Lyme Disease: Dcn–/– mice showed reduced Borrelia burgdorferi colonization in joints and milder arthritis .
DCN binds EGFR/ErbB2, inducing receptor internalization and lysosomal degradation, leading to cell cycle arrest (G1 phase) and apoptosis in lung cancer models .
Overexpression reduces metastasis via p53/p21 activation and suppression of MMPs .
Biglycan (Bgn) Compensation: Dcn–/– mice exhibit upregulated Bgn expression, partially rescuing collagen defects .
GAG Content: Total glycosaminoglycans decreased by 30% in Dcn–/– bone matrices, affecting hydration and mechanical properties .
Fibrosis: DCN suppresses TGF-β1, reducing collagen deposition in hepatic and pulmonary fibrosis models .
Cancer: Recombinant DCN is being explored as an adjunct therapy to inhibit tumor angiogenesis and metastasis .
Decorin (DCN) is a small leucine-rich proteoglycan that plays critical roles in extracellular matrix assembly and homeostasis. In mice, DCN functions in multiple tissues with context-dependent effects. In normal development, DCN is prominently expressed in the corneal stroma where it regulates collagen fibrillogenesis and tissue architecture . DCN also plays regulatory roles in inflammation, wound healing, and cancer progression through its ability to bind growth factors like TGF-β and modulate their signaling.
The functional importance of DCN becomes evident in knockout models, where DCN-deficient mice display impaired angiogenesis in injured corneas, demonstrating its regulatory role in new blood vessel formation . This suggests that beyond structural functions, DCN actively participates in tissue remodeling and repair processes.
Decorin expression undergoes significant changes during pathological conditions. In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) mouse models, intestinal DCN expression correlates with autophagy-associated proteins . During injury-induced inflammation, DCN expression patterns shift dramatically.
For example, in corneal injury models, while DCN is normally localized exclusively to the corneal stroma in wild-type mice, it becomes newly expressed in the forming capillaries following chemical cauterization injury . This injury-induced expression pattern suggests DCN participates in the vascular response to tissue damage.
Similarly, in ocular lens injury models (used to study posterior capsular opacification), DCN is highly upregulated in mouse and rat posterior capsular opacification tissues after extracapsular lens extraction surgery . This upregulation appears protective, as transgenic mice overexpressing human DCN show reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in lens epithelial cells.
For investigating DCN's role in angiogenesis, several complementary methodologies yield robust results:
Genetic Models Approach:
Generate targeted knockouts (DCN-deficient mice) and compare with wild-type controls
Create tissue-specific or inducible transgenic overexpression models (e.g., lens-specific hDCN-transgenic mice using Pax6-human alpha crystallin composite promoter)
Implement compound knockout models to study DCN interaction with other proteoglycans (BGN, FMOD)
Vascular Assessment Techniques:
Chemical cauterization injury model for corneal angiogenesis quantification
Immunohistochemical analysis tracking vascular markers along with DCN expression
Time-course studies to track expression changes (e.g., at day 3 post-injury vs. later timepoints)
The most informative approach combines genetic manipulation with standardized injury models and temporal assessment of vascular response. For instance, researchers demonstrated that DCN-deficient mice exhibit significantly diminished vessel growth after corneal injury, while FMOD- or BGN-deficient animals showed no significant changes . This comparative approach allows distinguishing between the specific roles of different proteoglycans in the angiogenic process.
To study DCN's effects on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a multi-modal approach is recommended:
Model Systems:
Lens injury model in DCN transgenic mice
In vitro culture of lens epithelial cells with DCN treatment or knockdown
Assessment Parameters:
Histological evaluation using H&E staining
Immunohistochemistry for EMT markers, particularly α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA)
Gene expression analysis of EMT-associated transcripts
Experimental Design:
Method | Control Group | Experimental Group | Key Parameters |
---|---|---|---|
Lens injury model | Wild-type mice | hDCN-Tg mice | Histological patterns, αSMA expression |
Cell culture | Vector-transfected LECs | DCN-overexpressing LECs | Cell morphology, EMT marker expression |
Research findings demonstrate that lens-specific overexpression of human DCN prevents injury-driven EMT in lens epithelial cells, suggesting a potential approach for preventing posterior capsular opacification . This methodology could be adapted to study DCN's role in EMT processes in other tissues and pathological contexts.
Current research indicates a correlation between DCN expression and autophagy in inflammatory conditions such as IBD. To investigate this relationship:
Experimental Approach:
Generate IBD mouse models through chemical induction (e.g., dextran sodium sulfate) or genetic methods
Analyze tissue samples for both DCN expression and autophagy markers
Implement pharmacological or genetic manipulations of autophagy to assess DCN response
Key autophagy proteins to monitor include LC3-I/LC3-II conversion, p62/SQSTM1 levels, and Beclin-1 expression. Electron microscopy can also be used to directly visualize autophagosomes in tissue samples.
The mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) contains neurons with diverse response properties to sound stimuli. Single-neuron recordings from unanesthetized mice reveal that DCN neurons can be classified according to response map schemes previously developed in other species .
In mice, type III responses are most commonly observed (44% of identified population), while type IV responses, which predominate in cats, account for only 7% of responses in mice . This suggests species-specific differences in DCN response properties. Complex-spike firing neurons can be identified as cartwheel cells (CWCs), with distinct electrophysiological signatures.
Mouse DCN neurons exhibit relatively little sound-driven inhibition compared to cats, which is consistent with observations in other rodent species . This basic characterization of neuronal response properties provides a foundation for more detailed studies of DCN function in mice.
The DCN serves as the first site of multisensory integration in the auditory pathway of mammals . This integration incorporates both auditory information from the inner ear and non-auditory signals, particularly those related to the animal's own behavior and movements.
The mouse DCN receives two main types of inputs:
Auditory signals from the inner ear
Non-auditory signals related to the mouse's own behavior, including head and ear position and self-generated sounds
This integration likely contributes to sound source localization and the suppression of perceptions of self-generated sounds. For example, neurons in the DCN appear to ignore sounds generated by the mouse's own licking behavior, while neurons in the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) respond strongly to such sounds . This selective response pattern suggests a sophisticated mechanism for filtering self-generated sounds while remaining responsive to external acoustic stimuli.
Successful single-neuron recordings from the mouse DCN require careful preparation and specialized techniques:
Preparation Approach:
The decerebrate mouse preparation has proven effective for DCN recordings, allowing direct visualization of the DCN surface while avoiding the confounding effects of anesthesia on neuronal responses . This preparation involves:
Surgical removal of the overlying cerebellum
Decerebration (rather than anesthesia) to maintain natural neuronal responses
Stabilization of the preparation to minimize movement artifacts
Recording Methodology:
Technique | Advantages | Considerations |
---|---|---|
Extracellular recording | Records from neurons in intact circuits; less invasive | Limited cellular detail; difficult to identify cell types |
Whole-cell patch-clamp | Provides detailed cellular properties; allows intracellular labeling | More technically challenging; shorter recording duration |
Two-photon imaging | Visualizes multiple neurons simultaneously; can track activity over time | Requires genetic or synthetic indicators; potential phototoxicity |
For classification of DCN neurons, researchers employ the response map scheme, plotting excitatory and inhibitory responses across different frequencies and sound levels . Complex spikes can be used to identify cartwheel cells, while other neurons are classified based on their response patterns (type I, II, III, or IV).
This decerebrate mouse preparation has been validated as comparable to both decerebrate gerbil and awake mouse DCN models, providing a valuable tool for studying DCN physiology without anesthetic confounds .
Investigating the DCN's role in canceling self-generated sounds requires specialized approaches:
Experimental Design:
Compare responses between DCN and VCN neurons during self-generated sounds
Use behavioral paradigms that produce consistent, measurable self-generated sounds
Manipulate the neural circuitry to disrupt cancellation mechanisms
One effective approach involves recording neural responses during licking behavior, which produces predictable sounds . This paradigm revealed that:
DCN and VCN neurons respond similarly to external sounds
VCN neurons respond strongly to the sound of the animal's own licking
DCN neurons appear to ignore self-generated licking sounds
Silencing behavior-related inputs to DCN causes DCN neurons to respond to self-generated sounds
Methodological Considerations:
Simultaneous recording of behavior (e.g., video recording of licking) and neural activity
Precise timing correlations between behavioral events and neural responses
Selective manipulation of specific cell types or inputs using genetic tools
This research approach has revealed that the DCN functions similarly to the electrosensory lobe in fish, using signals related to behavior to subtract out self-generated sensory inputs .
The trigeminal system provides important non-auditory inputs to the DCN that likely contribute to its multisensory integration functions:
Trigeminal Inputs:
First-order projections directly from the trigeminal ganglion
Second-order projections from the spinal trigeminal nucleus
These inputs may provide information about head and ear position or mouth movements that could predict self-generated sounds like chewing or licking .
Research Approaches:
Anatomical tracing using anterograde and retrograde tracers
Electrophysiological recording during trigeminal stimulation
Optogenetic activation or inhibition of trigeminal inputs
While evidence for these projections exists in guinea pigs and rats, research suggests the pathway may be smaller than expected for a function essential to prey animals' survival . The exact size, organization, and functional significance of trigeminal inputs to the mouse DCN require further investigation using modern genetic and imaging techniques.
This multisensory integration may be particularly important for sound source localization and for distinguishing self-generated sounds from environmental sounds, functions critical for predator detection and survival.
Advanced genetic tools available for mice make this species increasingly valuable for both Decorin and Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus research. For DCN (Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus) studies, genetic approaches enable identification and manipulation of specific cell types, providing unprecedented precision in understanding circuit function . For Decorin research, conditional knockout or overexpression models allow tissue-specific and temporal control of DCN expression.
Research on both DCN meanings has significant translational potential. Decorin studies in mice provide insights for potential therapeutic applications in conditions like inflammatory bowel disease, corneal injuries, and posterior capsular opacification . Meanwhile, Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus research may inform understanding of hearing disorders like tinnitus, which appears to involve DCN hyperactivity and is often affected by head and jaw movements .
The mouse Decorin protein is encoded by a cDNA that translates into a 354 amino acid precursor, which includes a 16 amino acid signal sequence and a 14 amino acid propeptide . The mature mouse Decorin contains twelve tandem LRRs and shares 80% and 87% amino acid sequence identity with human and rat Decorin, respectively . Decorin is an N-glycosylated protein that also carries a variably-sized hybrid chondroitin/dermatan sulfate chain at Ser34 .
Decorin is known for its ability to modulate collagen fibrillogenesis. It regulates the assembly of the extracellular collagen matrix and the bioactivity of matrix-associated growth factors such as FGF-2, GDF-8/Myostatin, TGF-beta, and WISP-1 . The activity of Decorin is measured by its ability to delay the rate of collagen fibrillogenesis, with studies showing that 5 µg/mL of recombinant mouse Decorin can significantly delay this process .
Recombinant mouse Decorin is typically produced using a mouse myeloma cell line, NS0-derived mouse Decorin protein, with a C-terminal 10-His tag . The protein is purified to a high degree, with a purity greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE visualized with Silver Staining and quantitative densitometry by Coomassie® Blue Staining . The endotoxin level is kept below 0.10 EU per 1 µg of the protein by the LAL method .
The recombinant mouse Decorin protein is typically lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution in PBS and should be reconstituted at 100 μg/mL in sterile PBS . It is shipped at ambient temperature and should be stored at -20 to -70 °C to maintain stability. After reconstitution, it can be stored at 2 to 8 °C for up to one month under sterile conditions, or at -20 to -70 °C for up to three months .
Decorin’s role in modulating collagen fibrillogenesis and its interactions with growth factors make it a valuable tool in the study of extracellular matrix biology and related fields.