The CYS6 Antibody is designed to bind specifically to the CST6 protein (Accession # NP_001314.1), which is expressed in human epithelial and immune cells. CST6 inhibits lysosomal cysteine proteases, such as cathepsins, and plays roles in modulating inflammation, tumor progression, and immune responses .
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Host | Rabbit |
| Isotype | IgG |
| Clone | 034 |
| Immunogen | Recombinant human CST6 (Met 1-Met 149) |
| Reactivity | Human |
| Application | ELISA |
| Recommended Dilution | 1:5000–1:10,000 |
| Storage | -20°C to -80°C (stable for 12 months); 2–8°C (1 month) |
Data compiled from product specifications .
The CYS6 Antibody is primarily used in ELISA to detect CST6 levels in human samples. While specific research studies are not detailed in available sources, CST6 antibodies are critical for:
Biomarker Analysis: CST6 overexpression is linked to cancer (e.g., breast, lung) and autoimmune diseases .
Diagnostic Development: CST6 may serve as a therapeutic target or prognostic marker.
Immune Response Monitoring: CST6 regulates protease activity in immune cells, influencing inflammation and disease progression.
Role in Cancer: CST6 suppresses cathepsin activity, potentially limiting tumor invasion. Antibodies targeting CST6 may disrupt this balance, though clinical applications remain under investigation.
Immune Modulation: CST6 is implicated in T-cell regulation and autoimmune diseases. The CYS6 Antibody could aid in studying CST6 expression in conditions like rheumatoid arthritis.
Specificity: The antibody’s Azide- and BSA-free format minimizes non-specific binding.
Stability: Long-term storage at -20°C ensures activity retention, critical for longitudinal studies.
Limited Research Data: No peer-reviewed studies directly evaluating the CYS6 Antibody’s performance in clinical or preclinical models are available in the provided sources.
Cross-Reactivity: Potential off-target binding to homologous proteins (e.g., other cystatins) requires validation.
Comparative Studies: Benchmarking against other CST6 antibodies (e.g., polyclonal variants) is needed to assess sensitivity and specificity.
CYS6 (CYSTATIN 6) is a protein inhibitor that regulates the activity of cysteine proteases, particularly XYLEM CYSTEINE PEPTIDASE 1 (XCP1). In plant immunity, CYS6 plays a critical role in pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) by inhibiting the protease activity of XCP1 toward RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOG D (RBOHD). This inhibition is essential for RBOHD accumulation upon pathogen infection, which subsequently leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as part of the plant immune response . CYS6, XCP1, and RBOHD appear to be conserved across various plant species, suggesting their involvement in a fundamental mechanism for regulating ROS production under different environmental conditions.
When selecting antibodies against CYS6, researchers should consider:
Specificity: Ensure the antibody specifically recognizes CYS6 without cross-reactivity to other cystatins or related proteins
Application compatibility: Verify the antibody's validated applications (Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunohistochemistry, etc.)
Species reactivity: Confirm it recognizes CYS6 from your species of interest
Binding region: Determine if the antibody binds to a functionally relevant domain, particularly if studying CYS6-XCP1 interactions
Monoclonal vs. polyclonal: Consider the experimental needs (monoclonals offer higher specificity, while polyclonals may provide stronger signals)
These considerations align with the validation principles used in antibody development for other protein targets .
Validating a new CYS6 antibody should follow a multi-application approach similar to established antibody validation protocols. Based on consensus principles developed by the broader research community, validation should include:
Western blotting: Using wild-type samples alongside cys6 knockout/knockdown controls to confirm specificity
Immunoprecipitation: Verifying the antibody can pull down native CYS6 and its binding partners
Immunohistochemistry: Confirming appropriate cellular and tissue localization patterns
Targeted mass spectrometry: Using immuno-MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) to verify the antibody captures the intended target
Protein array analysis: Testing cross-reactivity with related proteins
These validation steps should be performed across multiple cell lines or tissue types to ensure reproducibility . Data from each validation step should be documented with appropriate positive and negative controls.
To study CYS6-XCP1 interactions using antibodies, consider the following experimental design:
Co-immunoprecipitation: Use CYS6 antibodies to pull down native protein complexes and detect XCP1 in the precipitate (or vice versa)
Proximity ligation assay: Visualize CYS6-XCP1 interactions in situ using specific antibodies against each protein
ELISA-based interaction studies: Develop assays to measure the binding affinity and kinetics between purified CYS6 and XCP1
Competitive binding assays: Test if adding purified CYS6 can disrupt XCP1 interactions with other proteins
Sequential immunoprecipitation: Use CYS6 antibodies followed by XCP1 antibodies to isolate pure complexes
When designing these experiments, it's crucial to include appropriate controls, such as using IgG isotype controls and testing in both pathogen-challenged and unchallenged conditions to observe dynamic changes in these interactions .
When using CYS6 antibodies in immunological assays, the following controls should be included:
Positive controls:
Tissues or cells known to express CYS6
Recombinant CYS6 protein (for Western blots or as a blocking peptide)
Overexpression systems (cells transfected with CYS6)
Negative controls:
cys6 knockout/knockdown samples
Pre-immune serum or isotype control IgG
Samples from tissues where CYS6 is not expressed
Antibody pre-absorbed with purified CYS6 protein
Specificity controls:
Testing for cross-reactivity with related cystatin family members
Using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of CYS6
Technical controls:
Loading controls (for Western blotting)
Secondary antibody-only controls (to check for non-specific binding)
These controls align with validation principles used for other antibody reagents in research settings .
To quantify CYS6 expression levels across different experimental conditions:
Western blotting quantification:
Use housekeeping proteins (e.g., GAPDH, β-actin) as loading controls
Apply densitometry analysis with normalization to the loading control
Include a standard curve using recombinant CYS6 for absolute quantification
Use at least three biological replicates for statistical significance
qPCR for mRNA quantification:
Select appropriate reference genes that remain stable under your experimental conditions
Apply the 2^(-ΔΔCT) method for relative quantification
Validate primers for specificity and efficiency
Targeted mass spectrometry:
Develop a CYS6-specific immuno-MRM assay similar to those used for other protein targets
Use stable isotope-labeled peptides as internal standards
Calculate absolute concentrations based on calibration curves
ELISA-based quantification:
Develop a sandwich ELISA using two non-competing antibodies
Include a standard curve of recombinant CYS6 for concentration determination
Statistical analysis should include appropriate tests (t-test, ANOVA, etc.) based on your experimental design, with significance thresholds clearly defined .
Distinguishing between native and recombinant CYS6 in experimental systems can be achieved through:
Epitope tagging:
Add unique tags (His, FLAG, HA) to recombinant CYS6
Use tag-specific antibodies for selective detection
Design recombinant constructs with tag placement that doesn't interfere with function
Differential antibody targeting:
Use antibodies that target regions unique to either the native or recombinant forms
Develop antibodies specific to post-translational modifications present only in native CYS6
Mass spectrometry approaches:
Identify peptide signatures unique to either form
Look for differences in post-translational modifications
Use parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) to target specific peptides
Size-based discrimination:
Leverage size differences if the recombinant version includes tags or other modifications
Use gel filtration or gradient centrifugation to separate different forms
Cell/tissue-specific expression:
Use compartmentalization approaches if recombinant CYS6 is expressed in a different cellular location
These approaches draw from techniques used in other antibody-based research systems .
When faced with conflicting CYS6 antibody data from different assays or vendors:
Evaluate epitope differences:
Determine which domains of CYS6 each antibody targets
Consider if functional domains or protein-interaction sites affect antibody binding
Contact vendors for detailed epitope information
Assess validation rigor:
Review the validation data provided for each antibody
Check if validation included appropriate positive and negative controls
Determine if validation was performed in systems relevant to your research
Cross-validate with orthogonal methods:
Confirm CYS6 expression using nucleic acid-based methods (qPCR, RNA-seq)
Use mass spectrometry for antibody-independent protein identification
Apply genetic approaches (knockout/knockdown) to confirm specificity
Test for assay-specific limitations:
Check if sample preparation affects epitope accessibility (fixation, denaturation)
Assess if post-translational modifications affect antibody binding
Determine if buffer conditions influence antibody performance
Perform side-by-side comparisons:
Test multiple antibodies simultaneously under identical conditions
Include consistent positive and negative controls
This systematic approach follows best practices in antibody validation and characterization used in comprehensive antibody development programs .
CYS6 antibodies can be used to study plant immunity signaling pathways through:
Immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry (IP-MS):
Identify CYS6 interactome changes before and after pathogen challenge
Discover novel partners beyond the known XCP1 interaction
Map signaling complexes associated with CYS6 during immune responses
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) if CYS6 has nuclear functions:
Investigate potential transcriptional regulatory roles
Identify genomic regions associated with CYS6 during immunity
Proximity-dependent labeling:
Create CYS6-BioID or CYS6-APEX2 fusions
Use antibodies to capture CYS6 and identify proximal proteins
Map dynamic proximity interactions during immune response
Tissue- and cell-specific localization:
Track CYS6 localization changes during infection using immunohistochemistry
Correlate localization with cellular responses to pathogens
Phospho-specific antibodies:
Develop antibodies against phosphorylated forms of CYS6
Track post-translational modification changes during signaling
These approaches draw on methodologies developed for other signaling pathway studies, adapted to focus on CYS6's specific role in plant immunity .
Developing phospho-specific antibodies against CYS6 requires careful consideration of:
Phosphorylation site identification:
Conduct phosphoproteomic analysis to identify relevant phosphorylation sites
Focus on sites that change upon pathogen infection or during immune signaling
Prioritize evolutionarily conserved sites across plant species
Peptide design for immunization:
Design phosphopeptides containing the target phosphorylation site
Include 10-15 amino acids surrounding the phosphorylation site
Ensure good solubility and immunogenicity
Avoid regions with high sequence similarity to other cystatins
Screening and validation strategy:
Screen antibodies against both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides
Validate with samples from plants treated with phosphatase inhibitors
Test in samples from plants challenged with pathogens vs. unchallenged
Verify with phospho-null (S/T to A) and phospho-mimetic (S/T to D/E) mutants
Specificity controls:
Pre-absorb antibodies with non-phosphorylated peptide
Test against phosphatase-treated samples
Validate in cys6 knockout plants
These considerations align with approaches used for developing other phospho-specific antibodies, particularly those against signaling proteins .
Adapting CYS6 antibodies for high-throughput screening applications:
Automated immunoassay development:
Optimize CYS6 antibodies for use in 96- or 384-well plate formats
Develop sandwich ELISA or multiplexed bead-based assays
Standardize with recombinant CYS6 calibration curves
Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) adaptation:
Validate CYS6 antibodies for RPPA applications
Develop protocols for array printing and detection
Create standard curves for quantitative analysis
Fluorescence-based cellular assays:
Conjugate CYS6 antibodies with fluorophores for cellular imaging
Optimize for automated microscopy platforms
Develop image analysis pipelines for quantification
Flow cytometry applications:
Adapt protocols for intracellular CYS6 staining
Develop multiplexed panels with other immune signaling markers
Optimize for high-throughput flow cytometry
Antibody-based proximity assays:
Develop proximity ligation assays for CYS6-interactor screening
Adapt for high-content imaging platforms
These adaptations build on methodologies used for other antibody-based high-throughput screening platforms, particularly in cellular and protein interaction contexts .
For CYS6 immunolocalization studies, consider the following fixation and permeabilization methods:
Chemical fixation options:
Paraformaldehyde (3-4%): Preserves protein structure while maintaining antigenicity
Glutaraldehyde (0.1-0.5%) combined with PFA: Improves structural preservation but may reduce antibody access
Methanol: Alternative for exposing certain epitopes that may be masked by aldehyde fixation
Fixation parameters:
Duration: Typically 15-30 minutes for PFA fixation
Temperature: 4°C or room temperature depending on tissue sensitivity
Buffer: PBS or specialized plant fixation buffers to maintain physiological pH
Permeabilization strategies:
Triton X-100 (0.1-0.5%): Standard for most plant tissues
Saponin (0.1%): Gentler detergent that may better preserve membrane structures
Digitonin (10-50 μg/ml): For selective permeabilization of plasma membrane
Enzymatic methods: Limited cell wall digestion with cellulase/pectinase for improved antibody penetration
Antigen retrieval considerations:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval: In citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or Tris-EDTA (pH 9.0)
Enzymatic antigen retrieval: Proteinase K treatment at controlled concentrations
Testing matrix:
Systematically test combinations of fixation and permeabilization methods
Include positive controls with proteins of known localization
Validate findings with multiple microscopy techniques
These recommendations are based on immunolocalization protocols used for similar plant proteins, adapted specifically for studying CYS6 .
To improve sensitivity for detecting low-abundance CYS6 proteins:
Signal amplification techniques:
Tyramide signal amplification (TSA): Can increase sensitivity 10-100 fold
Poly-HRP conjugated secondary antibodies: Provide multiple enzyme molecules per binding event
Biotin-streptavidin systems: Leverage high-affinity binding for amplification
Sample preparation optimization:
Protein enrichment: Use subcellular fractionation to concentrate CYS6
Immunoprecipitation: Pre-enrich CYS6 before detection
Optimized extraction buffers: Include protease inhibitors and conditions that maximize CYS6 recovery
Detection system improvements:
Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates: Super-signal varieties for Western blotting
Fluorescent antibody conjugates: Direct labeling with bright, photostable fluorophores
Near-infrared (NIR) detection: Reduced background for improved signal-to-noise ratio
Instrument settings optimization:
Extended exposure times: Balanced to avoid background issues
Cooled CCD cameras: Reduce thermal noise for better detection
Photomultiplier tube (PMT) gain adjustment: Optimize for low-level detection
Alternative detection methods:
Single-molecule detection approaches
Digital ELISA platforms (e.g., Simoa technology)
Mass spectrometry with targeted approaches (PRM, SRM)
These approaches draw from sensitivity enhancement techniques used in detecting other low-abundance proteins .
Developing a quantitative multiplex assay using CYS6 antibodies alongside other immunity markers:
Antibody validation for multiplexing:
Test for cross-reactivity between all antibodies in the panel
Ensure each antibody maintains specificity in the presence of others
Validate each antibody independently before combining
Multiplex immunofluorescence approaches:
Sequential staining: Apply primary and secondary antibodies sequentially with stripping steps
Spectrally distinct fluorophores: Select non-overlapping fluorescent reporters
Primary antibody species variation: Use antibodies raised in different species
Directly conjugated primary antibodies: Eliminate cross-reactivity issues with secondary antibodies
Multiplexed immunoassay platforms:
Bead-based multiplexing: Adapt CYS6 antibodies to platforms like Luminex
Planar array approaches: Print antibodies in defined locations
Microfluidic-based multiplex systems: For cell-based applications
Quantification strategies:
Include recombinant protein standards for each target
Develop standard curves covering the physiological range
Use reference proteins for normalization
Apply appropriate statistical methods for evaluating changes across markers
Data analysis considerations:
Correct for spectral overlap when using fluorescent reporters
Account for potential antibody cross-reactivity in data processing
Apply multivariate analysis to understand relationships between markers
These methodologies build on approaches developed for multiplexed protein detection in various biological systems .
| Application | Sensitivity | Specificity | Sample Requirement | Key Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting | Medium-High | High | 10-50 μg total protein | Molecular weight confirmation | Semi-quantitative, denatured protein |
| Immunoprecipitation | High | Medium-High | 200-500 μg protein | Enriches low-abundance targets | Requires optimization of conditions |
| Immunohistochemistry | Medium | Medium | Fixed tissue sections | Preserves spatial information | Fixation may affect epitope accessibility |
| Immunofluorescence | High | Medium-High | Fixed cells/tissues | Subcellular localization | Autofluorescence interference |
| ELISA | Very High | High | 50-100 μl sample | Quantitative, high-throughput | Limited spatial information |
| Flow Cytometry | Medium-High | Medium | Single cell suspensions | Single-cell resolution | Limited to accessible epitopes |
| Immuno-MRM | Very High | Very High | Complex samples | Absolute quantification | Requires specialized equipment |
| Parameter | Recommended Range/Condition | Critical Factors | Optimization Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody Concentration | 1-5 μg/ml (WB); 2-10 μg/ml (IHC) | Signal-to-noise ratio | Titration experiments with positive controls |
| Incubation Time | 1-16 hours | Temperature, antibody affinity | Time course experiments |
| Blocking Solution | 3-5% BSA or 5% non-fat milk | Background reduction | Compare different blockers for optimal results |
| Sample Preparation | Fresh extraction, protease inhibitors | Protein integrity | Test multiple extraction buffers |
| Detection System | HRP, fluorescent, or biotin-based | Sensitivity requirements | Compare ECL substrates or fluorophores |
| Controls | Recombinant protein, knockout samples | Validation stringency | Include multiple control types for each experiment |
| Storage Conditions | -20°C with glycerol; 4°C short-term | Antibody stability | Aliquot to avoid freeze-thaw cycles |
These comprehensive tables provide researchers with practical guidance for working with CYS6 antibodies across different experimental contexts, based on established research practices for similar protein targets .
When encountering non-specific binding with CYS6 antibodies, consider these troubleshooting approaches:
Optimize blocking conditions:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, non-fat milk, normal serum)
Increase blocking time or concentration
Add 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Adjust antibody concentration and incubation:
Perform antibody titration to find optimal concentration
Reduce incubation temperature (4°C instead of room temperature)
Extend washing steps (number and duration)
Modify buffer conditions:
Increase salt concentration (150-500 mM NaCl) to reduce ionic interactions
Add 0.1% Triton X-100 to reduce non-specific hydrophobic binding
Include competing proteins (0.1-1% BSA in antibody diluent)
Pre-adsorb antibodies:
Incubate with extracts from cys6 knockout samples
Use tissues known not to express CYS6
Create an affinity column with related proteins to remove cross-reactive antibodies
Validate with additional controls:
Include peptide competition to confirm specificity
Test secondary antibody alone to check for direct binding
Use isotype control antibodies at matching concentrations
These approaches should be systematically tested and documented, similar to troubleshooting protocols used for other research antibodies .
To resolve discrepancies in CYS6 detection across different plant tissues or experimental conditions:
Extraction method optimization:
Develop tissue-specific extraction protocols to account for different matrices
Test multiple lysis buffers with varying detergent compositions
Include appropriate protease inhibitor cocktails optimized for each tissue type
Consider mechanical disruption methods appropriate for different tissue hardness
Sample normalization strategies:
Use total protein quantification methods resistant to tissue-specific interferents
Include multiple housekeeping proteins as controls
Consider spike-in standards for absolute quantification
Epitope accessibility assessment:
Test different antigen retrieval methods for fixed tissues
Evaluate native vs. denatured detection systems
Consider the impact of post-translational modifications on epitope recognition
Validation across conditions:
Perform parallel detection with orthogonal methods (mass spectrometry, RNA analysis)
Use genetic controls (overexpression, knockdown) in multiple tissue backgrounds
Develop tissue-specific positive controls
Technical standardization:
Process all samples simultaneously when possible
Include standard curves on each assay
Document all variables that differ between experiments
This systematic approach helps identify whether discrepancies reflect true biological differences or technical artifacts, following principles used in cross-tissue protein detection studies .
Strategies for improving CYS6 antibody performance in challenging experimental conditions:
For high background or auto-fluorescent samples:
Use alternative detection methods (e.g., HRP instead of fluorescence)
Apply quenching treatments (0.1-1% Sudan Black or 10 mM CuSO₄)
Consider near-infrared fluorescent secondaries to avoid autofluorescence
Implement computational background subtraction
For limited sample availability:
Scale down protocols to microvolumes
Use signal amplification methods (TSA, rolling circle amplification)
Consider ultrasensitive detection platforms (digital ELISA)
Apply sample concentration techniques before antibody application
For cross-linking fixatives that mask epitopes:
Optimize antigen retrieval (heat-induced or enzymatic)
Test different fixation durations or concentrations
Consider alternative fixatives (periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde)
Use epitope-tagged CYS6 constructs if native detection is challenging
For detecting CYS6 in complex protein mixtures:
Apply fractionation techniques before antibody-based detection
Use immunoprecipitation to enrich for CYS6
Consider automated Western blot systems with increased sensitivity
Develop targeted mass spectrometry methods as complementary approaches
For difficult-to-permeabilize tissues:
Optimize detergent concentration and incubation time
Apply mild sonication or freeze-thaw cycles
Consider enzymatic treatments for cell wall digestion
Test pressure-assisted or vacuum-assisted antibody infiltration
These strategies draw on advanced techniques used to optimize antibody performance across challenging experimental systems .