue samples, researchers should consider multiple complementary approaches:

Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence:

  • Use fixation protocols optimized for epidermal proteins (4% paraformaldehyde)

  • Include antigen retrieval steps to expose epitopes (citrate buffer, pH 6.0)

  • Block non-specific binding with BSA/FBS as recommended for skin tissue samples

  • Consider dual staining with differentiation markers (e.g., filaggrin, loricrin)

Western Blotting:

  • Optimize protein extraction from highly keratinized tissues

  • Use appropriate reducing conditions to expose antibody binding sites

  • Consider specialized extraction buffers for skin tissue (containing 8M urea)

What technical considerations are important when validating a new CYSRT1 antibody?

When validating a new CYSRT1 antibody, researchers should follow a comprehensive approach:

Specificity Testing:

  • Compare staining patterns in tissues known to express CYSRT1 (epidermis, oral mucosa) versus negative tissues

  • Perform knockdown/knockout validation using siRNA or CRISPR techniques

  • Test for cross-reactivity with related proteins, particularly LCE family members

  • Compare results from multiple antibody clones targeting different epitopes

Performance Assessment:

  • Determine optimal antibody concentration through titration experiments

  • Evaluate signal-to-noise ratio across different detection methods

  • Test antibody performance after various fixation and permeabilization protocols

  • Document lot-to-lot variation if using polyclonal antibodies

How can CYSRT1 antibodies be optimized for flow cytometry applications?

Optimizing CYSRT1 antibodies for flow cytometry requires careful consideration of cellular localization and sample preparation:

Panel Design Considerations:

Sample Preparation Protocol:

  • Optimize fixation and permeabilization conditions for intracellular staining

  • Include dead cell exclusion dyes (amine-reactive fixable dyes preferred over DNA-binding dyes)

  • Use FcR blocking to prevent non-specific binding in skin-derived cell preparations

  • Consider TrueStain Monocyte blocker when analyzing mixed cell populations

  • Filter samples prior to analysis to prevent clogging

Optimization ParameterRecommended ApproachRationale
Antibody titrationTest 5-6 concentrationsDetermines optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Fixation2-4% PFA followed by methanolPreserves epitopes while allowing permeabilization
Blocking10% serum + FcR blockReduces background and non-specific binding
ControlsFMO, isotype, biological negativeEssential for accurate gating
CompensationSingle-color controlsCorrects for spectral overlap

What are key experimental design considerations for using CYSRT1 antibodies in coimmunoprecipitation studies with LCE proteins?

When designing coimmunoprecipitation experiments to study CYSRT1-LCE interactions:

Lysate Preparation:

  • Use mild lysis buffers to preserve protein-protein interactions

  • Consider crosslinking approaches for transient interactions

  • Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors

  • Optimize lysis conditions for highly keratinized tissues

IP Strategy:

  • Perform reciprocal IPs (pull-down with anti-CYSRT1 and probe for LCE proteins, and vice versa)

  • Include appropriate negative controls (isotype IgG, unrelated proteins)

  • Consider pre-clearing lysates to reduce non-specific binding

  • Validate findings with multiple antibody clones if available

Detection Methods:

  • Use clean detection antibodies from different species than IP antibodies

  • Consider using protein A/G magnetic beads for efficient pull-down

  • Optimize washing conditions to balance specificity versus sensitivity

  • Validate findings with multiple detection methods (Western blot, mass spectrometry)

How can researchers investigate CYSRT1's antimicrobial properties using antibody-based techniques?

CYSRT1 has demonstrated antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Researchers interested in further characterizing this activity can employ several antibody-dependent approaches:

Neutralization Assays:

  • Design experiments using anti-CYSRT1 antibodies to block antimicrobial function in in vitro bacterial growth assays

  • Include proper controls (isotype antibodies, antibodies against other antimicrobial peptides)

  • Quantify bacterial growth using colony-forming unit (CFU) counts or optical density measurements

  • Test against multiple bacterial strains to assess spectrum of activity

Localization Studies:

  • Use immunofluorescence to correlate CYSRT1 localization with bacterial clearance in ex vivo skin models

  • Develop dual-staining protocols to visualize CYSRT1 and bacterial components simultaneously

  • Apply super-resolution microscopy techniques to resolve protein-bacteria interactions

Mechanism Investigation:

  • Utilize antibody-mediated pull-down of CYSRT1 from bacterial culture supernatants

  • Employ epitope-mapped antibodies to identify functional domains

  • Consider competitive binding assays between bacteria, CYSRT1, and LCE proteins

What approaches can be used to measure changes in CYSRT1 expression during skin barrier disruption or inflammation?

CYSRT1 expression can be induced by disruption of the skin barrier . To quantify these changes:

Quantitative Immunohistochemistry:

  • Utilize digital image analysis tools to quantify staining intensity

  • Normalize to epidermal area or nuclear count

  • Compare parallel sections stained for differentiation markers

  • Include multiple biological replicates and standardized controls

Flow Cytometry Protocol:

  • Isolate epidermal cells from control and barrier-disrupted skin

  • Establish gating strategy based on keratinocyte differentiation markers

  • Quantify CYSRT1 mean fluorescence intensity in relevant cell populations

  • Include appropriate compensation and FMO controls

Transcript Analysis:

  • Combine with antibody-based techniques for correlation between mRNA and protein levels

  • Consider laser capture microdissection to isolate specific epidermal layers

  • Use quantitative RT-PCR with appropriate housekeeping genes for normalization

How can T cell responses to CYSRT1 be evaluated in contexts of skin inflammation or barrier dysfunction?

Given CYSRT1's role in antimicrobial defense and its association with barrier function, researchers may want to evaluate T cell responses:

T Cell Epitope Mapping:

  • Predict potential CYSRT1 epitopes using bioinformatic approaches

  • Synthesize epitope peptides and load onto appropriate MHC molecules

  • Screen T cells from skin-derived samples for reactivity using tetramer staining

  • Apply similar approaches to those used for identifying SARS-CoV-2 epitopes

T Cell Receptor Profiling:

  • Isolate skin-resident T cells from healthy and inflammatory skin conditions

  • Perform TCR sequencing to identify expanded clones

  • Compare TCR repertoires between conditions using diversity indices

  • Look for public TCR motifs that might recognize CYSRT1-derived epitopes

Functional Assays:

  • Measure T cell activation (CD69, CD25) in response to CYSRT1-pulsed APCs

  • Quantify cytokine production (IFNγ, IL-17, IL-22) using intracellular cytokine staining

  • Evaluate proliferative responses using CFSE dilution assays

  • Consider blocking experiments with anti-CYSRT1 antibodies

How can researchers address non-specific binding when using CYSRT1 antibodies?

When encountering non-specific binding with CYSRT1 antibodies:

Optimization Strategies:

  • Increase blocking concentration and duration (use 5-10% serum from the same species as secondary antibody)

  • Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to reduce hydrophobic interactions

  • Pre-absorb antibody with negative control tissue lysates

  • Use monovalent Fab fragments instead of complete IgG to reduce Fc-mediated binding

  • Apply FcR blocking reagents when working with cell suspensions

Validation Approaches:

  • Test antibody on CYSRT1-negative tissues or cells

  • Compare staining patterns using different antibody clones

  • Perform peptide competition assays with immunizing peptide

  • Include proper isotype controls at matching concentrations

What factors should be considered when developing quantitative assays for CYSRT1?

Developing quantitative assays for CYSRT1 requires consideration of:

ELISA Development:

  • Select capture and detection antibodies recognizing different epitopes

  • Optimize antibody concentrations through checkerboard titration

  • Develop recombinant CYSRT1 standards for accurate quantification

  • Validate assay performance (sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy)

Western Blot Quantification:

  • Use appropriate loading controls specific for epidermal proteins

  • Include standard curves with recombinant protein

  • Optimize transfer conditions for efficient blotting of CYSRT1

  • Validate linear dynamic range of detection system

Image-Based Quantification:

  • Standardize image acquisition parameters (exposure, gain, offset)

  • Include calibration standards in each experimental run

  • Apply appropriate background correction methods

  • Utilize automated analysis algorithms to reduce subjective bias

How can CYSRT1 antibody research contribute to understanding skin barrier function and antimicrobial defense?

CYSRT1 research, facilitated by well-characterized antibodies, offers several important avenues for advancing our understanding of skin biology:

  • Elucidation of novel antimicrobial mechanisms in the epidermis beyond classic antimicrobial peptides

  • Better understanding of protein-protein interaction networks in the cornified envelope

  • Insights into the regulation of skin barrier function during health and disease

  • Potential identification of new therapeutic targets for skin disorders characterized by barrier dysfunction or dysbiosis

Methodologically, antibody-based approaches represent critical tools for studying CYSRT1 across multiple experimental systems, from molecular interactions to tissue-level expression patterns. The optimization strategies outlined in this FAQ collection provide researchers with a framework for developing robust protocols that can yield reliable, reproducible data on this emerging player in skin biology.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.